• Energy Research
• Open Access close
• AT close
• TH close

AbstractHeterojunction CdS/CdTe thin film solar cells were fabricated with a superstrate structure consisting of the successive layers: soda lime glass/ITO/CdS/CdTe/back contact. ZnTe:Cu films were deposited on the back surface of the CdTe layer presenting as ohmic back contact. The substrate was soda lime glass coated with ITO films by rf magnetron sputtering serving as the transparent front contact. A thin layer of CdS with thickness about 80nm was applied by chemical bath deposition. Close-spaced sublimation of the CdTe films was accomplished by placing a CdTe source in a close proximity (6mm) to the substrate in vacuum chamber with low pressure about 3×10-2 mbar. The source was heated to 550 ∘C and the substrate to 450 ∘C. This arrangement causes Cd and Te to sublime from source and diffuse to the substrate. The fabricated cells were investigated using current-voltage (I-V) in the temperature range 20-300K under a standard AM1.5 illumination in order to define the transport mechanism in the heterojunction. Tunnelling enhanced interface recombination has been found to dominate carrier transport mechanism in the junction at all investigated temperatures.

Related paper containing detailed description: Moesinger et al. (2020) Vegetation optical depth (VOD) describes the attenuation of radiation by plants. VOD a function of frequency as well as vegetation water content, and by extension biomass. VOD has many possible applications in studies of the biosphere, such as biomass monitoring, drought monitoring, phenology analyzes or fire risk management. We merged VOD observations from various spaceborne sensors (SSM/I, TMI, AMSR-E, AMSR2, WindSat) to create global long-term vod time series. Prior to aggregation the data has been rescaled to AMSR-E, removing systematic differences between them. There is a product for C-band (~6.9 GHz, 2002 - 2018), X-band (10.7 GHz, 1997 - 2018) and Ku-band (~19 GHz, 1987 - 2017). The data is global sampled on a regular 0.25 degrees grid. Each product is available as daily global netcdf4 files. Currently there is an issue with opening the file using ESA SNAP. As an alternative Panoply can be used to quickly visualize the data. An update of VODCA, addressing this issue and potentially including an extension of the dataset, is foreseen to be published on Zenodo early 2020. Please contact us if you have any questions, problems or suggestions for improvement! Files: "VODCA_C-band_2002-2018_v01.0.0.zip" (unzipped size: ~140 GB): VODCA C-band files, sorted into yearly folders "VODCA_X-band_1997-2018_v01.0.0.zip" (unzipped size: ~180 GB): VODCA X-band files, sorted into yearly folders "VODCA_Ku-band_1987-2017_v01.0.0.zip" (unzipped size: ~270 GB) : VODCA Ku-band files, sorted into yearly folders "vodca_v01-0_K-band_2007-06-01.nc" sample file of the Ku-band product "ESA-CCI-SOILMOISTURE-LAND_AND_RAINFOREST_MASK-fv04.2.nc" Contains a global land mask, VODCA only has data for land locations. Source: https://github.com/TUW-GEO/smecv-grid Variables of data in VODCA files: "VOD": Unitless, Vegetation Optical Depth of the respective band "sensor_flag": Bit-flag indicating which sensors contributed to each observation. Values: 1 = AMSR-E 2 = AMSR2 3 = SSM/I F8 4 = SSM/I F11 5 = SSM/I F13 6 = TMI 7 = WindSat "processing_flag": Bit-flag indicating irregularities during processing affecting the quality of the observations Values: 0 = Everything is fine 10 = AMSR-2 7.3 GHz band is used instead of 6.9 GHz 11 = Sensor is scaled to matched TMI instead of AMSR-E 12 = Sensor scaled without temporally overlapping observations "time"/"lon"/"lat": Dimensions of the data.

Abstract. Reliable quantification of the sources and sinks of greenhouse gases, together with trends and uncertainties, is essential to monitoring the progress in mitigating anthropogenic emissions under the Paris Agreement. This study provides a consolidated synthesis of CH4 and N2O emissions with consistently derived state-of-the-art bottom-up (BU) and top-down (TD) data sources for the European Union and UK (EU27+UK). We integrate recent emission inventory data, ecosystem process-based model results, and inverse modelling estimates over the period 1990–2018. BU and TD products are compared with European National GHG Inventories (NGHGI) reported to the UN climate convention secretariat UNFCCC in 2019. For uncertainties, we used for NGHGI the standard deviation obtained by varying parameters of inventory calculations, reported by the Member States following the IPCC guidelines recommendations. For atmospheric inversion models (TD) or other inventory datasets (BU), we defined uncertainties from the spread between different model estimates or model specific uncertainties when reported. In comparing NGHGI with other approaches, a key source of bias is the activities included, e.g. anthropogenic versus anthropogenic plus natural fluxes. In inversions, the separation between anthropogenic and natural emissions is sensitive to the geospatial prior distribution of emissions. Over the 2011–2015 period, which is the common denominator of data availability between all sources, the anthropogenic BU approaches are directly comparable, reporting mean emissions of 20.8 Tg CH4 yr−1 (EDGAR v5.0) and 19.0 Tg CH4 yr−1 (GAINS), consistent with the NGHGI estimates of 18.9 ± 1.7 Tg CH4 yr−1. TD total inversions estimates give higher emission estimates, as they also include natural emissions. Over the same period regional TD inversions with higher resolution atmospheric transport models give a mean emission of 28.8 Tg CH4 yr−1. Coarser resolution global TD inversions are consistent with regional TD inversions, for global inversions with GOSAT satellite data (23.3 Tg CH4yr−1) and surface network (24.4 Tg CH4 yr−1). The magnitude of natural peatland emissions from the JSBACH-HIMMELI model, natural rivers and lakes emissions and geological sources together account for the gap between NGHGI and inversions and account for 5.2 Tg CH4 yr−1. For N2O emissions, over the 2011–2015 period, both BU approaches (EDGAR v5.0 and GAINS) give a mean value of anthropogenic emissions of 0.8 and 0.9 Tg N2O yr−1 respectively, agreeing with the NGHGI data (0.9 ± 0.6 Tg N2O yr−1). Over the same period, the average of the three total TD global and regional inversions was 1.3 ± 0.4 and 1.3 ± 0.1 Tg N2O yr−1 respectively, compared to 0.9 Tg N2O yr−1 from the BU data. The TU and BU comparison method defined in this study can be operationalized for future yearly updates for the calculation of CH4 and N2O budgets both at EU+UK scale and at national scale. The referenced datasets related to figures are visualized at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4288969 (Petrescu et al., 2020).

Abstract. Regional land carbon budgets provide insights on the spatial distribution of the land uptake of atmospheric carbon dioxide, and can be used to evaluate carbon cycle models and to define baselines for land-based additional mitigation efforts. The scientific community has been involved in providing observation-based estimates of regional carbon budgets either by downscaling atmospheric CO2 observations into surface fluxes with atmospheric inversions, by using inventories of carbon stock changes in terrestrial ecosystems, by upscaling local field observations such as flux towers with gridded climate and remote sensing fields or by integrating data-driven or process-oriented terrestrial carbon cycle models. The first coordinated attempt to collect regional carbon budgets for nine regions covering the entire globe in the RECCAP-1 project has delivered estimates for the decade 2000–2009, but these budgets were not comparable between regions, due to different definitions and component fluxes reported or omitted. The recent recognition of lateral fluxes of carbon by human activities and rivers, that connect CO2 uptake in one area with its release in another also requires better definition and protocols to reach harmonized regional budgets that can be summed up to the globe and compared with the atmospheric CO2 growth rate and inversion results. In this study, for the international initiative RECCAP-2 coordinated by the Global Carbon Project, which aims as an update of regional carbon budgets over the last two decades based on observations, for 10 regions covering the globe, with a better harmonization that the precursor project, we provide recommendations for using atmospheric inversions results to match bottom-up carbon accounting and models, and we define the different component fluxes of the net land atmosphere carbon exchange that should be reported by each research group in charge of each region. Special attention is given to lateral fluxes, inland water fluxes and land use fluxes.

