• Energy Research
• Open Access close
• Closed Access close
• Open Source close
• Embargo close
• ES close
• FR close

Data type: Experimental measurements, correlations and Van't Hoff plot. Date format: .opj. Origin of the data: Experimental pressure composition isotherm measurements. Data generated by a home-made Sieverts’ type apparatus from CNRS, ICMPE, Thiais, France. Software needed to plot the data: Origin.

Seagrasses have experienced major losses globally mostly attributed to human impacts. Recently they are also associated with marine heat waves. The paucity of information on seagrass mortality thermal thresholds prevents the assessment of the risk of seagrass loss under marine heat waves. We conducted a synthesis of reported empirically- or experimentally-determined seagrass upper thermal limits (Tlimit) and tested the hypothesis that they increase with increasing local annual temperature. We found that Tlimit increases 0.42± 0.07°C per°C increase in in situ annual temperature (R2 = 0.52). By combining modelled seagrass Tlimit across global coastal areas with current and projected thermal regimes derived from an ocean reanalysis and global climate models (GCMs), we assessed the proximity of extant seagrass meadows to their Tlimit and the time required for Tlimit to be met under high (RCP8.5) and moderate (RCP4.5) emission scenarios of greenhouse gases. Seagrass meadows worldwide showed a modal difference of 5°C between present Tmax and seagrass Tlimit. This difference was lower than 3°C at the southern Red Sea, the Arabian Gulf, the Gulf of Mexico, revealing these are the areas most in risk of warming-derived seagrass die-off, and up to 24°C at high latitude regions. Seagrasses could meet their Tlimit regularly in summer within 50-60 years or 100 years under, respectively, RCP8.5 or RCP4.5 scenarios for the areas most at risk, to more than 200 years for the Arctic under both scenarios. This study shows that implementation of the goals under the Paris Agreement would safeguard much of global seagrass from heat-derived mass mortality and identifies regions where actions to remove local anthropogenic stresses would be particularly relevant to meet the Target 10 of the Aichi Targets of the Convention of the Biological Diversity. 6 pages. -- Supplementary Figure 1. Current mean maximum summer temperature (average 𝑇!"# """""" for the period 1980-2005) across potential seagrass distribution. -- Supplementary Figure 2. Difference between current mean maximum summer temperature ( 𝑇!"# """""" ) and the Tlimit as a function of latitude. Negative and positive latitude values for southern and northern hemispheres, respectively. -- Supplementary Figure 3. Uncertainty associated to the time (in years) for mean maximum summer temperature to reach seagrass upper thermal limit (Tlim) at the warming rates projected under the RCP8.5 scenario around potential seagrass sites. -- Supplementary Figure 4. Time (in years) for mean maximum summer temperature to reach the upper thermal limits (Tlim) of temperate and tropical affinity seagrass flora at the warming rates projected under the RCP8.5 scenario around potential seagrass sites in the Mediterranean Sea and Queensland (Australia) coastal areas. -- Supplementary Figure 5. The time (in years) to reach Tlimit at the warming rates predicted under the RCP4.5 scenario around potential seagrass sites. -- Supplementary Figure 6. Time (in years) for mean maximum summer temperature to reach the upper thermal limits (Tlim) of temperate and tropical affinity seagrass flora at the warming rates projected under the RCP4.5 scenario around potential seagrass sites in the Mediterranean Sea and Queensland (Australia) coastal areas. Peer reviewed

Estimate the effects of adaptation to climate change on productivity variables by coffee-growing households.

This dataset contains files produced for and generated from the CCAFS Household Baseline Study carried out in sites in Latin America (Trifinio in Honduras/Guatemala, and Cauca in Colombia) and in South-East Asia (a site in each of Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam) in the latter months of 2014 and the early months of 2015. There are six sites in all (two sites from Trifinio). Before downloading any of the files, particularly the data files, please download and read the CCAFS ReadMe file which is prefixed by the code 0000. To gain access to the GPS coordinates from the restricted files please download and complete the Non-disclosure agreement from the file "0002 Non-Disclosure Agreement 2013-01-20.pdf" and send this to Wiebke Foerch at w.foerch@cgiar.org The study was based on earlier baseline studies carried out in sites in West and East Africa and in South Asia. Data and other files from these earlier studies are available in a separate dataset in this Dataverse archive. (CCAFS Household Baseline Survey 2010-2012). If you are intending to use data from both studies together we suggest you read the file "0001 Questionnaire Differences & Recoding Details 2015-10-29.pdf" which explains differences between the two studies.

Dataset of process simulations results of the natural gas sweetening and flue gas treatment (first and second sheet, respectively as indicated by the sheet name in the .xlsx file). The dataset refers to the publication Bayesian Symbolic Learning to Build Analytical Correlations from Rigorous Process Simulations: Application to CO2 Capture Technologies by V. Negri, Vàzquey D., Sales-Pardo, Marta, Guimerà, R. and Guillén-Gosàlbez, G. The training and testing dataset are used to generate the figures in the main manuscript and supplementary information.

Comprehensive and reliable information on anthropogenic sources of greenhouse gas emissions is required to track progress towards keeping warming well below 2°C as agreed upon in the Paris Agreement. Here we provide a dataset on anthropogenic GHG emissions 1970-2019 with a broad country and sector coverage. We build the dataset from recent releases from the “Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research” (EDGAR) for CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and industry (FFI), CH4 emissions, N2O emissions, and fluorinated gases and use a well-established fast-track method to extend this dataset from 2018 to 2019. We complement this with information on net CO2 emissions from land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) from three available bookkeeping models.

Methodology: To carry out the calculation of these agroclimatic indicators, daily data of the following climatic variables were used at a resolution of 5 km: Maximum and minimum temperatures (source: CHIRTS). The indicators were calculated for each month during a period of 33 years (1983 - 2016). With the above, the indicators were calculated per month during 1983 -2016 and finally, in order to summarize the calculated indicators, an aggregation of data was carried out, calculating the average in the following time periods: 1983 - 2016, 1990 - 2016, 1995 - 2016, 2000 – 2016, 2005 – 2016, 2010 – 2016. The purpose for which these crop-specific indicators were created is to group or characterize the different accessions available in the Genesys database, considering the climatic data from where they were collected. For this, it is necessary to carry out a characterization of zones based on these specific ones per crop, which are part of evaluating when crops are exposed to heat stress.

Project: Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) datasets - These data have been generated as part of the internationally-coordinated Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6; see also GMD Special Issue: http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/special_issue590.html). The simulation data provides a basis for climate research designed to answer fundamental science questions and serves as resource for authors of the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC-AR6). CMIP6 is a project coordinated by the Working Group on Coupled Modelling (WGCM) as part of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP). Phase 6 builds on previous phases executed under the leadership of the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) and relies on the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) and the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (CEDA) along with numerous related activities for implementation. The original data is hosted and partially replicated on a federated collection of data nodes, and most of the data relied on by the IPCC is being archived for long-term preservation at the IPCC Data Distribution Centre (IPCC DDC) hosted by the German Climate Computing Center (DKRZ). The project includes simulations from about 120 global climate models and around 45 institutions and organizations worldwide. Summary: These data include the subset used by IPCC AR6 WGI authors of the datasets originally published in ESGF for 'CMIP6.HighResMIP.CNRM-CERFACS.CNRM-CM6-1-HR' with the full Data Reference Syntax following the template 'mip_era.activity_id.institution_id.source_id.experiment_id.member_id.table_id.variable_id.grid_label.version'. The CNRM-CM6-1-HR climate model, released in 2017, includes the following components: aerosol: prescribed monthly fields computed by TACTIC_v2 scheme, atmos: Arpege 6.3 (T359; Gaussian Reduced with 181724 grid points in total distributed over 360 latitude circles (with 720 grid points per latitude circle between 32.2degN and 32.2degS reducing to 18 grid points per latitude circle at 89.6degN and 89.6degS); 91 levels; top level 78.4 km), atmosChem: OZL_v2, land: Surfex 8.0c, ocean: Nemo 3.6 (eORCA025, tripolar primarily 1/4deg; 1442 x 1050 longitude/latitude; 75 levels; top grid cell 0-1 m), seaIce: Gelato 6.1. The model was run by the CNRM (Centre National de Recherches Meteorologiques, Toulouse 31057, France), CERFACS (Centre Europeen de Recherche et de Formation Avancee en Calcul Scientifique, Toulouse 31057, France) (CNRM-CERFACS) in native nominal resolutions: aerosol: 100 km, atmos: 100 km, atmosChem: 100 km, land: 100 km, ocean: 25 km, seaIce: 25 km.