• Energy Research
• IT close

Abstract The energy retrofitting of existing buildings reduces the energy use in the operation phase but the use of additional materials influence the energy use in other life cycle phases of retrofitted buildings. In this study, we analyse the life cycle primary energy implications of different material alternatives when retrofitting an existing building to meet high energy performance levels. We design retrofitting options assuming the highest and lowest value of final energy use, respectively, for passive house standards applicable in Sweden. The retrofitting options include the thermal improvement of the building envelope. We calculate the primary energy use in the operation phase (operation primary energy), as well as in production, maintenance and end-of-life phases (non-operation primary energy). Our results show that the non-operation primary energy use can vary significantly depending on the choice of materials for thermal insulation, cladding systems and windows. Although the operation energy use decreases by 63–78%, we find that the non-operation energy for building retrofitting accounts for up to 21% of the operation energy saving, depending on the passive house performance level and the material alternative. A careful selection of building materials can reduce the non-operation primary energy by up to 40%, especially when using wood-based materials.

The existing building stock is estimated to need major renovations in the near future. At the same time, the EU energy-efficiency strategy entails upgrading the energy performance of renovated buildings to meet the nearly-zero energy standard. To upgrade existing buildings, two main groups of measures can be adopted: thermally-improved building envelope and energy-efficient technical devices. The first measure usually involves additional building materials for thermal insulation and new building cladding, as well as new windows and doors. A number of commercially-available materials can be used to renovate thermal building envelopes. This study compares the life-cycle primary energy use and CO2 emission when renovating an existing building using different materials, commonly used in renovated buildings. A Swedish building constructed in 1972 is used as a case-study building. The building's envelope is assumed to be renovated to meet the Swedish passive house standard. The entire life cycle of the building envelope renovation is taken into account. The results show that the selection of building materials can significantly reduce the production primary energy and associated CO2 emissions by up to 62% and 77%, respectively. The results suggest that a careful material choice can significantly contribute to reduce primary energy use and CO2 emissions associated with energy renovation of buildings, especially when renewable-based materials are used.