• Energy Research
• FR close
• German close

This dataset and codebook correspond to the initial round of survey data gathered in Germany in 2022, within the project FULFILL - Fundamental Decarbonisation Through Sufficiency By Lifestyle Changes. As part of Work Package 3 (WP3) in the FULFILL project, we collected quantitative data from six countries: Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, and India. In the first round of the survey, we recruited a representative sample of approximately 2000 households in each country, taking into account both the individual and household perspectives. The survey includes a quantitative assessment of the carbon footprint in various domains of life, such as housing, mobility, and diet. In addition to this, the survey also measures socio-economic factors such as age, gender, income, education, household size, life stage, and political orientation. Furthermore, the survey includes measures of quality of life, encompassing aspects such as health and well-being, environmental quality, financial security, and comfort.

The aim of this study is to determine the forms, effects and limits of fact-checking about climate change. This emerging textual genre consists in the rectification of fake news by opposing two representations: one considered as potentially false or misleading, the other as factual and therefore irrefutable. After recalling the challenges in terms of communication and language that the fight against climate change has to face, the study analyses a corpus taken from Austrian fact-checking website mimikama.at. In an empirical-inductive approach, the analysis brings to light the generic characteristics at the macro- and microtextual levels in order to discuss the impact and the limits of fact-checking in climate communication. ; L’objectif de cette contribution est de déterminer les formes, les effets et les limites du fact-checking sur le changement climatique. Ce genre textuel émergent met en scène la rectification de fake news en opposant deux représentations : l’une considérée comme potentiellement fausse, voire trompeuse, l’autre comme factuelle et donc irréfutable. Après avoir rappelé les enjeux en termes de communication et de langage que revêt la lutte contre le changement climatique, la contribution propose l’analyse d’un corpus extrait du site autrichien de fact-checking mimikama.at. Dans une démarche empirico-inductive, l’analyse met au jour les caractéristiques génériques à l’échelle macro- et microtextuelle afin de pouvoir ensuite considérer l’impact et les limites du fact-checking dans la communication climatique.

La qualité fait partie de ces termes d’autant plus difficiles à appréhender que leur signification paraît évidente. En approfondissant les différentes acceptions de cette notion, il s’avère à la fois possible de rendre compte de sa désaffection par les sciences tout en comprenant, à l’inverse, l’intérêt qu’elle présente pour l’entreprise et le management. Cela permet aussi de mieux comprendre en quoi certaines approches officielles du développement durable s’avèrent décevantes. Entendue comme les caractéristiques ou les attributs d’un être ou d’une chose auxquels un acteur donné accorde de l’importance, la qualité apparaît comme un opérateur précieux pour favoriser l’expression et la reconnaissance de différents systèmes de lecture et d’appréciation. Elle ouvre la voie d’une meilleure communication entre acteurs sur des questions complexes, ainsi que l’illustre le cas du plateau de Saclay où l’auteur est intervenu durant dix-huit mois dans le cadre d’une démarche de facilitation stratégique. Situé dans le sud-ouest parisien, ce territoire concentre les enjeux. Il a donné lieu à de nombreux rapports officiels, sans qu’ait été explicité le référentiel des grandes qualités le concernant ; en conséquence, les responsables de ce territoire ont les plus grandes difficultés à donner un contenu concret à la notion de développement durable. Quality as a means to rethink the sustainable development of a territory. Quality is all the more difficult to define as its meaning seems obvious. It’s worth considering the different senses of the word and trying to explain how quality can, at the same time, be forgotten by sciences, while being so much used in the field of management. Hence, a more precise meaning can be given. This allows explaining why official approaches of sustainability have reached deadlock. In fact, quality appears to be a precious operator, that reveals which characteristics of beings or things are really important for actors. It opens the way for a better communication between actors on complex issues, as shown by the example of the plateau of Saclay. Located in the urban area of Paris, this territory concentrates a great number of aspects, ranging from a huge research potential to a high role in terms of biodiversity. Though numerous surveys and maps were developed for this area, no referential of important qualities about this territory exists. Consequently, actors meet the greatest difficulties in finding a way to deal concretely with the objective of sustainability. Key words: quality; sustainability; plateau of Saclay; limited relativity; referential of quality.

Das Working Paper beleuchtet den Themenbereich ‚Energie‘ und arbeitet Herausforderungen für die Raumentwicklung der Großregion ab. Es diskutiert den Begriff der Energiewende und legt einen Fokus auf Energiesysteme und –träger, insbesondere den Ausbau der Windkraft und Energiegewinnung aus Biomasse im Zusammenhang mit der Entwicklung fossil-atomarer Energiequellen in Deutschland und Frankreich.

This dataset and codebook correspond to the second round of survey data gathered in Germany in 2023, within the project FULFILL - Fundamental Decarbonisation Through Sufficiency By Lifestyle Changes. As part of Work Package 3 (WP3) in the FULFILL project, we collected quantitative data from six countries: Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, and India. The first round of the survey, consisted of recruiting a representative sample of approximately 2000 households in each country. In this second survey round, we recruit around 500 respondents from the initial survey round, ensuring representativity is maintained. This survey is very similar to the survey in the first round and includes a lot of identical items, including a quantitative assessment of the carbon footprint in the housing, mobility, and diet sectors, socio-economic factors such as age, gender, income, education, household size, life stage, and political orientation. Furthermore, the survey includes measures of quality of life, encompassing aspects such as health and well-being, environmental quality, financial security, and comfort. New for this second round, we have incorporated questions regarding the measures respondents adopted in response to the 2022 energy crisis.