Advanced search in Research products
Research products
arrow_drop_down
Searching FieldsTerms
Author ORCID
arrow_drop_down
is
arrow_drop_down

Filters

  • Access
  • Type
  • Year range
  • Field of Science
  • SDG [Beta]
  • Country
  • Source
  • Research community
The following results are related to Energy Research. Are you interested to view more results? Visit OpenAIRE - Explore.
1 Research products
Relevance
arrow_drop_down
unfold_lessCompact results

  • Energy Research

  • image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
    Authors: Yuchen Hu; Jianxing Hu; Yajuan Yu; Yajuan Yu; +3 Authors

    Abstract The footprint family was used to assess the environmental impact of Li–S, sodium-ion and Li-air batteries, and predict the greenest battery model among these three batteries in this study. Besides, considering the assessment sensibility affected of different LCA methodologies, totally 13 methods were used to form a comprehensive assessment result. The ecological footprint of the Li–S, sodium-ion and Li-air batteries are 189.40 Pt, 182.58 Pt and 29.84 Pt, respectively; the carbon footprint of the Li–S, sodium-ion and Li-air batteries are 67.94 kg CO2eq, 64.35 kg CO2eq and 10.15 kg CO2eq, respectively; and the water footprint of the Li–S, sodium-ion and Li-air batteries are 151.11 m3, 316.42 m3 and 21.15 m3, respectively. All methods show that Li-air battery is a more environmentally friendly battery model among these three new batteries. The footprint value of Li–S battery and Li-air battery mainly comes from the production of lithium-based materials. Also providing 1 kWh of electricity, far low demand for lithium resource is the main reason for Li-air battery to show its environmental advantages compared with Li–S battery. Besides, the close ecological and carbon footprints of sodium-ion battery are close to that of Li–S battery. And there is a far large water footprint of sodium-ion battery compared with Li–S battery. The low cost advantage of sodium resources is not enough to be reflected in the sodium-ion battery’s environmental advantages. The demand for lithium and sodium resources per kWh largely determines their environmental impact.

    image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Cleaner P...arrow_drop_down
    image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
    Journal of Cleaner Production
    Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
    License: Elsevier TDM
    Data sources: Crossref
    addClaim

    This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

    You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
    44
    citations44
    popularityTop 10%
    influenceTop 10%
    impulseTop 10%
    BIP!Powered by BIP!
    more_vert
      image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Cleaner P...arrow_drop_down
      image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
      Journal of Cleaner Production
      Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
      License: Elsevier TDM
      Data sources: Crossref
      addClaim

      This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

      You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Advanced search in Research products
Research products
arrow_drop_down
Searching FieldsTerms
Author ORCID
arrow_drop_down
is
arrow_drop_down
The following results are related to Energy Research. Are you interested to view more results? Visit OpenAIRE - Explore.
1 Research products
  • image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
    Authors: Yuchen Hu; Jianxing Hu; Yajuan Yu; Yajuan Yu; +3 Authors

    Abstract The footprint family was used to assess the environmental impact of Li–S, sodium-ion and Li-air batteries, and predict the greenest battery model among these three batteries in this study. Besides, considering the assessment sensibility affected of different LCA methodologies, totally 13 methods were used to form a comprehensive assessment result. The ecological footprint of the Li–S, sodium-ion and Li-air batteries are 189.40 Pt, 182.58 Pt and 29.84 Pt, respectively; the carbon footprint of the Li–S, sodium-ion and Li-air batteries are 67.94 kg CO2eq, 64.35 kg CO2eq and 10.15 kg CO2eq, respectively; and the water footprint of the Li–S, sodium-ion and Li-air batteries are 151.11 m3, 316.42 m3 and 21.15 m3, respectively. All methods show that Li-air battery is a more environmentally friendly battery model among these three new batteries. The footprint value of Li–S battery and Li-air battery mainly comes from the production of lithium-based materials. Also providing 1 kWh of electricity, far low demand for lithium resource is the main reason for Li-air battery to show its environmental advantages compared with Li–S battery. Besides, the close ecological and carbon footprints of sodium-ion battery are close to that of Li–S battery. And there is a far large water footprint of sodium-ion battery compared with Li–S battery. The low cost advantage of sodium resources is not enough to be reflected in the sodium-ion battery’s environmental advantages. The demand for lithium and sodium resources per kWh largely determines their environmental impact.

    image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Cleaner P...arrow_drop_down
    image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
    Journal of Cleaner Production
    Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
    License: Elsevier TDM
    Data sources: Crossref
    addClaim

    This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

    You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
    44
    citations44
    popularityTop 10%
    influenceTop 10%
    impulseTop 10%
    BIP!Powered by BIP!
    more_vert
      image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Cleaner P...arrow_drop_down
      image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
      Journal of Cleaner Production
      Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
      License: Elsevier TDM
      Data sources: Crossref
      addClaim

      This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

      You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Powered by OpenAIRE graph