- home
- Advanced Search
- Energy Research
- biological sciences
- Energy Research
- biological sciences
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2022 Italy, France, Germany, United Kingdom, France, NetherlandsPublisher:IOP Publishing Funded by:UKRI | Tropical Biomes in Transi...UKRI| Tropical Biomes in TransitionAuthors: Danaë M. A. Rozendaal; Daniela Requena Suárez; Véronique De Sy; Valerio Avitabile; +53 AuthorsDanaë M. A. Rozendaal; Daniela Requena Suárez; Véronique De Sy; Valerio Avitabile; Sarah Carter; Constant Yves Adou Yao; Esteban Álvarez-Dávila; Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira; Alejandro Araujo‐Murakami; Luzmila Arroyo; Benjamin Barca; Timothy R. Baker; Luca Birigazzi; Frans Bongers; Anne Branthomme; Roel Brienen; João M. B. Carreiras; Roberto Cazzolla Gatti; Susan C. Cook‐Patton; Mathieu Decuyper; Ben DeVries; Andrés Espejo; Ted R. Feldpausch; J Fox; Javier G. P. Gamarra; Bronson W. Griscom; Nancy L. Harris; Bruno Hérault; Eurídice N. Honorio Coronado; Inge Jonckheere; Eric Konan; Sara M. Leavitt; Simon L. Lewis; Jeremy Lindsell; Justin Kassi N'dja; Anny Estelle N'Guessan; Beatriz Schwantes Marimon; Edward T. A. Mitchard; A. Monteagudo; Alexandra Morel; Anssi Pekkarinen; Oliver L. Phillips; Lourens Poorter; Lan Qie; Ervan Rutishauser; Casey M. Ryan; Maurizio Santoro; Dos Santos Silayo; Plínio Sist; J. W. Ferry Slik; Bonaventure Sonké; Martin J. P. Sullivan; Gaia Vaglio Laurin; Emilio Vilanova; Maria M. H. Wang; Eliakimu Zahabu; Martin Herold;handle: 2067/47910 , 10023/24951 , 10568/117672
Abstract For monitoring and reporting forest carbon stocks and fluxes, many countries in the tropics and subtropics rely on default values of forest aboveground biomass (AGB) from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Inventories. Default IPCC forest AGB values originated from 2006, and are relatively crude estimates of average values per continent and ecological zone. The 2006 default values were based on limited plot data available at the time, methods for their derivation were not fully clear, and no distinction between successional stages was made. As part of the 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for GHG Inventories, we updated the default AGB values for tropical and subtropical forests based on AGB data from >25 000 plots in natural forests and a global AGB map where no plot data were available. We calculated refined AGB default values per continent, ecological zone, and successional stage, and provided a measure of uncertainty. AGB in tropical and subtropical forests varies by an order of magnitude across continents, ecological zones, and successional stage. Our refined default values generally reflect the climatic gradients in the tropics, with more AGB in wetter areas. AGB is generally higher in old-growth than in secondary forests, and higher in older secondary (regrowth >20 years old and degraded/logged forests) than in young secondary forests (⩽20 years old). While refined default values for tropical old-growth forest are largely similar to the previous 2006 default values, the new default values are 4.0–7.7-fold lower for young secondary forests. Thus, the refined values will strongly alter estimated carbon stocks and fluxes, and emphasize the critical importance of old-growth forest conservation. We provide a reproducible approach to facilitate future refinements and encourage targeted efforts to establish permanent plots in areas with data gaps.
CORE arrow_drop_down COREArticle . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/182599/1/Rozendaal_2022_Environ._Res._Lett._17_014047.pdfData sources: COREUniversity of St Andrews: Digital Research RepositoryArticle . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/24951Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)Article . 2022License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/117672Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Wageningen Staff PublicationsArticle . 2022License: CC BYData sources: Wageningen Staff PublicationsUniversità degli studi della Tuscia: Unitus DSpaceArticle . 2022Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/ac45b3&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 30 citations 30 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 48visibility views 48 download downloads 67 Powered bymore_vert CORE arrow_drop_down COREArticle . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/182599/1/Rozendaal_2022_Environ._Res._Lett._17_014047.pdfData sources: COREUniversity of St Andrews: Digital Research RepositoryArticle . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/24951Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)Article . 2022License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/117672Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Wageningen Staff PublicationsArticle . 2022License: CC BYData sources: Wageningen Staff PublicationsUniversità degli studi della Tuscia: Unitus DSpaceArticle . 2022Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/ac45b3&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2022 Italy, France, Germany, United Kingdom, France, NetherlandsPublisher:IOP Publishing Funded by:UKRI | Tropical Biomes in Transi...UKRI| Tropical Biomes in TransitionAuthors: Danaë M. A. Rozendaal; Daniela Requena Suárez; Véronique De Sy; Valerio Avitabile; +53 AuthorsDanaë M. A. Rozendaal; Daniela Requena Suárez; Véronique De Sy; Valerio Avitabile; Sarah Carter; Constant Yves Adou Yao; Esteban Álvarez-Dávila; Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira; Alejandro Araujo‐Murakami; Luzmila Arroyo; Benjamin Barca; Timothy R. Baker; Luca Birigazzi; Frans Bongers; Anne Branthomme; Roel Brienen; João M. B. Carreiras; Roberto Cazzolla Gatti; Susan C. Cook‐Patton; Mathieu Decuyper; Ben DeVries; Andrés Espejo; Ted R. Feldpausch; J Fox; Javier G. P. Gamarra; Bronson W. Griscom; Nancy L. Harris; Bruno Hérault; Eurídice N. Honorio Coronado; Inge Jonckheere; Eric Konan; Sara M. Leavitt; Simon L. Lewis; Jeremy Lindsell; Justin Kassi N'dja; Anny Estelle N'Guessan; Beatriz Schwantes Marimon; Edward T. A. Mitchard; A. Monteagudo; Alexandra Morel; Anssi Pekkarinen; Oliver L. Phillips; Lourens Poorter; Lan Qie; Ervan Rutishauser; Casey M. Ryan; Maurizio Santoro; Dos Santos Silayo; Plínio Sist; J. W. Ferry Slik; Bonaventure Sonké; Martin J. P. Sullivan; Gaia Vaglio Laurin; Emilio Vilanova; Maria M. H. Wang; Eliakimu Zahabu; Martin Herold;handle: 2067/47910 , 10023/24951 , 10568/117672
Abstract For monitoring and reporting forest carbon stocks and fluxes, many countries in the tropics and subtropics rely on default values of forest aboveground biomass (AGB) from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Inventories. Default IPCC forest AGB values originated from 2006, and are relatively crude estimates of average values per continent and ecological zone. The 2006 default values were based on limited plot data available at the time, methods for their derivation were not fully clear, and no distinction between successional stages was made. As part of the 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for GHG Inventories, we updated the default AGB values for tropical and subtropical forests based on AGB data from >25 000 plots in natural forests and a global AGB map where no plot data were available. We calculated refined AGB default values per continent, ecological zone, and successional stage, and provided a measure of uncertainty. AGB in tropical and subtropical forests varies by an order of magnitude across continents, ecological zones, and successional stage. Our refined default values generally reflect the climatic gradients in the tropics, with more AGB in wetter areas. AGB is generally higher in old-growth than in secondary forests, and higher in older secondary (regrowth >20 years old and degraded/logged forests) than in young secondary forests (⩽20 years old). While refined default values for tropical old-growth forest are largely similar to the previous 2006 default values, the new default values are 4.0–7.7-fold lower for young secondary forests. Thus, the refined values will strongly alter estimated carbon stocks and fluxes, and emphasize the critical importance of old-growth forest conservation. We provide a reproducible approach to facilitate future refinements and encourage targeted efforts to establish permanent plots in areas with data gaps.
CORE arrow_drop_down COREArticle . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/182599/1/Rozendaal_2022_Environ._Res._Lett._17_014047.pdfData sources: COREUniversity of St Andrews: Digital Research RepositoryArticle . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/24951Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)Article . 2022License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/117672Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Wageningen Staff PublicationsArticle . 2022License: CC BYData sources: Wageningen Staff PublicationsUniversità degli studi della Tuscia: Unitus DSpaceArticle . 2022Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/ac45b3&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 30 citations 30 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 48visibility views 48 download downloads 67 Powered bymore_vert CORE arrow_drop_down COREArticle . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/182599/1/Rozendaal_2022_Environ._Res._Lett._17_014047.pdfData sources: COREUniversity of St Andrews: Digital Research RepositoryArticle . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/24951Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)Article . 2022License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/117672Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Wageningen Staff PublicationsArticle . 2022License: CC BYData sources: Wageningen Staff PublicationsUniversità degli studi della Tuscia: Unitus DSpaceArticle . 2022Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/ac45b3&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu