- home
- Advanced Search
- Energy Research
- 2. Zero hunger
- AT
- PL
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
- Energy Research
- 2. Zero hunger
- AT
- PL
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2015 GermanyPublisher:IOP Publishing Erwin Schmid; Thomas A. M. Pugh; Joshua Elliott; Joshua Elliott; Christian Folberth; Christoph Müller; James P. Chryssanthacopoulos; Delphine Deryng; Delphine Deryng;Climate change is projected to negatively impact biophysical agricultural productivity in much of the world. Actions taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate future climate changes, are thus of central importance for agricultural production. Climate impacts are, however, not unidirectional; some crops in some regions (primarily higher latitudes) are projected to benefit, particularly if increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is assumed to strongly increase crop productivity at large spatial and temporal scales. Climate mitigation measures that are implemented by reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations lead to reductions both in the strength of climate change and in the benefits of carbon dioxide fertilization. Consequently, analysis of the effects of climate mitigation on agricultural productivity must address not only regions for which mitigation is likely to reduce or even reverse climate damages. There are also regions that are likely to see increased crop yields due to climate change, which may lose these added potentials under mitigation action. Comparing data from the most comprehensive archive of crop yield projections publicly available, we find that climate mitigation leads to overall benefits from avoided damages at the global scale and especially in many regions that are already at risk of food insecurity today. Ignoring controversial carbon dioxide fertilization effects on crop productivity, we find that for the median projection aggressive mitigation could eliminate ∼81% of the negative impacts of climate change on biophysical agricultural productivity globally by the end of the century. In this case, the benefits of mitigation typically extend well into temperate regions, but vary by crop and underlying climate model projections. Should large benefits to crop yields from carbon dioxide fertilization be realized, the effects of mitigation become much more mixed, though still positive globally and beneficial in many food insecure countries.
Publication Database... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125004&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 50 citations 50 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Publication Database... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125004&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2017 France, United Kingdom, FrancePublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Funded by:FCT | LA 1FCT| LA 1Authors: Cristina Arias-Navarro; Cristina Arias-Navarro; Cristina Arias-Navarro; Mariana C. Rufino; +6 AuthorsCristina Arias-Navarro; Cristina Arias-Navarro; Cristina Arias-Navarro; Mariana C. Rufino; Pablo Zuazo; Eugenio Díaz-Pinés; Eugenio Díaz-Pinés; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Louis V. Verchot;handle: 10568/82559
Increasing demand for food and fibre by the growing human population is driving significant land use (LU) change from forest into intensively managed land systems in tropical areas. But empirical evidence on the extent to which such changes affect the soil-atmosphere exchange of trace gases is still scarce, especially in Africa. We investigated the effect of LU on soil trace gas production in the Mau Forest Complex region, Kenya. Intact soil cores were taken from natural forest, commercial and smallholder tea plantations, eucalyptus plantations and grazing lands, and were incubated in the lab under different soil moisture conditions. Soil fluxes of nitrous oxide (N2O), nitric oxide (NO) and carbon dioxide (CO2) were quantified, and we approximated annual estimates of soil N2O and NO fluxes using soil moisture values measured in situ. Forest and eucalyptus plantations yielded annual fluxes of 0.3–1.3 kg N2O–N ha−1 a−1 and 1.5–5.2 kg NO–N ha−1 a−1. Soils of commercial tea plantations, which are highly fertilized, showed higher fluxes (0.9 kg N2O–N ha−1 a−1 and 4.3 kg NO–N ha−1 a−1) than smallholder tea plantations (0.1 kg N2O–N ha−1 a−1 and 2.1 kg NO–N ha−1 a−1) or grazing land (0.1 kg N2O–N ha−1 a−1 and 1.1 kg NO–N ha−1 a−1). High soil NO fluxes were probably the consequence of long-term N fertilization and associated soil acidification, likely promoting chemodenitrification. Our experimental approach can be implemented in understudied regions, with the potential to increase the amount of information on production and consumption of trace gases from soils.
Lancaster EPrints arrow_drop_down Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2017License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2017Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/82559Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s10533-017-0348-3&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 14 citations 14 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 1visibility views 1 download downloads 79 Powered bymore_vert Lancaster EPrints arrow_drop_down Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2017License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2017Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/82559Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s10533-017-0348-3&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2018 Switzerland, France, Germany, France, FrancePublisher:Wiley Funded by:SNSF | Farm-scale Methane Fluxes...SNSF| Farm-scale Methane Fluxes (FasMeF)Albin Hammerle; Matti Barthel; Haiyan Lu; Lutz Merbold; Lutz Merbold; Werner Eugster; Nina Buchmann; Thomas Ladreiter-Knauss; Matthias Zeeman; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Eugenio Díaz-Pinés; Eugenio Díaz-Pinés; Lukas Hörtnagl; Ralf Kiese; Susanne Burri; Michael Bahn; Katja Klumpp;AbstractCentral European grasslands are characterized by a wide range of different management practices in close geographical proximity. Site‐specific management strategies strongly affect the biosphere–atmosphere exchange of the three greenhouse gases (GHG) carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4). The evaluation of environmental impacts at site level is challenging, because most in situ measurements focus on the quantification of CO2 exchange, while long‐term N2O and CH4 flux measurements at ecosystem scale remain scarce. Here, we synthesized ecosystem CO2, N2O, and CH4 fluxes from 14 managed grassland sites, quantified by eddy covariance or chamber techniques. We found that grasslands were on average a CO2 sink (−1,783 to −91 g CO2 m−2 year−1), but a N2O source (18–638 g CO2‐eq. m−2 year−1), and either a CH4 sink or source (−9 to 488 g CO2‐eq. m−2 year−1). The net GHG balance (NGB) of nine sites where measurements of all three GHGs were available was found between −2,761 and −58 g CO2‐eq. m−2 year−1, with N2O and CH4 emissions offsetting concurrent CO2 uptake by on average 21 ± 6% across sites. The only positive NGB was found for one site during a restoration year with ploughing. The predictive power of soil parameters for N2O and CH4 fluxes was generally low and varied considerably within years. However, after site‐specific data normalization, we identified environmental conditions that indicated enhanced GHG source/sink activity (“sweet spots”) and gave a good prediction of normalized overall fluxes across sites. The application of animal slurry to grasslands increased N2O and CH4 emissions. The N2O‐N emission factor across sites was 1.8 ± 0.5%, but varied considerably at site level among the years (0.1%–8.6%). Although grassland management led to increased N2O and CH4 emissions, the CO2 sink strength was generally the most dominant component of the annual GHG budget.
Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2018Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/91680Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2018Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2018License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14079&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 67 citations 67 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2018Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/91680Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2018Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2018License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14079&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2016 France, United Kingdom, France, GermanyPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Funded by:UKRI | Delivering Food Security ...UKRI| Delivering Food Security on Limited Land (DEVIL)Pete Smith; Mario Herrero; Philip K. Thornton; Philip K. Thornton; Elke Stehfest; Benjamin B. Henderson; Richard T. Conant; P.J. Gerber; Petr Havlik; Margaret Gill; Tara Garnett; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Stefan Wirsenius; Stefan Wirsenius; Hugo Valin; Alexander N. Hristov;doi: 10.1038/nclimate2925
handle: 10568/72856 , 2164/7642
The livestock sector supports about 1.3 billion producers and retailers, and contributes 40–50% of agricultural GDP. We estimated that between 1995 and 2005, the livestock sector was responsible for greenhouse gas emissions of 5.6–7.5 GtCO2e yr–1. Livestock accounts for up to half of the technical mitigation potential of the agriculture, forestry and land-use sectors, through management options that sustainably intensify livestock production, promote carbon sequestration in rangelands and reduce emissions from manures, and through reductions in the demand for livestock products. The economic potential of these management alternatives is less than 10% of what is technically possible because of adoption constraints, costs and numerous trade-offs. The mitigation potential of reductions in livestock product consumption is large, but their economic potential is unknown at present. More research and investment are needed to increase the affordability and adoption of mitigation practices, to moderate consumption of livestock products where appropriate, and to avoid negative impacts on livelihoods, economic activities and the environment
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2016Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/72856Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Aberdeen University Research Archive (AURA)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2925&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 655 citations 655 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2016Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/72856Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Aberdeen University Research Archive (AURA)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2925&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2018Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2019 France, GermanyPublisher:Wiley Funded by:NSERC, SNSF | Climate and Environmental..., NSF | CNH: Pluvials, Droughts, ... +1 projectsNSERC ,SNSF| Climate and Environmental Physics: Modeling Global Biogeochemical Cycles in the Earth System (bgcCEP) ,NSF| CNH: Pluvials, Droughts, Energetics, and the Mongol Empire ,NSF| Collaborative Research: EaSM2--Wildfires and Regional Climate Variability - Mechanisms, Modeling, and PredictionAuthors: Wilfried Winiwarter; Wilfried Winiwarter; Sebastian Lienert; Sebastian Lienert; +25 AuthorsWilfried Winiwarter; Wilfried Winiwarter; Sebastian Lienert; Sebastian Lienert; Jia Yang; Jia Yang; Jinfeng Chang; Bowen Zhang; Palmira Messina; Philippe Ciais; Rona Thompson; Shufen Pan; Akihiko Ito; Robert B. Jackson; Fortunat Joos; Fortunat Joos; Eri Saikawa; Stefan Olin; Stefan Gerber; Sönke Zaehle; Changhui Peng; Chaoqun Lu; Eric A. Davidson; Almut Arneth; Nicolas Vuichard; Josep G. Canadell; Rongting Xu; Hanqin Tian; Hanqin Tian;pmid: 30414347
AbstractOur understanding and quantification of global soil nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and the underlying processes remain largely uncertain. Here, we assessed the effects of multiple anthropogenic and natural factors, including nitrogen fertilizer (N) application, atmospheric N deposition, manure N application, land cover change, climate change, and rising atmospheric CO2 concentration, on global soil N2O emissions for the period 1861–2016 using a standard simulation protocol with seven process‐based terrestrial biosphere models. Results suggest global soil N2O emissions have increased from 6.3 ± 1.1 Tg N2O‐N/year in the preindustrial period (the 1860s) to 10.0 ± 2.0 Tg N2O‐N/year in the recent decade (2007–2016). Cropland soil emissions increased from 0.3 Tg N2O‐N/year to 3.3 Tg N2O‐N/year over the same period, accounting for 82% of the total increase. Regionally, China, South Asia, and Southeast Asia underwent rapid increases in cropland N2O emissions since the 1970s. However, US cropland N2O emissions had been relatively flat in magnitude since the 1980s, and EU cropland N2O emissions appear to have decreased by 14%. Soil N2O emissions from predominantly natural ecosystems accounted for 67% of the global soil emissions in the recent decade but showed only a relatively small increase of 0.7 ± 0.5 Tg N2O‐N/year (11%) since the 1860s. In the recent decade, N fertilizer application, N deposition, manure N application, and climate change contributed 54%, 26%, 15%, and 24%, respectively, to the total increase. Rising atmospheric CO2 concentration reduced soil N2O emissions by 10% through the enhanced plant N uptake, while land cover change played a minor role. Our estimation here does not account for indirect emissions from soils and the directed emissions from excreta of grazing livestock. To address uncertainties in estimating regional and global soil N2O emissions, this study recommends several critical strategies for improving the process‐based simulations.
IIASA DARE arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14514&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routeshybrid 254 citations 254 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert IIASA DARE arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14514&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Research 2020Embargo end date: 26 Aug 2020 SwitzerlandPublisher:Copernicus GmbH Funded by:EC | DAFNEEC| DAFNEAuthors: Martina Botter; Matthias Zeeman; Paolo Burlando; Simone Fatichi;Abstract. Alpine grasslands sustain local economy providing fodder for livestock. Intensive fertilization is common to enhance their yields, thus creating negative externalities on water quality that are difficult to evaluate without reliable estimates of nutrient fluxes. We apply a 1-D mechanistic ecosystem model, seamlessly integrating land-surface energy balance, soil hydrology, vegetation dynamics, and soil biogeochemistry aiming at assessing the grassland response to fertilization. We simulate the major water, carbon, nutrient, and energy fluxes of nine grassland plots across the broad European Alpine region. We provide an unprecedent interdisciplinary model evaluation confirming its performance against observed variables from different datasets. Subsequently, we apply the model to test the influence of fertilization practices on grassland yields and nitrate (NO3) losses through leaching. Despite the generally low NO3 concentration in groundwater recharge, the variability across sites is remarkable, mostly, but not exclusively, dictated by elevation. In high-Alpine sites short growing seasons lead to less efficient nitrogen (N) uptake for biomass production. This combined with lower evapotranspiration rates results in higher amounts of drainage and NO3 leaching to groundwater. The local soil hydrology has a crucial role in driving the NO3 use efficiency. The commonly applied fixed-threshold limit on fertilizer N input is suboptimal. We suggest that major hydrological and soil property differences across sites should be considered in the delineation of best practices or regulations for management. Using distributed maps informed with key soil and climatic attributes or systematically implementing integrated ecosystem models as shown here can contribute to achieving more sustainable practices.
https://doi.org/10.5... arrow_drop_down https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-202...Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/bg-2020-294&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 2 citations 2 popularity Average influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
visibility 35visibility views 35 download downloads 52 Powered bymore_vert https://doi.org/10.5... arrow_drop_down https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-202...Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/bg-2020-294&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Part of book or chapter of book , Other literature type , Article 2016 United Kingdom, France, Germany, FrancePublisher:Springer International Publishing Clement Atzberger; David Stern; Mariana C. Rufino; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Germán Baldi; Todd S. Rosenstock;handle: 10568/129579
Este capítulo presenta un método para orientar los paisajes con el objetivo de evaluar las opciones de mitigación para la agricultura en pequeña escala. Presenta alternativas en términos del grado de detalle y complejidad del análisis, para que coincida con el requisito de las iniciativas de investigación y desarrollo. Abordamos la heterogeneidad en las decisiones de uso de la tierra que está vinculada a las características agroecológicas del paisaje y a los perfiles sociales y económicos de los usuarios de la tierra. Creemos que a medida que los proyectos implementen este enfoque y se disponga de más datos, el método se perfeccionará para reducir los costos y aumentar la eficiencia y la eficacia de la mitigación en la agricultura a pequeña escala. El enfoque se basa en el supuesto de que las clasificaciones del paisaje reflejan las diferencias en la productividad de la tierra y las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero (GEI), y se pueden utilizar para ampliar las mediciones puntuales o de campo. A nivel local, la diversidad de suelos y la gestión de la tierra se pueden resumir de manera significativa utilizando una tipología adecuada. Los tipos de campo que reflejan los gradientes de fertilidad a pequeña escala están correlacionados con la calidad de la tierra, la productividad de la tierra y bastante probablemente con las emisiones de GEI. Una tipología puede ser una herramienta útil para conectar los campos de los agricultores con las unidades de paisaje porque representa la calidad inherente de la tierra y los cambios inducidos por el hombre, y conecta el paisaje con los perfiles socioeconómicos existentes de los pequeños agricultores. El método se explica utilizando un sistema de pequeños agricultores del oeste de Kenia como ejemplo. Ce chapitre présente une méthode de ciblage des paysages dans le but d'évaluer les options d'atténuation pour les petites exploitations agricoles. Il présente des alternatives en termes de degré de détail et de complexité de l'analyse, pour répondre aux exigences des initiatives de recherche et développement. Nous abordons l'hétérogénéité dans les décisions d'utilisation des terres qui est liée aux caractéristiques agroécologiques du paysage et aux profils sociaux et économiques des utilisateurs des terres. Nous pensons qu'au fur et à mesure que les projets mettront en œuvre cette approche et que davantage de données seront disponibles, la méthode sera affinée pour réduire les coûts et accroître l'efficacité et l'efficience de l'atténuation dans les petites exploitations agricoles. L'approche est basée sur l'hypothèse que les classifications du paysage reflètent les différences de productivité des terres et les émissions de gaz à effet de serre (GES), et peut être utilisée pour augmenter les mesures ponctuelles ou sur le terrain. Au niveau local, la diversité des sols et la gestion des terres peuvent être résumées de manière significative à l'aide d'une typologie appropriée. Les types de champs reflétant les gradients de fertilité à petite échelle sont corrélés à la qualité des terres, à la productivité des terres et très probablement aux émissions de GES. Une typologie peut être un outil utile pour relier les champs des agriculteurs aux unités de paysage, car elle représente la qualité inhérente des terres et les changements induits par l'homme, et relie le paysage aux profils socio-économiques existants des petits exploitants. La méthode est expliquée en utilisant un système de petits exploitants de l'ouest du Kenya à titre d'exemple. This chapter presents a method for targeting landscapes with the objective of assessing mitigation options for smallholder agriculture. It presents alternatives in terms of the degree of detail and complexity of the analysis, to match the requirement of research and development initiatives. We address heterogeneity in land-use decisions that is linked to the agroecological characteristics of the landscape and to the social and economic profiles of the land users. We believe that as projects implement this approach, and more data become available, the method will be refined to reduce costs and increase the efficiency and effectiveness of mitigation in smallholder agriculture. The approach is based on the assumption that landscape classifications reflect differences in land productivity and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and can be used to scale up point or field-level measurements. At local level, the diversity of soils and land management can be meaningfully summarized using a suitable typology. Field types reflecting small-scale fertility gradients are correlated to land quality, land productivity and quite likely to GHG emissions. A typology can be a useful tool to connect farmers' fields to landscape units because it represents the inherent quality of the land and human-induced changes, and connects the landscape to the existing socioeconomic profiles of smallholders. The method is explained using a smallholder system from western Kenya as an example. يقدم هذا الفصل طريقة لاستهداف المناظر الطبيعية بهدف تقييم خيارات التخفيف لزراعة أصحاب الحيازات الصغيرة. ويقدم بدائل من حيث درجة تفصيل وتعقيد التحليل، لتتناسب مع متطلبات مبادرات البحث والتطوير. نحن نعالج عدم التجانس في قرارات استخدام الأراضي المرتبطة بالخصائص الزراعية الإيكولوجية للمناظر الطبيعية والملامح الاجتماعية والاقتصادية لمستخدمي الأراضي. نعتقد أنه مع تنفيذ المشاريع لهذا النهج، وتوافر المزيد من البيانات، سيتم تحسين الطريقة لتقليل التكاليف وزيادة كفاءة وفعالية التخفيف في زراعة أصحاب الحيازات الصغيرة. ويستند هذا النهج إلى افتراض أن تصنيفات المناظر الطبيعية تعكس الاختلافات في إنتاجية الأراضي وانبعاثات غازات الدفيئة، ويمكن استخدامها لتوسيع نطاق القياسات على المستوى النقطي أو الميداني. على المستوى المحلي، يمكن تلخيص تنوع التربة وإدارة الأراضي بشكل هادف باستخدام تصنيف مناسب. ترتبط أنواع الحقول التي تعكس تدرجات الخصوبة على نطاق صغير بجودة الأراضي وإنتاجيتها ومن المرجح جدًا أن تؤدي إلى انبعاثات غازات الدفيئة. يمكن أن يكون التصنيف أداة مفيدة لربط حقول المزارعين بوحدات المناظر الطبيعية لأنه يمثل الجودة المتأصلة للأرض والتغيرات التي يسببها الإنسان، ويربط المناظر الطبيعية بالملامح الاجتماعية والاقتصادية الحالية لصغار المزارعين. يتم شرح الطريقة باستخدام نظام أصحاب الحيازات الصغيرة من غرب كينيا كمثال.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Part of book or chapter of book . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/129579Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Part of book or chapter of book . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...Part of book or chapter of book . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefhttps://link.springer.com/cont...Part of book or chapter of bookLicense: CC BYData sources: UnpayWallLancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/978-3-319-29794-1_2&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 3 citations 3 popularity Average influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Part of book or chapter of book . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/129579Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Part of book or chapter of book . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...Part of book or chapter of book . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefhttps://link.springer.com/cont...Part of book or chapter of bookLicense: CC BYData sources: UnpayWallLancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/978-3-319-29794-1_2&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018 Austria, GermanyPublisher:Informa UK Limited Funded by:[no funder available]Authors: Brenner, Claire; Zeeman, Matthias; Bernhardt, Matthias; Schulz, Karsten;Spatially distributed high-resolution data of land surface temperature (LST) and evapotranspiration (ET) are important information for crop water management and other applications in the agricultural sector. While satellite data can provide LST high-resolution data of 100 m, the current development of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and affordable low-weight thermal cameras allows LST and subsequent ET to be derived at resolutions down to centimetre scale. In this study, UAS-based images in the thermal infrared (TIR) and visible spectral range were collected over a managed temperate grassland in July 2016 at the Terrestrial Environmental Observatories Networks TERENO preAlpine observatory site at Fendt, Germany. The UAS set-up included a lightweight thermal camera (Optris Pi Lightweight) and a regular digital camera (Sony α 6000) that allowed for the acquisition of thermal and optical images with a ground resolution of 5 cm and 1 cm, respectively. Three TIR-based ET models of different complexity were applied and the resulting ET estimates were compared to the Eddy covariance (EC) observations of turbulent energy fluxes and also to the evaporative fraction. While the Deriving Atmosphere Turbulent Transport Useful To Dummies Using Temperature (DATTUTDUT) model and the Triangle Method belong to the group of simpler contextual models, the Two-Source Energy Balance (TSEB) model incorporates a more physically based formulation of the surface energy balance. In addition to the comparison of UAS-based estimates of latent heat fluxes to EC observations, the effect of the spatial resolution of the model imagery input on the modelled results was analysed by running the models with imagery from the native resolution of the acquired images to resolutions that were aggregated up to 30 m. The results show that both contextual models are sensitive to the input image resolution and that the agreement with the EC observations improves with increasing image resolution. The TSEB model assumes that LST pixels represent a mixed signal of the soil and canopy components, thus an image resolution coarse enough to ensure this assumption should be chosen. However, with the exception of the native image resolution of 5 cm, we found no effect of image resolution on the spatially weighted mean TSEB estimates. For the studied grassland, the comparison of model estimates with EC observations indicates that all three models are able to reproduce observed energy fluxes with comparable accuracy with mean absolute errors of ET between 20 and 40 W m-2. The TSEB model showed larger deviations from the reference observations under cloudy conditions with rapid fluctuations of LST within the 30 min averaging period for EC. The two contextual models yielded similar results for most of the flights. The good performance of the DATTUTDUT model, which had the lowest input requirements of the three models, is especially promising in view of the application of UAS for routine near-real-time ET monitoring.
KITopen (Karlsruhe I... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Remote SensingArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1080/01431161.2018.1471550&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 38 citations 38 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert KITopen (Karlsruhe I... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Remote SensingArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1080/01431161.2018.1471550&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2021 GermanyPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Funded by:NSF | DMUU: Center for Robust D..., NSF | Graduate Research Fellows..., EC | EARTH@LTERNATIVES +1 projectsNSF| DMUU: Center for Robust Decision-Making Tools for Climate and Energy Policy ,NSF| Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) ,EC| EARTH@LTERNATIVES ,NSF| NRT INFEWS: computational data science to advance research at the energy-environment nexusHaynes Stephens; Meridel Phillips; Meridel Phillips; Rastislav Skalsky; Jens Heinke; Tommaso Stella; Babacar Faye; Masashi Okada; Jonas Jägermeyr; Jonas Jägermeyr; Jonas Jägermeyr; David Kelly; Juraj Balkovic; Juraj Balkovic; Oleksandr Mialyk; Alex C. Ruane; Toshichika Iizumi; Christoph Müller; Stefan Lange; Oscar Castillo; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Kathrin Fuchs; Joep F. Schyns; James A. Franke; Wenfeng Liu; Sara Minoli; Heidi Webber; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Clemens Scheer; Joshua Elliott; Elisabeth J. Moyer; Sam S. Rabin; Sam S. Rabin; Cheryl Porter; Christian Folberth; Ian Foster; Atul K. Jain; Nikolay Khabarov; Florian Zabel; Tzu-Shun Lin; Andrew Smerald; Julia M. Schneider; Jose R. Guarin; Jose R. Guarin;pmid: 37117503
Potential climate-related impacts on future crop yield are a major societal concern. Previous projections of the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison based on the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 identified substantial climate impacts on all major crops, but associated uncertainties were substantial. Here we report new twenty-first-century projections using ensembles of latest-generation crop and climate models. Results suggest markedly more pessimistic yield responses for maize, soybean and rice compared to the original ensemble. Mean end-of-century maize productivity is shifted from +5% to -6% (SSP126) and from +1% to -24% (SSP585)-explained by warmer climate projections and improved crop model sensitivities. In contrast, wheat shows stronger gains (+9% shifted to +18%, SSP585), linked to higher CO2 concentrations and expanded high-latitude gains. The 'emergence' of climate impacts consistently occurs earlier in the new projections-before 2040 for several main producing regions. While future yield estimates remain uncertain, these results suggest that major breadbasket regions will face distinct anthropogenic climatic risks sooner than previously anticipated.
KITopen (Karlsruhe I... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s43016-021-00400-y&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 375 citations 375 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.01% Powered by BIP!
more_vert KITopen (Karlsruhe I... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s43016-021-00400-y&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Part of book or chapter of book , Other literature type 2021Embargo end date: 08 Apr 2024 FrancePublisher:Springer International Publishing Publicly fundedMohammad Zaman; Kristina Kleineidam; Lars R. Bakken; Jacqueline Berendt; Conor Bracken; Klaus Butterbach‐Bahl; Zucong Cai; Scott X. Chang; Timothy J. Clough; Khadim Dawar; Weixin Ding; Peter Dörsch; M. dos Reis Martins; C. Eckhardt; Sebastian Fiedler; Torsten Frosch; J. P. Goopy; Carolyn-Monika Görres; Apoorv Gupta; S. Henjes; Magdalena E. G. Hofmann; Marcus A. Horn; M. M. R. Jahangir; Anne Jansen-Willems; Katharina Lenhart; Lee Heng; Dominika Lewicka‐Szczebak; G. Lucic; Lutz Merbold; Joachim Mohn; Lars Molstad; Gerald M. Moser; Pat Murphy; Alberto Sanz-Cobeña; Miloslav Šimek; Segundo Urquiaga; Reinhard Well; Nicole Wrage‐Mönnig; Shahriar Zaman; J. Zhang; Christoph Müller;handle: 10568/129536
AbstractThe rapidly changing global climate due to increased emission of anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHGs) is leading to an increased occurrence of extreme weather events such as droughts, floods, and heatwaves. The three major GHGs are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). The major natural sources of CO2 include ocean–atmosphere exchange, respiration of animals, soils (microbial respiration) and plants, and volcanic eruption; while the anthropogenic sources include burning of fossil fuel (coal, natural gas, and oil), deforestation, and the cultivation of land that increases the decomposition of soil organic matter and crop and animal residues. Natural sources of CH4 emission include wetlands, termite activities, and oceans. Paddy fields used for rice production, livestock production systems (enteric emission from ruminants), landfills, and the production and use of fossil fuels are the main anthropogenic sources of CH4. Nitrous oxide, in addition to being a major GHG, is also an ozone-depleting gas. N2O is emitted by natural processes from oceans and terrestrial ecosystems. Anthropogenic N2O emissions occur mostly through agricultural and other land-use activities and are associated with the intensification of agricultural and other human activities such as increased use of synthetic fertiliser (119.4 million tonnes of N worldwide in 2019), inefficient use of irrigation water, deposition of animal excreta (urine and dung) from grazing animals, excessive and inefficient application of farm effluents and animal manure to croplands and pastures, and management practices that enhance soil organic N mineralisation and C decomposition. Agriculture could act as a source and a sink of GHGs. Besides direct sources, GHGs also come from various indirect sources, including upstream and downstream emissions in agricultural systems and ammonia (NH3) deposition from fertiliser and animal manure.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Part of book or chapter of book . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/129536Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...Part of book or chapter of book . 2021 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Crossrefhttps://link.springer.com/cont...Part of book or chapter of bookLicense: CC BYData sources: UnpayWallhttps://dx.doi.org/10.15488/16...Part of book or chapter of book . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Dataciteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/978-3-030-55396-8_1&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routeshybrid 2 citations 2 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Part of book or chapter of book . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/129536Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...Part of book or chapter of book . 2021 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Crossrefhttps://link.springer.com/cont...Part of book or chapter of bookLicense: CC BYData sources: UnpayWallhttps://dx.doi.org/10.15488/16...Part of book or chapter of book . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Dataciteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/978-3-030-55396-8_1&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2015 GermanyPublisher:IOP Publishing Erwin Schmid; Thomas A. M. Pugh; Joshua Elliott; Joshua Elliott; Christian Folberth; Christoph Müller; James P. Chryssanthacopoulos; Delphine Deryng; Delphine Deryng;Climate change is projected to negatively impact biophysical agricultural productivity in much of the world. Actions taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate future climate changes, are thus of central importance for agricultural production. Climate impacts are, however, not unidirectional; some crops in some regions (primarily higher latitudes) are projected to benefit, particularly if increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is assumed to strongly increase crop productivity at large spatial and temporal scales. Climate mitigation measures that are implemented by reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations lead to reductions both in the strength of climate change and in the benefits of carbon dioxide fertilization. Consequently, analysis of the effects of climate mitigation on agricultural productivity must address not only regions for which mitigation is likely to reduce or even reverse climate damages. There are also regions that are likely to see increased crop yields due to climate change, which may lose these added potentials under mitigation action. Comparing data from the most comprehensive archive of crop yield projections publicly available, we find that climate mitigation leads to overall benefits from avoided damages at the global scale and especially in many regions that are already at risk of food insecurity today. Ignoring controversial carbon dioxide fertilization effects on crop productivity, we find that for the median projection aggressive mitigation could eliminate ∼81% of the negative impacts of climate change on biophysical agricultural productivity globally by the end of the century. In this case, the benefits of mitigation typically extend well into temperate regions, but vary by crop and underlying climate model projections. Should large benefits to crop yields from carbon dioxide fertilization be realized, the effects of mitigation become much more mixed, though still positive globally and beneficial in many food insecure countries.
Publication Database... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125004&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 50 citations 50 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Publication Database... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125004&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2017 France, United Kingdom, FrancePublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Funded by:FCT | LA 1FCT| LA 1Authors: Cristina Arias-Navarro; Cristina Arias-Navarro; Cristina Arias-Navarro; Mariana C. Rufino; +6 AuthorsCristina Arias-Navarro; Cristina Arias-Navarro; Cristina Arias-Navarro; Mariana C. Rufino; Pablo Zuazo; Eugenio Díaz-Pinés; Eugenio Díaz-Pinés; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Louis V. Verchot;handle: 10568/82559
Increasing demand for food and fibre by the growing human population is driving significant land use (LU) change from forest into intensively managed land systems in tropical areas. But empirical evidence on the extent to which such changes affect the soil-atmosphere exchange of trace gases is still scarce, especially in Africa. We investigated the effect of LU on soil trace gas production in the Mau Forest Complex region, Kenya. Intact soil cores were taken from natural forest, commercial and smallholder tea plantations, eucalyptus plantations and grazing lands, and were incubated in the lab under different soil moisture conditions. Soil fluxes of nitrous oxide (N2O), nitric oxide (NO) and carbon dioxide (CO2) were quantified, and we approximated annual estimates of soil N2O and NO fluxes using soil moisture values measured in situ. Forest and eucalyptus plantations yielded annual fluxes of 0.3–1.3 kg N2O–N ha−1 a−1 and 1.5–5.2 kg NO–N ha−1 a−1. Soils of commercial tea plantations, which are highly fertilized, showed higher fluxes (0.9 kg N2O–N ha−1 a−1 and 4.3 kg NO–N ha−1 a−1) than smallholder tea plantations (0.1 kg N2O–N ha−1 a−1 and 2.1 kg NO–N ha−1 a−1) or grazing land (0.1 kg N2O–N ha−1 a−1 and 1.1 kg NO–N ha−1 a−1). High soil NO fluxes were probably the consequence of long-term N fertilization and associated soil acidification, likely promoting chemodenitrification. Our experimental approach can be implemented in understudied regions, with the potential to increase the amount of information on production and consumption of trace gases from soils.
Lancaster EPrints arrow_drop_down Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2017License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2017Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/82559Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s10533-017-0348-3&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 14 citations 14 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 1visibility views 1 download downloads 79 Powered bymore_vert Lancaster EPrints arrow_drop_down Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2017License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2017Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/82559Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s10533-017-0348-3&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2018 Switzerland, France, Germany, France, FrancePublisher:Wiley Funded by:SNSF | Farm-scale Methane Fluxes...SNSF| Farm-scale Methane Fluxes (FasMeF)Albin Hammerle; Matti Barthel; Haiyan Lu; Lutz Merbold; Lutz Merbold; Werner Eugster; Nina Buchmann; Thomas Ladreiter-Knauss; Matthias Zeeman; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Eugenio Díaz-Pinés; Eugenio Díaz-Pinés; Lukas Hörtnagl; Ralf Kiese; Susanne Burri; Michael Bahn; Katja Klumpp;AbstractCentral European grasslands are characterized by a wide range of different management practices in close geographical proximity. Site‐specific management strategies strongly affect the biosphere–atmosphere exchange of the three greenhouse gases (GHG) carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4). The evaluation of environmental impacts at site level is challenging, because most in situ measurements focus on the quantification of CO2 exchange, while long‐term N2O and CH4 flux measurements at ecosystem scale remain scarce. Here, we synthesized ecosystem CO2, N2O, and CH4 fluxes from 14 managed grassland sites, quantified by eddy covariance or chamber techniques. We found that grasslands were on average a CO2 sink (−1,783 to −91 g CO2 m−2 year−1), but a N2O source (18–638 g CO2‐eq. m−2 year−1), and either a CH4 sink or source (−9 to 488 g CO2‐eq. m−2 year−1). The net GHG balance (NGB) of nine sites where measurements of all three GHGs were available was found between −2,761 and −58 g CO2‐eq. m−2 year−1, with N2O and CH4 emissions offsetting concurrent CO2 uptake by on average 21 ± 6% across sites. The only positive NGB was found for one site during a restoration year with ploughing. The predictive power of soil parameters for N2O and CH4 fluxes was generally low and varied considerably within years. However, after site‐specific data normalization, we identified environmental conditions that indicated enhanced GHG source/sink activity (“sweet spots”) and gave a good prediction of normalized overall fluxes across sites. The application of animal slurry to grasslands increased N2O and CH4 emissions. The N2O‐N emission factor across sites was 1.8 ± 0.5%, but varied considerably at site level among the years (0.1%–8.6%). Although grassland management led to increased N2O and CH4 emissions, the CO2 sink strength was generally the most dominant component of the annual GHG budget.
Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2018Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/91680Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2018Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2018License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14079&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 67 citations 67 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2018Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/91680Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2018Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2018License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14079&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2016 France, United Kingdom, France, GermanyPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Funded by:UKRI | Delivering Food Security ...UKRI| Delivering Food Security on Limited Land (DEVIL)Pete Smith; Mario Herrero; Philip K. Thornton; Philip K. Thornton; Elke Stehfest; Benjamin B. Henderson; Richard T. Conant; P.J. Gerber; Petr Havlik; Margaret Gill; Tara Garnett; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Stefan Wirsenius; Stefan Wirsenius; Hugo Valin; Alexander N. Hristov;doi: 10.1038/nclimate2925
handle: 10568/72856 , 2164/7642
The livestock sector supports about 1.3 billion producers and retailers, and contributes 40–50% of agricultural GDP. We estimated that between 1995 and 2005, the livestock sector was responsible for greenhouse gas emissions of 5.6–7.5 GtCO2e yr–1. Livestock accounts for up to half of the technical mitigation potential of the agriculture, forestry and land-use sectors, through management options that sustainably intensify livestock production, promote carbon sequestration in rangelands and reduce emissions from manures, and through reductions in the demand for livestock products. The economic potential of these management alternatives is less than 10% of what is technically possible because of adoption constraints, costs and numerous trade-offs. The mitigation potential of reductions in livestock product consumption is large, but their economic potential is unknown at present. More research and investment are needed to increase the affordability and adoption of mitigation practices, to moderate consumption of livestock products where appropriate, and to avoid negative impacts on livelihoods, economic activities and the environment
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2016Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/72856Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Aberdeen University Research Archive (AURA)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2925&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 655 citations 655 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2016Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/72856Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Aberdeen University Research Archive (AURA)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2925&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2018Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2019 France, GermanyPublisher:Wiley Funded by:NSERC, SNSF | Climate and Environmental..., NSF | CNH: Pluvials, Droughts, ... +1 projectsNSERC ,SNSF| Climate and Environmental Physics: Modeling Global Biogeochemical Cycles in the Earth System (bgcCEP) ,NSF| CNH: Pluvials, Droughts, Energetics, and the Mongol Empire ,NSF| Collaborative Research: EaSM2--Wildfires and Regional Climate Variability - Mechanisms, Modeling, and PredictionAuthors: Wilfried Winiwarter; Wilfried Winiwarter; Sebastian Lienert; Sebastian Lienert; +25 AuthorsWilfried Winiwarter; Wilfried Winiwarter; Sebastian Lienert; Sebastian Lienert; Jia Yang; Jia Yang; Jinfeng Chang; Bowen Zhang; Palmira Messina; Philippe Ciais; Rona Thompson; Shufen Pan; Akihiko Ito; Robert B. Jackson; Fortunat Joos; Fortunat Joos; Eri Saikawa; Stefan Olin; Stefan Gerber; Sönke Zaehle; Changhui Peng; Chaoqun Lu; Eric A. Davidson; Almut Arneth; Nicolas Vuichard; Josep G. Canadell; Rongting Xu; Hanqin Tian; Hanqin Tian;pmid: 30414347
AbstractOur understanding and quantification of global soil nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and the underlying processes remain largely uncertain. Here, we assessed the effects of multiple anthropogenic and natural factors, including nitrogen fertilizer (N) application, atmospheric N deposition, manure N application, land cover change, climate change, and rising atmospheric CO2 concentration, on global soil N2O emissions for the period 1861–2016 using a standard simulation protocol with seven process‐based terrestrial biosphere models. Results suggest global soil N2O emissions have increased from 6.3 ± 1.1 Tg N2O‐N/year in the preindustrial period (the 1860s) to 10.0 ± 2.0 Tg N2O‐N/year in the recent decade (2007–2016). Cropland soil emissions increased from 0.3 Tg N2O‐N/year to 3.3 Tg N2O‐N/year over the same period, accounting for 82% of the total increase. Regionally, China, South Asia, and Southeast Asia underwent rapid increases in cropland N2O emissions since the 1970s. However, US cropland N2O emissions had been relatively flat in magnitude since the 1980s, and EU cropland N2O emissions appear to have decreased by 14%. Soil N2O emissions from predominantly natural ecosystems accounted for 67% of the global soil emissions in the recent decade but showed only a relatively small increase of 0.7 ± 0.5 Tg N2O‐N/year (11%) since the 1860s. In the recent decade, N fertilizer application, N deposition, manure N application, and climate change contributed 54%, 26%, 15%, and 24%, respectively, to the total increase. Rising atmospheric CO2 concentration reduced soil N2O emissions by 10% through the enhanced plant N uptake, while land cover change played a minor role. Our estimation here does not account for indirect emissions from soils and the directed emissions from excreta of grazing livestock. To address uncertainties in estimating regional and global soil N2O emissions, this study recommends several critical strategies for improving the process‐based simulations.
IIASA DARE arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14514&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routeshybrid 254 citations 254 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert IIASA DARE arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14514&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Research 2020Embargo end date: 26 Aug 2020 SwitzerlandPublisher:Copernicus GmbH Funded by:EC | DAFNEEC| DAFNEAuthors: Martina Botter; Matthias Zeeman; Paolo Burlando; Simone Fatichi;Abstract. Alpine grasslands sustain local economy providing fodder for livestock. Intensive fertilization is common to enhance their yields, thus creating negative externalities on water quality that are difficult to evaluate without reliable estimates of nutrient fluxes. We apply a 1-D mechanistic ecosystem model, seamlessly integrating land-surface energy balance, soil hydrology, vegetation dynamics, and soil biogeochemistry aiming at assessing the grassland response to fertilization. We simulate the major water, carbon, nutrient, and energy fluxes of nine grassland plots across the broad European Alpine region. We provide an unprecedent interdisciplinary model evaluation confirming its performance against observed variables from different datasets. Subsequently, we apply the model to test the influence of fertilization practices on grassland yields and nitrate (NO3) losses through leaching. Despite the generally low NO3 concentration in groundwater recharge, the variability across sites is remarkable, mostly, but not exclusively, dictated by elevation. In high-Alpine sites short growing seasons lead to less efficient nitrogen (N) uptake for biomass production. This combined with lower evapotranspiration rates results in higher amounts of drainage and NO3 leaching to groundwater. The local soil hydrology has a crucial role in driving the NO3 use efficiency. The commonly applied fixed-threshold limit on fertilizer N input is suboptimal. We suggest that major hydrological and soil property differences across sites should be considered in the delineation of best practices or regulations for management. Using distributed maps informed with key soil and climatic attributes or systematically implementing integrated ecosystem models as shown here can contribute to achieving more sustainable practices.
https://doi.org/10.5... arrow_drop_down https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-202...Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/bg-2020-294&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 2 citations 2 popularity Average influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
visibility 35visibility views 35 download downloads 52 Powered bymore_vert https://doi.org/10.5... arrow_drop_down https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-202...Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/bg-2020-294&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Part of book or chapter of book , Other literature type , Article 2016 United Kingdom, France, Germany, FrancePublisher:Springer International Publishing Clement Atzberger; David Stern; Mariana C. Rufino; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Germán Baldi; Todd S. Rosenstock;handle: 10568/129579
Este capítulo presenta un método para orientar los paisajes con el objetivo de evaluar las opciones de mitigación para la agricultura en pequeña escala. Presenta alternativas en términos del grado de detalle y complejidad del análisis, para que coincida con el requisito de las iniciativas de investigación y desarrollo. Abordamos la heterogeneidad en las decisiones de uso de la tierra que está vinculada a las características agroecológicas del paisaje y a los perfiles sociales y económicos de los usuarios de la tierra. Creemos que a medida que los proyectos implementen este enfoque y se disponga de más datos, el método se perfeccionará para reducir los costos y aumentar la eficiencia y la eficacia de la mitigación en la agricultura a pequeña escala. El enfoque se basa en el supuesto de que las clasificaciones del paisaje reflejan las diferencias en la productividad de la tierra y las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero (GEI), y se pueden utilizar para ampliar las mediciones puntuales o de campo. A nivel local, la diversidad de suelos y la gestión de la tierra se pueden resumir de manera significativa utilizando una tipología adecuada. Los tipos de campo que reflejan los gradientes de fertilidad a pequeña escala están correlacionados con la calidad de la tierra, la productividad de la tierra y bastante probablemente con las emisiones de GEI. Una tipología puede ser una herramienta útil para conectar los campos de los agricultores con las unidades de paisaje porque representa la calidad inherente de la tierra y los cambios inducidos por el hombre, y conecta el paisaje con los perfiles socioeconómicos existentes de los pequeños agricultores. El método se explica utilizando un sistema de pequeños agricultores del oeste de Kenia como ejemplo. Ce chapitre présente une méthode de ciblage des paysages dans le but d'évaluer les options d'atténuation pour les petites exploitations agricoles. Il présente des alternatives en termes de degré de détail et de complexité de l'analyse, pour répondre aux exigences des initiatives de recherche et développement. Nous abordons l'hétérogénéité dans les décisions d'utilisation des terres qui est liée aux caractéristiques agroécologiques du paysage et aux profils sociaux et économiques des utilisateurs des terres. Nous pensons qu'au fur et à mesure que les projets mettront en œuvre cette approche et que davantage de données seront disponibles, la méthode sera affinée pour réduire les coûts et accroître l'efficacité et l'efficience de l'atténuation dans les petites exploitations agricoles. L'approche est basée sur l'hypothèse que les classifications du paysage reflètent les différences de productivité des terres et les émissions de gaz à effet de serre (GES), et peut être utilisée pour augmenter les mesures ponctuelles ou sur le terrain. Au niveau local, la diversité des sols et la gestion des terres peuvent être résumées de manière significative à l'aide d'une typologie appropriée. Les types de champs reflétant les gradients de fertilité à petite échelle sont corrélés à la qualité des terres, à la productivité des terres et très probablement aux émissions de GES. Une typologie peut être un outil utile pour relier les champs des agriculteurs aux unités de paysage, car elle représente la qualité inhérente des terres et les changements induits par l'homme, et relie le paysage aux profils socio-économiques existants des petits exploitants. La méthode est expliquée en utilisant un système de petits exploitants de l'ouest du Kenya à titre d'exemple. This chapter presents a method for targeting landscapes with the objective of assessing mitigation options for smallholder agriculture. It presents alternatives in terms of the degree of detail and complexity of the analysis, to match the requirement of research and development initiatives. We address heterogeneity in land-use decisions that is linked to the agroecological characteristics of the landscape and to the social and economic profiles of the land users. We believe that as projects implement this approach, and more data become available, the method will be refined to reduce costs and increase the efficiency and effectiveness of mitigation in smallholder agriculture. The approach is based on the assumption that landscape classifications reflect differences in land productivity and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and can be used to scale up point or field-level measurements. At local level, the diversity of soils and land management can be meaningfully summarized using a suitable typology. Field types reflecting small-scale fertility gradients are correlated to land quality, land productivity and quite likely to GHG emissions. A typology can be a useful tool to connect farmers' fields to landscape units because it represents the inherent quality of the land and human-induced changes, and connects the landscape to the existing socioeconomic profiles of smallholders. The method is explained using a smallholder system from western Kenya as an example. يقدم هذا الفصل طريقة لاستهداف المناظر الطبيعية بهدف تقييم خيارات التخفيف لزراعة أصحاب الحيازات الصغيرة. ويقدم بدائل من حيث درجة تفصيل وتعقيد التحليل، لتتناسب مع متطلبات مبادرات البحث والتطوير. نحن نعالج عدم التجانس في قرارات استخدام الأراضي المرتبطة بالخصائص الزراعية الإيكولوجية للمناظر الطبيعية والملامح الاجتماعية والاقتصادية لمستخدمي الأراضي. نعتقد أنه مع تنفيذ المشاريع لهذا النهج، وتوافر المزيد من البيانات، سيتم تحسين الطريقة لتقليل التكاليف وزيادة كفاءة وفعالية التخفيف في زراعة أصحاب الحيازات الصغيرة. ويستند هذا النهج إلى افتراض أن تصنيفات المناظر الطبيعية تعكس الاختلافات في إنتاجية الأراضي وانبعاثات غازات الدفيئة، ويمكن استخدامها لتوسيع نطاق القياسات على المستوى النقطي أو الميداني. على المستوى المحلي، يمكن تلخيص تنوع التربة وإدارة الأراضي بشكل هادف باستخدام تصنيف مناسب. ترتبط أنواع الحقول التي تعكس تدرجات الخصوبة على نطاق صغير بجودة الأراضي وإنتاجيتها ومن المرجح جدًا أن تؤدي إلى انبعاثات غازات الدفيئة. يمكن أن يكون التصنيف أداة مفيدة لربط حقول المزارعين بوحدات المناظر الطبيعية لأنه يمثل الجودة المتأصلة للأرض والتغيرات التي يسببها الإنسان، ويربط المناظر الطبيعية بالملامح الاجتماعية والاقتصادية الحالية لصغار المزارعين. يتم شرح الطريقة باستخدام نظام أصحاب الحيازات الصغيرة من غرب كينيا كمثال.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Part of book or chapter of book . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/129579Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Part of book or chapter of book . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...Part of book or chapter of book . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefhttps://link.springer.com/cont...Part of book or chapter of bookLicense: CC BYData sources: UnpayWallLancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/978-3-319-29794-1_2&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 3 citations 3 popularity Average influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Part of book or chapter of book . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/129579Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Part of book or chapter of book . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...Part of book or chapter of book . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefhttps://link.springer.com/cont...Part of book or chapter of bookLicense: CC BYData sources: UnpayWallLancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/978-3-319-29794-1_2&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018 Austria, GermanyPublisher:Informa UK Limited Funded by:[no funder available]Authors: Brenner, Claire; Zeeman, Matthias; Bernhardt, Matthias; Schulz, Karsten;Spatially distributed high-resolution data of land surface temperature (LST) and evapotranspiration (ET) are important information for crop water management and other applications in the agricultural sector. While satellite data can provide LST high-resolution data of 100 m, the current development of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and affordable low-weight thermal cameras allows LST and subsequent ET to be derived at resolutions down to centimetre scale. In this study, UAS-based images in the thermal infrared (TIR) and visible spectral range were collected over a managed temperate grassland in July 2016 at the Terrestrial Environmental Observatories Networks TERENO preAlpine observatory site at Fendt, Germany. The UAS set-up included a lightweight thermal camera (Optris Pi Lightweight) and a regular digital camera (Sony α 6000) that allowed for the acquisition of thermal and optical images with a ground resolution of 5 cm and 1 cm, respectively. Three TIR-based ET models of different complexity were applied and the resulting ET estimates were compared to the Eddy covariance (EC) observations of turbulent energy fluxes and also to the evaporative fraction. While the Deriving Atmosphere Turbulent Transport Useful To Dummies Using Temperature (DATTUTDUT) model and the Triangle Method belong to the group of simpler contextual models, the Two-Source Energy Balance (TSEB) model incorporates a more physically based formulation of the surface energy balance. In addition to the comparison of UAS-based estimates of latent heat fluxes to EC observations, the effect of the spatial resolution of the model imagery input on the modelled results was analysed by running the models with imagery from the native resolution of the acquired images to resolutions that were aggregated up to 30 m. The results show that both contextual models are sensitive to the input image resolution and that the agreement with the EC observations improves with increasing image resolution. The TSEB model assumes that LST pixels represent a mixed signal of the soil and canopy components, thus an image resolution coarse enough to ensure this assumption should be chosen. However, with the exception of the native image resolution of 5 cm, we found no effect of image resolution on the spatially weighted mean TSEB estimates. For the studied grassland, the comparison of model estimates with EC observations indicates that all three models are able to reproduce observed energy fluxes with comparable accuracy with mean absolute errors of ET between 20 and 40 W m-2. The TSEB model showed larger deviations from the reference observations under cloudy conditions with rapid fluctuations of LST within the 30 min averaging period for EC. The two contextual models yielded similar results for most of the flights. The good performance of the DATTUTDUT model, which had the lowest input requirements of the three models, is especially promising in view of the application of UAS for routine near-real-time ET monitoring.
KITopen (Karlsruhe I... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Remote SensingArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1080/01431161.2018.1471550&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 38 citations 38 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert KITopen (Karlsruhe I... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Remote SensingArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1080/01431161.2018.1471550&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2021 GermanyPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Funded by:NSF | DMUU: Center for Robust D..., NSF | Graduate Research Fellows..., EC | EARTH@LTERNATIVES +1 projectsNSF| DMUU: Center for Robust Decision-Making Tools for Climate and Energy Policy ,NSF| Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) ,EC| EARTH@LTERNATIVES ,NSF| NRT INFEWS: computational data science to advance research at the energy-environment nexusHaynes Stephens; Meridel Phillips; Meridel Phillips; Rastislav Skalsky; Jens Heinke; Tommaso Stella; Babacar Faye; Masashi Okada; Jonas Jägermeyr; Jonas Jägermeyr; Jonas Jägermeyr; David Kelly; Juraj Balkovic; Juraj Balkovic; Oleksandr Mialyk; Alex C. Ruane; Toshichika Iizumi; Christoph Müller; Stefan Lange; Oscar Castillo; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Kathrin Fuchs; Joep F. Schyns; James A. Franke; Wenfeng Liu; Sara Minoli; Heidi Webber; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Clemens Scheer; Joshua Elliott; Elisabeth J. Moyer; Sam S. Rabin; Sam S. Rabin; Cheryl Porter; Christian Folberth; Ian Foster; Atul K. Jain; Nikolay Khabarov; Florian Zabel; Tzu-Shun Lin; Andrew Smerald; Julia M. Schneider; Jose R. Guarin; Jose R. Guarin;pmid: 37117503
Potential climate-related impacts on future crop yield are a major societal concern. Previous projections of the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison based on the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 identified substantial climate impacts on all major crops, but associated uncertainties were substantial. Here we report new twenty-first-century projections using ensembles of latest-generation crop and climate models. Results suggest markedly more pessimistic yield responses for maize, soybean and rice compared to the original ensemble. Mean end-of-century maize productivity is shifted from +5% to -6% (SSP126) and from +1% to -24% (SSP585)-explained by warmer climate projections and improved crop model sensitivities. In contrast, wheat shows stronger gains (+9% shifted to +18%, SSP585), linked to higher CO2 concentrations and expanded high-latitude gains. The 'emergence' of climate impacts consistently occurs earlier in the new projections-before 2040 for several main producing regions. While future yield estimates remain uncertain, these results suggest that major breadbasket regions will face distinct anthropogenic climatic risks sooner than previously anticipated.
KITopen (Karlsruhe I... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s43016-021-00400-y&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 375 citations 375 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.01% Powered by BIP!
more_vert KITopen (Karlsruhe I... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s43016-021-00400-y&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Part of book or chapter of book , Other literature type 2021Embargo end date: 08 Apr 2024 FrancePublisher:Springer International Publishing Publicly fundedMohammad Zaman; Kristina Kleineidam; Lars R. Bakken; Jacqueline Berendt; Conor Bracken; Klaus Butterbach‐Bahl; Zucong Cai; Scott X. Chang; Timothy J. Clough; Khadim Dawar; Weixin Ding; Peter Dörsch; M. dos Reis Martins; C. Eckhardt; Sebastian Fiedler; Torsten Frosch; J. P. Goopy; Carolyn-Monika Görres; Apoorv Gupta; S. Henjes; Magdalena E. G. Hofmann; Marcus A. Horn; M. M. R. Jahangir; Anne Jansen-Willems; Katharina Lenhart; Lee Heng; Dominika Lewicka‐Szczebak; G. Lucic; Lutz Merbold; Joachim Mohn; Lars Molstad; Gerald M. Moser; Pat Murphy; Alberto Sanz-Cobeña; Miloslav Šimek; Segundo Urquiaga; Reinhard Well; Nicole Wrage‐Mönnig; Shahriar Zaman; J. Zhang; Christoph Müller;handle: 10568/129536
AbstractThe rapidly changing global climate due to increased emission of anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHGs) is leading to an increased occurrence of extreme weather events such as droughts, floods, and heatwaves. The three major GHGs are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). The major natural sources of CO2 include ocean–atmosphere exchange, respiration of animals, soils (microbial respiration) and plants, and volcanic eruption; while the anthropogenic sources include burning of fossil fuel (coal, natural gas, and oil), deforestation, and the cultivation of land that increases the decomposition of soil organic matter and crop and animal residues. Natural sources of CH4 emission include wetlands, termite activities, and oceans. Paddy fields used for rice production, livestock production systems (enteric emission from ruminants), landfills, and the production and use of fossil fuels are the main anthropogenic sources of CH4. Nitrous oxide, in addition to being a major GHG, is also an ozone-depleting gas. N2O is emitted by natural processes from oceans and terrestrial ecosystems. Anthropogenic N2O emissions occur mostly through agricultural and other land-use activities and are associated with the intensification of agricultural and other human activities such as increased use of synthetic fertiliser (119.4 million tonnes of N worldwide in 2019), inefficient use of irrigation water, deposition of animal excreta (urine and dung) from grazing animals, excessive and inefficient application of farm effluents and animal manure to croplands and pastures, and management practices that enhance soil organic N mineralisation and C decomposition. Agriculture could act as a source and a sink of GHGs. Besides direct sources, GHGs also come from various indirect sources, including upstream and downstream emissions in agricultural systems and ammonia (NH3) deposition from fertiliser and animal manure.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Part of book or chapter of book . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/129536Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...Part of book or chapter of book . 2021 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Crossrefhttps://link.springer.com/cont...Part of book or chapter of bookLicense: CC BYData sources: UnpayWallhttps://dx.doi.org/10.15488/16...Part of book or chapter of book . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Dataciteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/978-3-030-55396-8_1&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routeshybrid 2 citations 2 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Part of book or chapter of book . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/129536Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...Part of book or chapter of book . 2021 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Crossrefhttps://link.springer.com/cont...Part of book or chapter of bookLicense: CC BYData sources: UnpayWallhttps://dx.doi.org/10.15488/16...Part of book or chapter of book . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Dataciteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/978-3-030-55396-8_1&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu