• Energy Research
• Embargo close
• 2. Zero hunger close
• CN close
• GB close

Miscanthus (ANDERSSON) is considered a promising perennial industrial crop for providing biomass in a growing bioeconomy. One approach to increasing the biodiversity-enhancing ecosystem services of Miscanthus is the co-cultivation of flower-rich native wild plant species (WPS), for example, the perennial WPS common tansy (Tanacetum vulgare L.) and mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris L.), as well as the biennial WPS wild teasel (Dipsacus fullonum L.) and yellow melilot (Melilotus officinalis L.). This study tested whether these selected WPS would be as suitable for combustion as Miscanthus, in this case the sterile hybrid Miscanthus x giganteus Greef et Deuter, allowing for a mixing of the biomasses. By doing so, no additional value chain (e.g. biogas production) would be necessary to economically exploit the diversification of the agricultural system for bioenergy production. Feedstock samples of Miscanthus and the four above-mentioned WPS from a field trial in southwest Germany were used to investigate the combustion characteristics as well as the higher heating value (HHV). It was found that all WPS exhibited better combustion properties than Miscanthus with respect to ash melting behavior at similar HHVs of 16.3–17.5 MJ kg−1. From an admixture of >30% WPS to the Miscanthus biomass, a significant increase in the ash melting temperature by 20% from 1000 to 1200 °C was shown. Thus, the mixture of WPS and Miscanthus could potentially improve the combustion quality, leading to reduced costs in the incineration plant operation process. However, the reduced costs of incineration should be greater than the loss in productivity due to the lower biomass yields from the WPS. This is highly dependent on the particular site conditions and the establishment success of the WPS and needs to be investigated in long-term studies.

While clonal integration can improve the performance of rhizomatous plants, it remains unclear whether their clonal integration strategy changes under contrasting clipping and saline-alkali homogeneous and heterogeneous environments. Leymus chinensis is a clonal grass native to the Songnen grassland where heavy grazing and patchy saline-alkali stress are serious environmental and ecological problems. We hypothesized that L. chinensis overcomes these stresses through clonal integration, in particular the transfer of nitrogen and carbohydrates.A pot experiment was carried out with 15N isotope soil labeling method to study clonal integration strategy in the connected mother and daughter ramets of L. chinensis. The connected ramet pairs were grown in homogeneous (both connected ramets were treated) and heterogeneous (only daughter ramets were treated) environments with four treatments: control, clipping (60% aboveground biomass removal), saline-alkali (3.45 g of NaCl, NaHCO3, and Na2CO3 per pot), and clipping × saline-alkali.A significant amount (22.5%) of 15N was transferred from mother to daughter ramets under non-stressed conditions. When homogeneously stressing both mother and daughter ramets, N transfer was significantly reduced to 8.5--14.6%, independent of the nature of the stress. When only daughters were stressed (heterogeneous stress), saline-alkali stress led to a division of labor where daughters had enhanced photosynthesis, and mother ramets had increased 15N uptake and growth. Clipping only daughters reduced biomass and 15N uptake of both daughter and mother ramets.Our results demonstrated that clonal integration also occurs in homogeneous favorable environments but is reduced under homogeneous stress. In heterogeneous environments, clonal integration is used to translocate resource after clipping and a division of labor is established to overcome saline-alkali stress. Clonal integration continued even when daughters were severely stressed by the combined treatments. Our findings suggest that these mechanisms are key to the success of L. chinensis in the Songnen grassland.

Worldwide, marginalized and low-income communities will disproportionately suffer climate change impacts while also retaining the least political power to mitigate their consequences. To adapt to environmental shocks, communities must balance intensifying natural resource consumption with the need to ensure the sustainability of ecosystem provisioning services. Thus, scientists have long been providing policy recommendations that seek to balance humanitarian needs with the best outcomes for the conservation of ecosystems and wildlife. However, many conservation and development practitioners from biological backgrounds receive minimal training in either social research methods or participatory project design. Without a clear understanding of the sociocultural factors shaping decision-making, their initiatives may fail to meet their goals, even when communities support proposed initiatives. This paper explores the underlying assumptions of a community's agency, or its ability to develop and enact preferred resilience-enhancing adaptations. We present a context-adaptable toolkit to assess community agency, identify barriers to adaptation, and survey perceptions of behaviour change around natural resource conservation and alternative food acquisition strategies. This tool draws on public health and ecology methods to facilitate conversations between community members, practitioners and scientists. We then provide insights from the toolkit's collaborative development and pilot testing with Vezo fishing communities in southwestern Madagascar.This article is part of the theme issue ‘Climate change adaptation needs a science of culture’.

Abstract The coffee sector generates vast amounts of residues along its value chain. Crop residues, like coffee stems, are burned in the field, used for domestic cooking or coffee drying in processing plants having significant environmental and health implication to rural communities. This research investigated the environmental impacts of replacing current practices with modern bioenergy applications in the Colombian coffee sector. A biomass gasification system to produce decentralised energy from coffee stems was considered, and the environmental impacts of such bioenergy implementation were evaluated. A lifecycle assessment was conducted to quantify the environmental performance of this bioenergy system and compare it to current residues uses and energy needs that feature small-to large-scale coffee farms. The results show that deploying modern bioenergy could result in reductions in 48–86% greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and up to 98% less particulate matter formation when current practices and fossil-based energy are replaced. However, negative impacts should be considered as substituting grid electricity, largely generated from hydro-electricity, could increase GHGs by 68% and fossil fuel consumption by 73%. The results also show the relevance of understanding the environmental performance of bioenergy systems compared to reference scenarios; this allowed to evaluate and identify environmental trade-offs from modern bioenergy implementations. To maximise benefits and minimise the limitations of these systems, it is important to conduct whole-system assessments that inform on the wider environmental impacts of using agri-residues for bioenergy generation in a region- and system-specific context.