• Energy Research
• engineering and technology close
• PT close
• AO close

Abstract One of the critical areas in the outer shell of household refrigerators is the compressor compartment, which has relatively high temperatures, due to the heat generated while the compressor is running. This implies a larger heat transfer to the interior air volume and, consequently, more energy consumption. One way to decrease this temperature is to ventilate the base of the refrigerator with a small fan. In the research carried out, a decrease of 11 °C in the temperature of the surfaces close to the compressor was recorded, when the fan was running. The implications of this effect can be seen at two levels: changes in the temperature distribution at the bottom of the refrigerator envelope and the resulting dynamic effects, and a decrease in energy consumption of the entire system. Consequently, there are lower CO 2 emissions to the environment, making household refrigerators more efficient and sustainable.

Abstract One of the critical areas in the outer shell of household refrigerators is the compressor compartment, which has relatively high temperatures, due to the heat generated while the compressor is running. This implies a larger heat transfer to the interior air volume and, consequently, more energy consumption. One way to decrease this temperature is to ventilate the base of the refrigerator with a small fan. In the research carried out, a decrease of 11 °C in the temperature of the surfaces close to the compressor was recorded, when the fan was running. The implications of this effect can be seen at two levels: changes in the temperature distribution at the bottom of the refrigerator envelope and the resulting dynamic effects, and a decrease in energy consumption of the entire system. Consequently, there are lower CO 2 emissions to the environment, making household refrigerators more efficient and sustainable.

Abstract Growing quantities of biomass ashes are currently produced worldwide due to the increasing consumption of biomass in energy applications. The disposal of biomass ash in landfills is costly and leads to the loss of valuable resources. Biomass ash has important macro-nutrient contents and relevant soil liming capacity, and can be recycled to soils, thus contributing to biomass-to-energy process integration and a sustainable energy production. Although the EU Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection has highlighted the importance of promoting soil amelioration through nutrient recycling and some Member States have already recognised biomass-ash value in a context of circular economy, recycling of this material at the EU level and the potential use of ash-based material in fertilisers is still not properly framed by the EU regulatory framework. Adequate regulation for biomass ash from the energy sector is recognised of most importance as a driving force towards implementation of correct management and valorisation of ash as a raw material. This review provides a discussion on biomass ash properties and related EU regulations, notably the Waste Framework Directive and the Fertilisers Regulation, which are relevant for implementing a strategy for valorisation of biomass ash for soil amelioration purposes. Steps needed to provide the biomass ash with an appropriate end-of-waste and/or by-product status were identified. Key product and process aspects to enable the inclusion of biomass ash in the list of materials that can be used as fertilisers or as ingredients of soil fertilisers in the scope of the revised Fertilisers Regulation were discussed. Quality and safety standards to be harmonised at the EU level, as well as necessary revisions of the risk assessment framework were also discussed here.

Abstract Growing quantities of biomass ashes are currently produced worldwide due to the increasing consumption of biomass in energy applications. The disposal of biomass ash in landfills is costly and leads to the loss of valuable resources. Biomass ash has important macro-nutrient contents and relevant soil liming capacity, and can be recycled to soils, thus contributing to biomass-to-energy process integration and a sustainable energy production. Although the EU Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection has highlighted the importance of promoting soil amelioration through nutrient recycling and some Member States have already recognised biomass-ash value in a context of circular economy, recycling of this material at the EU level and the potential use of ash-based material in fertilisers is still not properly framed by the EU regulatory framework. Adequate regulation for biomass ash from the energy sector is recognised of most importance as a driving force towards implementation of correct management and valorisation of ash as a raw material. This review provides a discussion on biomass ash properties and related EU regulations, notably the Waste Framework Directive and the Fertilisers Regulation, which are relevant for implementing a strategy for valorisation of biomass ash for soil amelioration purposes. Steps needed to provide the biomass ash with an appropriate end-of-waste and/or by-product status were identified. Key product and process aspects to enable the inclusion of biomass ash in the list of materials that can be used as fertilisers or as ingredients of soil fertilisers in the scope of the revised Fertilisers Regulation were discussed. Quality and safety standards to be harmonised at the EU level, as well as necessary revisions of the risk assessment framework were also discussed here.

Mateo-Tomás and López-Bao (2022) expose several arguments on why nuclear energy is needed for biodiversity conservation. The authors aptly expose that land use is the main driver of biodiversity loss and discuss the land footprint of renewable energy, namely solar, wind and hydropower, mining activities and hence the biodiversity impact, compared to nuclear energy. Likewise, Mateo-Tomás and López-Bao (2022) highlight the drawbacks of nuclear energy in such regard. In this sense, they state that “.nuclear power is not exempt of environmental and socioeconomic concerns, such as operating risks, long-term radioactive wastes, high costs, thermal pollution or miningâ€. Furthermore, they indicate that “all of these issues deserve further attention in order to be minimised, and some of them must be properly accounted for, especially if fair comparisons among the land footprints of nuclear and renewable energies are intendedâ€. Lastly, the authors end by expressing that “nuclear energy should be integrated in the political agenda to prevent that acting against climate change will boost habitat degradation and, in turn, biodiversity loss.