- home
- Advanced Search
- Energy Research
- AU
- NL
- Sustainability
- Energy Research
- AU
- NL
- Sustainability
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2018Publisher:MDPI AG van den Heiligenberg, Harm; Heimeriks, Gaston; Hekkert, Marko; Raven, Rob; Sol, Jifke;doi: 10.3390/su10051624
The sustainability challenge requires experimentation with innovations, followed by an upscaling process towards a broader regime change in the long term. In Europe we observe various regional hotspots for sustainability experimentation which suggests that there are favorable spatial contexts. Little is known about why different kinds of experiments flourish or fail in various spatial contexts. In this paper we explore these contexts by using the habitat concept. A habitat is regarded as the configuration of favorable local and regional context factors for experimentation. To capture the diversity of these habitats we have constructed archetypical experimentation patterns. These patterns are built up of five dimensions: knowledge, governance, informal institutions, regional innovation advantages, and social learning. In a comparative case study in four city regions in Europe we find a large contrast in habitats. Countercultures play an important role, as they shape a beneficial context for experimentation through alternative ideas and lifestyles. We also find indications that it is important that a combination of several habitat factors is present, and that these factors have aligned and evolved over several years of experimentation, thus leading to a more mature habitat. The research suggests that regional stakeholders can positively influence most of the habitat factors shaping future upscaling. However, there are also some important factors, such as regional knowledge and skills, which have a path-dependent nature and are more difficult to improve in the short term.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1624/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteResearch@WURArticle . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: https://edepot.wur.nl/453066Data sources: Research@WURadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 8 citations 8 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1624/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteResearch@WURArticle . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: https://edepot.wur.nl/453066Data sources: Research@WURadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2016Publisher:MDPI AG JinHyo Yun; Dooseok Lee; Heungju Ahn; Kyungbae Park; Tan Yigitcanlar;doi: 10.3390/su8080797
handle: 20.500.11750/5087
What do we need for sustainable artificial intelligence that is not harmful but beneficial human life? This paper builds up the interaction model between direct and autonomous learning from the human’s cognitive learning process and firms’ open innovation process. It conceptually establishes a direct and autonomous learning interaction model. The key factor of this model is that the process to respond to entries from external environments through interactions between autonomous learning and direct learning as well as to rearrange internal knowledge is incessant. When autonomous learning happens, the units of knowledge determinations that arise from indirect learning are separated. They induce not only broad autonomous learning made through the horizontal combinations that surpass the combinations that occurred in direct learning but also in-depth autonomous learning made through vertical combinations that appear so that new knowledge is added. The core of the interaction model between direct and autonomous learning is the variability of the boundary between proven knowledge and hypothetical knowledge, limitations in knowledge accumulation, as well as complementarity and conflict between direct and autonomous learning. Therefore, these should be considered when introducing the interaction model between direct and autonomous learning into navigations, cleaning robots, search engines, etc. In addition, we should consider the relationship between direct learning and autonomous learning when building up open innovation strategies and policies.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2016License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/8/797/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteQueensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)DGIST Scholar (Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology)Article . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 54 citations 54 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2016License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/8/797/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteQueensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)DGIST Scholar (Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology)Article . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2022Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Vural Gursel, Iris; Elbersen, Berien; Meesters, Koen P.H.; van Leeuwen, Myrna;doi: 10.3390/su141912780
To support progress towards the transition to a circular economy, the ability to measure circularity is essential. The consideration of the role biobased products can play in this transition is however still largely lacking in the current development of circularity monitoring approaches. The first step in coming to a suitable monitoring framework for biobased products is to define circular economy principles. In this paper, specific characteristics of biobased products were considered in defining six circular economy principles for biobased products: (1). Reduce reliance on fossil resources, (2). Use resources efficiently, (3). Valorize waste and residues, (4). Regenerate, (5). Recirculate and (6). Extend the high-quality use of biomass. In order to evaluate the circularity performance of biobased products with respect to these principles, what needs to be measured was defined considering both intrinsic circularity and impact of this circularity. The intrinsic indicators provide a measure of success in implementation of these circularity principles, and the latter impacts of circularity, i.e., impact of closing the loops on accumulation of hazardous substances and impact of circularity on sustainability (environmental, economic and social). Yet, to unlock the potential of a sustainable circular bioeconomy, strong accompanying measures are required.
Research@WUR arrow_drop_down Research@WURArticle . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://edepot.wur.nl/579769Data sources: Research@WURadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 32 citations 32 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Research@WUR arrow_drop_down Research@WURArticle . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://edepot.wur.nl/579769Data sources: Research@WURadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2018Publisher:MDPI AG Craig Hutton; Robert Nicholls; Attila Lázár; Alex Chapman; Marije Schaafsma; Mashfiqus Salehin;The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are offered as a comprehensive strategy to guide and encourage sustainable development at multiple scales both nationally and internationally. Furthermore, through the development of indicators associated with each goal and sub-goal, the SDGs support the notion of monitoring, evaluation and adaptive management, underpinned by the aspirations of social justice, equity and transparency. As such, the ethical intention of the SDGs is well founded. However, possible conflicts and trade-offs between individual SDGs have received little attention. For example, SDGs relating to poverty (SDG 1), inequality (SDG 10), food security (SDG2), economic development (SDG 8) and life in water and on land (SDGs 14 and 15), are potentially competing in many circumstances. In a social–ecological context, policy support and formulation are increasingly adopting systems approaches, which analyse the complex interactions of system elements. Adopting such an approach in this work, the above SDGs are analysed for coastal Bangladesh. This demonstrates multiple potential trade-offs between the SDGs, including agricultural farming approaches in the light of poverty reduction, and between economic growth and environmental integrity as well as equity. To develop coherent and policy relevant socio-ecological strategies, appropriate decision frameworks need to be co-developed across the range of stakeholders and decision-makers. Integrated models have great potential to support such a process.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1108/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteUniversity of Southampton: e-Prints SotonArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)SustainabilityArticle . 2018University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 55 citations 55 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1108/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteUniversity of Southampton: e-Prints SotonArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)SustainabilityArticle . 2018University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2022Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Gabriel Andres Rojas Cardenas; Rahmat Khezri; Amin Mahmoudi; Solmaz Kahourzadeh;doi: 10.3390/su14052892
handle: 11541.2/30796
This paper proposes a multi-size Split-diesel generator (Split-DG) model with three different sizes of DGs and more switching configurations compared to the existing split-DG models. The proposed multi-size Split-DG system is examined for optimal sizing of remote microgrids with and without renewable-battery system. As a novel concept, multi-size Split-DG is used to reduce contamination, cost, and dumped power by using multiple small DGs to replace the single-size large DG. As another contribution of this study, a practical model is developed by considering the capacity degradation of components, spinning reserve, as well as DG’s and fuel tank’s constraints. The optimization problem is solved using a variable weighting particle swarm optimization (VW-PSO) algorithm. The effectiveness of the proposed Split-DG systems, optimized by the developed VW-PSO, is verified by comparing the results with conventional single-size DG system and the system optimized by conventional PSO. While the formulated optimization problem is general and can be used for any remote microgrids, an aboriginal community in South Australia is examined in this study. For this purpose, realistic data of load and weather, as well as technical and economic data of components, are used. It is found that the Split-DG-PV-WT-BES system has the lowest electricity cost compared to the systems without BES, or without PV and WT.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2892/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteUniSA Research Outputs RepositoryArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedData sources: UniSA Research Outputs Repositoryadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access Routesgold 9 citations 9 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2892/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteUniSA Research Outputs RepositoryArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedData sources: UniSA Research Outputs Repositoryadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2019Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Menuka Jayaratne; Gillian Sullivan Mort; Clare D’Souza;doi: 10.3390/su11247076
Sustainability is a multidimensional concept that goes beyond environmental protection to economic development and social equity. This change drives entrepreneurs introducing new sustainability-derived products and services to help sustain nature and communities. Entrepreneurship is increasingly being cited as a significant conduit for bringing about a transformation to sustainable products and processes. This research uses the term sustainability entrepreneurs for those who introduce innovative sustainability-derived products, processes, and services for gain, where gain includes economic and non-economic gains to individuals, the economy, and society. The research design was a qualitative exploratory study. The study focuses on a sample of sustainability entrepreneurs as the target respondents who take a commitment to sustainability via sustainability entrepreneurship. Interviews were based around open-ended questions prompting the respondents to engage in a storytelling approach to describe their journey from consumer concern to sustainability entrepreneurship. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. A set of themes emerged after analysis, reflecting experience as sustainability entrepreneurs. The themes were: Concern as a consumer for sustainability living; Entrepreneurship is not just for money or identity fulfilment but also for altruism; Values underpinning sustainability entrepreneurship: Fairness, responsibility, altruism, and integrity; and Collaboration not competition. This research contributes to an understanding of sustainability entrepreneurs as those who emerge from consumer concern to introduce innovative sustainability derived products, processes, and services for gain, where gain includes economic and non-economic gain to individuals, the economy, and society.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2019License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7076/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access Routesgold 22 citations 22 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2019License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7076/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2023Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Manuel Corrales-Gonzalez; George Lavidas; Giovanni Besio;doi: 10.3390/su15119113
handle: 11567/1143735
Clean energies are being incorporated into the energy mix in numerous countries. Through a spatial survey of maritime trade, restricted military maritime areas, marine planning, and the presence of fauna and flora along the Ligurian Sea, locations for possible investments in wave energy harvesting were identified in the Northern Thyrrenian Sea, along the Ligurian coast. Previous studies in this region have demonstrated, at a lower spatial resolution, the wave energy potential that can be captured and its variation over time. However, the optimization of wave energy exploitation under the criteria of the functionality and safety of converter devices has not yet been evaluated in the Ligurian Sea. The purpose of this study is to identify the optimal wave energy converter from an economic and technical perspective at several selected locations in the Ligurian Sea. This study involves the scaling of the employed power matrices to obtain the optimized capacity factors of wave energy converters.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9113/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteDelft University of Technology: Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2023Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 4 citations 4 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
visibility 7visibility views 7 download downloads 5 Powered by
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9113/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteDelft University of Technology: Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2023Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2021Embargo end date: 06 Jan 2022Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Miriam von Thenen; Aurelija Armoškaitė; Víctor Cordero-Penín; Sara García-Morales; +5 AuthorsMiriam von Thenen; Aurelija Armoškaitė; Víctor Cordero-Penín; Sara García-Morales; Josefine B. Gottschalk; Débora Gutierrez; Malena Ripken; Pascal Thoya; Kerstin S. Schiele;handle: 10553/113222
In early 2021, the Erasmus+ knowledge flows partnership organised a session to discuss the future of marine spatial planning (MSP) at an international conference. We, a group of nine early career researchers, came together after the conference to continue the discussion: which topics should be considered in future MSP, what are the challenges, and which solutions are there to overcome these challenges? This communication shall raise awareness of the topics of climate change, ecological sustainability, blue justice, ecosystem services, and blue governance, which we identified as important for future MSP endeavours. We show the interconnectedness of the topics and argue that transdisciplinary education is required to contribute to a common understanding of MSP, which adopts an ecosystem-based approach, ensures equitable distribution of benefits, and secures ecologically sustainable development within an adaptive governance framework.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2022Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 5 citations 5 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2022Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2010Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Schmitt Olabisi, Laura K.; Kapuscinski, Anne R.; Johnson, Kris A.; Reich, Peter B.; +2 AuthorsSchmitt Olabisi, Laura K.; Kapuscinski, Anne R.; Johnson, Kris A.; Reich, Peter B.; Stenquist, Brian; Draeger, Kathryn J.;doi: 10.3390/su2082686
handle: 11299/175086
Both scenario visioning and participatory system dynamics modeling emphasize the dynamic and uncontrollable nature of complex socio-ecological systems, and the significance of multiple feedback mechanisms. These two methodologies complement one another, but are rarely used together. We partnered with regional organizations in Minnesota to design a future visioning process that incorporated both scenarios and participatory system dynamics modeling. The three purposes of this exercise were: first, to assist regional leaders in making strategic decisions that would make their communities sustainable; second, to identify research gaps that could impede the ability of regional and state groups to plan for the future; and finally, to introduce more systems thinking into planning and policy-making around environmental issues. We found that scenarios and modeling complemented one another, and that both techniques allowed regional groups to focus on the sustainability of fundamental support systems (energy, food, and water supply). The process introduced some creative tensions between imaginative scenario visioning and quantitative system dynamics modeling, and between creating desired futures (a strong cultural norm) and inhabiting the future (a premise of the Minnesota 2050 exercise). We suggest that these tensions can stimulate more agile, strategic thinking about the future.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2010License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/8/2686/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access Routesgold 50 citations 50 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2010License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/8/2686/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2017Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Vidushini Siva; Thomas Hoppe; Mansi Jain;doi: 10.3390/su9060919
The building sector in Singapore consumes up to half of the nation’s total energy. The government has therefore been urging the transformation of the industry by targeting 80% of all buildings to be green-certified by 2030. Thus far, Singapore has done relatively well, and is widely viewed as frontrunner in this respect. This paper addresses the question: what are the benefits and limitations of Singapore’s sectoral innovation system in spurring an energy transition in the building sector, in particular by up-scaling the use of green building technology? The Sectoral Innovation Systems (SIS) theoretical framework was used to analyze the Singapore case. Four SIS components were assessed: technological regime, market demand, actor interactions and networks, and institutional framework. The benefits of Singapore’s sectoral innovation system identified in the analysis basically concern aspects of all of the four elements of SIS. Particular success factors concerned the launching of an integrated strategy to support green building innovations (i.e., the Green Mark policy scheme), implementing support policies, and setting up test beds. Furthermore, a masterplan to engage and educate end-users was implemented, knowledge exchange platforms were set up, regulations on the use of efficient equipment in buildings were issued, and standards and a certification system were adopted. The results also shed light on key barriers, namely, the reluctance of building users to change their habits, ineffective stakeholder collaboration, and green buildings innovation support coming from the government only. Measures in place have been moderately effective.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/919/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteDelft University of Technology: Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access Routesgold 33 citations 33 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 18visibility views 18 download downloads 20 Powered by
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/919/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteDelft University of Technology: Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2018Publisher:MDPI AG van den Heiligenberg, Harm; Heimeriks, Gaston; Hekkert, Marko; Raven, Rob; Sol, Jifke;doi: 10.3390/su10051624
The sustainability challenge requires experimentation with innovations, followed by an upscaling process towards a broader regime change in the long term. In Europe we observe various regional hotspots for sustainability experimentation which suggests that there are favorable spatial contexts. Little is known about why different kinds of experiments flourish or fail in various spatial contexts. In this paper we explore these contexts by using the habitat concept. A habitat is regarded as the configuration of favorable local and regional context factors for experimentation. To capture the diversity of these habitats we have constructed archetypical experimentation patterns. These patterns are built up of five dimensions: knowledge, governance, informal institutions, regional innovation advantages, and social learning. In a comparative case study in four city regions in Europe we find a large contrast in habitats. Countercultures play an important role, as they shape a beneficial context for experimentation through alternative ideas and lifestyles. We also find indications that it is important that a combination of several habitat factors is present, and that these factors have aligned and evolved over several years of experimentation, thus leading to a more mature habitat. The research suggests that regional stakeholders can positively influence most of the habitat factors shaping future upscaling. However, there are also some important factors, such as regional knowledge and skills, which have a path-dependent nature and are more difficult to improve in the short term.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1624/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteResearch@WURArticle . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: https://edepot.wur.nl/453066Data sources: Research@WURadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 8 citations 8 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1624/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteResearch@WURArticle . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: https://edepot.wur.nl/453066Data sources: Research@WURadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2016Publisher:MDPI AG JinHyo Yun; Dooseok Lee; Heungju Ahn; Kyungbae Park; Tan Yigitcanlar;doi: 10.3390/su8080797
handle: 20.500.11750/5087
What do we need for sustainable artificial intelligence that is not harmful but beneficial human life? This paper builds up the interaction model between direct and autonomous learning from the human’s cognitive learning process and firms’ open innovation process. It conceptually establishes a direct and autonomous learning interaction model. The key factor of this model is that the process to respond to entries from external environments through interactions between autonomous learning and direct learning as well as to rearrange internal knowledge is incessant. When autonomous learning happens, the units of knowledge determinations that arise from indirect learning are separated. They induce not only broad autonomous learning made through the horizontal combinations that surpass the combinations that occurred in direct learning but also in-depth autonomous learning made through vertical combinations that appear so that new knowledge is added. The core of the interaction model between direct and autonomous learning is the variability of the boundary between proven knowledge and hypothetical knowledge, limitations in knowledge accumulation, as well as complementarity and conflict between direct and autonomous learning. Therefore, these should be considered when introducing the interaction model between direct and autonomous learning into navigations, cleaning robots, search engines, etc. In addition, we should consider the relationship between direct learning and autonomous learning when building up open innovation strategies and policies.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2016License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/8/797/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteQueensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)DGIST Scholar (Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology)Article . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 54 citations 54 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2016License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/8/797/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteQueensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)DGIST Scholar (Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology)Article . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2022Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Vural Gursel, Iris; Elbersen, Berien; Meesters, Koen P.H.; van Leeuwen, Myrna;doi: 10.3390/su141912780
To support progress towards the transition to a circular economy, the ability to measure circularity is essential. The consideration of the role biobased products can play in this transition is however still largely lacking in the current development of circularity monitoring approaches. The first step in coming to a suitable monitoring framework for biobased products is to define circular economy principles. In this paper, specific characteristics of biobased products were considered in defining six circular economy principles for biobased products: (1). Reduce reliance on fossil resources, (2). Use resources efficiently, (3). Valorize waste and residues, (4). Regenerate, (5). Recirculate and (6). Extend the high-quality use of biomass. In order to evaluate the circularity performance of biobased products with respect to these principles, what needs to be measured was defined considering both intrinsic circularity and impact of this circularity. The intrinsic indicators provide a measure of success in implementation of these circularity principles, and the latter impacts of circularity, i.e., impact of closing the loops on accumulation of hazardous substances and impact of circularity on sustainability (environmental, economic and social). Yet, to unlock the potential of a sustainable circular bioeconomy, strong accompanying measures are required.
Research@WUR arrow_drop_down Research@WURArticle . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://edepot.wur.nl/579769Data sources: Research@WURadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 32 citations 32 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Research@WUR arrow_drop_down Research@WURArticle . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://edepot.wur.nl/579769Data sources: Research@WURadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2018Publisher:MDPI AG Craig Hutton; Robert Nicholls; Attila Lázár; Alex Chapman; Marije Schaafsma; Mashfiqus Salehin;The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are offered as a comprehensive strategy to guide and encourage sustainable development at multiple scales both nationally and internationally. Furthermore, through the development of indicators associated with each goal and sub-goal, the SDGs support the notion of monitoring, evaluation and adaptive management, underpinned by the aspirations of social justice, equity and transparency. As such, the ethical intention of the SDGs is well founded. However, possible conflicts and trade-offs between individual SDGs have received little attention. For example, SDGs relating to poverty (SDG 1), inequality (SDG 10), food security (SDG2), economic development (SDG 8) and life in water and on land (SDGs 14 and 15), are potentially competing in many circumstances. In a social–ecological context, policy support and formulation are increasingly adopting systems approaches, which analyse the complex interactions of system elements. Adopting such an approach in this work, the above SDGs are analysed for coastal Bangladesh. This demonstrates multiple potential trade-offs between the SDGs, including agricultural farming approaches in the light of poverty reduction, and between economic growth and environmental integrity as well as equity. To develop coherent and policy relevant socio-ecological strategies, appropriate decision frameworks need to be co-developed across the range of stakeholders and decision-makers. Integrated models have great potential to support such a process.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1108/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteUniversity of Southampton: e-Prints SotonArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)SustainabilityArticle . 2018University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 55 citations 55 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1108/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteUniversity of Southampton: e-Prints SotonArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)SustainabilityArticle . 2018University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2022Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Gabriel Andres Rojas Cardenas; Rahmat Khezri; Amin Mahmoudi; Solmaz Kahourzadeh;doi: 10.3390/su14052892
handle: 11541.2/30796
This paper proposes a multi-size Split-diesel generator (Split-DG) model with three different sizes of DGs and more switching configurations compared to the existing split-DG models. The proposed multi-size Split-DG system is examined for optimal sizing of remote microgrids with and without renewable-battery system. As a novel concept, multi-size Split-DG is used to reduce contamination, cost, and dumped power by using multiple small DGs to replace the single-size large DG. As another contribution of this study, a practical model is developed by considering the capacity degradation of components, spinning reserve, as well as DG’s and fuel tank’s constraints. The optimization problem is solved using a variable weighting particle swarm optimization (VW-PSO) algorithm. The effectiveness of the proposed Split-DG systems, optimized by the developed VW-PSO, is verified by comparing the results with conventional single-size DG system and the system optimized by conventional PSO. While the formulated optimization problem is general and can be used for any remote microgrids, an aboriginal community in South Australia is examined in this study. For this purpose, realistic data of load and weather, as well as technical and economic data of components, are used. It is found that the Split-DG-PV-WT-BES system has the lowest electricity cost compared to the systems without BES, or without PV and WT.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2892/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteUniSA Research Outputs RepositoryArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedData sources: UniSA Research Outputs Repositoryadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access Routesgold 9 citations 9 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2892/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteUniSA Research Outputs RepositoryArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedData sources: UniSA Research Outputs Repositoryadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2019Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Menuka Jayaratne; Gillian Sullivan Mort; Clare D’Souza;doi: 10.3390/su11247076
Sustainability is a multidimensional concept that goes beyond environmental protection to economic development and social equity. This change drives entrepreneurs introducing new sustainability-derived products and services to help sustain nature and communities. Entrepreneurship is increasingly being cited as a significant conduit for bringing about a transformation to sustainable products and processes. This research uses the term sustainability entrepreneurs for those who introduce innovative sustainability-derived products, processes, and services for gain, where gain includes economic and non-economic gains to individuals, the economy, and society. The research design was a qualitative exploratory study. The study focuses on a sample of sustainability entrepreneurs as the target respondents who take a commitment to sustainability via sustainability entrepreneurship. Interviews were based around open-ended questions prompting the respondents to engage in a storytelling approach to describe their journey from consumer concern to sustainability entrepreneurship. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. A set of themes emerged after analysis, reflecting experience as sustainability entrepreneurs. The themes were: Concern as a consumer for sustainability living; Entrepreneurship is not just for money or identity fulfilment but also for altruism; Values underpinning sustainability entrepreneurship: Fairness, responsibility, altruism, and integrity; and Collaboration not competition. This research contributes to an understanding of sustainability entrepreneurs as those who emerge from consumer concern to introduce innovative sustainability derived products, processes, and services for gain, where gain includes economic and non-economic gain to individuals, the economy, and society.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2019License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7076/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access Routesgold 22 citations 22 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2019License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7076/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2023Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Manuel Corrales-Gonzalez; George Lavidas; Giovanni Besio;doi: 10.3390/su15119113
handle: 11567/1143735
Clean energies are being incorporated into the energy mix in numerous countries. Through a spatial survey of maritime trade, restricted military maritime areas, marine planning, and the presence of fauna and flora along the Ligurian Sea, locations for possible investments in wave energy harvesting were identified in the Northern Thyrrenian Sea, along the Ligurian coast. Previous studies in this region have demonstrated, at a lower spatial resolution, the wave energy potential that can be captured and its variation over time. However, the optimization of wave energy exploitation under the criteria of the functionality and safety of converter devices has not yet been evaluated in the Ligurian Sea. The purpose of this study is to identify the optimal wave energy converter from an economic and technical perspective at several selected locations in the Ligurian Sea. This study involves the scaling of the employed power matrices to obtain the optimized capacity factors of wave energy converters.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9113/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteDelft University of Technology: Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2023Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 4 citations 4 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
visibility 7visibility views 7 download downloads 5 Powered by
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9113/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteDelft University of Technology: Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2023Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2021Embargo end date: 06 Jan 2022Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Miriam von Thenen; Aurelija Armoškaitė; Víctor Cordero-Penín; Sara García-Morales; +5 AuthorsMiriam von Thenen; Aurelija Armoškaitė; Víctor Cordero-Penín; Sara García-Morales; Josefine B. Gottschalk; Débora Gutierrez; Malena Ripken; Pascal Thoya; Kerstin S. Schiele;handle: 10553/113222
In early 2021, the Erasmus+ knowledge flows partnership organised a session to discuss the future of marine spatial planning (MSP) at an international conference. We, a group of nine early career researchers, came together after the conference to continue the discussion: which topics should be considered in future MSP, what are the challenges, and which solutions are there to overcome these challenges? This communication shall raise awareness of the topics of climate change, ecological sustainability, blue justice, ecosystem services, and blue governance, which we identified as important for future MSP endeavours. We show the interconnectedness of the topics and argue that transdisciplinary education is required to contribute to a common understanding of MSP, which adopts an ecosystem-based approach, ensures equitable distribution of benefits, and secures ecologically sustainable development within an adaptive governance framework.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2022Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 5 citations 5 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2022Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2010Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Schmitt Olabisi, Laura K.; Kapuscinski, Anne R.; Johnson, Kris A.; Reich, Peter B.; +2 AuthorsSchmitt Olabisi, Laura K.; Kapuscinski, Anne R.; Johnson, Kris A.; Reich, Peter B.; Stenquist, Brian; Draeger, Kathryn J.;doi: 10.3390/su2082686
handle: 11299/175086
Both scenario visioning and participatory system dynamics modeling emphasize the dynamic and uncontrollable nature of complex socio-ecological systems, and the significance of multiple feedback mechanisms. These two methodologies complement one another, but are rarely used together. We partnered with regional organizations in Minnesota to design a future visioning process that incorporated both scenarios and participatory system dynamics modeling. The three purposes of this exercise were: first, to assist regional leaders in making strategic decisions that would make their communities sustainable; second, to identify research gaps that could impede the ability of regional and state groups to plan for the future; and finally, to introduce more systems thinking into planning and policy-making around environmental issues. We found that scenarios and modeling complemented one another, and that both techniques allowed regional groups to focus on the sustainability of fundamental support systems (energy, food, and water supply). The process introduced some creative tensions between imaginative scenario visioning and quantitative system dynamics modeling, and between creating desired futures (a strong cultural norm) and inhabiting the future (a premise of the Minnesota 2050 exercise). We suggest that these tensions can stimulate more agile, strategic thinking about the future.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2010License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/8/2686/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access Routesgold 50 citations 50 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2010License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/8/2686/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2017Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Vidushini Siva; Thomas Hoppe; Mansi Jain;doi: 10.3390/su9060919
The building sector in Singapore consumes up to half of the nation’s total energy. The government has therefore been urging the transformation of the industry by targeting 80% of all buildings to be green-certified by 2030. Thus far, Singapore has done relatively well, and is widely viewed as frontrunner in this respect. This paper addresses the question: what are the benefits and limitations of Singapore’s sectoral innovation system in spurring an energy transition in the building sector, in particular by up-scaling the use of green building technology? The Sectoral Innovation Systems (SIS) theoretical framework was used to analyze the Singapore case. Four SIS components were assessed: technological regime, market demand, actor interactions and networks, and institutional framework. The benefits of Singapore’s sectoral innovation system identified in the analysis basically concern aspects of all of the four elements of SIS. Particular success factors concerned the launching of an integrated strategy to support green building innovations (i.e., the Green Mark policy scheme), implementing support policies, and setting up test beds. Furthermore, a masterplan to engage and educate end-users was implemented, knowledge exchange platforms were set up, regulations on the use of efficient equipment in buildings were issued, and standards and a certification system were adopted. The results also shed light on key barriers, namely, the reluctance of building users to change their habits, ineffective stakeholder collaboration, and green buildings innovation support coming from the government only. Measures in place have been moderately effective.
Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/919/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteDelft University of Technology: Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access Routesgold 33 citations 33 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 18visibility views 18 download downloads 20 Powered by
more_vert Sustainability arrow_drop_down SustainabilityOther literature type . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/919/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteDelft University of Technology: Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
