• Energy Research
• agricultural and veterinary science... close
• 12. Responsible consumption close
• 11. Sustainability close
• FR close
• NL close
• CH close

The ‘4 per mille Soils for Food Security and Climate’ was launched at the COP21 with an aspiration to increase global soil organic matter stocks by 4 per 1000 (or 0.4 %) per year as a compensation for the global emissions of greenhouse gases by anthropogenic sources. This paper surveyed the soil organic carbon (SOC) stock estimates and sequestration potentials from 20 regions in the world (New Zealand, Chile, South Africa, Australia, Tanzania, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria, India, China Taiwan, South Korea, China Mainland, United States of America, France, Canada, Belgium, England & Wales, Ireland, Scotland, and Russia). We asked whether the 4 per mille initiative is feasible for the region. The outcomes highlight region specific efforts and scopes for soil carbon sequestration. Reported soil C sequestration rates globally show that under best management practices, 4 per mille or even higher sequestration rates can be accomplished. High C sequestration rates (up to 10 per mille) can be achieved for soils with low initial SOC stock (topsoil less than 30 t C ha− 1), and at the first twenty years after implementation of best management practices. In addition, areas which have reached equilibrium will not be able to further increase their sequestration. We found that most studies on SOC sequestration only consider topsoil (up to 0.3 m depth), as it is considered to be most affected by management techniques. The 4 per mille number was based on a blanket calculation of the whole global soil profile C stock, however the potential to increase SOC is mostly on managed agricultural lands. If we consider 4 per mille in the top 1m of global agricultural soils, SOC sequestration is between 2-3 Gt C year− 1, which effectively offset 20–35% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. As a strategy for climate change mitigation, soil carbon sequestration buys time over the next ten to twenty years while other effective sequestration and low carbon technologies become viable. The challenge for cropping farmers is to find disruptive technologies that will further improve soil condition and deliver increased soil carbon. Progress in 4 per mille requires collaboration and communication between scientists, farmers, policy makers, and marketeers.

The new GHG calculator named SECTOR (Source-selective and Emission-adjusted GHG CalculaTOR for Cropland) is based on the IPCC Tier 2 approach for rice as well as other crops. The new features of SECTOR facilitate high flexibility in terms of entering newly obtained emission factors, easy data transfer from crop statistics for entering activity data and detailed specifications of GHG scenarios. A new procedure of entering frequency-based data on current water management practices was also developed. Moreover, the tool allows deviating from the 2006 IPCC Guidelines by considering field records with high background levels of N₂O emissions in the overall assessment of GHG emissions. This article assesses different applications of the tool, namely as add-ons to field measurements, for GHG calculation at national/sectorial scale and within measurement, reporting and verification of development projects. SECTOR is downloadable in the form of templates that can be used to develop custom versions with varying levels of disaggregated data entries at different scales. A case study for rice production in one Vietnamese province demonstrates the potential to display GHG results in combination with GIS. SECTOR can easily be adjusted to incorporate new emission factors and calculation procedures expected in forthcoming revisions of the IPCC Guidelines.

Once previous industrial activity has ceased, brownfields are found in urban and suburban environments and managed in different ways ranging from being left untouched to total reconversion. These situations apply to large surface areas often impacted by residual diffuse pollution. Though significant and preventing any sensitive use, residual contamination does not necessarily require treatment. Moreover, conventional treatments show their technical and economic limits in these situations and gentle remediation options such as phytomanagement might appear more relevant to the management of those sites. Thus, these sites face up two major issues: managing moderate contamination levels and providing an alternative use of economic interest. This work proposes to assess a management strategy associating the phytoremediation of organic pollution along with the production of biomass for energy generation production. A 16-week controlled growth experiment was conducted on a soil substrate moderately impacted by multiple pollution (trace elements, mainly Zn and Pb, and hydrocarbons), by associating rhizodegradation with Medicago sativa or biomass production with Robinia pseudoacacia or Alnus incana in monocultures. The effect of a microbial inoculum amendment on the performances of these treatments was also evaluated. Results showed total hydrocarbons (TH), and to a lesser extent polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), concentrations decreased over time, whatever the plant cover. Good biomass production yields were achieved for both tree species in comparison with the control sample, even though R. pseudoacacia seemed to perform better. Furthermore, the quality of the biomass produced was in conformity with the thresholds set by the legislation concerning its use as a renewable energy source.

La combinaison de différents systèmes de culture et de travail du sol avec différents génotypes au cours de plusieurs saisons de culture peut révéler des opportunités d'intensification durable (IS). L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer la performance de six génotypes de maïs en culture intercalaire avec labour de conservation (sans labour) - deux options prometteuses pour le SI. L'expérience a été menée sur trois ans (ou six saisons de culture) à la station de recherche de Kiboko, au Kenya, avec la culture de la sole et le labour des plaques de moulage comme systèmes de production de base. Les résultats ont montré que les génotypes et les systèmes de culture du maïs avaient un effet significatif sur le rendement, mais que l'effet du travail du sol n'était pas significatif. De plus, il n'y avait pas d'effets interactifs significatifs des facteurs testés sur le rendement du maïs. Le génotype de maïs CKH10085 avait le rendement le plus élevé de 7,7 t ha-1 en culture en solitaire, mais il a également enregistré la plus grande pénalité de rendement en raison de la culture intercalaire de 1,1 t ha-1. D'autre part, le génotype CKH10717 a maintenu le même rendement moyen de 7,1 t ha-1 dans les systèmes de travail du sol conventionnels et de conservation. Les génotypes commerciaux CKH10080 et CKH08051 étaient plus stables que les autres génotypes expérimentaux dans les conditions variables de croissance et de gestion. Ces deux génotypes sont de maturité intermédiaire et de tolérance à la sécheresse, deux attributs essentiels à l'amélioration de la production de maïs. Les cultures intercalaires ont réduit les rendements de maïs en raison de la concurrence accrue, par exemple, le rendement global de la culture de la sole était de 7,1 t ha-1 par rapport à 6,4 t ha-1 en cultures intercalaires ; ce qui représente une pénalité de rendement global de 0,7 t ha-1. Les différences de performance des génotypes de maïs ont révélé des possibilités de déploiement de génotypes pour réduire les risques ou maximiser le rendement, en fonction des circonstances biophysiques et de l'objectif de production de l'agriculteur. La combinación de diferentes sistemas de cultivo y labranza con diferentes genotipos a lo largo de varias temporadas de cultivo puede revelar oportunidades para la intensificación sostenible (IS). El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el rendimiento de seis genotipos de maíz en cultivos intercalados con labranza conservadora (sin labranza), dos opciones prometedoras para SI. El experimento se llevó a cabo durante tres años (o seis temporadas de cultivo) en la Estación de Investigación de Kiboko, Kenia, con el cultivo de lenguado y el arado de vertederos como sistemas de producción de referencia. Los resultados mostraron que los genotipos de maíz y los sistemas de cultivo tuvieron un efecto significativo en el rendimiento, pero el efecto de la labranza no fue significativo. Además, no hubo efectos interactivos significativos de los factores probados en el rendimiento del maíz. El genotipo de maíz CKH10085 tuvo el mayor rendimiento de 7,7 t ha-1 en el cultivo de lenguado, pero también registró la mayor penalización de rendimiento debido al cultivo intercalado de 1,1 t ha-1. Por otro lado, el genotipo CKH10717 mantuvo el mismo rendimiento medio de 7,1 t ha-1 tanto en sistemas de labranza convencional como conservadora. Los genotipos comerciales CKH10080 y CKH08051 fueron más estables que los otros genotipos experimentales en las condiciones variables de crecimiento y manejo. Estos dos genotipos son de madurez intermedia y tolerancia a la sequía, dos atributos críticos para mejorar la producción de maíz. Los cultivos intercalados redujeron los rendimientos de maíz debido a una mayor competencia, por ejemplo, el rendimiento general del cultivo de lenguado fue de 7,1 t ha-1 en comparación con 6,4 t ha-1 en cultivos intercalados; lo que representa una penalización de rendimiento general de 0,7 t ha-1. Las diferencias en el rendimiento de los genotipos de maíz revelaron oportunidades para desplegar genotipos para reducir el riesgo o maximizar el rendimiento, dependiendo de las circunstancias biofísicas y el objetivo de producción del agricultor. Combining different cropping and tillage systems with different genotypes across several cropping seasons can reveal opportunities for sustainable intensification (SI). The objective of this study was to assess the performance of six maize genotypes under intercropping with conservation tillage (no-till) - two promising options for SI. The experiment was carried out over three years (or six cropping seasons) at Kiboko Research Station, Kenya with sole cropping and mouldboard ploughing as baseline production systems. Results showed that maize genotypes and cropping systems had a significant effect on yield, but the effect of tillage was not significant. Moreover, there was no significant interactive effects of the tested factors on maize yield. The maize genotype CKH10085 had the highest yield of 7.7 t ha-1 under sole cropping yet it also recorded the largest yield penalty due to intercropping of 1.1 t ha-1. On the other hand, genotype CKH10717 maintained the same average yield of 7.1 t ha-1 in both conventional and conservation tillage systems. The commercial genotype genotype CKH10080 and CKH08051 were more stable than the other experimental genotypes under the variable growing and management conditions. These two genotypes are of intermediate maturity and drought tolerance, two critical attributes to improved maize production. Intercropping reduced maize yields due to increased competition, for example the overall yield of sole cropping was 7.1 t ha-1 compared with 6.4 t ha-1 under intercropping; representing an overall yield penalty of 0.7 t ha-1. The differences in performance of maize genotypes revealed opportunities to deploy genotypes to reduce risk or maximize yield, depending on the biophysical circumstances and the production objective of the farmer. يمكن أن يكشف الجمع بين أنظمة المحاصيل والحراثة المختلفة والأنماط الجينية المختلفة عبر العديد من مواسم المحاصيل عن فرص للتكثيف المستدام (SI). كان الهدف من هذه الدراسة هو تقييم أداء ستة أنماط جينية للذرة تحت الزراعة البينية مع حراثة الحفظ (بدون حراثة) - وهما خياران واعدان لـ SI. تم إجراء التجربة على مدى ثلاث سنوات (أو ستة مواسم زراعة) في محطة أبحاث كيبوكو، كينيا باستخدام الزراعة الوحيدة وحرث ألواح القوالب كنظم إنتاج أساسية. أظهرت النتائج أن الأنماط الجينية للذرة وأنظمة المحاصيل كان لها تأثير كبير على المحصول، لكن تأثير الحراثة لم يكن كبيرًا. علاوة على ذلك، لم تكن هناك آثار تفاعلية كبيرة للعوامل التي تم اختبارها على محصول الذرة. كان للنمط الجيني للذرة CKH10085 أعلى إنتاجية تبلغ 7.7 طن هكتار -1 تحت المحصول الوحيد، ومع ذلك فقد سجل أيضًا أكبر عقوبة على المحصول بسبب المحصول البيني البالغ 1.1 طن هكتار -1. من ناحية أخرى، حافظ النمط الجيني CKH10717 على نفس متوسط العائد البالغ 7.1 طن هكتار -1 في كل من أنظمة الحراثة التقليدية وأنظمة الحفظ. كان النمط الجيني التجاري CKH10080 و CKH08051 أكثر استقرارًا من الأنماط الجينية التجريبية الأخرى في ظل ظروف النمو والإدارة المتغيرة. هذان النمطان الوراثيان لهما نضج متوسط وتحمل للجفاف، وهما سمتان حاسمتان لتحسين إنتاج الذرة. قللت الزراعة البينية من غلة الذرة بسبب زيادة المنافسة، على سبيل المثال، كان العائد الإجمالي للمحصول الوحيد 7.1 طن هكتار -1 مقارنة بـ 6.4 طن هكتار -1 تحت الزراعة البينية ؛ مما يمثل عقوبة إنتاجية إجمالية قدرها 0.7 طن هكتار -1. كشفت الاختلافات في أداء الأنماط الجينية للذرة عن فرص لنشر الأنماط الجينية لتقليل المخاطر أو زيادة الغلة، اعتمادًا على الظروف الفيزيائية الحيوية وهدف الإنتاج للمزارع.

