• Energy Research
• other engineering and technologies close
• 8. Economic growth close
• 15. Life on land close
• US close
• DE close
• EU close

Dans cet article, nous étudions l'utilisation du flux de lots dans les problèmes de planification de flowhop sans permutation. L'objectif est de minimiser le makepan soumis aux contraintes de flowhop standard, mais où il est maintenant autorisé de réorganiser les tâches entre les machines. En outre, les tâches peuvent être divisées en sous-lots gérables, une stratégie connue sous le nom de flux de lots. Les expériences informatiques montrent que le flux de lots réduit le makepan jusqu'à 43% pour un large éventail de cas par rapport au cas où aucun fractionnement de tâches n'est appliqué. Les avantages augmentent à mesure que le nombre d'étapes du processus de production augmente mais atteignent une limite. Au-delà d'un certain point, la division des tâches en sous-lots supplémentaires n'améliore pas la solution. En este documento investigamos el uso de la transmisión de lotes en problemas de programación de Flowshop sin permutación. El objetivo es minimizar el makepan sujeto a las restricciones estándar de Flowshop, pero donde ahora se permite reordenar trabajos entre máquinas. Además, los trabajos se pueden dividir en sublotes manejables, una estrategia conocida como transmisión de lotes. Los experimentos computacionales muestran que la transmisión de lotes reduce el makepan hasta un 43% para una amplia gama de instancias en comparación con el caso en el que no se aplica la división de trabajos. Los beneficios crecen a medida que aumenta el número de etapas en el proceso de producción, pero alcanzan un límite. Más allá de cierto punto, la división de trabajos en sublotes adicionales no mejora la solución. In this paper we investigate the use of lot streaming in non-permutation flowshop scheduling problems.The objective is to minimize the makespan subject to the standard flowshop constraints, but where it is now permitted to reorder jobs between machines.In addition, the jobs can be divided into manageable sublots, a strategy known as lot streaming.Computational experiments show that lot streaming reduces the makespan up to 43% for a wide range of instances when compared to the case in which no job splitting is applied.The benefits grow as the number of stages in the production process increases but reach a limit.Beyond a certain point, the division of jobs into additional sublots does not improve the solution. في هذه الورقة، نتحقق من استخدام تدفق اللوت في مشاكل جدولة ورشة التدفق غير القابلة للتحويل. الهدف هو تقليل فترة التشغيل وفقًا لقيود ورشة التدفق القياسية، ولكن حيث يُسمح الآن بإعادة ترتيب الوظائف بين الآلات. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، يمكن تقسيم الوظائف إلى أقسام فرعية يمكن التحكم فيها، وهي استراتيجية تعرف باسم تدفق اللوت. تظهر التجارب الحاسوبية أن تدفق اللوت يقلل من فترة التشغيل إلى 43 ٪ لمجموعة واسعة من الحالات عند مقارنتها بالحالة التي لا يتم فيها تطبيق تقسيم الوظائف. تنمو الفوائد مع زيادة عدد المراحل في عملية الإنتاج ولكنها تصل إلى حد. بعد نقطة معينة، لا يؤدي تقسيم الوظائف إلى أقسام فرعية إضافية إلى تحسين الحل.

Dans cet article, nous étudions l'utilisation du flux de lots dans les problèmes de planification de flowhop sans permutation. L'objectif est de minimiser le makepan soumis aux contraintes de flowhop standard, mais où il est maintenant autorisé de réorganiser les tâches entre les machines. En outre, les tâches peuvent être divisées en sous-lots gérables, une stratégie connue sous le nom de flux de lots. Les expériences informatiques montrent que le flux de lots réduit le makepan jusqu'à 43% pour un large éventail de cas par rapport au cas où aucun fractionnement de tâches n'est appliqué. Les avantages augmentent à mesure que le nombre d'étapes du processus de production augmente mais atteignent une limite. Au-delà d'un certain point, la division des tâches en sous-lots supplémentaires n'améliore pas la solution. En este documento investigamos el uso de la transmisión de lotes en problemas de programación de Flowshop sin permutación. El objetivo es minimizar el makepan sujeto a las restricciones estándar de Flowshop, pero donde ahora se permite reordenar trabajos entre máquinas. Además, los trabajos se pueden dividir en sublotes manejables, una estrategia conocida como transmisión de lotes. Los experimentos computacionales muestran que la transmisión de lotes reduce el makepan hasta un 43% para una amplia gama de instancias en comparación con el caso en el que no se aplica la división de trabajos. Los beneficios crecen a medida que aumenta el número de etapas en el proceso de producción, pero alcanzan un límite. Más allá de cierto punto, la división de trabajos en sublotes adicionales no mejora la solución. In this paper we investigate the use of lot streaming in non-permutation flowshop scheduling problems.The objective is to minimize the makespan subject to the standard flowshop constraints, but where it is now permitted to reorder jobs between machines.In addition, the jobs can be divided into manageable sublots, a strategy known as lot streaming.Computational experiments show that lot streaming reduces the makespan up to 43% for a wide range of instances when compared to the case in which no job splitting is applied.The benefits grow as the number of stages in the production process increases but reach a limit.Beyond a certain point, the division of jobs into additional sublots does not improve the solution. في هذه الورقة، نتحقق من استخدام تدفق اللوت في مشاكل جدولة ورشة التدفق غير القابلة للتحويل. الهدف هو تقليل فترة التشغيل وفقًا لقيود ورشة التدفق القياسية، ولكن حيث يُسمح الآن بإعادة ترتيب الوظائف بين الآلات. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، يمكن تقسيم الوظائف إلى أقسام فرعية يمكن التحكم فيها، وهي استراتيجية تعرف باسم تدفق اللوت. تظهر التجارب الحاسوبية أن تدفق اللوت يقلل من فترة التشغيل إلى 43 ٪ لمجموعة واسعة من الحالات عند مقارنتها بالحالة التي لا يتم فيها تطبيق تقسيم الوظائف. تنمو الفوائد مع زيادة عدد المراحل في عملية الإنتاج ولكنها تصل إلى حد. بعد نقطة معينة، لا يؤدي تقسيم الوظائف إلى أقسام فرعية إضافية إلى تحسين الحل.

In recent years, sustainability concerns have gained increasing attention among countries and stakeholders worldwide. Towards the transition to sustainable rural development, the rural web framework (RWF) has become a consistent tool. Indicators from the RWF have been used to explore sustainable rural development for decision-making tasks, which improves the social, economic, and environmental performance of rural regions. However, the application of the RWF in studies is on the decline. Furthermore, there is a lack of literature reviews on the importance of the RWF and its relationship with different facets of sustainable development. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) (a) to explore how studies have used the RWF in the context of sustainable development and (b) to identify areas for further research. This study found that the RWF has mostly been used in developed countries, with fewer applications in developing countries. We suggest that there should be increased application of the RWF, particularly in developing countries, to broaden the rural web–sustainable development discourse and its relevance. This paper presents several areas where the indicators of the RWF can be applied to illustrate their relevance for policy decisions towards the achievement of the sustainable development goals (SDGs).

In recent years, sustainability concerns have gained increasing attention among countries and stakeholders worldwide. Towards the transition to sustainable rural development, the rural web framework (RWF) has become a consistent tool. Indicators from the RWF have been used to explore sustainable rural development for decision-making tasks, which improves the social, economic, and environmental performance of rural regions. However, the application of the RWF in studies is on the decline. Furthermore, there is a lack of literature reviews on the importance of the RWF and its relationship with different facets of sustainable development. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) (a) to explore how studies have used the RWF in the context of sustainable development and (b) to identify areas for further research. This study found that the RWF has mostly been used in developed countries, with fewer applications in developing countries. We suggest that there should be increased application of the RWF, particularly in developing countries, to broaden the rural web–sustainable development discourse and its relevance. This paper presents several areas where the indicators of the RWF can be applied to illustrate their relevance for policy decisions towards the achievement of the sustainable development goals (SDGs).

Activities involving land use, land-use change,forestry, and agriculture (LUCF) can help reducegreenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations in the atmosphereby increasing biotic carbon storage, by decreasing GHGemissions, and by producing biomass as a substitutefor fossil fuels. Potential activities includereducing rates of deforestation, increasing landdevoted to forest plantations, regenerating secondaryforest, agroforestry, improving the management offorests and agricultural areas; and producing energycrops.Policymakers debating the inclusion of a variety ofLUCF activities in the Clean Development Mechanism(CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol need to consider themagnitude of the carbon contribution these activitiescould make. Existing estimates of the cumulative GHGoffset potential of LUCF activities often take aglobal or regional approach. In contrast, land-usedecisions are usually made at the local level anddepend on many factors including productive capacityof the land, financial considerations of thelandowner, and environmental concerns. Estimates ofGHG offset potential made at a local, or at mostcountry, level that incorporate these factors may belower, as well as more useful for policy analyses,than global or large regional estimates. Whilecountry-level estimates exist for forestry activities,similar estimates utilizing local information need tobe generated for agricultural activities and biofuels,as well as for the cumulative potential of all LUCFactivities in a particular location.

Activities involving land use, land-use change,forestry, and agriculture (LUCF) can help reducegreenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations in the atmosphereby increasing biotic carbon storage, by decreasing GHGemissions, and by producing biomass as a substitutefor fossil fuels. Potential activities includereducing rates of deforestation, increasing landdevoted to forest plantations, regenerating secondaryforest, agroforestry, improving the management offorests and agricultural areas; and producing energycrops.Policymakers debating the inclusion of a variety ofLUCF activities in the Clean Development Mechanism(CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol need to consider themagnitude of the carbon contribution these activitiescould make. Existing estimates of the cumulative GHGoffset potential of LUCF activities often take aglobal or regional approach. In contrast, land-usedecisions are usually made at the local level anddepend on many factors including productive capacityof the land, financial considerations of thelandowner, and environmental concerns. Estimates ofGHG offset potential made at a local, or at mostcountry, level that incorporate these factors may belower, as well as more useful for policy analyses,than global or large regional estimates. Whilecountry-level estimates exist for forestry activities,similar estimates utilizing local information need tobe generated for agricultural activities and biofuels,as well as for the cumulative potential of all LUCFactivities in a particular location.

Darfur farming and pastoralist livelihoods are both adaptations to the environmental variability that characterises the region. This article describes this adaptation and the longer‐term transformation of these specialised livelihoods from the perspective of local communities. Over several decades farmers and herders have experienced a continuous stream of climate, conflict and other shocks, which, combined with wider processes of change, have transformed livelihoods and undermined livelihood institutions. Their well‐rehearsed specialist strategies are now combined with new strategies to cope. These responses help people get by in the short term but risk antagonising not only their specialist strategies but also those of others. A combination of factors has undermined the former integration between farming and pastoralism and their livelihood institutions. Efforts to build resilience in similar contexts must take a long‐term view of livelihood adaptation as a specialisation, and consider the implications of new strategies for the continuity and integration of livelihood specialisations.

Darfur farming and pastoralist livelihoods are both adaptations to the environmental variability that characterises the region. This article describes this adaptation and the longer‐term transformation of these specialised livelihoods from the perspective of local communities. Over several decades farmers and herders have experienced a continuous stream of climate, conflict and other shocks, which, combined with wider processes of change, have transformed livelihoods and undermined livelihood institutions. Their well‐rehearsed specialist strategies are now combined with new strategies to cope. These responses help people get by in the short term but risk antagonising not only their specialist strategies but also those of others. A combination of factors has undermined the former integration between farming and pastoralism and their livelihood institutions. Efforts to build resilience in similar contexts must take a long‐term view of livelihood adaptation as a specialisation, and consider the implications of new strategies for the continuity and integration of livelihood specialisations.