Humanity’s role in changing the face of the earth is a long-standing concern, as is the human domination of ecosystems. Geologists are debating the introduction of a new geological epoch, the ‘anthropocene’, as humans are ‘overwhelming the great forces of nature’. In this context, the accumulation of artefacts, i.e., human-made physical objects, is a pervasive phenomenon. Variously dubbed ‘manufactured capital’, ‘technomass’, ‘human-made mass’, ‘in-use stocks’ or ‘socioeconomic material stocks’, they have become a major focus of sustainability sciences in the last decade. Globally, the mass of socioeconomic material stocks now exceeds 10e14 kg, which is roughly equal to the dry-matter equivalent of all biomass on earth. It is doubling roughly every 20 years, almost perfectly in line with ‘real’ (i.e. inflation-adjusted) GDP. In terms of mass, buildings and infrastructures (here collectively called ‘built structures’) represent the overwhelming majority of all socioeconomic material stocks. This dataset features a detailed map of material stocks in the CONUS on a 10m grid based on high resolution Earth Observation data (Sentinel-1 + Sentinel-2), crowd-sourced geodata (OSM) and material intensity factors. Spatial extent This subdataset covers the West Coast CONUS, i.e. CA OR WA For the remaining CONUS, see the related identifiers. Temporal extent The map is representative for ca. 2018. Data format The data are organized by states. Within each state, data are split into 100km x 100km tiles (EQUI7 grid), and mosaics are provided. Within each tile, images for area, volume, and mass at 10m spatial resolution are provided. Units are m², m³, and t, respectively. Each metric is split into buildings, other, rail and street (note: In the paper, other, rail, and street stocks are subsumed to mobility infrastructure). Each category is further split into subcategories (e.g. building types). Additionally, a grand total of all stocks is provided at multiple spatial resolutions and units, i.e. t at 10m x 10m kt at 100m x 100m Mt at 1km x 1km Gt at 10km x 10km For each state, mosaics of all above-described data are provided in GDAL VRT format, which can readily be opened in most Geographic Information Systems. File paths are relative, i.e. DO NOT change the file structure or file naming. Additionally, the grand total mass per state is tabulated for each county in mass_grand_total_t_10m2.tif.csv. County FIPS code and the ID in this table can be related via FIPS-dictionary_ENLOCALE.csv. Material layers Note that material-specific layers are not included in this repository because of upload limits. Only the totals are provided (i.e. the sum over all materials). However, these can easily be derived by re-applying the material intensity factors from (see related identifiers): A. Baumgart, D. Virág, D. Frantz, F. Schug, D. Wiedenhofer, Material intensity factors for buildings, roads and rail-based infrastructure in the United States. Zenodo (2022), doi:10.5281/zenodo.5045337. Further information For further information, please see the publication. A web-visualization of this dataset is available here. Visit our website to learn more about our project MAT_STOCKS - Understanding the Role of Material Stock Patterns for the Transformation to a Sustainable Society. Publication D. Frantz, F. Schug, D. Wiedenhofer, A. Baumgart, D. Virág, S. Cooper, C. Gomez-Medina, F. Lehmann, T. Udelhoven, S. van der Linden, P. Hostert, H. Haberl. Weighing the US Economy: Map of Built Structures Unveils Patterns in Human-Dominated Landscapes. In prep Funding This research was primarly funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (MAT_STOCKS, grant agreement No 741950). Workflow development was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—Project-ID 414984028-SFB 1404. Acknowledgments We thank the European Space Agency and the European Commission for freely and openly sharing Sentinel imagery; USGS for the National Land Cover Database; Microsoft for Building Footprints; Geofabrik and all contributors for OpenStreetMap.This dataset was partly produced on EODC - we thank Clement Atzberger for supporting the generation of this dataset by sharing disc space on EODC.

This file contains the raw dataset used in the manuscript "Tailored Nanoscale Plasmon-Enhanced Vibrational Electron Spectroscopy" published in L. H. G. Tizei et al Nano Letters, 2020 (doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04659) Data has been acquired using Nion Swift (https://nionswift.readthedocs.io/en/stable/). Experimental details can be found in L. H. G. Tizei et al Nano Letters, 2020 (doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04659). The dataset has been analyzed using the following Python libraries: Numpy, Scipy, Hyperspy, Matplotlib EELS hyperspectral images have been aligned using the Hyperspy "align1D" method. Aligned EELS hyperspectral images are saved in files finished with "_Aligned.hspy": For the strong coupling experiments: Tip 1 is on hBN Tip 2 is on vacuum For each of the nanowires tips, a file with the fitted coefficients are available, as well as a plot of the data and the fitted curve. Datasets have been fitted with gaussian and/or lorentizan functions, as described in the published text. Any question can be forwarded to the corresponding authors of the published text. Other funding: 1) National Agency for Researchunder the program of future investment TEMPOS-CHROMATEM (reference no. ANR-10-EQPX-50); 2) Spanish MINECO (MAT2017-88492-R and SEV2015-0522); 3) the Catalan CERCA Program; 4) Fundació Privada Celle;

Dataset of major hydropower plants in Austria. Provides location, capacity, turbine technology, head, flow, and further data.