- home
- Advanced Search
Filters
Access
Type
Year range
-chevron_right GO- This year
- Last 5 years
- Last 10 years
Field of Science
SDG [Beta]
Country
Source
Research community
Organization
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2018 United Kingdom, United KingdomPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Authors: Johnson, T.R.; Lora-Wainwright, A.; Lu, J.;Environmental distribution conflicts (EDCs) related to the construction and operation of waste incinerators have become commonplace in China. This article presents a detailed case study of citizen opposition to an incinerator in the village of Panguanying, Hebei Province. Drawing on in-depth fieldwork, we show how this case was notable, because it transcended the local arena to raise bigger questions about environmental justice, particularly in relation to public participation in siting decisions, after villagers exposed fraudulent public consultation in the environmental impact assessment. An informal network between villagers and urban environmental activists formed, enabling the Panguanying case to exert influence far beyond the village locality. This network was critical in creating wider public debate about uneven power and substandard public participation in siting disputes, a central feature in many Chinese EDCs. By transcending local specificities and exposing broader, systemic inadequacies, this case became instrumental in supporting "strong sustainability".
CORE arrow_drop_down Oxford University Research ArchiveArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Oxford University Research ArchiveAll Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s11625-018-0545-6&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 31 citations 31 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CORE arrow_drop_down Oxford University Research ArchiveArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Oxford University Research ArchiveAll Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s11625-018-0545-6&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2018 United Kingdom, United KingdomPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Authors: Johnson, T.R.; Lora-Wainwright, A.; Lu, J.;Environmental distribution conflicts (EDCs) related to the construction and operation of waste incinerators have become commonplace in China. This article presents a detailed case study of citizen opposition to an incinerator in the village of Panguanying, Hebei Province. Drawing on in-depth fieldwork, we show how this case was notable, because it transcended the local arena to raise bigger questions about environmental justice, particularly in relation to public participation in siting decisions, after villagers exposed fraudulent public consultation in the environmental impact assessment. An informal network between villagers and urban environmental activists formed, enabling the Panguanying case to exert influence far beyond the village locality. This network was critical in creating wider public debate about uneven power and substandard public participation in siting disputes, a central feature in many Chinese EDCs. By transcending local specificities and exposing broader, systemic inadequacies, this case became instrumental in supporting "strong sustainability".
CORE arrow_drop_down Oxford University Research ArchiveArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Oxford University Research ArchiveAll Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s11625-018-0545-6&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 31 citations 31 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CORE arrow_drop_down Oxford University Research ArchiveArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Oxford University Research ArchiveAll Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s11625-018-0545-6&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu