• Energy Research
• DE close
• AT close
• PL close
• English close

The data contains three supporting datasets: 1. Mid-intertidal data 2. Vertical transect data 3. GPS coordinates for all sites

This climate change impact data (future scenarios on temperature-induced GDP losses) and climate change mitigation cost data (REMIND model scenarios) is published under doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3541809 and used in this paper: Ueckerdt F, Frieler K, Lange S, Wenz L, Luderer G, Levermann A (2018) The economically optimal warming limit of the planet. Earth System Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-741-2019 Below the individual file contents are explained. For further questions feel free to write to Falko Ueckerdt (ueckerdt@pik-potsdam.de). Climate change impact data File 1: Data_rel-GDPpercapita-changes_withCC_per-country_all-RCP_all-SSP_4GCM.csv Content: Data of relative change in absolute GDP/CAP levels (compared to the baseline path of the respective SSP in the SSP database) for each country, RCP (and a zero-emissions scenario), SSP and 4 GCMs (spanning a broad range of climate sensitivity). Negative (positive) values indicate losses (gains) due to climate change. For figure 1a of the paper, this data was aggregated for all countries. File 2: Data_rel-GDPpercapita-changes_withCC_per-country_all-SSP_4GCM_interpolated-for-REMIND-scenarios.csv Content: Data of relative change in absolute GDP/CAP levels (compared to the baseline path of the respective SSP in the SSP database) for each country, SSP and 4 GCMs (spanning a broad range of climate sensitivity). The RCP (and a zero-emissions scenario) are interpolated to the temperature pathways of the ten REMIND model scenarios used for climate change mitigation costs. Hereby the set of scenarios for climate impacts and climate change mitigation are consistent and can be combined to total costs of climate change (for a broad range of mitigation action). File 3: Data_rel-GDPpercapita-changes_withCC_per-country_SSP2_12GCM_interpolated-for-REMIND-scenarios.csv Content: Same as file 2, but only for the SSP2 (chosen default scenario for the study) and for all 12 GCMs. Data of relative change in absolute GDP/CAP levels (compared to the baseline path of the respective SSP in the SSP database) for each country, SSP-2 and 12 GCMs (spanning a broad range of climate sensitivity). The RCP (and a zero-emissions scenario) are interpolated to the temperature pathways of the ten REMIND model scenarios used for climate change mitigation costs. Hereby the set of scenarios for climate impacts and climate change mitigation are consistent and can be combined to total costs of climate change (for a broad range of mitigation action). In addition, reference GDP and population data (without climate change) for each country until 2100 was downloaded from the SSP database, release Version 1.0 (March 2013, https://tntcat.iiasa.ac.at/SspDb/, last accessed 15Nov 2019). Climate change mitigation cost data The scenario design and runs used in this paper have first been conducted in [1] and later also used in [2]. File 4: REMIND_scenario_results_economic_data.csv File 5: REMIND_scenarios_climate_data.csv Content: A broad range of climate change mitigation scenarios of the REMIND model. File 4 contains the economic data of e.g. GDP and macro-economic consumption for each of the countries and world regions, as well as GHG emissions from various economic sectors. File 5 contains the global climate-related data, e.g. forcing, concentration, temperature. In the scenario description “FFrunxxx” (column 2), the code “xxx” specifies the scenario as follows. See [1] for a detailed discussion of the scenarios. The first dimension specifies the climate policy regime (delayed action, baseline scenarios): 1xx: climate action from 2010 5xx: climate action from 2015 2xx climate action from 2020 (used in this study) 3xx climate action from 2030 4x1 weak policy baseline (before Paris agreement) The second dimension specifies the technology portfolio and assumptions: x1x Full technology portfolio (used in this study) x2x noCCS: unavailability of CCS x3x lowEI: lower energy intensity, with final energy demand per economic output decreasing faster than historically observed x4x NucPO: phase out of investments into nuclear energy x5x Limited SW: penetration of solar and wind power limited x6x Limited Bio: reduced bioenergy potential p.a. (100 EJ compared to 300 EJ in all other cases) x6x noBECCS: unavailability of CCS in combination with bioenergy The third dimension specifies the climate change mitigation ambition level, i.e. the height of a global CO2 tax in 2020 (which increases with 5% p.a.). xx1 0$/tCO2 (baseline) xx2 10$/tCO2 xx3 30$/tCO2 xx4 50$/tCO2 xx5 100$/tCO2 xx6 200$/tCO2 xx7 500$/tCO2 xx8 40$/tCO2 xx9 20$/tCO2 xx0 5$/tCO2 For figure 1b of the paper, this data was aggregated for all countries and regions. Relative changes of GDP are calculated relative to the baseline (4x1 with zero carbon price). [1] Luderer, G., Pietzcker, R. C., Bertram, C., Kriegler, E., Meinshausen, M. and Edenhofer, O.: Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets, Environmental Research Letters, 8(3), 034033, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033, 2013a. [2] Rogelj, J., Luderer, G., Pietzcker, R. C., Kriegler, E., Schaeffer, M., Krey, V. and Riahi, K.: Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C, Nature Climate Change, 5(6), 519–527, doi:10.1038/nclimate2572, 2015.

The data consists of annual measurements of standing aboveground plant biomass, annual aboveground net primary productivity and annual soil respiration between 1998 and 2012. Data were collected from seven European shrublands that were subject to the climate manipulations drought and warming. Sites were located in the United Kingdom (UK), the Netherlands (NL), Denmark ( two sites, DK-B and DK-M), Hungary (HU), Spain (SP) and Italy (IT). All field sites consisted of untreated control plots, plots where the plant canopy air is artificially warmed during night time hours, and plots where rainfall is excluded from the plots at least during the plants growing season. Standing aboveground plant biomass (grams biomass per square metre) was measured in two undisturbed areas within the plots using the pin-point method (UK, DK-M, DK-B), or along a transect (IT, SP, HU, NL). Aboveground net primary productivity was calculated from measurements of standing aboveground plant biomass estimates and litterfall measurements. Soil respiration was measured in pre-installed opaque soil collars bi-weekly, monthly, or in measurement campaigns (SP only). The datasets provided are the basis for the data analysis presented in Reinsch et al. (2017) Shrubland primary production and soil respiration diverge along European climate gradient. Scientific Reports 7:43952 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43952 Standing biomass was measured using the non-destructive pin-point method to assess aboveground biomass. Measurements were conducted at the state of peak biomass specific for each site. Litterfall was measured annually using litterfall traps. Litter collected in the traps was dried and the weight was measured. Aboveground biomass productivity was estimated as the difference between the measured standing biomass in year x minus the standing biomass measured the previous year. Soil respiration was measured bi-weekly or monthly, or in campaigns (Spain only). It was measured on permanently installed soil collars in treatment plots. The Gaussen Index of Aridity (an index that combines information on rainfall and temperature) was calculated using mean annual precipitation, mean annual temperature. The reduction in precipitation and increase in temperature for each site was used to calculate the Gaussen Index for the climate treatments for each site. Data of standing biomass and soil respiration was provided by the site responsible. Data from all sites were collated into one data file for data analysis. A summary data set was combined with information on the Gaussen Index of Aridity Data were then exported from these Excel spreadsheet to .csv files for ingestion into the EIDC.

Overview The following dataset presents the energy cycle characteristics for 5G/6G mobile systems supported by Renewable Energy Sources (RES) and/or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RISs). In addition, within the dataset, the energy gain related to the engagement of RES within the Radio Access Network (RAN) has also been distinguished. Scenario The considered network scenario includes 8 three- (_results_gcas.csv) or one-cell (_results_scas.csv & _results_kras.csv) base stations (BSs) placed within the Poznan city (surroundings of the old market) and supported by Renewable Energy Sources — photovoltaic panels (PVs) and/or wind turbines (WTs). The aforementioned base stations can be treated as stationary towers or mobile access points (e.g., drones/UAVs). Those latter have been additionally equipped with RIS devices, which are able to reflect and manipulate a radio signal to influence occurrences such as interferences, coverage, or human exposure. However, the use of RISs has been taken into account only to evaluate the impact of the engagement of such devices on the energy side of the mobile system, omitting the changes in radio characteristics. The network traffic has been assumed to be fixed (64 mobile users (UEs) with 100 Mbps downlink — DL, and 25 Mbps uplink — UL, per each), however, its density in specific parts of the city is modeled randomly for each simulation run. The simulation runs have been performed for 4 dates (vernal equinox, summer solstice, autumn equinox, winter solstice), each one from a different season of the year. The aim of such an approach was to highlight the impact of the time of the day and the year on the energy gain obtained thanks to enabling RES generators. The weather conditions assumed within the simulation are typical for the climate in Poland. Methodology The energy-cycle calculations (system's power consumption, renewable energy production, and excessive energy storage) have been based on the mathematical formulas from the scientific literature and performed within the digital simulation runs by using the Green Radio Access Network Design (GRAND) tool (developed by teams from the Ghent University & Poznan University of Technology). The UE-BS association process within the mobile system has been done by doing multi-objective optimization using the Gurobi software, which has taken into account parameters like path loss, predicted power consumption of BSs, and guaranteed DL & UL bit rates for UEs. Simulation setup The setup of the input parameters for used mathematical models (power consumption, energy generation, energy storage) has been done in accordance with the values attached within the delivered literature positions (cited within the publications included in the Related works section of the following dataset) and adjusted to the considered study. Furthermore, the data used to model the network environment (building distribution, coverage area, base stations' locations) as well as to predict weather conditions are the real data (for the year 2022) collected by the city hall of Poznan, one of the Polish mobile operators, and weather stations placed in Poznan, respectively. The number of simulation runs performed has been equal to 10 (each run has included energy-cycle calculations for 4 seasons of the year), with the time step of a single run set to 1 hour of the day. Results The results of the aforementioned investigations have been included in the attached files, which can be described as follows: File _results_gcas.csv The first column denotes the date (season of the year), for which the values have been obtained. The columns from second to fifth present observed values of the State of Charge (SoC) of a battery system (in %) for a single network cell on average in a time step. Those columns are the obtained values for the RAN, in which no RES, only PVs, only WTs, and both types of RES generators have been enabled, respectively. Files _results_scas.csv & _results_kras.csv The first column denotes the date (season of the year), for which the values have been obtained. The second and third columns denote the number of drone base station (DBS) exchanges within the wireless system on average in a particular time step, where no RES and only PVs are enabled, respectively. The fourth and fifth columns present the conventional (fossil-fuels-based) energy consumption (in kWh) for the whole system in a specific time step, in which no RES and only PVs are engaged for all the access nodes. The sixth column is the energy savings (in kWh) related to the use of RES generators within the mobile network. Furthermore, the seventh and eighth columns represent the amount of renewable energy harvested from the solar radiation in total and the peak value of this amount observed during the entire day, respectively. Acknowledgment More details about the conducted studies have been described within the attached papers (Related works section). The data has been collected within the COST CA10210 INTERACT. M. Deruyck is a Post-Doctoral Fellow of the FWO-V (Research Foundation – Flanders, ref: 12Z5621N). The work (including the following dataset preparation) by A. Samorzewski and A. Kliks was realized within project no. 2021/43/B/ST7/01365 funded by the National Science Center in Poland.

This database includes more than 100 decarbonisation innovations in Paper, Plastic, Steel and Meat & Dairy sectors, across their value chains, as well as in Finance. For each innovation there is a description, information about its contribution to decarbonisation, actors and collaborators involved, sources of funding, drivers, (co)benefits and disadvantages. More information on the method for selecting innovations for the database is available here. The database was created as part of REINVENT – a Horizon 2020 research project funded by the European Commission (grant agreement 730053). REINVENT involves five research institutions from four countries: Lund University (Sweden), Durham University (United Kingdom), Wuppertal Institute (Germany), PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (the Netherlands) and Utrecht University (the Netherlands). More information can be found on our website: www.reinvent-project.eu.

# Data from: Eocene Shark Teeth from Peninsular Antarctica: Windows to Habitat Use and Paleoceanography. [https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.qz612jmq2](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.qz612jmq2) The repository folder includes scripts and spreadsheets for phosphate oxygen stable isotope (δ18Op) analysis measured from shark tooth biogenic apatite collected from the Eocene deposits of the La Meseta and Submeseta formations (West Antarctica, Seymour Island). It also contains Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis, a Bayesian model for temperature estimates, and model output extraction scripts from the iCESM simulation for the Early Eocene (Zhu et al., 2020). Scripts and data are stored in specific folders on the type of analysis. All scripts are in R or Python language. **Usage notes** **1 "iCESM modeling scripts" directory** The folder includes scripts in Jupiter Notebook format for extracting and plotting iCESM seawater outputs for the Eocene. The folder includes two files: 1) “d18Ow Analysis Script.ipynb” - This is a Python script primarily using the XArray library, to import iCESM output from Zhu et al. (2020), calculating δ18Ow, and reorganizing the output into monthly time intervals along 25 m and 115 m depth slices, while also averaging output down to these depths; 2) “NetCDF Plotting.ipynb” - this is a Python script primarily using the XArray, Matplotlib, and Cartopy libraries. The script writes a single callable function that creates Matplotlib contour plots from iCESM history output. Variables include temperature, salinity, ideal age, oxygen isotopes, and neodymium isotopes, and map projections include Plate Carree, Mollweide, and orthographic (centering on the Drake Passage). Options are built to enable scale normalization or to set maximum and minimum values for data and select colormaps from a predefined selection of Matplotlib’s “Spectral”, “Viridis”, “Coolwarm”, “GNUplot2”, “PiYG”, “RdYlBu”, and “RdYlGn”. For further questions on model output scripts, please email Adam Aleksinski at [aaleksin@purdue.edu](https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/aaleksin@purdue.edu). **2 "d18O data and maps" directory** The folder includes δ18Op of shark tooth bioapatite and other datasets to interpret shark paleoecology. These datasets include: · δ18Op of shark tooth bioapatite (“shark FEST d18Op.csv”). Isotope measurements were run at the Stable Isotope Ecosystem Laboratory of (SIELO) University of California, Merced (California, USA). · Reference silver phosphate material δ18Op for analytical accuracy and precision (“TCEA reference materials.csv"). Isotope measurements were run at the Stable Isotope Ecosystem Laboratory of (SIELO) University of California, Merced (California, USA). · Bulk and serially sampled δ18Oc data of co-occurring bivalves (Ivany et al., 2008; Judd et al., 2019) (“Ivany et al. 2008_bulk.csv” and “Judd et al., 2019_serial sampling.csv"). · iCESM model temperature and δ18Ow outputs at 3x and 6x pre-industrial CO2 levels for the Early Eocene (Zhu et al., 2020) (“SpinupX3_25m_Mean_Monthly.nc”, “SpinupX6_25m_Mean_Monthly.nc.”, and “CA_x3CO2.csv”). Simulations are integrated from the surface to 25 m. · δ18O values of invertebrate species published in Longinelli (1965) and Longinelli & Nuti (1973), used to convert bulk δ18Oc (V-SMOW) data of bivalves into δ18Op (V-SMOW) values after δ18Oc (V-PDB) - δ18Oc (V-SMOW) conversion found in Kim et al. (2015) (“d18O carbonate and phosphate references.csv”). · R script for data analysis ("d18O data and maps.Rmd”). The script provides annotation through libraries, instrumental accuracy and precision tests, tables, statistical analysis, figures, and model output extractions. . ("TELM_diversity.csv") displays diversity trends of chondrichthyans across TELMs in one of the main figures of the manuscript. **2.1 Dataset description** **shark FEST d18Op.csv** · *Sample_ID*: Identification number of tooth specimens. · *Other_ID*: Temporary identification number of tooth specimens. · *Taxon*: Species assigned to shark tooth specimens. · *TELM*: Stratigraphic units of La Meseta (TELM 2-5; ~45 to ~37 Ma) and Submeseta formations (TELMs 6 and 7; ~37 to ~34 Ma) (Amenábar et al., 2020; Douglas et al., 2014; Montes et al., 2013). · *d18Op*: Mean δ18Op values of silver phosphate crystals precipitated from shark tooth bioapatite. Specimens were run in triplicates, corrected, and standardized on the V-SMOW scale. · *sd*: Standard deviation of silver phosphate triplicate samples per specimen. · *Protocol*: Silver phosphate protocols used to precipitate crystals from shark tooth bioapatite. We adopted the Rapid UC (“UC_Rapid”) and the SPORA (“SPORA”) protocols after Mine et al. and (2017) Larocca Conte et al. (2024) based on the tooth specimen size and sampling strategy. Descriptions of the methods are included in the main manuscript. · *Environment*: Inferred shark habitat based on taxonomy classified as benthic or pelagic environment. · *Collection*: Institutional abbreviations of museum collections from which shark tooth specimens are housed. NRM-PZ is the abbreviation for the Swedish Natural History Museum (Stockholm, Sweden), PRI is the abbreviation for the Paleontological Research Institute (Ithaca, New York, United States), and UCMP is the University of California Museum of Paleontology (Berkeley, California, United States). **TCEA reference materials.csv** · *Identifier_1*: unique identifier number per sample. · *sample*: reference silver phosphate materials (USGS 80 and USGS 81). · *amount*: weight of samples in mg. · *Area 28*: peak area of mass 28 (12C16O). · *Area 30*: peak area of mass 30 (12C18O). · *d18O_corrected*: corrected δ18Op value of reference materials following drift correction, linearity correction, and 2-point calibration to report values on the V-SMOW scale. **Ivany et al. 2008_bulk.csv** · *Telm*: Stratigraphic units of La Meseta (TELM 2-5; ~45 to ~37 Ma) and Submeseta formations (TELMs 6 and 7; ~37 to ~34 Ma) (Amenábar et al., 2020; Douglas et al., 2014; Montes et al., 2013). · *Locality*: Locality code from which bivalves were collected. · *Genus*: Genera of bivalves. Specimens are assigned to *Cucullaea* and *Eurhomalea* genera. · *Line*: Sampling areas of specimens. The sampling strategy is described in Ivany et al. (2008). · *d13C*: δ13C values of specimens from sampled lines. Values are reported in the V-PDB scale. · *d18Oc_PDB*: δ18Oc values of specimens from sampled lines. Values are reported in the V-PDB scale. **Judd et al., 2019_serial sampling.csv** · *Horizon:* horizons of the TELM 5 unit (La Meseta Formation) from which bivalves were collected. Horizon 1 is stratigraphically the lowest, while horizon 4 is the highest (Judd et al., 2019). · *ID*: Identification number of specimens. · *Latitude*: Geographic coordinate where bivalve specimens were collected. · *Longitude*: Geographic coordinate where bivalve specimens were collected. · *Surface sampled*: Specific sampling area, indicating whether sampling occurred in the interior or exterior portion of shells. · *distance*: The distance from the umbo in mm from which sampling occurred along a single shell. · *d18Oc_PDB*: δ18Oc values of specimens from sampled areas of shells. Values are reported on the V-PDB scale. **SpinupX3_25m_Mean_Monthly.nc** See section 1 ("iCESM modeling scripts" directory, “d18Ow Analysis Script.ipynb” script) for a full description of the iCESM model output extraction. **SpinupX6_25m_Mean_Monthly.nc** See section 1 ("iCESM modeling scripts" directory, “d18Ow Analysis Script.ipynb” script) for a full description of the iCESM model output extraction. **CA_x3CO2.csv** · *lat*: Geographic coordinate where temperature and δ18Ow model values are extracted from the iCESM simulation scaled at 3x preindustrial CO2 levels (values averaged within a seawater column depth of 25 m). · *long*: Geographic coordinate where temperature and δ18Ow model values are extracted from the iCESM simulation scaled at 3x preindustrial CO2 levels (values averaged within a seawater column depth of 25 m). · *T_mean*: Simulated seawater temperature values in °C. · *d18Ow*: Simulated seawater δ18Ow values (V-SMOW). · *d18Op*: Simulated seawater δ18Op values (V-SMOW). Values were calculated by using seawater temperature and δ18Ow arrays following the paleothermometer equation after Lécuyer et al. (2013). **d18O carbonate and phosphate references.csv** · *species*: Species of invertebrate taxa. · *type*: Specimen type, including barnacles, brachiopods, crabs, and mollusks. · *depth*: Depth of seawater column where specimens were collected, reported in meters below sea level when specified. · *d18Op*: δ18Op values of invertebrate specimens (V-SMOW). · *d18Oc_PDB*: δ18Oc values of invertebrate specimens (V-PDB). · *Reference*: Citations from which data were taken to build the dataset (Longinelli, 1965; Longinelli & Nuti, 1973). **TELM diversity.csv** · *genus:* genera of sharks and rays compiled from literature (Engelbrecht et al., 2016a, 2016b, 2017a, 2017b, 2019; Kriwet, 2005; Kriwet et al., 2016; Long, 1992; Marramá et al., 2018). · *species*: species of sharks and rays compiled from literature (Engelbrecht et al., 2016a, 2016b, 2017a, 2017b, 2019; Kriwet, 2005; Kriwet et al., 2016; Long, 1992; Marramá et al., 2018). · *Environment*: Inferred shark habitat based on taxonomy classified as benthic or pelagic environment. · *TELM*: Stratigraphic units of La Meseta (TELM 1-5; ~44 to ~37 Ma) and Submeseta formations (TELMs 6 and 7; ~37 to ~34 Ma) (Amenábar et al., 2020; Douglas et al., 2014; Montes et al., 2013). **3 “FTIR data” directory** The folder includes FTIR acquisitions and data analysis scripts on reference materials and shark tooth bioapatite for quality checks to test diagenesis effects on δ18Op of sharks. The folder includes: · The R project file “apatite_ftir.Rproj”. This project file navigates through scripts for raw data processing and data analysis. The background of the raw data was processed following custom R functions from Trayler et al. (2023; [https://github.com/robintrayler/collagen_demineralization](https://github.com/robintrayler/collagen_demineralization)). · The “.Rproj.user” folder includes project-specific temporary files (e.g. auto-saved source documents, window-state, etc.) stored by the R project file “apatite_ftir.Rproj”. The folder may be hidden depending on directory view options. · The “raw data” directory stores spectra acquisitions as .dpt files. Spectra files are stored in the folders “apatite” and “calcite” based on the material type. Spectra were obtained in the 400 – 4000 cm⁻¹ range using a Bruker Vertex 70 Far-Infrared in ATR located at the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Facility at the University of California Merced (California, USA). · The “processed” directory includes processed spectra stored as .csv files (“apatite_data.csv” and “calcite_data.csv”) following the background correction (Trayler et al., 2023) and processed infrared data from Larocca Conte et al. (2024) (“Larocca Conte et al._SPORA_apatite_data.csv”) from which the NIST SRM 120c spectrum was filtered. Infrared spectra data in “Larocca Conte et al._SPORA_apatite_data.csv” were obtained and corrected following the same methodologies mentioned above. · The “R” directory includes R scripts of customized source functions for background correction (Trayler et al., 2023; inspect the "functions" directory and the R script "0_process_data.R") and data analysis (“data_analysis.R”). The scripts provide annotation through libraries and functions used for data processing and analysis. · Additional datasets. The “data_FTIR_d18O.csv” includes infrared data and δ18Op values of specimens, while the “Grunenwald et al., 2014_CO3.csv” is the dataset after Grunenwald et al. (2014) used to predict carbonate content from the materials featured in this work. **3.1 Dataset description** Spreadsheets included in the “processed” directory The datasets “apatite_data.csv”, “calcite_data.csv”, and “Larocca Conte et al._SPORA_apatite_data.csv” are structured with the following variables: · *wavenumber*: infrared wavenumber in cm-1. · *absorbance*: infrared absorbance value. · *file_name:* .dpt file name from which infrared wavenumber and absorbance values were obtained following the background correction. **data_FTIR_d18O.csv** · *file_name:* .dpt file name from which infrared wavenumber and absorbance values were obtained following the background correction. · *v4PO4_565_wavenumber*: Wavenumber of maximum infrared absorbance around the first νPO4 band, usually at 565 cm-1. · *v4PO4_565*: Peak absorbance value of the first ν4PO4 band (~565 cm-1). · *v4PO4_valley_wavenumber*: Wavenumber of valley between ν4PO4 bands. · *v4PO4_valley*: Absorbance value of the valley between ν4PO4 bands. · *v4PO4_603_wavenumber*: Wavenumber of maximum infrared absorbance around the second ν4PO4 band, usually at 603 cm-1. · *v4PO4_603*: Peak absorbance value of the second ν4PO4 band (~603 cm-1). · *CI*: Crystallinity index calculated after equation provided in (Shemesh, 1990) as (*v4PO4_565* + *v4PO4_603* / *v4PO4_valley*) (i.e., the sum of peak absorbance of νPO4 bands divided by the absorbance value of the valley between peaks). · *material*: Material type of samples (i.e., standard material, enameloid, dentin sampled from the crown or root area of shark teeth, and enameloid mixed with dentin). · *AUC_v3PO4*: Area under the curve of the ν3PO4 and ν1PO4 bands where maximum absorbance is at ~1025 cm-1 and ~960 cm-1, respectively. · *AUC_v3CO3*: Area under the curves of Type-A and Type-B carbonate bands having maximum infrared absorbance at ~1410 (Type-B), ~1456 (Type-B), and ~1545 cm-1 (Type-A). · *v3CO3_v3PO4_ratio*: Ratio between area under the curves of carbonate and phosphate bands (i.e., *AUC_v3CO3* / *AUC_v3PO4*). · *CO3_wt*: Estimated mean carbonate content following the equation in Grunenwald et al. (2014) (i.e. *CO3_wt* = 28.4793 (±1.4803) *v3CO3_v3PO4_ratio* + 0.1808(±0.2710); R2 = 0.985). · *CO3_wt_sd*: Standard deviation of estimated carbonate content calculated by propagating the error around coefficients provided in the Grunenwald et al. (2014) equation (see full equation in *CO3_wt*). · *Taxon*: Species assigned to shark tooth specimens. · *TELM*: Stratigraphic units of La Meseta (TELM 2-5; ~45 to ~37 Ma) and Submeseta formations (TELMs 6 and 7; ~37 to ~34 Ma) (Amenábar et al., 2020; Douglas et al., 2014; Montes et al., 2013). · *d18Op*: Mean δ18Op values of silver phosphate crystals precipitated from shark tooth bioapatite. Specimens were run in triplicates, corrected, and standardized on the V-SMOW scale. · *sd*: Standard deviation of silver phosphate triplicate samples per specimen. · *Collection*: Institutional abbreviations of museum collections where shark tooth specimens are housed. Infrared spectra were obtained from a selected subset of tooth specimens in the care of the Swedish Natural History Museum (NRM-PZ; Stockholm, Sweden). **Grunenwald et al., 2014_CO3.csv** · *sample*: Sample code. · *material*: Material type of samples (i.e., standard material, bone, and enamel). · *v3CO3*: Area under the curves of Type-A and Type-B carbonate bands having maximum infrared absorbance at ~1410 (Type-B), ~1456 (Type-B), and ~1545 cm-1 (Type-A). · *v3PO4*: *AUC_v3PO4*: Area under the curve of the ν3PO4 and ν1PO4 bands where maximum absorbance is at ~1025 cm-1 and ~960 cm-1, respectively. · *v3CO3_v3PO4_ratio*: *v3CO3_v3PO4_ratio*: Ratio between area under the curves of carbonate and phosphate bands (i.e., *v3CO3* /*v3PO4*). · *CO3_wt*: Carbonate content measured via CO2 coulometry. Further details about the analytical measurements are found in Grunenwald et al. (2014). **4 “Bayes_FEST_Temperautre Estimates” directory** The folder includes the Bayesian approach used to estimate posterior seawater temperature, δ18Ow values from δ18Op of sharks bioapatite using a Bayesian approach modified after Griffiths et al. (2023). The original scripts used in Griffiths et al. (2023) are reposited here: [https://github.com/robintrayler/bayesian_phosphate](https://github.com/robintrayler/bayesian_phosphate). The directory includes: · The R project file “Bayes_FEST.Rproj”. This project file navigates through scripts for raw data analysis. · The “.Rproj.user” folder includes project-specific temporary files (e.g. auto-saved source documents, window-state, etc.) stored by the R project file “Bayes_FEST.Rproj”. The folder may be hidden depending on directory view options. · The “data” folder includes the spreadsheets for modeled seawater temperature and δ18Ow values (“CA_x3CO2.csv”) and δ18Op values of shark tooth bioapatite (“shark FEST d18Op.csv”) used as prior information for the Bayesian model. We refer to section 2.1 for the full description of spreadsheets. · The “R” folder includes customized functions for the Bayesian model stored in the “functions” directory and the script for data analysis (“01_model_sharks.R”). The script includes a comparison of paleothermometer equations after Kolodny et al. (1983), Lécuyer et al. (2013), Longinelli & Nuti (1973), and (Pucéat et al. (2010) using the bulk δ18Op shark tooth bioapatite, simulated seawater temperature and δ18Ow values as prior inputs. While all paleothermometers estimate similar posterior bulk δ18Op close to empirical values, temperature estimates using the Pucéat et al. (2010) method are often the highest, generating estimates ~8°C higher than other equations. We therefore used the Lécuyer et al. (2013) paleothermomether for temperature estimates using δ18Op of shark bioapatite grouped by taxa because it: 1\) Provides consistent posterior temperature estimates relative to other equations (Longinelli & Nuti, 1973, Kolodny et al., 1983). 2\) provides temperature values from fish tooth specimens consistent with estimates of co-existing bivalves or brachiopod carbonate shells. The script provides annotation through libraries, statistical analysis, figures, and tables. **4 Software** **4.1 R** R and R Studio (R Development Core Team, 2024; RStudio Team, 2024) are required to run scripts included in the "d18O data and maps", “FTIR data”, and “Bayes_FEST_Temperautre Estimates” directories, which were created using versions 4.4.1 and 2024.04.02, respectively. Install the following libraries before running scripts: “cowplot” (Wilke, 2024), “colorspace” (Zeileis et al., 2020), “DescTools” (Signorell, 2024), “lattice” (Sarkar, 2008), “flextable” (Gohel & Skintzos, 2024), “ggh4x” (van den Brand, 2024), “ggnewscale” (Campitelli, 2024), “ggpubr” (Kassambara, 2023a), “ggspatial” (Dunnington, 2023), “ggstance” (Henry et al., 2024), “ggstar” (Xu, 2022), “greekLetters” (Kévin Allan Sales Rodrigues, 2023), “gridExtra” (Auguie, 2017), “mapdata” (code by Richard A. Becker & version by Ray Brownrigg., 2022); “mapproj” (for R by Ray Brownrigg et al., 2023), “maps” (code by Richard A. Becker et al., 2023), “ncdf4” (Pierce, 2023), “oce” (Kelley & Richards, 2023), “rasterVis” (Oscar Perpiñán & Robert Hijmans, 2023), “RColorBrewer” (Neuwirth, 2022), “rnaturalearth” (Massicotte & South, 2023), “rnaturalearthhires” (South et al., 2024),”rstatix” (Kassambara, 2023b), “scales” (Wickham et al., 2023), “tidyverse” (Wickham et al., 2019), “viridisLite” (Garnier et al., 2023). **4.2 Python** Python scripts, including “d18O Analysis Script.ipynb” and “NetCDF Plotting.ipynb”, utilize the Jupyter Notebook interactive ‘platform and are executed using Python version 3.9.16. Install the following libraries before running scripts: “xarray” (Hoyer & Joseph, 2017), “matplotlib” (Hunter, 2007), “cartopy” (Met Office, 2015). **5 References** Amenábar, C. R., Montes, M., Nozal, F., & Santillana, S. (2020). Dinoflagellate cysts of the la Meseta Formation (middle to late Eocene), Antarctic Peninsula: Implications for biostratigraphy, palaeoceanography and palaeoenvironment. *Geological Magazine*, *157*(3), 351–366. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756819000591](https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756819000591) Auguie, B. (2017). gridExtra: Miscellaneous Functions for “Grid” Graphics. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=gridExtra](https://cran.r-project.org/package=gridExtra) van den Brand, T. (2024). ggh4x: Hacks for “ggplot2.” Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggh4x](https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggh4x) Campitelli, E. (2024). ggnewscale: Multiple Fill and Colour Scales in “ggplot2.” Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggnewscale](https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggnewscale) code by Richard A. Becker, O. S., & version by Ray Brownrigg., A. R. W. R. (2022). mapdata: Extra Map Databases. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=mapdata](https://cran.r-project.org/package=mapdata) code by Richard A. Becker, O. S., version by Ray Brownrigg. Enhancements by Thomas P Minka, A. R. W. R., & Deckmyn., A. (2023). maps: Draw Geographical Maps. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=maps](https://cran.r-project.org/package=maps) Douglas, P. M. J., Affek, H. P., Ivany, L. C., Houben, A. J. P., Sijp, W. P., Sluijs, A., et al. (2014). Pronounced zonal heterogeneity in Eocene southern high-latitude sea surface temperatures. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America*, *111*(18), 6582–6587. [https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321441111](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321441111) Dunnington, D. (2023). ggspatial: Spatial Data Framework for ggplot2. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggspatial](https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggspatial) Engelbrecht, A., Mörs, T., Reguero, M. A., & Kriwet, J. (2016a). A new sawshark, Pristiophorus laevis, from the Eocene of Antarctica with comments on Pristiophorus lanceolatus. *Historical Biology*, *29*(6), 841–853. [https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2016.1252761](https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2016.1252761) Engelbrecht, A., Mörs, T., Reguero, M. A., & Kriwet, J. (2016b). Revision of Eocene Antarctic carpet sharks (Elasmobranchii, Orectolobiformes) from Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. *Journal of Systematic Palaeontology*, *15*(12), 969–990. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2016.1266048](https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2016.1266048) Engelbrecht, A., Mörs, T., Reguero, M. A., & Kriwet, J. (2017a). Eocene squalomorph sharks (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) from Antarctica. *Journal of South American Earth Sciences*, *78*, 175–189. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2017.07.006](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2017.07.006) Engelbrecht, A., Mörs, T., Reguero, M. A., & Kriwet, J. (2017b). New carcharhiniform sharks (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) from the early to middle Eocene of Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. *Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology*, *37*(6). [https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2017.1371724](https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2017.1371724) Engelbrecht, A., Mörs, T., Reguero, M. A., & Kriwet, J. (2019). Skates and rays (Elasmobranchii, Batomorphii) from the Eocene La Meseta and Submeseta formations, Seymour Island, Antarctica. *Historical Biology*, *31*(8), 1028–1044. [https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2017.1417403](https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2017.1417403) for R by Ray Brownrigg, D. M. P., Minka, T. P., & transition to Plan 9 codebase by Roger Bivand. (2023). mapproj: Map Projections. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=mapproj](https://cran.r-project.org/package=mapproj) Garnier, Simon, Ross, Noam, Rudis, Robert, et al. (2023). {viridis(Lite)} - Colorblind-Friendly Color Maps for R. [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4678327](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4678327) Gohel, D., & Skintzos, P. (2024). flextable: Functions for Tabular Reporting. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=flextable](https://cran.r-project.org/package=flextable) Griffiths, M. L., Eagle, R. A., Kim, S. L., Flores, R. J., Becker, M. A., IV, H. M. M., et al. (2023). Endothermic physiology of extinct megatooth sharks. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences*, *120*(27), e2218153120. [https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.2218153120](https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.2218153120) Grunenwald, A., Keyser, C., Sautereau, A. M., Crubézy, E., Ludes, B., & Drouet, C. (2014). Revisiting carbonate quantification in apatite (bio)minerals: A validated FTIR methodology. *Journal of Archaeological Science*, *49*(1), 134–141. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.004](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.004) Henry, L., Wickham, H., & Chang, W. (2024). ggstance: Horizontal “ggplot2” Components. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggstance](https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggstance) Hoyer, S., & Joseph, H. (2017). xarray: N-D labeled Arrays and Datasets in Python. *Journal of Open Research Software*, *5*(1), 17. [https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.148](https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.148) Hunter, J. D. (2007). Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. *Computing in Science & Engineering*, *9*(3), 90–95. [https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55](https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55) Ivany, L. C., Lohmann, K. C., Hasiuk, F., Blake, D. B., Glass, A., Aronson, R. B., & Moody, R. M. (2008). Eocene climate record of a high southern latitude continental shelf: Seymour Island, Antarctica. *Bulletin of the Geological Society of America*, *120*(5–6), 659–678. [https://doi.org/10.1130/B26269.1](https://doi.org/10.1130/B26269.1) Judd, E. J., Ivany, L. C., DeConto, R. M., Halberstadt, A. R. W., Miklus, N. M., Junium, C. K., & Uveges, B. T. (2019). Seasonally Resolved Proxy Data From the Antarctic Peninsula Support a Heterogeneous Middle Eocene Southern Ocean. *Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology*, *34*(5), 787–799. [https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003581](https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003581) Kassambara, A. (2023a). ggpubr: “ggplot2” Based Publication Ready Plots. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggpubr](https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggpubr) Kassambara, A. (2023b). rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=rstatix](https://cran.r-project.org/package=rstatix) Kelley, D., & Richards, C. (2023). oce: Analysis of Oceanographic Data. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=oce](https://cran.r-project.org/package=oce) Kévin Allan Sales Rodrigues. (2023). greekLetters: routines for writing Greek letters and mathematical symbols on the RStudio and RGui. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=greekLetters](https://cran.r-project.org/package=greekLetters) Kolodny, Y., Luz, B., & Navon, O. (1983). Oxygen isotope variations in phosphate of biogenic apatites, I. Fish bone apatite-rechecking the rules of the game. *Earth and Planetary Science Letters*, *64*(3), 398–404. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(83)90100-0](https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X\(83\)90100-0) Kriwet, J. (2005). Additions to the Eocene selachian fauna of Antarctica with comments on Antarctic selachian diversity. *Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology*, *25*(1), 1–7. [https://doi.org/10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025\[0001:ATTESF\]2.0.CO;2](https://doi.org/10.1671/0272-4634\(2005\)025[0001:ATTESF]2.0.CO;2) Kriwet, J., Engelbrecht, A., Mörs, T., Reguero, M., & Pfaff, C. (2016). Ultimate Eocene (Priabonian) chondrichthyans (Holocephali, Elasmobranchii) of Antarctica. *Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology*, *36*(4). [https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2016.1160911](https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2016.1160911) Larocca Conte, G., Lopes, L. E., Mine, A. H., Trayler, R. B., & Kim, S. L. (2024). SPORA, a new silver phosphate precipitation protocol for oxygen isotope analysis of small, organic-rich bioapatite samples. *Chemical Geology*, *651*, 122000. [https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMGEO.2024.122000](https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMGEO.2024.122000) Lécuyer, C., Amiot, R., Touzeau, A., & Trotter, J. (2013). Calibration of the phosphate δ18O thermometer with carbonate-water oxygen isotope fractionation equations. *Chemical Geology*, *347*, 217–226. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.03.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.03.008) Long, D. J. (1992). Sharks from the La Meseta Formation (Eocene), Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. *Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology*, *12*(1), 11–32. [https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.1992.10011428](https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.1992.10011428) Longinelli, A. (1965). Oxygen isotopic composition of orthophosphate from shells of living marine organisms. *Nature*, *207*(4998), 716–719. [https://doi.org/10.1038/207716a0](https://doi.org/10.1038/207716a0) Longinelli, A., & Nuti, S. (1973). Revised phosphate-water isotopic temperature scale. *Earth and Planetary Science Letters*, *19*(3), 373–376. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(73)90088-5](https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X\(73\)90088-5) Marramá, G., Engelbrecht, A., Mörs, T., Reguero, M. A., & Kriwet, J. (2018). The southernmost occurrence of Brachycarcharias (Lamniformes, Odontaspididae) from the Eocene of Antarctica provides new information about the paleobiogeography and paleobiology of Paleogene sand tiger sharks. *Rivista Italiana Di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia*, *124*(2), 283–297. Massicotte, P., & South, A. (2023). rnaturalearth: World Map Data from Natural Earth. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=rnaturalearth](https://cran.r-project.org/package=rnaturalearth) Met Office. (2015). Cartopy: a cartographic python library with a Matplotlib interface. Exeter, Devon. Retrieved from [https://scitools.org.uk/cartopy](https://scitools.org.uk/cartopy) Mine, A. H., Waldeck, A., Olack, G., Hoerner, M. E., Alex, S., & Colman, A. S. (2017). Microprecipitation and δ18O analysis of phosphate for paleoclimate and biogeochemistry research. *Chemical Geology*, *460*(March), 1–14. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.03.032](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.03.032) Montes, M., Nozal, F., Santillana, S., Marenssi, S., & Olivero, E. (2013). Mapa Geológico de Isla Marambio (Seymour), Antártida, escala 1:20,000. *Serie Cartográfica*. Neuwirth, E. (2022). RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer Palettes. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=RColorBrewer](https://cran.r-project.org/package=RColorBrewer) Oscar Perpiñán, & Robert Hijmans. (2023). rasterVis. Retrieved from [https://oscarperpinan.github.io/rastervis/](https://oscarperpinan.github.io/rastervis/) Pierce, D. (2023). ncdf4: Interface to Unidata netCDF (Version 4 or Earlier) Format Data Files. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=ncdf4](https://cran.r-project.org/package=ncdf4) Pucéat, E., Joachimski, M. M., Bouilloux, A., Monna, F., Bonin, A., Motreuil, S., et al. (2010). Revised phosphate-water fractionation equation reassessing paleotemperatures derived from biogenic apatite. *Earth and Planetary Science Letters*, *298*(1–2), 135–142. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.07.034](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.07.034) R Development Core Team. (2024). A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Vienna, Austria. RStudio Team. (2024). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC. Retrieved from [http://www.rstudio.com/](http://www.rstudio.com/). Sarkar, D. (2008). *Lattice: Multivariate Data Visualization with R*. New York: Springer. Retrieved from [http://lmdvr.r-forge.r-project.org](http://lmdvr.r-forge.r-project.org) Shemesh, A. (1990). Crystallinity and diagenesis of sedimentary apatites. *Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta*, *54*(9), 2433–2438. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(90)90230-I](https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037\(90\)90230-I) Signorell, A. (2024). DescTools: Tools for Descriptive Statistics. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=DescTools](https://cran.r-project.org/package=DescTools) South, A., Michael, S., & Massicotte, P. (2024). rnaturalearthhires: High Resolution World Vector Map Data from Natural Earth used in rnaturalearth. Retrieved from [https://github.com/ropensci/rnaturalearthhires](https://github.com/ropensci/rnaturalearthhires) Trayler, R. B., Landa, P. V., & Kim, S. L. (2023). Evaluating the efficacy of collagen isolation using stable isotope analysis and infrared spectroscopy. *Journal of Archaeological Science*, *151*, 105727. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2023.105727](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2023.105727) Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D., François, R., et al. (2019). Welcome to the {tidyverse}. *Journal of Open Source Software*, *4*(43), 1686. [https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686) Wickham, H., Pedersen, T. L., & Seidel, D. (2023). scales: Scale Functions for Visualization. Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=scales](https://cran.r-project.org/package=scales) Wilke, C. O. (2024). cowplot: Streamlined Plot Theme and Plot Annotations for “ggplot2.” Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=cowplot](https://cran.r-project.org/package=cowplot) Xu, S. (2022). ggstar: Multiple Geometric Shape Point Layer for “ggplot2.” Retrieved from [https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggstar](https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggstar) Zeileis, A., Fisher, J. C., Hornik, K., Ihaka, R., McWhite, C. D., Murrell, P., et al. (2020). {colorspace}: A Toolbox for Manipulating and Assessing Colors and Palettes. *Journal of Statistical Software*, *96*(1), 1–49. [https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v096.i01](https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v096.i01) Zhu, J., Poulsen, C. J., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Liu, Z., Brady, E. C., & Noone, D. C. (2020). Simulation of early Eocene water isotopes using an Earth system model and its implication for past climate reconstruction. *Earth and Planetary Science Letters*, *537*, 116164. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116164](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116164) Eocene climate cooling, driven by the falling pCO2 and tectonic changes in the Southern Ocean, impacted marine ecosystems. Sharks in high-latitude oceans, sensitive to these changes, offer insights into both environmental shifts and biological responses, yet few paleoecological studies exist. The Middle-to-Late Eocene units on Seymour Island, Antarctica, provide a rich, diverse fossil record, including sharks. We analyzed the oxygen isotope composition of phosphate from shark tooth bioapatite (δ18Op) and compared our results to co-occurring bivalves and predictions from an isotope-enabled global climate model to investigate habitat use and environmental conditions. Bulk δ18Op values (mean 22.0 ± 1.3‰) show no significant changes through the Eocene. Furthermore, the variation in bulk δ18Op values often exceeds that in simulated seasonal and regional values. Pelagic and benthic sharks exhibit similar δ18Op values across units but are offset relative to bivalve and modeled values. Some taxa suggest movements into warmer or more brackish waters (e.g., Striatolamia, Carcharias) or deeper, colder waters (e.g., Pristiophorus). Taxa like Raja and Squalus display no shift, tracking local conditions in Seymour Island. The lack of difference in δ18Op values between pelagic and benthic sharks in the Late Eocene could suggest a poorly stratified water column, inconsistent with a fully opened Drake Passage. Our findings demonstrate that shark tooth bioapatite tracks the preferred habitat conditions for individual taxa rather than recording environmental conditions where they are found. A lack of secular variation in δ18Op values says more about species ecology than the absence of regional or global environmental changes. See methods in Larocca Conte, G., Aleksinski, A., Liao, A., Kriwet, J., Mörs, T., Trayler, R. B., Ivany, L. C., Huber, M., Kim, S. L. (2024). Eocene Shark Teeth From Peninsular Antarctica: Windows to Habitat Use and Paleoceanography. Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology, 39, e2024PA004965.

Tree cores were sampled using increment borers. At each site three trees were chosen for coring, with two or three cores taken per tree. Cores were sanded and ring widths measured based on high-resolution images of the sanded cores. Cores were cross-dated and summary statistics used to compare cross-dating accuracy. The dataset contains the resulting dated ring width series. This dataset includes tree ring width data, derived from tree cores, that were sampled from sites across the Rhön Biosphere Reserve (Germany). At each chosen site three trees were cored, with two or three cores taken per cored tree. Data was collected in August 2021.

Project: Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) datasets - These data have been generated as part of the internationally-coordinated Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6; see also GMD Special Issue: http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/special_issue590.html). The simulation data provides a basis for climate research designed to answer fundamental science questions and serves as resource for authors of the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC-AR6). CMIP6 is a project coordinated by the Working Group on Coupled Modelling (WGCM) as part of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP). Phase 6 builds on previous phases executed under the leadership of the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) and relies on the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) and the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (CEDA) along with numerous related activities for implementation. The original data is hosted and partially replicated on a federated collection of data nodes, and most of the data relied on by the IPCC is being archived for long-term preservation at the IPCC Data Distribution Centre (IPCC DDC) hosted by the German Climate Computing Center (DKRZ). The project includes simulations from about 120 global climate models and around 45 institutions and organizations worldwide. Summary: These data include the subset used by IPCC AR6 WGI authors of the datasets originally published in ESGF for 'CMIP6.ScenarioMIP.DKRZ.MPI-ESM1-2-HR.ssp126' with the full Data Reference Syntax following the template 'mip_era.activity_id.institution_id.source_id.experiment_id.member_id.table_id.variable_id.grid_label.version'. The MPI-ESM1.2-HR climate model, released in 2017, includes the following components: aerosol: none, prescribed MACv2-SP, atmos: ECHAM6.3 (spectral T127; 384 x 192 longitude/latitude; 95 levels; top level 0.01 hPa), land: JSBACH3.20, landIce: none/prescribed, ocean: MPIOM1.63 (tripolar TP04, approximately 0.4deg; 802 x 404 longitude/latitude; 40 levels; top grid cell 0-12 m), ocnBgchem: HAMOCC6, seaIce: unnamed (thermodynamic (Semtner zero-layer) dynamic (Hibler 79) sea ice model). The model was run by the Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg 20146, Germany (DKRZ) in native nominal resolutions: aerosol: 100 km, atmos: 100 km, land: 100 km, landIce: none, ocean: 50 km, ocnBgchem: 50 km, seaIce: 50 km.

Comprehensive and reliable information on anthropogenic sources of greenhouse gas emissions is required to track progress towards keeping warming well below 2°C as agreed upon in the Paris Agreement. Here we provide a dataset on anthropogenic GHG emissions 1970-2019 with a broad country and sector coverage. We build the dataset from recent releases from the “Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research” (EDGAR) for CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and industry (FFI), CH4 emissions, N2O emissions, and fluorinated gases and use a well-established fast-track method to extend this dataset from 2018 to 2019. We complement this with information on net CO2 emissions from land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) from three available bookkeeping models.