Understanding the impacts of climate on food systems is vital to identifying the most effective food system interventions to support climate-smart agriculture. The study examines how climate change is affecting food systems and what can be done to mitigate its effects. Two methodological approaches were combined in the study. The first was an Asia-wide regional consultation and forum to explore a range of initiatives that transform food systems among stakeholders working in Myanmar. The second method was an in-depth food systems study employing qualitative methods in Htee Pu Village in the Myanmar Central Dry Zone, a research site of IIRR since 2017. Key informant interviews (KII) and focus group discussions (FGD) were conducted to capture insights and data. Food systems consist of components, drivers, actors, and elements that interact with one another and other systems such as social, health, and transportation. The Myanmar food system is complex. Making it sustainable and transformative requires a mix of different approaches implemented at various scales from local to national. It also requires actions that engage various actors in the system from producers to consumers. The study of the local food system of Htee Pu Village indicates that the village has a rural and traditional food system and that climate change is one of its key food system drivers. Climate change negatively impacted farming and agricultural practices and disrupted the input supply of the local food systems. The role of intermediaries such as traders and consolidators is critical in the supply and distribution of food in the Central Dry Zone. Improved and more connected roads are essential for the supply and distribution of food for the village. The informal market outlets serve as the primary food source or sale points for households. Household diets are inadequate in quantity as the population remains highly dependent on their crops for their diets due to relatively low income. Climate adaptation must be embedded in the local level management to mitigate the effect of climate change in food production in the longer term.