• Energy Research
• Open Access close
• US close
• FR close
• Netherlands Research Portal close

Wheat Biomass for Kherson and Poltava regions in Ukraine The dataset contains Dry Above Ground Biomass (DAM) estimates over the Kherson and Poltava regions in Ukraine for years 2020,2021 and 2022. - Processing:The processing is done using the AgriCarbon-EOv1.5 processing chain, using the TREX processing centre at CNES France.The input remote sensing data are L2A Sentinel-2 surface reflectances provided by the MAJA processing chain based on the Copernicus Sentinel-2 L1C data.The Landcover maps are provided using ML Deep learning based on the Copernicus L2A data.The daily weather data is extracted from ERA5Land products (C3S). -Geophysical variable:Dry Above ground biomass of winter wheat in g/m2. - Extents: * DAM estimates over the Copernicus Sentinel-2 tile 36TWT cover the Kherson region.* DAM estimates over the Copernicus Sentinel-2 tile 36UVA cover the Poltava region. - Spatial resolution:10m resolution estimlates over wheat plots identified in the landcover map. - Temporal coverage:Estimates are provided at the end of the wheat cycle for cycles:* The year 2020 correspond to cycle: 2019-2020* The year 2021 corresponds to cycle : 2020-2021* The year 2022 corresponds to cycle : 2021-2022 - Projection: EPSG:32636 - File content: Each Raster file has 2 bands containing respectively: * band1: mean value of DAM in g/m2. * band2: standard deviation of DAM in g/m2. - List of maps:* Dry_aboveground_biomass_2020_T36TWT_Kherson_Ukraine.tif* Dry_aboveground_biomass_2020_T36UVA_Poltava_Ukraine.tif* Dry_aboveground_biomass_2021_T36TWT_Kherson_Ukraine.tif* Dry_aboveground_biomass_2021_T36UVA_Poltava_Ukraine.tif* Dry_aboveground_biomass_2022_T36TWT_Kherson_Ukraine.tif* Dry_aboveground_biomass_2022_T36UVA_Poltava_Ukraine.tif

The Global Yield Gap Atlas project (GYGA - http://yieldgap.org ) has undertaken a yield gap assessment following the protocol recommended by van Ittersum et. al. (van Ittersum et. al., 2013). This datafile holds the results for rainfed rice.

This README file was generated on 2024-03-04 by Adriana Parra. ## GENERAL INFORMATION 1\. Title of Dataset: **Climate-limited vegetation change in the conterminous United States of America** 2\. Author Information A. First Author Contact Information Name: Adriana Parra Institution: University of Nevada, Reno Address: Reno, NV USA Email: adrianaparra@unr.edu B. Co-author Contact Information Name: Jonathan Greenberg Institution: University of Nevada, Reno Address: Reno, NV USA Email: jgreenberg@unr.edu 3\. Coverage period of the dataset: 1986-2018 4\. Geographic location of dataset: Conterminous United States 5\. Description: This dataset contains the input and the resulting rasters for the study “CLIMATE-LIMITED VEGETATION CHANGE IN THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”, published in the Global Change Biology journal. The dataset includes a) the observed rates of vegetation change, b) the climate derived potential vegetation rates of change, c) the difference between potential and observed values and d) the identified climatic limiting factor. Additionally, the dataset includes a legend file for the identified climatic limiting factor rasters. ## SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION 1\. Links to publications that cite or use the data: **Parra, A., & Greenberg, J. (2024). Climate-limited vegetation change in the conterminous United States of America. Global Change Biology, 30, e17204. [https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17204](https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17204)** 2\. Links to other publicly accessible locations of the data: None 3\. Links/relationships to ancillary data sets: None 4\. Was data derived from another source? Yes A. If yes, list source(s): "Vegetative Lifeform Cover from Landsat SR for CONUS" product publicly available in the ORNL DAAC (https://daac.ornl.gov/cgi-bin/dsviewer.pl?ds_id=1809) TerraClimate data catalog publicly available at the website https://www.climatologylab.org/terraclimate.html 5\. Recommended citation for this dataset: Parra, A., & Greenberg, J. (2024). Climate-limited vegetation change in the conterminous United States of America. Global Change Biology, 30, e17204. [https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17204](https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17204) ## DATA & FILE OVERVIEW This dataset contains 16 geotiff files, and one csv file. There are 4 geotiff files per each of the lifeform classes evaluated in this study: herbaceous, tree, shrub, and non-vegetation. The files corresponding to each lifeform class are indicated by the first two letters in the file name, HC indicates herbaceous cover, TC indicates tree cover, SC indicates shrub cover, and NC indicates non-vegetation cover. 1\. File List: a) Observed change: Trends of vegetation change between 1986 and 2018. b) Potential predict: Predicted rates of vegetation change form the climate limiting factor analysis. c) Potential observed difference: Difference between the potential and the observed vegetation rates of change. d) Limiting variable: Climate variable identified as the limiting factor for each pixel the conterminous United States. e) Legend of the Limiting variable raster All the geotiff files are stored as Float 32 type, and in CONUS Albers Equal Area coordinate system (EPSG:5070) The csv file included in the dataset is the legend for the limiting variable geotiff files. This file includes the name of the climate variable corresponding to each number in the limiting variable files, as well as information on the variable type and the corresponding time lag. 2\. Relationship between files, if important: None 3\. Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: None 4\. Are there multiple versions of the dataset? No A. If yes, name of file(s) that was updated: NA i. Why was the file updated? NA ii. When was the file updated? NA Input data We use the available data from the “Vegetative Lifeform Cover from Landsat SR for CONUS” product (https://daac.ornl.gov/cgi-bin/dsviewer.pl?ds_id=1809) to evaluate the changes in vegetation fractional cover. The information for the climate factors was derived from the TerraClimate data catalog (https://www.climatologylab.org/terraclimate.html). We downloaded data from this catalog for the period 1971 to 2018 for the following variables: minimum temperature (TMIN), precipitation (PPT), actual evapotranspiration (AET), potential evapotranspiration (PET), and climatic water deficit (DEF). Preprocessing of vegetation fractional cover data We resampled and aligned the maps of fractional cover using pixel averaging to the extent and resolution of the TerraClimate dataset (~ 4 km). Then, we calculated rates of lifeform cover change per pixel using the Theil-Sen slope analysis (Sen, 1968; Theil, 1992). Preprocessing of climate variables data To process the climate data, we defined a year time step as the months from July of one year to July of the next. Following this definition, we constructed annual maps of each climate variable for the years 1971 to 2018. The annual maps of each climate variable were further summarized per pixel, into mean and slope (calculated as the Theil-Sen slope) across one, two, three, four, five, ten-, and 15-year lags. Estimation of climate potential We constructed a final multilayer dataset of response and predictor variables for the CONUS including the resulting maps of fractional cover rate of change (four response variables), the mean and slope maps for the climate variables for all the time-lags (70 predictor variables), and the initial percent cover for each lifeform in the year 1986 (four predictor variables). We evaluated for each pixel in the CONUS which of the predictor variables produced the minimum potential rate of change in fractional cover for each lifeform class. To do that, we first calculated the 100% quantile hull of the distribution of each predictor variable against each response variable. To calculate the 100% quantile of the predictor variables’ distribution we divided the total range of each predictor variable into equal-sized bins. The size and number of bins were set specifically per variable due to differences in their data distribution. For each of the bins, we calculated the maximum value of the vegetation rate of change, which resulted in a lookup table with the lower and upper boundaries of each bin, and the associated maximum rate of change. We constructed a total of 296 lookup tables, one per lifeform class and predictor variable combination. The resulting lookup tables were used to construct spatially explicit maps of maximum vegetation rate of change from each of the predictor variable input rasters, and the final climate potential maps were constructed by stacking all the resulting maps per lifeform class and selecting for each pixel the minimum predicted rate of change and the predictor variable that produced that rate. Identifying climate-limited areas We defined climate-limited areas as the parts of the CONUS with little or no differences between the estimated climate potential and the observed rates of change in fractional cover. To identify these areas, we subtracted the raster of observed rates of change from the raster of climate potential for each lifeform class. In the study “CLIMATE-LIMITED VEGETATION CHANGE IN THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”, published in the Global Change Biology journal, we evaluated the effects of climate conditions on vegetation composition and distribution in the conterminous United States (CONUS). To disentangle the direct effects of climate change from different non-climate factors, we applied "Liebig's law of the minimum" in a geospatial context, and determined the climate-limited potential for tree, shrub, herbaceous, and non-vegetation fractional cover change. We then compared these potential rates against observed change rates for the period 1986 to 2018 to identify areas of the CONUS where vegetation change is likely being limited by climatic conditions. This dataset contains the input and the resulting rasters for the study which include a) the observed rates of vegetation change, b) the climate derived potential vegetation rates of change, c) the difference between potential and observed values and d) the identified climatic limiting factor.

This dataset contains files produced for and generated from the CCAFS Household Baseline Study carried out in sites in Latin America (Trifinio in Honduras/Guatemala, and Cauca in Colombia) and in South-East Asia (a site in each of Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam) in the latter months of 2014 and the early months of 2015. There are six sites in all (two sites from Trifinio). Before downloading any of the files, particularly the data files, please download and read the CCAFS ReadMe file which is prefixed by the code 0000. To gain access to the GPS coordinates from the restricted files please download and complete the Non-disclosure agreement from the file "0002 Non-Disclosure Agreement 2013-01-20.pdf" and send this to Wiebke Foerch at w.foerch@cgiar.org The study was based on earlier baseline studies carried out in sites in West and East Africa and in South Asia. Data and other files from these earlier studies are available in a separate dataset in this Dataverse archive. (CCAFS Household Baseline Survey 2010-2012). If you are intending to use data from both studies together we suggest you read the file "0001 Questionnaire Differences & Recoding Details 2015-10-29.pdf" which explains differences between the two studies.

The Global Yield Gap Atlas project (GYGA - http://yieldgap.org ) has undertaken a yield gap assessment following the protocol recommended by van Ittersum et. al. (van Ittersum et. al., 2013). This datafile holds the results for rainfed sugarcane.

This dataset gathers data used to determine the temporal variability of couplings between pelagic and benthic habitats for fish assemblages at five periods. Organic matter fluxes were assessed using stable isotopes analysis. Species relative biomass was considered to explore energy fluxes within the fish assemblage

Forest aboveground carbon density (ACD) for the main eight Hawaiian Islands in 2015-2016. The data are in 30 meter resolution format with the units of Mg C per hectare. The file is a standard GeoTIFF. Use of these data requires citation of this dataset plus citation of the source study as follows: Asner, G.P., S. Sousan, D.E. Knapp, P.C. Selmants, R.E. Martin, R.F. Hughes, and C.P. Giardina. 2016. Rapid forest carbon assessments of oceanic islands: a case study of the Hawaiian archipelago. Carbon Balance and Management 11, doi:10.1186/s13021-015-0043-4

Two maps are provided from a study of the Republic of Panama. The maps are based on airborne light detection and ranging (lidar) data, combined with satellite-based maps of forest cover and properties, acquired in 2012. The resulting maps are: (1) top of canopy height or TCH; and (2) aboveground carbon density or ACD. Units for TCH are meters above ground. Units for ACD are Mg C per hectare. Maps are provided at 1.0 ha spatial resolution. File format is GeoTIFF. Use of these data require citation of this dataset and the original journal paper that delivered the mapping method. These citations are as follows: Asner, G.P., J. Mascaro, C. Anderson, D.E. Knapp, R.E. Martin, T. Kennedy-Bowdoin, M. van Breugel, S. Davies, J.S. Hall, H.C. Muller-Landau, C. Potvin, W. Sousa, J. Wright and E. Bermingham. 2013. High-fidelity national carbon mapping for resource management and REDD+. Carbon Balance and Management 8:7 (doi:10.1186/1750-0680-8-7) Asner, G.P., J. Mascaro, C. Anderson, D.E. Knapp, and R.E. Martin. 2021. Global Airborne Observatory: Forest canopy height and carbon stocks of Panama (Version 1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4624240

Agricultural adaptation to climate change is critical for ensuring future food security. Social capital is important for climate change adaptation, but institutions and social networks at multiple scales (e.g., household, community, and institution) have been overlooked in studying agricultural climate change adaptation. We combine data from 13 sites in 11 low-income countries in East Africa, West Africa, and South Asia to explore how multiple scales of social capital relate to household food security outcomes among smallholder farmers. Using social network theory, we define three community organizational social network types (fragmented defined by lack of coordination, brokered defined as having a strong central actor, or shared defined by high coordination) and examine household social capital through group memberships. We find community and household social capital are positively related, with higher household group membership more likely in brokered and shared networks. Household group membership is associated with more than a 10% reduction in average months of food insecurity, an effect moderated by community social network type. In communities with fragmented and shared organizational networks, additional household group memberships is associated with consistent decreases in food insecurity, in some cases up to two months; whereas in brokered networks, reductions in food insecurity are only associated with membership in credit groups. These effects are confirmed by hierarchical random effects models, which control for demographic factors. This suggests that multiple scales of social capital—both within and outside the household—are correlated with household food security. This social capital may both be bridging (across groups) and bonding (within groups) with different implications for how social capital structure affects food security. Efforts to improve food security could recognize the potential for both household and community level social networks and collaboration, which further research can capture by analyzing multiple scales of social capital data.