- home
- Advanced Search
- Energy Research
- natural sciences
- Energy Research
- natural sciences
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2020 United Kingdom, AustraliaPublisher:Public Library of Science (PLoS) Authors:Lisa Boström-Einarsson;
Lisa Boström-Einarsson
Lisa Boström-Einarsson in OpenAIRERussell C. Babcock;
Elisa Bayraktarov; Daniela Ceccarelli; +11 AuthorsRussell C. Babcock
Russell C. Babcock in OpenAIRELisa Boström-Einarsson;
Lisa Boström-Einarsson
Lisa Boström-Einarsson in OpenAIRERussell C. Babcock;
Elisa Bayraktarov; Daniela Ceccarelli;Russell C. Babcock
Russell C. Babcock in OpenAIRENathan Cook;
Nathan Cook
Nathan Cook in OpenAIRESebastian C. A. Ferse;
Boze Hancock; Peter Harrison; Margaux Hein; Elizabeth Shaver;Sebastian C. A. Ferse
Sebastian C. A. Ferse in OpenAIREAdam Smith;
David Suggett;Adam Smith
Adam Smith in OpenAIREPhoebe J. Stewart-Sinclair;
Tali Vardi;Phoebe J. Stewart-Sinclair
Phoebe J. Stewart-Sinclair in OpenAIREIan M. McLeod;
Ian M. McLeod
Ian M. McLeod in OpenAIRECoral reef ecosystems have suffered an unprecedented loss of habitat-forming hard corals in recent decades. While marine conservation has historically focused on passive habitat protection, demand for and interest in active restoration has been growing in recent decades. However, a disconnect between coral restoration practitioners, coral reef managers and scientists has resulted in a disjointed field where it is difficult to gain an overview of existing knowledge. To address this, we aimed to synthesise the available knowledge in a comprehensive global review of coral restoration methods, incorporating data from the peer-reviewed scientific literature, complemented with grey literature and through a survey of coral restoration practitioners. We found that coral restoration case studies are dominated by short-term projects, with 60% of all projects reporting less than 18 months of monitoring of the restored sites. Similarly, most projects are relatively small in spatial scale, with a median size of restored area of 100 m2. A diverse range of species are represented in the dataset, with 229 different species from 72 coral genera. Overall, coral restoration projects focused primarily on fast-growing branching corals (59% of studies), and report survival between 60 and 70%. To date, the relatively young field of coral restoration has been plagued by similar 'growing pains' as ecological restoration in other ecosystems. These include 1) a lack of clear and achievable objectives, 2) a lack of appropriate and standardised monitoring and reporting and, 3) poorly designed projects in relation to stated objectives. Mitigating these will be crucial to successfully scale up projects, and to retain public trust in restoration as a tool for resilience based management. Finally, while it is clear that practitioners have developed effective methods to successfully grow corals at small scales, it is critical not to view restoration as a replacement for meaningful action on climate change.
James Cook Universit... arrow_drop_down James Cook University, Australia: ResearchOnline@JCUArticle . 2020Full-Text: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226631Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Fachrepositorium LebenswissenschaftenArticle . 2020Data sources: Fachrepositorium LebenswissenschaftenThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1371/journal.pone.0226631&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 432 citations 432 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert James Cook Universit... arrow_drop_down James Cook University, Australia: ResearchOnline@JCUArticle . 2020Full-Text: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226631Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Fachrepositorium LebenswissenschaftenArticle . 2020Data sources: Fachrepositorium LebenswissenschaftenThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1371/journal.pone.0226631&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu