- home
- Advanced Search
Filters
Year range
-chevron_right GOCountry
Source
Organization
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2022Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Sally E. Koerner; Meghan L. Avolio; John M. Blair; Alan K. Knapp; Melinda D. Smith;pmid: 36507971
Ecosystems are faced with an onslaught of co-occurring global change drivers. While frequently studied independently, the effects of multiple global change drivers have the potential to be additive, antagonistic, or synergistic. Global warming, for example, may intensify the effects of more variable precipitation regimes with warmer temperatures increasing evapotranspiration and thereby amplifying the effect of already dry soils. Here, we present the long-term effects (11 years) of altered precipitation patterns (increased intra-annual variability in the growing season) and warming (1 °C year-round) on plant community composition and aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP), a key measure of ecosystem functioning in mesic tallgrass prairie. Based on past results, we expected that increased precipitation variability and warming would have additive effects on both community composition and ANPP. Increased precipitation variability altered plant community composition and increased richness, with no effect on ANPP. In contrast, warming decreased ANPP via reduction in grass stems and biomass but had no effect on the plant community. Contrary to expectations, across all measured variables, precipitation and warming treatments had no interactive effects. While treatment interactions did not occur, each treatment did individually impact a different component of the ecosystem (i.e., community vs. function). Thus, different aspects of the ecosystem may be sensitive to different global change drivers in mesic grassland ecosystems.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s00442-022-05295-5&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 7 citations 7 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s00442-022-05295-5&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2016 United StatesPublisher:Wiley Carlson, Ben S; Koerner, Sally E; Medjibe, Vincent P; White, Lee JT; Poulsen, John R;AbstractDeadwood is a major component of aboveground biomass (AGB) in tropical forests and is important as habitat and for nutrient cycling and carbon storage. With deforestation and degradation taking place throughout the tropics, improved understanding of the magnitude and spatial variation in deadwood is vital for the development of regional and global carbon budgets. However, this potentially important carbon pool is poorly quantified in Afrotropical forests and the regional drivers of deadwood stocks are unknown. In the first large‐scale study of deadwood in Central Africa, we quantified stocks in 47 forest sites across Gabon and evaluated the effects of disturbance (logging), forest structure variables (live AGB, wood density, abundance of large trees), and abiotic variables (temperature, precipitation, seasonality). Average deadwood stocks (measured as necromass, the biomass of deadwood) were 65 Mg ha−1 or 23% of live AGB. Deadwood stocks varied spatially with disturbance and forest structure, but not abiotic variables. Deadwood stocks increased significantly with logging (+38 Mg ha−1) and the abundance of large trees (+2.4 Mg ha−1 for every tree >60 cm dbh). Gabon holds 0.74 Pg C, or 21% of total aboveground carbon in deadwood, a threefold increase over previous estimates. Importantly, deadwood densities in Gabon are comparable to those in the Neotropics and respond similarly to logging, but represent a lower proportion of live AGB (median of 18% in Gabon compared to 26% in the Neotropics). In forest carbon accounting, necromass is often assumed to be a constant proportion (9%) of biomass, but in humid tropical forests this ratio varies from 2% in undisturbed forest to 300% in logged forest. Because logging significantly increases the deadwood carbon pool, estimates of tropical forest carbon should at a minimum use different ratios for logged (mean of 30%) and unlogged forests (mean of 18%).
Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13453&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 16 citations 16 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13453&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2017Publisher:Wiley Anna Katarina Gilgen; Yiqi Luo; Shanghua Sun; Melinda D. Smith; Junyi Liang; Alan K. Knapp; Petr Holub; Daniel R. LeCain; Scott L. Collins; William T. Pockman; Kevin R. Wilcox; Sarah E. Evans; Laureano A. Gherardi; Pablo García-Palacios; David L. Hoover; Laura Yahdjian; Edward W. Bork; Kerry M. Byrne; Shannon R. White; Lifen Jiang; Sally E. Koerner; James F. Cahill; Josep Peñuelas; Nathan P. Lemoine; Kai Zhu; Kai Zhu; Zheng Shi;doi: 10.1111/gcb.13706
pmid: 28370946
AbstractClimatic changes are altering Earth's hydrological cycle, resulting in altered precipitation amounts, increased interannual variability of precipitation, and more frequent extreme precipitation events. These trends will likely continue into the future, having substantial impacts on net primary productivity (NPP) and associated ecosystem services such as food production and carbon sequestration. Frequently, experimental manipulations of precipitation have linked altered precipitation regimes to changes in NPP. Yet, findings have been diverse and substantial uncertainty still surrounds generalities describing patterns of ecosystem sensitivity to altered precipitation. Additionally, we do not know whether previously observed correlations between NPP and precipitation remain accurate when precipitation changes become extreme. We synthesized results from 83 case studies of experimental precipitation manipulations in grasslands worldwide. We used meta‐analytical techniques to search for generalities and asymmetries of aboveground NPP (ANPP) and belowground NPP (BNPP) responses to both the direction and magnitude of precipitation change. Sensitivity (i.e., productivity response standardized by the amount of precipitation change) of BNPP was similar under precipitation additions and reductions, but ANPP was more sensitive to precipitation additions than reductions; this was especially evident in drier ecosystems. Additionally, overall relationships between the magnitude of productivity responses and the magnitude of precipitation change were saturating in form. The saturating form of this relationship was likely driven by ANPP responses to very extreme precipitation increases, although there were limited studies imposing extreme precipitation change, and there was considerable variation among experiments. This highlights the importance of incorporating gradients of manipulations, ranging from extreme drought to extreme precipitation increases into future climate change experiments. Additionally, policy and land management decisions related to global change scenarios should consider how ANPP and BNPP responses may differ, and that ecosystem responses to extreme events might not be predicted from relationships found under moderate environmental changes.
Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13706&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routeshybrid 241 citations 241 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
visibility 11visibility views 11 Powered bymore_vert Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13706&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2023 NorwayPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Funded by:NSF | LTER: Biodiversity, Multi..., NSF | RCN: Coordination of the ..., FCT | LA 1 +1 projectsNSF| LTER: Biodiversity, Multiple Drivers of Environmental Change and Ecosystem Functioning at the Prairie Forest Border ,NSF| RCN: Coordination of the Nutrient Network (NutNet), global manipulations of nutrients and consumers ,FCT| LA 1 ,DFG| German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research - iDivMarie Spohn; Sumanta Bagchi; Lori A. Biederman; Elizabeth T. Borer; Kari Anne Bråthen; Miguel N. Bugalho; Maria C. Caldeira; Jane A. Catford; Scott L. Collins; Nico Eisenhauer; Nicole Hagenah; Sylvia Haider; Yann Hautier; Johannes M. H. Knops; Sally E. Koerner; Lauri Laanisto; Ylva Lekberg; Jason P. Martina; Holly M. Martinson; Rebecca L. McCulley; Pablo Luís Peri; Petr Macek; Sally A. Power; Anita C. Risch; Christiane Roscher; Eric W. Seabloom; Carly J. Stevens; G. F. Veen; Risto Virtanen; Laura Yahdjian;pmid: 37857640
pmc: PMC10587103
AbstractLittle is currently known about how climate modulates the relationship between plant diversity and soil organic carbon and the mechanisms involved. Yet, this knowledge is of crucial importance in times of climate change and biodiversity loss. Here, we show that plant diversity is positively correlated with soil carbon content and soil carbon-to-nitrogen ratio across 84 grasslands on six continents that span wide climate gradients. The relationships between plant diversity and soil carbon as well as plant diversity and soil organic matter quality (carbon-to-nitrogen ratio) are particularly strong in warm and arid climates. While plant biomass is positively correlated with soil carbon, plant biomass is not significantly correlated with plant diversity. Our results indicate that plant diversity influences soil carbon storage not via the quantity of organic matter (plant biomass) inputs to soil, but through the quality of organic matter. The study implies that ecosystem management that restores plant diversity likely enhances soil carbon sequestration, particularly in warm and arid climates.
Nature Communication... arrow_drop_down Munin - Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Munin - Open Research Archiveadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41467-023-42340-0&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 35 citations 35 popularity Average influence Average impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Nature Communication... arrow_drop_down Munin - Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Munin - Open Research Archiveadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41467-023-42340-0&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2019 United States, United States, United States, Australia, Qatar, United States, Argentina, United Kingdom, Australia, Australia, QatarPublisher:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Scott L. Collins; Mark J. Hovenden; Kevin R. Wilcox; Lauren M. Hallett; Jennifer Firn; Juergen Kreyling; Alan K. Knapp; David Tilman; Andrew Baldwin; Katherine N. Suding; Jodi N. Price; Nona R. Chiariello; Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia; Laura Gough; Jimin Cheng; Annika K. Jägerbrand; Juliette M. G. Bloor; Harry Harmens; Vladimir G. Onipchenko; F. Leland Russell; Yunhai Zhang; Yunhai Zhang; J. Hans C. Cornelissen; Bryan L. Foster; John P. Anderson; Guozhen Du; Pedro M. Tognetti; Andrea J. Britton; Enrique J. Chaneton; K. Blake Suttle; Shannon R. White; Carl Beierkuhnlein; Rien Aerts; William D. Bowman; Tony J. Svejcar; Sara G. Baer; Jennie R. McLaren; Christel C. Kern; Yiqi Luo; Roy Turkington; Kari Klanderud; Emily Grman; Edward W. Bork; Nathan P. Lemoine; R. Travis Belote; Anke Jentsch; J. Patrick Megonigal; Qiang Yu; Pengfei Zhang; Pengfei Zhang; Wei Li; Gregory R. Houseman; Elizabeth H. Boughton; Laura Yahdjian; Melinda D. Smith; Sally E. Koerner; Lara Souza; Osvaldo E. Sala; David Samuel Johnson; Forest Isbell; Janet S. Prevéy; Juha M. Alatalo; Zhuwen Xu; Clare H. Robinson; James F. Cahill; Anu Eskelinen; Meghan L. Avolio; Rebecca L. McCulley; Kimberly J. Komatsu; Patrick J. Bohlen; Eric W. Seabloom; Xingguo Han; Katherine L. Gross; Peter B. Reich; Peter B. Reich; John M. Blair; John W. Morgan; Steven C. Pennings; Jonathan D. Bates;pmid: 31427510
pmc: PMC6731679
Significance Accurate prediction of community responses to global change drivers (GCDs) is critical given the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem services. There is consensus that human activities are driving species extinctions at the global scale, but debate remains over whether GCDs are systematically altering local communities worldwide. Across 105 experiments that included over 400 experimental manipulations, we found evidence for a lagged response of herbaceous plant communities to GCDs caused by shifts in the identities and relative abundances of species, often without a corresponding difference in species richness. These results provide evidence that community responses are pervasive across a wide variety of GCDs on long-term temporal scales and that these responses increase in strength when multiple GCDs are simultaneously imposed.
FAUBA Digital (Facul... arrow_drop_down Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedData sources: CrossrefProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)Qatar University: QU Institutional RepositoryArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Wichita State University: SOAR (Shocker Open Access Repository)Article . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1073/pnas.1819027116&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 164 citations 164 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
visibility 3visibility views 3 download downloads 24 Powered bymore_vert FAUBA Digital (Facul... arrow_drop_down Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedData sources: CrossrefProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)Qatar University: QU Institutional RepositoryArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Wichita State University: SOAR (Shocker Open Access Repository)Article . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1073/pnas.1819027116&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018 AustraliaPublisher:Wiley Kimberly J. La Pierre; J. Adam Langley; Alan K. Knapp; Bryan L. Foster; Mark J. Hovenden; Kevin R. Wilcox; William D. Bowman; Peter B. Reich; Peter B. Reich; Samantha K. Chapman; Forest Isbell; Sally E. Koerner; David Tilman; Paul C. D. Newton; K. B. Suttle; Meghan L. Avolio; David Samuel Johnson; Christopher J. Lortie; James Patrick Megonigal; Melinda D. Smith;doi: 10.1111/gcb.14442
pmid: 30369019
AbstractThe responses of species to environmental changes will determine future community composition and ecosystem function. Many syntheses of global change experiments examine the magnitude of treatment effect sizes, but we lack an understanding of how plant responses to treatments compare to ongoing changes in the unmanipulated (ambient or background) system. We used a database of long‐term global change studies manipulating CO2, nutrients, water, and temperature to answer three questions: (a) How do changes in plant species abundance in ambient plots relate to those in treated plots? (b) How does the magnitude of ambient change in species‐level abundance over time relate to responsiveness to global change treatments? (c) Does the direction of species‐level responses to global change treatments differ from the direction of ambient change? We estimated temporal trends in plant abundance for 791 plant species in ambient and treated plots across 16 long‐term global change experiments yielding 2,116 experiment–species–treatment combinations. Surprisingly, for most species (57%) the magnitude of ambient change was greater than the magnitude of treatment effects. However, the direction of ambient change, whether a species was increasing or decreasing in abundance under ambient conditions, had no bearing on the direction of treatment effects. Although ambient communities are inherently dynamic, there is now widespread evidence that anthropogenic drivers are directionally altering plant communities in many ecosystems. Thus, global change treatment effects must be interpreted in the context of plant species trajectories that are likely driven by ongoing environmental changes.
Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversity of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14442&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routeshybrid 30 citations 30 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversity of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14442&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2020 Portugal, Portugal, United States, France, United Kingdom, Argentina, ArgentinaPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Funded by:FCT | LA 1, EC | GLOBEPURE, EC | BIOSTASES +1 projectsFCT| LA 1 ,EC| GLOBEPURE ,EC| BIOSTASES ,NSF| RCN: Coordination of the Nutrient Network (NutNet), global manipulations of nutrients and consumersElizabeth T. Borer; Andy Hector; Pablo Luis Peri; Peter B. Adler; Risto Virtanen; Anita C. Risch; Melinda D. Smith; Miguel N. Bugalho; Amandine Hansar; Shaopeng Wang; Nico Eisenhauer; Joslin L. Moore; Laura E. Dee; Edwin Pos; Jarrett E. K. Byrnes; Mahesh Sankaran; Mahesh Sankaran; Philip A. Fay; Peter A. Wilfahrt; Jonathan D. Bakker; Oliver Carroll; Forest Isbell; Pedro M. Tognetti; Carlos Alberto Arnillas; Martin Schütz; Mick Crawley; Carly J. Stevens; Anu Eskelinen; Anu Eskelinen; Johannes M. H. Knops; Yann Hautier; Sally A. Power; Maria C. Caldeira; Benjamin Gilbert; John W. Morgan; Jodi N. Price; Sally E. Koerner; Scott L. Collins; Kevin R. Wilcox; Peter B. Reich; Jonathan S. Lefcheck; Marc W. Cadotte; Pengfei Zhang; Christiane Roscher; Michel Loreau; Glenda M. Wardle; Lars A. Brudvig; Kimberly J. Komatsu; Akira Mori; Andrew S. MacDougall; Eric W. Seabloom; Pedro Daleo; Rebecca L. McCulley; Juan Alberti;doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19252-4 , 10.60692/ek9fr-2vy51 , 10.26181/5fa88c8b515f5 , 10.60692/75wsa-89s88
pmc: PMC7585434
handle: 1959.7/uws:62577
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19252-4 , 10.60692/ek9fr-2vy51 , 10.26181/5fa88c8b515f5 , 10.60692/75wsa-89s88
pmc: PMC7585434
handle: 1959.7/uws:62577
AbstractEutrophication is a widespread environmental change that usually reduces the stabilizing effect of plant diversity on productivity in local communities. Whether this effect is scale dependent remains to be elucidated. Here, we determine the relationship between plant diversity and temporal stability of productivity for 243 plant communities from 42 grasslands across the globe and quantify the effect of chronic fertilization on these relationships. Unfertilized local communities with more plant species exhibit greater asynchronous dynamics among species in response to natural environmental fluctuations, resulting in greater local stability (alpha stability). Moreover, neighborhood communities that have greater spatial variation in plant species composition within sites (higher beta diversity) have greater spatial asynchrony of productivity among communities, resulting in greater stability at the larger scale (gamma stability). Importantly, fertilization consistently weakens the contribution of plant diversity to both of these stabilizing mechanisms, thus diminishing the positive effect of biodiversity on stability at differing spatial scales. Our findings suggest that preserving grassland functional stability requires conservation of plant diversity within and among ecological communities.
Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Utah State University: DigitalCommons@USUArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2020Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03169697Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Universidade de Lisboa: Repositório.ULArticle . 2020Data sources: Universidade de Lisboa: Repositório.ULUniversity of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41467-020-19252-4&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 87 citations 87 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
visibility 45visibility views 45 download downloads 233 Powered bymore_vert Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Utah State University: DigitalCommons@USUArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2020Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03169697Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Universidade de Lisboa: Repositório.ULArticle . 2020Data sources: Universidade de Lisboa: Repositório.ULUniversity of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41467-020-19252-4&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2022Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Sally E. Koerner; Meghan L. Avolio; John M. Blair; Alan K. Knapp; Melinda D. Smith;pmid: 36507971
Ecosystems are faced with an onslaught of co-occurring global change drivers. While frequently studied independently, the effects of multiple global change drivers have the potential to be additive, antagonistic, or synergistic. Global warming, for example, may intensify the effects of more variable precipitation regimes with warmer temperatures increasing evapotranspiration and thereby amplifying the effect of already dry soils. Here, we present the long-term effects (11 years) of altered precipitation patterns (increased intra-annual variability in the growing season) and warming (1 °C year-round) on plant community composition and aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP), a key measure of ecosystem functioning in mesic tallgrass prairie. Based on past results, we expected that increased precipitation variability and warming would have additive effects on both community composition and ANPP. Increased precipitation variability altered plant community composition and increased richness, with no effect on ANPP. In contrast, warming decreased ANPP via reduction in grass stems and biomass but had no effect on the plant community. Contrary to expectations, across all measured variables, precipitation and warming treatments had no interactive effects. While treatment interactions did not occur, each treatment did individually impact a different component of the ecosystem (i.e., community vs. function). Thus, different aspects of the ecosystem may be sensitive to different global change drivers in mesic grassland ecosystems.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s00442-022-05295-5&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 7 citations 7 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s00442-022-05295-5&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2016 United StatesPublisher:Wiley Carlson, Ben S; Koerner, Sally E; Medjibe, Vincent P; White, Lee JT; Poulsen, John R;AbstractDeadwood is a major component of aboveground biomass (AGB) in tropical forests and is important as habitat and for nutrient cycling and carbon storage. With deforestation and degradation taking place throughout the tropics, improved understanding of the magnitude and spatial variation in deadwood is vital for the development of regional and global carbon budgets. However, this potentially important carbon pool is poorly quantified in Afrotropical forests and the regional drivers of deadwood stocks are unknown. In the first large‐scale study of deadwood in Central Africa, we quantified stocks in 47 forest sites across Gabon and evaluated the effects of disturbance (logging), forest structure variables (live AGB, wood density, abundance of large trees), and abiotic variables (temperature, precipitation, seasonality). Average deadwood stocks (measured as necromass, the biomass of deadwood) were 65 Mg ha−1 or 23% of live AGB. Deadwood stocks varied spatially with disturbance and forest structure, but not abiotic variables. Deadwood stocks increased significantly with logging (+38 Mg ha−1) and the abundance of large trees (+2.4 Mg ha−1 for every tree >60 cm dbh). Gabon holds 0.74 Pg C, or 21% of total aboveground carbon in deadwood, a threefold increase over previous estimates. Importantly, deadwood densities in Gabon are comparable to those in the Neotropics and respond similarly to logging, but represent a lower proportion of live AGB (median of 18% in Gabon compared to 26% in the Neotropics). In forest carbon accounting, necromass is often assumed to be a constant proportion (9%) of biomass, but in humid tropical forests this ratio varies from 2% in undisturbed forest to 300% in logged forest. Because logging significantly increases the deadwood carbon pool, estimates of tropical forest carbon should at a minimum use different ratios for logged (mean of 30%) and unlogged forests (mean of 18%).
Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13453&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 16 citations 16 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13453&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2017Publisher:Wiley Anna Katarina Gilgen; Yiqi Luo; Shanghua Sun; Melinda D. Smith; Junyi Liang; Alan K. Knapp; Petr Holub; Daniel R. LeCain; Scott L. Collins; William T. Pockman; Kevin R. Wilcox; Sarah E. Evans; Laureano A. Gherardi; Pablo García-Palacios; David L. Hoover; Laura Yahdjian; Edward W. Bork; Kerry M. Byrne; Shannon R. White; Lifen Jiang; Sally E. Koerner; James F. Cahill; Josep Peñuelas; Nathan P. Lemoine; Kai Zhu; Kai Zhu; Zheng Shi;doi: 10.1111/gcb.13706
pmid: 28370946
AbstractClimatic changes are altering Earth's hydrological cycle, resulting in altered precipitation amounts, increased interannual variability of precipitation, and more frequent extreme precipitation events. These trends will likely continue into the future, having substantial impacts on net primary productivity (NPP) and associated ecosystem services such as food production and carbon sequestration. Frequently, experimental manipulations of precipitation have linked altered precipitation regimes to changes in NPP. Yet, findings have been diverse and substantial uncertainty still surrounds generalities describing patterns of ecosystem sensitivity to altered precipitation. Additionally, we do not know whether previously observed correlations between NPP and precipitation remain accurate when precipitation changes become extreme. We synthesized results from 83 case studies of experimental precipitation manipulations in grasslands worldwide. We used meta‐analytical techniques to search for generalities and asymmetries of aboveground NPP (ANPP) and belowground NPP (BNPP) responses to both the direction and magnitude of precipitation change. Sensitivity (i.e., productivity response standardized by the amount of precipitation change) of BNPP was similar under precipitation additions and reductions, but ANPP was more sensitive to precipitation additions than reductions; this was especially evident in drier ecosystems. Additionally, overall relationships between the magnitude of productivity responses and the magnitude of precipitation change were saturating in form. The saturating form of this relationship was likely driven by ANPP responses to very extreme precipitation increases, although there were limited studies imposing extreme precipitation change, and there was considerable variation among experiments. This highlights the importance of incorporating gradients of manipulations, ranging from extreme drought to extreme precipitation increases into future climate change experiments. Additionally, policy and land management decisions related to global change scenarios should consider how ANPP and BNPP responses may differ, and that ecosystem responses to extreme events might not be predicted from relationships found under moderate environmental changes.
Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13706&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routeshybrid 241 citations 241 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
visibility 11visibility views 11 Powered bymore_vert Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13706&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2023 NorwayPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Funded by:NSF | LTER: Biodiversity, Multi..., NSF | RCN: Coordination of the ..., FCT | LA 1 +1 projectsNSF| LTER: Biodiversity, Multiple Drivers of Environmental Change and Ecosystem Functioning at the Prairie Forest Border ,NSF| RCN: Coordination of the Nutrient Network (NutNet), global manipulations of nutrients and consumers ,FCT| LA 1 ,DFG| German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research - iDivMarie Spohn; Sumanta Bagchi; Lori A. Biederman; Elizabeth T. Borer; Kari Anne Bråthen; Miguel N. Bugalho; Maria C. Caldeira; Jane A. Catford; Scott L. Collins; Nico Eisenhauer; Nicole Hagenah; Sylvia Haider; Yann Hautier; Johannes M. H. Knops; Sally E. Koerner; Lauri Laanisto; Ylva Lekberg; Jason P. Martina; Holly M. Martinson; Rebecca L. McCulley; Pablo Luís Peri; Petr Macek; Sally A. Power; Anita C. Risch; Christiane Roscher; Eric W. Seabloom; Carly J. Stevens; G. F. Veen; Risto Virtanen; Laura Yahdjian;pmid: 37857640
pmc: PMC10587103
AbstractLittle is currently known about how climate modulates the relationship between plant diversity and soil organic carbon and the mechanisms involved. Yet, this knowledge is of crucial importance in times of climate change and biodiversity loss. Here, we show that plant diversity is positively correlated with soil carbon content and soil carbon-to-nitrogen ratio across 84 grasslands on six continents that span wide climate gradients. The relationships between plant diversity and soil carbon as well as plant diversity and soil organic matter quality (carbon-to-nitrogen ratio) are particularly strong in warm and arid climates. While plant biomass is positively correlated with soil carbon, plant biomass is not significantly correlated with plant diversity. Our results indicate that plant diversity influences soil carbon storage not via the quantity of organic matter (plant biomass) inputs to soil, but through the quality of organic matter. The study implies that ecosystem management that restores plant diversity likely enhances soil carbon sequestration, particularly in warm and arid climates.
Nature Communication... arrow_drop_down Munin - Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Munin - Open Research Archiveadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41467-023-42340-0&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 35 citations 35 popularity Average influence Average impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Nature Communication... arrow_drop_down Munin - Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Munin - Open Research Archiveadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41467-023-42340-0&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2019 United States, United States, United States, Australia, Qatar, United States, Argentina, United Kingdom, Australia, Australia, QatarPublisher:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Scott L. Collins; Mark J. Hovenden; Kevin R. Wilcox; Lauren M. Hallett; Jennifer Firn; Juergen Kreyling; Alan K. Knapp; David Tilman; Andrew Baldwin; Katherine N. Suding; Jodi N. Price; Nona R. Chiariello; Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia; Laura Gough; Jimin Cheng; Annika K. Jägerbrand; Juliette M. G. Bloor; Harry Harmens; Vladimir G. Onipchenko; F. Leland Russell; Yunhai Zhang; Yunhai Zhang; J. Hans C. Cornelissen; Bryan L. Foster; John P. Anderson; Guozhen Du; Pedro M. Tognetti; Andrea J. Britton; Enrique J. Chaneton; K. Blake Suttle; Shannon R. White; Carl Beierkuhnlein; Rien Aerts; William D. Bowman; Tony J. Svejcar; Sara G. Baer; Jennie R. McLaren; Christel C. Kern; Yiqi Luo; Roy Turkington; Kari Klanderud; Emily Grman; Edward W. Bork; Nathan P. Lemoine; R. Travis Belote; Anke Jentsch; J. Patrick Megonigal; Qiang Yu; Pengfei Zhang; Pengfei Zhang; Wei Li; Gregory R. Houseman; Elizabeth H. Boughton; Laura Yahdjian; Melinda D. Smith; Sally E. Koerner; Lara Souza; Osvaldo E. Sala; David Samuel Johnson; Forest Isbell; Janet S. Prevéy; Juha M. Alatalo; Zhuwen Xu; Clare H. Robinson; James F. Cahill; Anu Eskelinen; Meghan L. Avolio; Rebecca L. McCulley; Kimberly J. Komatsu; Patrick J. Bohlen; Eric W. Seabloom; Xingguo Han; Katherine L. Gross; Peter B. Reich; Peter B. Reich; John M. Blair; John W. Morgan; Steven C. Pennings; Jonathan D. Bates;pmid: 31427510
pmc: PMC6731679
Significance Accurate prediction of community responses to global change drivers (GCDs) is critical given the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem services. There is consensus that human activities are driving species extinctions at the global scale, but debate remains over whether GCDs are systematically altering local communities worldwide. Across 105 experiments that included over 400 experimental manipulations, we found evidence for a lagged response of herbaceous plant communities to GCDs caused by shifts in the identities and relative abundances of species, often without a corresponding difference in species richness. These results provide evidence that community responses are pervasive across a wide variety of GCDs on long-term temporal scales and that these responses increase in strength when multiple GCDs are simultaneously imposed.
FAUBA Digital (Facul... arrow_drop_down Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedData sources: CrossrefProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)Qatar University: QU Institutional RepositoryArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Wichita State University: SOAR (Shocker Open Access Repository)Article . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1073/pnas.1819027116&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 164 citations 164 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
visibility 3visibility views 3 download downloads 24 Powered bymore_vert FAUBA Digital (Facul... arrow_drop_down Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedData sources: CrossrefProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)Qatar University: QU Institutional RepositoryArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Wichita State University: SOAR (Shocker Open Access Repository)Article . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1073/pnas.1819027116&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018 AustraliaPublisher:Wiley Kimberly J. La Pierre; J. Adam Langley; Alan K. Knapp; Bryan L. Foster; Mark J. Hovenden; Kevin R. Wilcox; William D. Bowman; Peter B. Reich; Peter B. Reich; Samantha K. Chapman; Forest Isbell; Sally E. Koerner; David Tilman; Paul C. D. Newton; K. B. Suttle; Meghan L. Avolio; David Samuel Johnson; Christopher J. Lortie; James Patrick Megonigal; Melinda D. Smith;doi: 10.1111/gcb.14442
pmid: 30369019
AbstractThe responses of species to environmental changes will determine future community composition and ecosystem function. Many syntheses of global change experiments examine the magnitude of treatment effect sizes, but we lack an understanding of how plant responses to treatments compare to ongoing changes in the unmanipulated (ambient or background) system. We used a database of long‐term global change studies manipulating CO2, nutrients, water, and temperature to answer three questions: (a) How do changes in plant species abundance in ambient plots relate to those in treated plots? (b) How does the magnitude of ambient change in species‐level abundance over time relate to responsiveness to global change treatments? (c) Does the direction of species‐level responses to global change treatments differ from the direction of ambient change? We estimated temporal trends in plant abundance for 791 plant species in ambient and treated plots across 16 long‐term global change experiments yielding 2,116 experiment–species–treatment combinations. Surprisingly, for most species (57%) the magnitude of ambient change was greater than the magnitude of treatment effects. However, the direction of ambient change, whether a species was increasing or decreasing in abundance under ambient conditions, had no bearing on the direction of treatment effects. Although ambient communities are inherently dynamic, there is now widespread evidence that anthropogenic drivers are directionally altering plant communities in many ecosystems. Thus, global change treatment effects must be interpreted in the context of plant species trajectories that are likely driven by ongoing environmental changes.
Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversity of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14442&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routeshybrid 30 citations 30 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversity of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14442&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2020 Portugal, Portugal, United States, France, United Kingdom, Argentina, ArgentinaPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Funded by:FCT | LA 1, EC | GLOBEPURE, EC | BIOSTASES +1 projectsFCT| LA 1 ,EC| GLOBEPURE ,EC| BIOSTASES ,NSF| RCN: Coordination of the Nutrient Network (NutNet), global manipulations of nutrients and consumersElizabeth T. Borer; Andy Hector; Pablo Luis Peri; Peter B. Adler; Risto Virtanen; Anita C. Risch; Melinda D. Smith; Miguel N. Bugalho; Amandine Hansar; Shaopeng Wang; Nico Eisenhauer; Joslin L. Moore; Laura E. Dee; Edwin Pos; Jarrett E. K. Byrnes; Mahesh Sankaran; Mahesh Sankaran; Philip A. Fay; Peter A. Wilfahrt; Jonathan D. Bakker; Oliver Carroll; Forest Isbell; Pedro M. Tognetti; Carlos Alberto Arnillas; Martin Schütz; Mick Crawley; Carly J. Stevens; Anu Eskelinen; Anu Eskelinen; Johannes M. H. Knops; Yann Hautier; Sally A. Power; Maria C. Caldeira; Benjamin Gilbert; John W. Morgan; Jodi N. Price; Sally E. Koerner; Scott L. Collins; Kevin R. Wilcox; Peter B. Reich; Jonathan S. Lefcheck; Marc W. Cadotte; Pengfei Zhang; Christiane Roscher; Michel Loreau; Glenda M. Wardle; Lars A. Brudvig; Kimberly J. Komatsu; Akira Mori; Andrew S. MacDougall; Eric W. Seabloom; Pedro Daleo; Rebecca L. McCulley; Juan Alberti;doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19252-4 , 10.60692/ek9fr-2vy51 , 10.26181/5fa88c8b515f5 , 10.60692/75wsa-89s88
pmc: PMC7585434
handle: 1959.7/uws:62577
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19252-4 , 10.60692/ek9fr-2vy51 , 10.26181/5fa88c8b515f5 , 10.60692/75wsa-89s88
pmc: PMC7585434
handle: 1959.7/uws:62577
AbstractEutrophication is a widespread environmental change that usually reduces the stabilizing effect of plant diversity on productivity in local communities. Whether this effect is scale dependent remains to be elucidated. Here, we determine the relationship between plant diversity and temporal stability of productivity for 243 plant communities from 42 grasslands across the globe and quantify the effect of chronic fertilization on these relationships. Unfertilized local communities with more plant species exhibit greater asynchronous dynamics among species in response to natural environmental fluctuations, resulting in greater local stability (alpha stability). Moreover, neighborhood communities that have greater spatial variation in plant species composition within sites (higher beta diversity) have greater spatial asynchrony of productivity among communities, resulting in greater stability at the larger scale (gamma stability). Importantly, fertilization consistently weakens the contribution of plant diversity to both of these stabilizing mechanisms, thus diminishing the positive effect of biodiversity on stability at differing spatial scales. Our findings suggest that preserving grassland functional stability requires conservation of plant diversity within and among ecological communities.
Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Utah State University: DigitalCommons@USUArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2020Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03169697Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Universidade de Lisboa: Repositório.ULArticle . 2020Data sources: Universidade de Lisboa: Repositório.ULUniversity of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41467-020-19252-4&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 87 citations 87 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
visibility 45visibility views 45 download downloads 233 Powered bymore_vert Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Utah State University: DigitalCommons@USUArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2020Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03169697Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Universidade de Lisboa: Repositório.ULArticle . 2020Data sources: Universidade de Lisboa: Repositório.ULUniversity of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41467-020-19252-4&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu