- home
- Advanced Search
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2018 United Kingdom, NorwayPublisher:Public Library of Science (PLoS) Funded by:RCN | A FRAMEWORK FOR SCIENCE-B...RCN| A FRAMEWORK FOR SCIENCE-BASED MANAGEMENT OF MARINE RECREATIONAL FISHERIES IN NORWAYAuthors:Kieran Hyder;
Kieran Hyder; Bryony Townhill;Kieran Hyder
Kieran Hyder in OpenAIREZachary Radford;
+7 AuthorsZachary Radford
Zachary Radford in OpenAIREKieran Hyder;
Kieran Hyder; Bryony Townhill;Kieran Hyder
Kieran Hyder in OpenAIREZachary Radford;
Zachary Radford
Zachary Radford in OpenAIRERaúl Prellezo;
Raúl Prellezo
Raúl Prellezo in OpenAIREEstanis Mugerza;
Estanis Mugerza
Estanis Mugerza in OpenAIREHarry Vincent Strehlow;
Harry Vincent Strehlow
Harry Vincent Strehlow in OpenAIREWolf-Christian Lewin;
Wolf-Christian Lewin
Wolf-Christian Lewin in OpenAIREMarc Simon Weltersbach;
Keno Ferter;Marc Simon Weltersbach
Marc Simon Weltersbach in OpenAIRELucia Zarauz;
Lucia Zarauz
Lucia Zarauz in OpenAIREMarine recreational fishing (MRF) has been shown to substantially contribute to fishing mortality of marine fish. However, European MRF catches are only quantified for a small number of stocks, so it is unclear whether a significant part of fishing mortality is excluded from stock assessments. This study estimated: (i) European MRF removals, which were defined as landings plus dead releases; and (ii) impact at stock level by comparing the percentage contribution to total removal by MRF and commercial fishing. As MRF data were limited for some European countries, catches were reconstructed using a mixture of average release proportions, average fish weights, and extrapolation using the catch per fisher of the nearest country providing catch estimates. Where catch reconstructions exceeded 50%, data were excluded from further analysis. Furthermore, as MRF survey methodology can be variable, semi-quantitative estimates of bias and error were calculated for each stock. Only 10 of the 20 stocks assessed in this study had sufficient MRF data for full reliable estimates. Percentage contribution to total removals (MRF + commercial removals) by MRF ranged between 2% for Atlantic mackerel in the North Sea and Skagerrak and 43% for Atlantic pollack in the Celtic Seas and English Channel. The biomass removed ranged between 297 (± 116) tonnes (Atlantic cod in the western English Channel and southern Celtic seas) and 4820 (± 1889) tonnes (Atlantic mackerel in the North Sea and Skagerrak), but the errors were substantial. Additionally, the bias in the estimated removals was low for most stocks, with some positive biases found. The present study indicates that removals by MRF can represent a high proportion of the total removals for some European marine fish stocks, so inclusion in stock assessments should be routine. To achieve this, regular surveys of MRF are required to collect data essential for stock assessments.
University of East A... arrow_drop_down University of East Anglia digital repositoryArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: University of East Anglia digital repositoryUniversity of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1371/journal.pone.0201666&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 97 citations 97 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert University of East A... arrow_drop_down University of East Anglia digital repositoryArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: University of East Anglia digital repositoryUniversity of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1371/journal.pone.0201666&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu