• Energy Research
• Closed Access close
• Open Source close
• Embargo close
• Neuroinformatics close

The aggregation of gel-filtered human platelets induced by A23187 is very sensitive to inhibition by ethanol. Similarly when platelets preloaded with [3H]5-hydroxytryptamine ([3H]5HT) are studied in a superfusion system under conditions where aggregation is likely (high platelet density, presence of Ca2+) the rate of release of [3H]5HT induced by A23187 is reduced by the presence of ethanol. However when platelet aggregation is less likely (low platelet density, absence of Ca2+) ethanol does not reduce the rate of [3H]5HT efflux induced by A23187 in superfused platelets. In addition, in contrast to the effects of ethanol on platelet aggregation, the transformation of human red cells to echinocytes induced by A23187 is accelerated by the presence of ethanol. Similarly the increased efflux of 3H from superfused rat striatal slices preloaded with [3H]dopamine which is produced by A23187 is potentiated by ethanol. It is concluded that the inhibitory effect of ethanol on the action of A23187 may be confined to platelet aggregation. This may be because the mechanisms of action of either A23187 or ethanol on platelet aggregation differ from those on other cell functions.

Relative internal concentrations of Na+ and K+ are important in regulating (Na+,K+)‐ATPase in situ. Ethanol is known to inhibit (Na+,K+)‐ATPase and to reduce K+ affinity, but the concentrations required for these effects in vitro are large compared with those probably attainable in vivo. Yet, there is evidence suggesting that ethanol has physiologically relevant effects on (Na+,K+)‐ATPase. We have investigated the effects of ethanol on selectivity for Na+ versus K+. At 150 mM, ethanol had little effect on (Na+,K+)‐ATPase activity under the usual assay conditions, slightly (but nonsignificantly) reduced K+ affinity, and had no effect on extrapolated Na+ affinity in the absence of K+. However, ethanol had marked effects on cation selectivity, doubling the K, for K+ on Na+ affinity and halving the K, for Na+ on K+ affinity. These data show that ethanol, at concentrations too small for effects on (Na+,K+)‐ATPase activity under optimal assay conditions, can alter its responses to changes in Na+ or K+.

Inositol monophosphatase can be modified at two sites by pyrene maleimide. These sites have been identified as Cys141 and Cys218. Stoichiometric addition of pyrene maleimide allows the sole modification of Cys218. The fluorescence of the pyrene moiety on the modified protein can be excited directly or by resonance energy transfer. The fluorescence properties of the pyrene group on Cys218 allows the interaction of ligands with the enzyme to be monitored. This feature has allowed dissociation constants for various metal ions to be determined and allowed the formation of various enzyme/ligand complexes to be observed. These studies have demonstrated that Mg2+ is required to support Pi binding and that Li+ interacts with a post‐catalytic complex which is only formed in the forward reaction.

There is an analogy between sleep EEGs produced by microinjections of morphine in the bulbo-mesencephalo-thalamic recruiting system and EEGs seen during anesthetic-induced sleep. Many studies in the last 10 years have claimed cross-tolerance and cross-dependence between opiates and ethyl alcohol. Opiates, ethyl alcohol and pentobarbital have many common metabolic actions in the central nervous system. Like morphine, microinjections of optimal equimolar doses of ethyl alcohol and pentobarbital in the bulbo-mesencephalo-thalamic sleep-inducing system of the rabbit produce sleep EEGs with abundant fast activity, which is blocked by naloxone (2 mg/kg i.v.) or by microinjections (160 micrograms) into the same structures. However, there is neither binding nor displacement by naloxone of ethyl alcohol or pentobarbital from the opiate receptor. It is thus probable that, via an as yet unknown mechanism, ethyl alcohol and pentobarbital promote the release of endorphins or peptides, which are specific ligands of all or some opiate receptors.

Generally, compounds discriminated by animals possess psychotropic effects in animals and humans. As with many other drugs of abuse, strength of the ethanol discriminative stimulus is dose related. The majority of studies show that doses close to 1.0 g/kg are close to the minimum at which the discrimination can be learned easily. Substitution studies suggest that anxiolytic, sedative, atactic, and myorelaxant effects of ethanol all play an important role in the formation of its intercoeptive stimulus. Low doses of ethanol produce more excitatory cues, similar to amphetamine-like subjective stimuli, whereas higher doses produce rather sedative/hypnotic stimuli similar to those elicited by barbiturates. Substitution studies have shown that the complete substitution for ethanol may be exerted by certain GABA-mimetic drugs acting through different sites within the GABA(A)-benzodiazepine receptor complex (e.g., diazepam, pentobarbital, certain neurosteroids), gamma-hydroxybutyrate, and antagonists of the glutamate NMDA receptor. Among the NMDA receptor antagonists both noncompetitive (e.g., dizocilpine) and competitive antagonists (e.g., CGP 40116) are capable of substituting for ethanol. Further, some antagonists of strychnine-insensitive glycine modulatory sites among the NMDA receptor complex (e.g., L-701,324) dose-dependently substitute for the ethanol discriminative stimulus. On the other hand, neither GABA-benzodiazepine antagonists nor NMDA receptor agonists produce contradictory effects (i.e., reduce the ethanol discriminative stimulus). There is influence of a particular training dose of ethanol on the substitution pattern of different compounds. For example, 5-HT(1B/2C) agonists substitute for intermediate (1.0 g/kg) but not higher (2.0 g/kg) ethanol training doses. Discrimination studies with ethanol and drugs acting on NMDA and GABA receptors consistently indicate asymmetrical generalization. For example, ethanol is able to generalize to barbiturates and benzodiazepines, but neither the benzodiazepine nor barbiturate response generalizes to ethanol. Only a few drugs are able to antagonize, at least to some extent, the discriminative stimulus of ethanol (e.g., partial inverse GABA-benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-4513 and the opioid antagonist naloxone). The ethanol stimulus effect may be increased (i.e., stronger recognition) by N-cholinergic drugs (nicotine), dopaminergic drugs (apomorphine), and 5-HT3 receptor agonists (m-chlorophenylbiguanide). Thus, the ethanol stimulus is composed of the several components, with the NMDA receptor and GABA(A) receptor complex being of particular importance. This suggests that a drug mixture may be more capable of substituting for ethanol (or block its stimulus) than a single compound. The ability of drugs to substitute for the ethanol discriminative stimulus is frequently, although not preclusively, associated with the reduction of voluntary ethanol consumption. The examples of positive correlation are gamma-hydroxybutyrate, possibly memantine and certain serotonergic drugs such as fluoxetine. However, it remains uncertain to what extent the discriminative stimulus of ethanol can be seen as relevant in the understanding of the complex mechanisms of dependence.

Rats of two different ages (2 and 7 months) were treated with an ethanol-containing liquid diet for 24 days and change of the ceramide composition of gangliosides were studied in the brain synaptosomal, microsomal and myelin fractions. Greater differences were observed in the younger age, where ethanol treatment caused a significant increase of C20:1 LCB in GM1 ganglioside of synaptosomes and microsomes and in GD1a of myelin.

Long-Evans and Sprague-Dawley rats show differential behavioral responses to cocaethylene, a metabolite derived from the simultaneous ingestion of ethanol and cocaine. Such differences may also be manifested when these outbred strains are exposed to ethanol and cocaine. To test this hypothesis, both strains were fed an ethanol-diet (8.7% v/v) in conjunction with cocaine (15 mg/kg) injections for 15 days. The following parameters were evaluated: (a) ethanol consumption, (b) cocaine-induced behavioral activity, (c) blood ethanol levels, (d) blood, liver, or brain cocaine and cocaethylene levels, and (e) liver catalase and esterase activity. We found that Long-Evans rats drank significantly more of the ethanol diet relative to the Sprague-Dawley line during the first few days of the test session. This rat phenotype also differed significantly from the Sprague-Dawley line in terms of behavioral activity after cocaine administration. Blood ethanol levels did not differ between strains. Similarly, we failed to detect strain-dependent differences in blood, liver, or brain cocaine levels as measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Cocaethylene levels, however, were higher in blood and brain of Long-Evans relative to Sprague-Dawley cohorts. Although the ethanol-cocaine regimen produced a marked suppression of catalase and esterase activity compared with control-fed rats, this suppression was roughly equivalent in both rat phenotypes. These data are discussed in the context of genotypic background and vulnerability to polysubstance abuse.

Summary: The potential role of genetic factors in the etiology of posttraumatic and alcohol‐associated seizures was studied in 289 male patients with recurrent seizures and in 174 individuals who had never experienced a seizure. The incidence of seizures in first‐degree relatives of probands was compared with that in relatives of unaffected individuals. Relatives of patients with alcoholassociated seizures had a rate ratio of 2.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41–4.251, whereas no excess incidence was noted among relatives of posttraumatic epilepsy patients (rate ratio 1.20, 0.64–2.25 CI). Relatives of probands with both antecedents showed an intermediate rate ratio of 1.72 (0.92–3.20 CI). Among probands with alcohol‐associated seizures, the rate ratio of 2.05 for patients with alcohol‐related seizures (i.e., spontaneously occurring seizures in association with chronic alcohol abuse) was slightly higher than that of 1.85 for probands with alcohol withdrawal seizures. Trauma severity had a slight impact on the incidence of affected relatives; patients with severe head injuries had a rate ratio of 0.73 and probands with milder trauma had a rate ratio of 0.99. The results indicate a limited, if any, role of genetic predisposition in development of posttraumatic seizures. Alcoholrelated seizures, however, showed familial aggregation of unprovoked seizures, suggesting an involvement of genetic factors in the origin of such seizures.