- home
- Advanced Search
Filters
Access
Type
Year range
-chevron_right GO- This year
- Last 5 years
- Last 10 years
Field of Science
SDG [Beta]
Country
Source
Research community
Organization
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2014 United StatesPublisher:American Geophysical Union (AGU) Ivy Tan; Yuxing Yun; Yuxing Yun; Ulrike Lohmann; Yong Wang; Yong Wang; Muge Komurcu; Joyce E. Penner; Trude Storelvmo; Xiaohong Liu; Xiaohong Liu; Toshihiko Takemura;doi: 10.1002/2013jd021119
handle: 20.500.11919/707 , 2027.42/106995
Mixed-phase clouds (clouds that consist of both cloud droplets and ice crystals) are frequently present in the Earth’s atmosphere and influence the Earth’s energy budget through their radiative properties, which are highly dependent on the cloud water phase. In this study, the phase partitioning of cloud water is compared among six global climate models (GCMs) and with Cloud and Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization retrievals. It is found that the GCMs predict vastly different distributions of cloud phase for a given temperature, and none of them are capable of reproducing the spatial distribution or magnitude of the observed phase partitioning. While some GCMs produced liquid water paths comparable to satellite observations, they all failed to preserve sufficient liquid water at mixed-phase cloud temperatures. Our results suggest that validating GCMs using only the vertically integrated water contents could lead to amplified differences in cloud radiative feedback. The sensitivity of the simulated cloud phase in GCMs to the choice of heterogeneous ice nucleation parameterization is also investigated. The response to a change in ice nucleation is quite different for each GCM, and the implementation of the same ice nucleation parameterization in all models does not reduce the spread in simulated phase amongmore » GCMs. The results suggest that processes subsequent to ice nucleation are at least as important in determining phase and should be the focus of future studies aimed at understanding and reducing differences among the models.« less
Mountain Scholar arrow_drop_down Mountain ScholarArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11919/707Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversity of Michigan: Deep BlueArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/2013jd021119&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 126 citations 126 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Mountain Scholar arrow_drop_down Mountain ScholarArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11919/707Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversity of Michigan: Deep BlueArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/2013jd021119&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2014 United StatesPublisher:American Geophysical Union (AGU) Ivy Tan; Yuxing Yun; Yuxing Yun; Ulrike Lohmann; Yong Wang; Yong Wang; Muge Komurcu; Joyce E. Penner; Trude Storelvmo; Xiaohong Liu; Xiaohong Liu; Toshihiko Takemura;doi: 10.1002/2013jd021119
handle: 20.500.11919/707 , 2027.42/106995
Mixed-phase clouds (clouds that consist of both cloud droplets and ice crystals) are frequently present in the Earth’s atmosphere and influence the Earth’s energy budget through their radiative properties, which are highly dependent on the cloud water phase. In this study, the phase partitioning of cloud water is compared among six global climate models (GCMs) and with Cloud and Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization retrievals. It is found that the GCMs predict vastly different distributions of cloud phase for a given temperature, and none of them are capable of reproducing the spatial distribution or magnitude of the observed phase partitioning. While some GCMs produced liquid water paths comparable to satellite observations, they all failed to preserve sufficient liquid water at mixed-phase cloud temperatures. Our results suggest that validating GCMs using only the vertically integrated water contents could lead to amplified differences in cloud radiative feedback. The sensitivity of the simulated cloud phase in GCMs to the choice of heterogeneous ice nucleation parameterization is also investigated. The response to a change in ice nucleation is quite different for each GCM, and the implementation of the same ice nucleation parameterization in all models does not reduce the spread in simulated phase amongmore » GCMs. The results suggest that processes subsequent to ice nucleation are at least as important in determining phase and should be the focus of future studies aimed at understanding and reducing differences among the models.« less
Mountain Scholar arrow_drop_down Mountain ScholarArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11919/707Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversity of Michigan: Deep BlueArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/2013jd021119&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 126 citations 126 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Mountain Scholar arrow_drop_down Mountain ScholarArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11919/707Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversity of Michigan: Deep BlueArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/2013jd021119&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu