- home
- Advanced Search
Filters
Access
Type
Year range
-chevron_right GO- This year
- Last 5 years
- Last 10 years
Field of Science
SDG [Beta]
Country
Source
Research community
Organization
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2020 Australia, South AfricaPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Julia Van Velden; Boyson Moyo; Kerrie A. Wilson; Peter A. Lindsey; Peter A. Lindsey; Hamish McCallum; Duan Biggs;handle: 2263/73811 , 10072/395489
The hunting and consumption of wild meat (bushmeat) is recognized as a key threat to the world’s biodiversity and there are indications this threat may extend to much of the African continent. However, this problem is understudied in African savannah systems—particularly in southern Africa. Due to its illicit nature, little research on the drivers behind hunting and consumption exists, especially using methods appropriate to the topic’s sensitivity. We explored the prevalence of hunting and consumption of wild meat in the low-income country of Malawi, by conducting 1562 interviews in communities neighbouring four different protected areas. We identified characteristics of households illegally hunting and consuming wild meat, using the unmatched count technique and socio-demographic variables in linear models. Consumption had a higher prevalence than hunting, reaching up to 39% of the population, while 4–19% of the population engaged in hunting. Consumption was more prevalent in poorer households, while hunting was more prevalent in wealthier households. Increased involvement in community projects initiated by protected areas did not always lead to reduced consumption or hunting, including at protected areas with substantial outside investment, indicating these projects need a clearer link to conservation outcomes. A preference for the taste of wild meat and for added diversity in diet were key drivers of consumption, whereas hunting was primarily motivated by the need for income. Our results highlight the disparity between drivers of hunting and consumption of wild meat and the pervasive nature of this threat, despite considerable investment into community projects and enforcement.
Queensland Universit... arrow_drop_down Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2020License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Griffith University: Griffith Research OnlineArticle . 2020Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10072/395489Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Biodiversity and ConservationArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: CrossrefThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s10531-020-01944-4&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 30 citations 30 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Queensland Universit... arrow_drop_down Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2020License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Griffith University: Griffith Research OnlineArticle . 2020Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10072/395489Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Biodiversity and ConservationArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: CrossrefThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s10531-020-01944-4&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2020 Australia, South AfricaPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Julia Van Velden; Boyson Moyo; Kerrie A. Wilson; Peter A. Lindsey; Peter A. Lindsey; Hamish McCallum; Duan Biggs;handle: 2263/73811 , 10072/395489
The hunting and consumption of wild meat (bushmeat) is recognized as a key threat to the world’s biodiversity and there are indications this threat may extend to much of the African continent. However, this problem is understudied in African savannah systems—particularly in southern Africa. Due to its illicit nature, little research on the drivers behind hunting and consumption exists, especially using methods appropriate to the topic’s sensitivity. We explored the prevalence of hunting and consumption of wild meat in the low-income country of Malawi, by conducting 1562 interviews in communities neighbouring four different protected areas. We identified characteristics of households illegally hunting and consuming wild meat, using the unmatched count technique and socio-demographic variables in linear models. Consumption had a higher prevalence than hunting, reaching up to 39% of the population, while 4–19% of the population engaged in hunting. Consumption was more prevalent in poorer households, while hunting was more prevalent in wealthier households. Increased involvement in community projects initiated by protected areas did not always lead to reduced consumption or hunting, including at protected areas with substantial outside investment, indicating these projects need a clearer link to conservation outcomes. A preference for the taste of wild meat and for added diversity in diet were key drivers of consumption, whereas hunting was primarily motivated by the need for income. Our results highlight the disparity between drivers of hunting and consumption of wild meat and the pervasive nature of this threat, despite considerable investment into community projects and enforcement.
Queensland Universit... arrow_drop_down Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2020License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Griffith University: Griffith Research OnlineArticle . 2020Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10072/395489Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Biodiversity and ConservationArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: CrossrefThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s10531-020-01944-4&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 30 citations 30 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Queensland Universit... arrow_drop_down Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2020License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Griffith University: Griffith Research OnlineArticle . 2020Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10072/395489Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Biodiversity and ConservationArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: CrossrefThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s10531-020-01944-4&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu