- home
- Advanced Search
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2024Publisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Carine F. Bourgeois; Richard A. MacKenzie; Sahadev Sharma; Rupesh K. Bhomia; Nels G. Johnson; Andre S. Rovai; Thomas A. Worthington; Ken W. Krauss; Kangkuso Analuddin; Jacob J. Bukoski; Jose Alan Castillo; Angie Elwin; Leah Glass; Tim C. Jennerjahn; Mwita M. Mangora; Cyril Marchand; Michael J. Osland; Ismaël A. Ratefinjanahary; Raghab Ray; null Severino G. Salmo III; Sigit D. Sasmito; Rempei Suwa; Pham Hong Tinh; Carl C. Trettin;pmid: 38968357
Mangroves’ ability to store carbon (C) has long been recognized, but little is known about whether planted mangroves can store C as efficiently as naturally established (i.e., intact) stands and in which time frame. Through Bayesian logistic models compiled from 40 years of data and built from 684 planted mangrove stands worldwide, we found that biomass C stock culminated at 71 to 73% to that of intact stands ~20 years after planting. Furthermore, prioritizing mixed-species planting including Rhizophora spp. would maximize C accumulation within the biomass compared to monospecific planting. Despite a 25% increase in the first 5 years following planting, no notable change was observed in the soil C stocks thereafter, which remains at a constant value of 75% to that of intact soil C stock, suggesting that planting effectively prevents further C losses due to land use change. These results have strong implications for mangrove restoration planning and serve as a baseline for future C buildup assessments.
James Cook Universit... arrow_drop_down James Cook University, Australia: ResearchOnline@JCUArticle . 2024Full-Text: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk5430Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 23 citations 23 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert James Cook Universit... arrow_drop_down James Cook University, Australia: ResearchOnline@JCUArticle . 2024Full-Text: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk5430Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2025Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Authors: Christopher M. Murray; Tyler Steven Coleman; Wray Gabel; Ken W. Krauss;Blue carbon refers to organic carbon sequestered by oceanic and coastal ecosystems. This stock has gained global attention as a high organic carbon repository relative to other ecosystems. Within blue carbon ecosystems, tidally influenced wetlands alone store a disproportionately higher amount of organic carbon than other blue carbon systems. North America harbors 42% of tidally influenced global wetland area, which has been identified as a critical carbon stock in the context of climate change mitigation. However, quantified associations between vertebrate biota and carbon sequestration within ecosystems are in their infancy and have been incidental, given that microbial trophic levels are thought to drive nutrient dynamics. Here, we assess the relationship between American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) demography and tidally influenced wetland soil carbon stock among habitats at continental, biogeographically-relevant, and local scales. We used soil core profile data from the Smithsonian's Coastal Carbon Network and filtered for continuous core profiles in tidally influenced wetland areas along the Gulf and Atlantic Coasts of the United States. Results indicate that American alligator presence is positively correlated with soil carbon stock across habitats within their native distribution. Further, American alligator demographic variables are positively correlated with soil carbon stock at local scales. These conclusions are concordant with previous findings that apex predators, through trophic cascade theory, play a key role in regulating soil carbon stock and that alligators are functional apex predators in carbon dynamics and a key commercialized natural resource.
https://doi.org/10.1... arrow_drop_down https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598...Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen hybrid 0 citations 0 popularity Average influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert https://doi.org/10.1... arrow_drop_down https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598...Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2020Publisher:Wiley Publicly fundedMichael J. Osland; Laura C. Feher; Amanda C. Spivak; Janet A. Nestlerode; Alejandro E. Almario; Nicole Cormier; Andrew S. From; Ken W. Krauss; Marc J. Russell; Federico Alvarez; Darrin D. Dantin; James E. Harvey; Camille L. Stagg;AbstractMangrove forests are among the world's most productive and carbon‐rich ecosystems. Despite growing understanding of factors controlling mangrove forest soil carbon stocks, there is a need to advance understanding of the speed of peat development beneath maturing mangrove forests, especially in created and restored mangrove forests that are intended to compensate for ecosystem functions lost during mangrove forest conversion to other land uses. To better quantify the rate of soil organic matter development beneath created, maturing mangrove forests, we measured ecosystem changes across a 25‐yr chronosequence. We compared ecosystem properties in created, maturing mangrove forests to adjacent natural mangrove forests. We also quantified site‐specific changes that occurred between 2010 and 2016. Soil organic matter accumulated rapidly beneath maturing mangrove forests as sandy soils transitioned to organic‐rich soils (peat). Within 25 yr, a 20‐cm deep peat layer developed. The time required for created mangrove forests to reach equivalency with natural mangrove forests was estimated as (1) <15 yr for herbaceous and juvenile vegetation, (2) ~55 yr for adult trees, (3) ~25 yr for the upper soil layer (0–10 cm), and (4) ~45–80 yr for the lower soil layer (10–30 cm). For soil elevation change, the created mangrove forests were equivalent to or surpassed natural mangrove forests within the first 5 yr. A comparison to chronosequence studies from other ecosystems indicates that the rate of soil organic matter accumulation beneath maturing mangrove forests may be among the fastest globally. In most peatland ecosystems, soil organic matter formation occurs slowly (over centuries, millennia); however, these results show that mangrove peat formation can occur within decades. Peat development, primarily due to subsurface root accumulation, enables mangrove forests to sequester carbon, adjust their elevation relative to sea level, and adapt to changing conditions at the dynamic land–ocean interface. In the face of climate change and rising sea levels, coastal managers are increasingly concerned with the longevity and functionality of coastal restoration efforts. Our results advance understanding of the pace of ecosystem development in created, maturing mangrove forests, which can improve predictions of mangrove forest responses to global change and ecosystem restoration.
Ecological Applicati... arrow_drop_down Ecological ApplicationsArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access Routesbronze 60 citations 60 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Ecological Applicati... arrow_drop_down Ecological ApplicationsArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2022Publisher:MDPI AG Camille LaFosse Stagg; Claudia Laurenzano; William C. Vervaeke; Ken W. Krauss; Karen L. McKee;Coastal wetlands are dynamic ecosystems that exist along a landscape continuum that can range from freshwater forested wetlands to tidal marsh to mudflat communities. Climate-driven stressors, such as sea-level rise, can cause shifts among these communities, resulting in changes to ecological functions and services. While a growing body of research has characterized the landscape-scale impacts of individual climate-driven stressors, little is known about how multiple stressors and their potential interactions will affect ecological functioning of these ecosystems. How will coastal wetlands respond to discrete climate disturbances, such as hurricane sediment deposition events, under future conditions of elevated atmospheric CO2? Will these responses vary among the different wetland communities? We conducted experimental greenhouse manipulations to simulate sediment deposition from a land-falling hurricane under future elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations (720 ppm CO2). We measured responses of net primary production, decomposition, and elevation change in mesocosms representing four communities along a coastal wetland landscape gradient: freshwater forested wetland, forest/marsh mix, marsh, and mudflat. When Schoenoplectus americanus was present, above- and belowground biomass production was highest, decomposition rates were lowest, and wetland elevation gain was greatest, regardless of CO2 and sediment deposition treatments. Sediment addition initially increased elevation capital in all communities, but post-deposition rates of elevation gain were lower than in mesocosms without added sediment. Together these results indicate that encroachment of oligohaline marshes into freshwater forested wetlands can enhance belowground biomass accumulation and resilience to sea-level rise, and these plant-mediated ecosystem services will be augmented by periodic sediment pulses from storms and restoration efforts.
Plants arrow_drop_down PlantsOther literature type . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/9/1259/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 4 citations 4 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert Plants arrow_drop_down PlantsOther literature type . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/9/1259/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2023Publisher:Copernicus GmbH Shanshan Song; Yali Ding; Wei Li; Yuchen Meng; Jian Zhou; Ruikun Gou; Conghe Zhang; Shengbin Ye; Neil Saintilan; Ken W. Krauss; Stephen Crooks; Shuguo Lv; Guanghui Lin;Significant efforts have been invested to restore mangrove forests worldwide through reforestation and afforestation. However, blue carbon benefit has not been compared between these two silvicultural pathways at the global scale. Here, we integrated results from direct field measurements of over 370 restoration sites around the world to show that mangrove reforestation (reestablishing mangroves where they previously colonized) had a greater carbon storage potential per hectare than afforestation (establishing mangroves where not previously mangrove). Greater carbon accumulation was mainly attributed to favorable intertidal positioning, higher nitrogen availability, and lower salinity at most reforestation sites. Reforestation of all physically feasible areas in the deforested mangrove regions of the world could promote the uptake of 671.5–688.8 Tg CO2-eq globally over a 40-year period, 60% more than afforesting the same global area on tidal flats (more marginal sites). Along with avoiding conflicts of habitat conversion, mangrove reforestation should be given priority when designing nature-based solutions for mitigating global climate change.
Nature Communication... arrow_drop_down add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 129 citations 129 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Nature Communication... arrow_drop_down add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2021Publisher:Public Library of Science (PLoS) Andrew S. From; Ken W. Krauss; Julie L. Whitbeck; Gregory B. Noe; Rebecca F. Moss; Camille L. Stagg; Nicole Cormier; Nicole Cormier;Wetlands along upper estuaries are characterized by dynamic transitions between forested and herbaceous communities (marsh) as salinity, hydroperiod, and nutrients change. The importance of belowground net primary productivity (BNPP) associated with fine and coarse root growth also changes but remains the dominant component of overall productivity in these important blue carbon wetlands. Appropriate BNPP assessment techniques to use in various tidal wetlands are not well-defined, and could make a difference in BNPP estimation. We hypothesized that different BNPP techniques applied among tidal wetlands differ in estimation of BNPP and possibly also correlate differently with porewater nutrient concentrations. We compare 6-month and 12-month root ingrowth, serial soil coring techniques utilizing two different calculations, and a mass balance approach (TBCA, Total Belowground Carbon Allocation) among four tidal wetland types along each of two river systems transitioning from freshwater forest to marsh. Median values of BNPP were 266 to 2946 g/m2/year among all techniques used, with lower BNPP estimation from root ingrowth cores and TBCA (266–416 g/m2/year), and higher BNPP estimation from serial coring of standing crop root biomass (using Smalley and Max-Min calculation methods) (2336–2946 g/m2/year). Root turnover (or longevity) to a soil depth of 30 cm was 2.2/year (1.3 years), 2.7/year (1.1 years), 4.5/year (0.9 years), and 1.2/year (2.6 years), respectively, for Upper Forest, Middle Forest, Lower Forest, and Marsh. Marsh had greater root biomass and BNPP, with slower root turnover (greater root longevity) versus forested wetlands. Soil porewater concentrations of NH3 and reactive phosphorus stimulated BNPP in the marsh when assessed with short-deployment BNPP techniques, indicating that pulses of mineralized nutrients may stimulate BNPP to facilitate marsh replacement of forested wetlands. Overall, ingrowth techniques appeared to represent forested wetland BNPP adequately, while serial coring may be necessary to represent herbaceous plant BNPP from rhizomes as marshes replace forested wetlands.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 11 citations 11 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2023Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Publicly fundedFunded by:EC | METLAKE, NSF | Graduate Research Fellows..., NSERCEC| METLAKE ,NSF| Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) ,NSERCSheel Bansal; Irena F. Creed; Brian A. Tangen; Scott D. Bridgham; Ankur R. Desai; Ken W. Krauss; Scott C. Neubauer; Gregory B. Noe; Donald O. Rosenberry; Carl Trettin; Kimberly P. Wickland; Scott T. Allen; Ariane Arias‐Ortiz; Anna R. Armitage; Dennis Baldocchi; Kakoli Banerjee; David Bastviken; Peter Berg; Matthew J. Bogard; Alex T. Chow; William H. Conner; Christopher Craft; Courtney A. Creamer; Tonya DelSontro; Jamie A. Duberstein; M. E. Gonneea; M. Siobhan Fennessy; Sarah A. Finkelstein; Mathias Goeckede; Sabine Grunwald; Meghan Halabisky; Ellen R. Herbert; M. M. R. Jahangir; Olivia F. Johnson; Miriam C. Jones; Jeffrey J. Kelleway; Sara Knox; Kevin D. Kroeger; Kevin A. Kuehn; David A. Lobb; Amanda L. Loder; Shizhou Ma; Damien T. Maher; Gavin McNicol; Jacob Meier; Beth A. Middleton; Christopher T. Mills; Purbasha Mistry; Abhijit Mitra; Courtney Mobilian; Amanda M. Nahlik; Susan Newman; Jessica L. O'Connell; Patricia Y. Oikawa; Max Post van der Burg; Charles A. Schutte; Chunqiao Song; Camille L. Stagg; Jess Turner; Rodrigo Vargas; Mark P. Waldrop; Marcus B. Wallin; Zhaohui Aleck Wang; Eric J. Ward; Debra A. Willard; Stephanie A. Yarwood; Xianghong Zhu;pmid: 38037553
pmc: PMC10684704
AbstractWetlands cover a small portion of the world, but have disproportionate influence on global carbon (C) sequestration, carbon dioxide and methane emissions, and aquatic C fluxes. However, the underlying biogeochemical processes that affect wetland C pools and fluxes are complex and dynamic, making measurements of wetland C challenging. Over decades of research, many observational, experimental, and analytical approaches have been developed to understand and quantify pools and fluxes of wetland C. Sampling approaches range in their representation of wetland C from short to long timeframes and local to landscape spatial scales. This review summarizes common and cutting-edge methodological approaches for quantifying wetland C pools and fluxes. We first define each of the major C pools and fluxes and provide rationale for their importance to wetland C dynamics. For each approach, we clarify what component of wetland C is measured and its spatial and temporal representativeness and constraints. We describe practical considerations for each approach, such as where and when an approach is typically used, who can conduct the measurements (expertise, training requirements), and how approaches are conducted, including considerations on equipment complexity and costs. Finally, we review key covariates and ancillary measurements that enhance the interpretation of findings and facilitate model development. The protocols that we describe to measure soil, water, vegetation, and gases are also relevant for related disciplines such as ecology. Improved quality and consistency of data collection and reporting across studies will help reduce global uncertainties and develop management strategies to use wetlands as nature-based climate solutions.
University of Califo... arrow_drop_down University of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/15b835k7Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationer från Linköpings universitetArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Publikationer från Linköpings universiteteScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2023Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaUniversity of Wollongong, Australia: Research OnlineArticle . 2023Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen hybrid 35 citations 35 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert University of Califo... arrow_drop_down University of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/15b835k7Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationer från Linköpings universitetArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Publikationer från Linköpings universiteteScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2023Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaUniversity of Wollongong, Australia: Research OnlineArticle . 2023Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2025Publisher:Wiley Michael J. Osland; John B. Bradford; Lauren T. Toth; Matthew J. Germino; James B. Grace; Judith Z. Drexler; Camille L. Stagg; Eric R. Grossman; Karen M. Thorne; Stephanie S. Romañach; Davina L. Passeri; Gregory B. Noe; Jessica R. Lacy; Ken W. Krauss; Kurt P. Kowalski; Glenn R. Guntenspergen; Neil K. Ganju; Nicholas M. Enwright; Joel A. Carr; Kristin B. Byrd; Kevin J. Buffington;doi: 10.1002/ecs2.70229
AbstractAn ecological threshold is the point at which a comparatively small environmental change triggers an abrupt and disproportionately large ecological response. In the face of accelerating climate change, there is concern that abrupt ecosystem transformations will become more widespread as critical ecological thresholds are crossed. There has been ongoing debate, however, regarding the prevalence of ecological thresholds across the natural world. While ecological thresholds are ubiquitous in some ecosystems, thresholds have been difficult to detect in others. Some studies have even concluded that threshold responses are uncommon in the natural world and overly emphasized in the ecological literature. As ecologists who work in ecosystems chronically exposed to high abiotic stress, we consider ecological thresholds and ecosystem transformations to be critical concepts that can greatly advance understanding of ecological responses to climate change and inform ecosystem management. But quantifying ecological thresholds can be challenging, if not impossible, without data that are strategically collected for that purpose. Here, we present a conceptual framework built upon linkages between abiotic stress, climate‐driven ecological threshold responses, and the risk of ecosystem transformation. We also present a simple approach for quantifying ecological thresholds across abiotic stress gradients. We hypothesize that climate‐driven threshold responses are especially influential in ecosystems chronically exposed to high abiotic stress, where autotroph diversity is low and foundation species play a prominent ecological role. Abiotic conditions in these environments are often near physiological tolerance limits of foundation species, which means that small abiotic changes can trigger landscape‐level ecological transformations. Conversely, the alleviation of stress near thresholds can allow foundation species to thrive and spread into previously inhospitable locations. We provide examples of this climate‐driven threshold behavior from four high‐stress environments: coastal wetlands, coral reefs, drylands, and alpine ecosystems. Our overarching aim in this review is to clarify the strong relationships between abiotic stress, climate‐driven ecological thresholds, and the risk of ecosystem transformation under climate change.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access Routesgold 2 citations 2 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2024Publisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Carine F. Bourgeois; Richard A. MacKenzie; Sahadev Sharma; Rupesh K. Bhomia; Nels G. Johnson; Andre S. Rovai; Thomas A. Worthington; Ken W. Krauss; Kangkuso Analuddin; Jacob J. Bukoski; Jose Alan Castillo; Angie Elwin; Leah Glass; Tim C. Jennerjahn; Mwita M. Mangora; Cyril Marchand; Michael J. Osland; Ismaël A. Ratefinjanahary; Raghab Ray; null Severino G. Salmo III; Sigit D. Sasmito; Rempei Suwa; Pham Hong Tinh; Carl C. Trettin;pmid: 38968357
Mangroves’ ability to store carbon (C) has long been recognized, but little is known about whether planted mangroves can store C as efficiently as naturally established (i.e., intact) stands and in which time frame. Through Bayesian logistic models compiled from 40 years of data and built from 684 planted mangrove stands worldwide, we found that biomass C stock culminated at 71 to 73% to that of intact stands ~20 years after planting. Furthermore, prioritizing mixed-species planting including Rhizophora spp. would maximize C accumulation within the biomass compared to monospecific planting. Despite a 25% increase in the first 5 years following planting, no notable change was observed in the soil C stocks thereafter, which remains at a constant value of 75% to that of intact soil C stock, suggesting that planting effectively prevents further C losses due to land use change. These results have strong implications for mangrove restoration planning and serve as a baseline for future C buildup assessments.
James Cook Universit... arrow_drop_down James Cook University, Australia: ResearchOnline@JCUArticle . 2024Full-Text: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk5430Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 23 citations 23 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert James Cook Universit... arrow_drop_down James Cook University, Australia: ResearchOnline@JCUArticle . 2024Full-Text: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk5430Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2025Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Authors: Christopher M. Murray; Tyler Steven Coleman; Wray Gabel; Ken W. Krauss;Blue carbon refers to organic carbon sequestered by oceanic and coastal ecosystems. This stock has gained global attention as a high organic carbon repository relative to other ecosystems. Within blue carbon ecosystems, tidally influenced wetlands alone store a disproportionately higher amount of organic carbon than other blue carbon systems. North America harbors 42% of tidally influenced global wetland area, which has been identified as a critical carbon stock in the context of climate change mitigation. However, quantified associations between vertebrate biota and carbon sequestration within ecosystems are in their infancy and have been incidental, given that microbial trophic levels are thought to drive nutrient dynamics. Here, we assess the relationship between American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) demography and tidally influenced wetland soil carbon stock among habitats at continental, biogeographically-relevant, and local scales. We used soil core profile data from the Smithsonian's Coastal Carbon Network and filtered for continuous core profiles in tidally influenced wetland areas along the Gulf and Atlantic Coasts of the United States. Results indicate that American alligator presence is positively correlated with soil carbon stock across habitats within their native distribution. Further, American alligator demographic variables are positively correlated with soil carbon stock at local scales. These conclusions are concordant with previous findings that apex predators, through trophic cascade theory, play a key role in regulating soil carbon stock and that alligators are functional apex predators in carbon dynamics and a key commercialized natural resource.
https://doi.org/10.1... arrow_drop_down https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598...Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen hybrid 0 citations 0 popularity Average influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert https://doi.org/10.1... arrow_drop_down https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598...Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2020Publisher:Wiley Publicly fundedMichael J. Osland; Laura C. Feher; Amanda C. Spivak; Janet A. Nestlerode; Alejandro E. Almario; Nicole Cormier; Andrew S. From; Ken W. Krauss; Marc J. Russell; Federico Alvarez; Darrin D. Dantin; James E. Harvey; Camille L. Stagg;AbstractMangrove forests are among the world's most productive and carbon‐rich ecosystems. Despite growing understanding of factors controlling mangrove forest soil carbon stocks, there is a need to advance understanding of the speed of peat development beneath maturing mangrove forests, especially in created and restored mangrove forests that are intended to compensate for ecosystem functions lost during mangrove forest conversion to other land uses. To better quantify the rate of soil organic matter development beneath created, maturing mangrove forests, we measured ecosystem changes across a 25‐yr chronosequence. We compared ecosystem properties in created, maturing mangrove forests to adjacent natural mangrove forests. We also quantified site‐specific changes that occurred between 2010 and 2016. Soil organic matter accumulated rapidly beneath maturing mangrove forests as sandy soils transitioned to organic‐rich soils (peat). Within 25 yr, a 20‐cm deep peat layer developed. The time required for created mangrove forests to reach equivalency with natural mangrove forests was estimated as (1) <15 yr for herbaceous and juvenile vegetation, (2) ~55 yr for adult trees, (3) ~25 yr for the upper soil layer (0–10 cm), and (4) ~45–80 yr for the lower soil layer (10–30 cm). For soil elevation change, the created mangrove forests were equivalent to or surpassed natural mangrove forests within the first 5 yr. A comparison to chronosequence studies from other ecosystems indicates that the rate of soil organic matter accumulation beneath maturing mangrove forests may be among the fastest globally. In most peatland ecosystems, soil organic matter formation occurs slowly (over centuries, millennia); however, these results show that mangrove peat formation can occur within decades. Peat development, primarily due to subsurface root accumulation, enables mangrove forests to sequester carbon, adjust their elevation relative to sea level, and adapt to changing conditions at the dynamic land–ocean interface. In the face of climate change and rising sea levels, coastal managers are increasingly concerned with the longevity and functionality of coastal restoration efforts. Our results advance understanding of the pace of ecosystem development in created, maturing mangrove forests, which can improve predictions of mangrove forest responses to global change and ecosystem restoration.
Ecological Applicati... arrow_drop_down Ecological ApplicationsArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access Routesbronze 60 citations 60 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Ecological Applicati... arrow_drop_down Ecological ApplicationsArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2022Publisher:MDPI AG Camille LaFosse Stagg; Claudia Laurenzano; William C. Vervaeke; Ken W. Krauss; Karen L. McKee;Coastal wetlands are dynamic ecosystems that exist along a landscape continuum that can range from freshwater forested wetlands to tidal marsh to mudflat communities. Climate-driven stressors, such as sea-level rise, can cause shifts among these communities, resulting in changes to ecological functions and services. While a growing body of research has characterized the landscape-scale impacts of individual climate-driven stressors, little is known about how multiple stressors and their potential interactions will affect ecological functioning of these ecosystems. How will coastal wetlands respond to discrete climate disturbances, such as hurricane sediment deposition events, under future conditions of elevated atmospheric CO2? Will these responses vary among the different wetland communities? We conducted experimental greenhouse manipulations to simulate sediment deposition from a land-falling hurricane under future elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations (720 ppm CO2). We measured responses of net primary production, decomposition, and elevation change in mesocosms representing four communities along a coastal wetland landscape gradient: freshwater forested wetland, forest/marsh mix, marsh, and mudflat. When Schoenoplectus americanus was present, above- and belowground biomass production was highest, decomposition rates were lowest, and wetland elevation gain was greatest, regardless of CO2 and sediment deposition treatments. Sediment addition initially increased elevation capital in all communities, but post-deposition rates of elevation gain were lower than in mesocosms without added sediment. Together these results indicate that encroachment of oligohaline marshes into freshwater forested wetlands can enhance belowground biomass accumulation and resilience to sea-level rise, and these plant-mediated ecosystem services will be augmented by periodic sediment pulses from storms and restoration efforts.
Plants arrow_drop_down PlantsOther literature type . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/9/1259/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 4 citations 4 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert Plants arrow_drop_down PlantsOther literature type . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/9/1259/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2023Publisher:Copernicus GmbH Shanshan Song; Yali Ding; Wei Li; Yuchen Meng; Jian Zhou; Ruikun Gou; Conghe Zhang; Shengbin Ye; Neil Saintilan; Ken W. Krauss; Stephen Crooks; Shuguo Lv; Guanghui Lin;Significant efforts have been invested to restore mangrove forests worldwide through reforestation and afforestation. However, blue carbon benefit has not been compared between these two silvicultural pathways at the global scale. Here, we integrated results from direct field measurements of over 370 restoration sites around the world to show that mangrove reforestation (reestablishing mangroves where they previously colonized) had a greater carbon storage potential per hectare than afforestation (establishing mangroves where not previously mangrove). Greater carbon accumulation was mainly attributed to favorable intertidal positioning, higher nitrogen availability, and lower salinity at most reforestation sites. Reforestation of all physically feasible areas in the deforested mangrove regions of the world could promote the uptake of 671.5–688.8 Tg CO2-eq globally over a 40-year period, 60% more than afforesting the same global area on tidal flats (more marginal sites). Along with avoiding conflicts of habitat conversion, mangrove reforestation should be given priority when designing nature-based solutions for mitigating global climate change.
Nature Communication... arrow_drop_down add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 129 citations 129 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Nature Communication... arrow_drop_down add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2021Publisher:Public Library of Science (PLoS) Andrew S. From; Ken W. Krauss; Julie L. Whitbeck; Gregory B. Noe; Rebecca F. Moss; Camille L. Stagg; Nicole Cormier; Nicole Cormier;Wetlands along upper estuaries are characterized by dynamic transitions between forested and herbaceous communities (marsh) as salinity, hydroperiod, and nutrients change. The importance of belowground net primary productivity (BNPP) associated with fine and coarse root growth also changes but remains the dominant component of overall productivity in these important blue carbon wetlands. Appropriate BNPP assessment techniques to use in various tidal wetlands are not well-defined, and could make a difference in BNPP estimation. We hypothesized that different BNPP techniques applied among tidal wetlands differ in estimation of BNPP and possibly also correlate differently with porewater nutrient concentrations. We compare 6-month and 12-month root ingrowth, serial soil coring techniques utilizing two different calculations, and a mass balance approach (TBCA, Total Belowground Carbon Allocation) among four tidal wetland types along each of two river systems transitioning from freshwater forest to marsh. Median values of BNPP were 266 to 2946 g/m2/year among all techniques used, with lower BNPP estimation from root ingrowth cores and TBCA (266–416 g/m2/year), and higher BNPP estimation from serial coring of standing crop root biomass (using Smalley and Max-Min calculation methods) (2336–2946 g/m2/year). Root turnover (or longevity) to a soil depth of 30 cm was 2.2/year (1.3 years), 2.7/year (1.1 years), 4.5/year (0.9 years), and 1.2/year (2.6 years), respectively, for Upper Forest, Middle Forest, Lower Forest, and Marsh. Marsh had greater root biomass and BNPP, with slower root turnover (greater root longevity) versus forested wetlands. Soil porewater concentrations of NH3 and reactive phosphorus stimulated BNPP in the marsh when assessed with short-deployment BNPP techniques, indicating that pulses of mineralized nutrients may stimulate BNPP to facilitate marsh replacement of forested wetlands. Overall, ingrowth techniques appeared to represent forested wetland BNPP adequately, while serial coring may be necessary to represent herbaceous plant BNPP from rhizomes as marshes replace forested wetlands.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen gold 11 citations 11 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2023Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Publicly fundedFunded by:EC | METLAKE, NSF | Graduate Research Fellows..., NSERCEC| METLAKE ,NSF| Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) ,NSERCSheel Bansal; Irena F. Creed; Brian A. Tangen; Scott D. Bridgham; Ankur R. Desai; Ken W. Krauss; Scott C. Neubauer; Gregory B. Noe; Donald O. Rosenberry; Carl Trettin; Kimberly P. Wickland; Scott T. Allen; Ariane Arias‐Ortiz; Anna R. Armitage; Dennis Baldocchi; Kakoli Banerjee; David Bastviken; Peter Berg; Matthew J. Bogard; Alex T. Chow; William H. Conner; Christopher Craft; Courtney A. Creamer; Tonya DelSontro; Jamie A. Duberstein; M. E. Gonneea; M. Siobhan Fennessy; Sarah A. Finkelstein; Mathias Goeckede; Sabine Grunwald; Meghan Halabisky; Ellen R. Herbert; M. M. R. Jahangir; Olivia F. Johnson; Miriam C. Jones; Jeffrey J. Kelleway; Sara Knox; Kevin D. Kroeger; Kevin A. Kuehn; David A. Lobb; Amanda L. Loder; Shizhou Ma; Damien T. Maher; Gavin McNicol; Jacob Meier; Beth A. Middleton; Christopher T. Mills; Purbasha Mistry; Abhijit Mitra; Courtney Mobilian; Amanda M. Nahlik; Susan Newman; Jessica L. O'Connell; Patricia Y. Oikawa; Max Post van der Burg; Charles A. Schutte; Chunqiao Song; Camille L. Stagg; Jess Turner; Rodrigo Vargas; Mark P. Waldrop; Marcus B. Wallin; Zhaohui Aleck Wang; Eric J. Ward; Debra A. Willard; Stephanie A. Yarwood; Xianghong Zhu;pmid: 38037553
pmc: PMC10684704
AbstractWetlands cover a small portion of the world, but have disproportionate influence on global carbon (C) sequestration, carbon dioxide and methane emissions, and aquatic C fluxes. However, the underlying biogeochemical processes that affect wetland C pools and fluxes are complex and dynamic, making measurements of wetland C challenging. Over decades of research, many observational, experimental, and analytical approaches have been developed to understand and quantify pools and fluxes of wetland C. Sampling approaches range in their representation of wetland C from short to long timeframes and local to landscape spatial scales. This review summarizes common and cutting-edge methodological approaches for quantifying wetland C pools and fluxes. We first define each of the major C pools and fluxes and provide rationale for their importance to wetland C dynamics. For each approach, we clarify what component of wetland C is measured and its spatial and temporal representativeness and constraints. We describe practical considerations for each approach, such as where and when an approach is typically used, who can conduct the measurements (expertise, training requirements), and how approaches are conducted, including considerations on equipment complexity and costs. Finally, we review key covariates and ancillary measurements that enhance the interpretation of findings and facilitate model development. The protocols that we describe to measure soil, water, vegetation, and gases are also relevant for related disciplines such as ecology. Improved quality and consistency of data collection and reporting across studies will help reduce global uncertainties and develop management strategies to use wetlands as nature-based climate solutions.
University of Califo... arrow_drop_down University of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/15b835k7Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationer från Linköpings universitetArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Publikationer från Linköpings universiteteScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2023Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaUniversity of Wollongong, Australia: Research OnlineArticle . 2023Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access RoutesGreen hybrid 35 citations 35 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert University of Califo... arrow_drop_down University of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/15b835k7Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationer från Linköpings universitetArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Publikationer från Linköpings universiteteScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2023Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaUniversity of Wollongong, Australia: Research OnlineArticle . 2023Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2025Publisher:Wiley Michael J. Osland; John B. Bradford; Lauren T. Toth; Matthew J. Germino; James B. Grace; Judith Z. Drexler; Camille L. Stagg; Eric R. Grossman; Karen M. Thorne; Stephanie S. Romañach; Davina L. Passeri; Gregory B. Noe; Jessica R. Lacy; Ken W. Krauss; Kurt P. Kowalski; Glenn R. Guntenspergen; Neil K. Ganju; Nicholas M. Enwright; Joel A. Carr; Kristin B. Byrd; Kevin J. Buffington;doi: 10.1002/ecs2.70229
AbstractAn ecological threshold is the point at which a comparatively small environmental change triggers an abrupt and disproportionately large ecological response. In the face of accelerating climate change, there is concern that abrupt ecosystem transformations will become more widespread as critical ecological thresholds are crossed. There has been ongoing debate, however, regarding the prevalence of ecological thresholds across the natural world. While ecological thresholds are ubiquitous in some ecosystems, thresholds have been difficult to detect in others. Some studies have even concluded that threshold responses are uncommon in the natural world and overly emphasized in the ecological literature. As ecologists who work in ecosystems chronically exposed to high abiotic stress, we consider ecological thresholds and ecosystem transformations to be critical concepts that can greatly advance understanding of ecological responses to climate change and inform ecosystem management. But quantifying ecological thresholds can be challenging, if not impossible, without data that are strategically collected for that purpose. Here, we present a conceptual framework built upon linkages between abiotic stress, climate‐driven ecological threshold responses, and the risk of ecosystem transformation. We also present a simple approach for quantifying ecological thresholds across abiotic stress gradients. We hypothesize that climate‐driven threshold responses are especially influential in ecosystems chronically exposed to high abiotic stress, where autotroph diversity is low and foundation species play a prominent ecological role. Abiotic conditions in these environments are often near physiological tolerance limits of foundation species, which means that small abiotic changes can trigger landscape‐level ecological transformations. Conversely, the alleviation of stress near thresholds can allow foundation species to thrive and spread into previously inhospitable locations. We provide examples of this climate‐driven threshold behavior from four high‐stress environments: coastal wetlands, coral reefs, drylands, and alpine ecosystems. Our overarching aim in this review is to clarify the strong relationships between abiotic stress, climate‐driven ecological thresholds, and the risk of ecosystem transformation under climate change.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.Access Routesgold 2 citations 2 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
