- home
- Advanced Search
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2011Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2011 United States, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, United States, Switzerland, Australia, United States, United States, AustraliaPublisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Funded by:NSF | RCN: Coordination of the ...NSF| RCN: Coordination of the Nutrient Network (NutNet), global manipulations of nutrients and consumersYann Hautier; Anita C. Risch; Andy Hector; Jennifer Firn; Kevin P. Kirkman; Eve I. Gasarch; Andrew S. MacDougall; Eric W. Seabloom; Charles E. Mitchell; Laura B. Calabrese; Suzanne M. Prober; Nicole M. DeCrappeo; Melinda D. Smith; T. Michael Anderson; Nicole Hagenah; Nicole Hagenah; Kathryn L. Cottingham; Peter D. Wragg; Peter B. Adler; John G. Lambrinos; Jonathan D. Bakker; Daneil S. Gruner; James B. Grace; Gang Wang; Elizabeth T. Borer; Scott L. Collins; Brent Mortensen; Kendi F. Davies; Chengjin Chu; Michael J. Crawley; Carly J. Stevens; Carly J. Stevens; Martin Schuetz; Kimberly J. La Pierre; Louie H. Yang; Virginia L. Jin; Joslin L. Moore; John L. Orrock; Helmut Hillebrand; Lauren L. Sullivan; Yvonne M. Buckley; Brett A. Melbourne; Philip A. Fay; W. Stanley Harpole; Johannes M. H. Knops; Adam D. Kay; John W. Morgan; Lori A. Biederman; Paul N. Frater; Ellen I. Damschen; Lydia R. O'Halloran; Justin P. Wright; Julia A. Klein; Wei Li; Hope C. Humphries; Rebecca L. McCulley; Elsa E. Cleland; Janneke Hille Ris Lambers; Cynthia S. Brown; David A. Pyke;Standardized sampling from many sites worldwide was used to address an important ecological problem.
CORE arrow_drop_down Zurich Open Repository and ArchiveArticle . 2011 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Zurich Open Repository and ArchiveThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Digital Repository @ Iowa State UniversityArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of St. Thomas: UST Research OnlineArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1126/science.1204498&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 489 citations 489 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CORE arrow_drop_down Zurich Open Repository and ArchiveArticle . 2011 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Zurich Open Repository and ArchiveThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Digital Repository @ Iowa State UniversityArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of St. Thomas: UST Research OnlineArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1126/science.1204498&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2016Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Funded by:NSF | CAREER: Forecasting Clima..., NSF | LTER: Long-Term Research ...NSF| CAREER: Forecasting Climate Change Impacts on Plant Communities? When Do Species Interactions Matter? ,NSF| LTER: Long-Term Research at the Jornada Basin (LTER-VI)Peter B. Adler; Kris M. Havstad; Mitchel P. McClaran; Andrew R. Kleinhesselink; Debra P. C. Peters; Chengjin Chu; Lance T. Vermeire; Haiyan Wei;AbstractTheory predicts that strong indirect effects of environmental change will impact communities when niche differences between competitors are small and variation in the direct effects experienced by competitors is large, but empirical tests are lacking. Here we estimate negative frequency dependence, a proxy for niche differences, and quantify the direct and indirect effects of climate change on each species. Consistent with theory, in four of five communities indirect effects are strongest for species showing weak negative frequency dependence. Indirect effects are also stronger in communities where there is greater variation in direct effects. Overall responses to climate perturbations are driven primarily by direct effects, suggesting that single species models may be adequate for forecasting the impacts of climate change in these communities.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/ncomms11766&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 37 citations 37 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/ncomms11766&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2010 FrancePublisher:Wiley J. Xu; Sa Xiao; J.‐L. Zhang; C.‐J. Chu; Richard Michalet; Richard Michalet; Gen-Xuan Wang;pmid: 20701701
Biotic interaction studies have revealed a large discrepancy among experiments in target responses to the effects of neighbours, which may in part be due to both high species-specificity of plant responses and low number of target species used in experiments. Our aim was to assess facilitative responses at the community level and the role of both functional groups and ecological attributes of target species. In a sub-alpine grassland on the eastern Tibet plateau, we assessed growth responses of all species in the community to removal of a dominant shrub. We also measured changes in the main environmental variables. Species responses were analysed by functional group and in relation to their mean regional altitudinal distribution. All significant interactions were positive and affected one-third of the total species richness of the community. All functional groups were facilitated but forbs were less strongly facilitated than in the two other groups. High-alpine species were less strongly facilitated than low-sub-alpine species, but the strength of this relationship was weaker than that reported in previous work. There was evidence of a decrease in extreme temperatures below the canopy of the shrub but no variations in soil moisture. We conclude that the highly stressful conditions induced by the dry continental climate of the eastern Tibet plateau are a main driver of the exclusive dominance of positive interactions. Assessing interactive responses at the community level is likely to provide a useful tool to better understand the role of biotic interactions in community responses to environmental changes.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00271.x&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu30 citations 30 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00271.x&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2019 Australia, NetherlandsPublisher:Wiley Chengjin Chu; Guozhen Du; Merel B. Soons; Mariet M. Hefting; Cynthia S. Brown; Pengfei Zhang; Pengfei Zhang; Yann Hautier; Jennifer Firn; George A. Kowalchuk; Zhi Guo; Xian-Hui Zhou; Xiaolong Zhou; Zhi-Gang Zhao;Abstract Predicting changes in plant diversity in response to human activities represents one of the major challenges facing ecologists and land managers striving for sustainable ecosystem management. Classical field studies have emphasized the importance of community primary productivity in regulating changes in plant species richness. However, experimental studies have yielded inconsistent empirical evidence, suggesting that primary productivity is not the sole determinant of plant diversity. Recent work has shown that more accurate predictions of changes in species diversity can be achieved by combining measures of species’ cover and height into an index of space resource utilization (SRU). While the SRU approach provides reliable predictions, it is time‐consuming and requires extensive taxonomic expertise. Ecosystem processes and plant community structure are likely driven primarily by dominant species (mass ratio effect). Within communities, it is likely that dominant and rare species have opposite contributions to overall biodiversity trends. We, therefore, suggest that better species richness predictions can be achieved by utilizing SRU assessments of only the dominant species (SRUD), as compared to SRU or biomass of the entire community. Here, we assess the ability of these measures to predict changes in plant diversity as driven by nutrient addition and herbivore exclusion. First, we tested our hypotheses by carrying out a detailed analysis in an alpine grassland that measured all species within the community. Next, we assessed the broader applicability of our approach by measuring the first three dominant species for five additional experimental grassland sites across a wide geographic and habitat range. We show that SRUD outperforms community biomass, as well as community SRU, in predicting biodiversity dynamics in response to nutrients and herbivores in an alpine grassland. Across our additional sites, SRUD yielded far better predictions of changes in species richness than community biomass, demonstrating the robustness and generalizable nature of this approach. Synthesis. The SRUD approach provides a simple, non‐destructive and more accurate means to monitor and predict the impact of global change drivers and management interventions on plant communities, thereby facilitating efforts to maintain and recover plant diversity.
Queensland Universit... arrow_drop_down Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2019License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/1365-2745.13205&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 10 citations 10 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert Queensland Universit... arrow_drop_down Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2019License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/1365-2745.13205&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2015 DenmarkPublisher:Wiley Fangliang He; Fangliang He; Jérôme Chave; Jacob Weiner; Chengjin Chu; Megan K. Bartlett; Youshi Wang; Lawren Sack;doi: 10.1111/gcb.13079
pmid: 26442433
AbstractThe need for rigorous analyses of climate impacts has never been more crucial. Current textbooks state that climate directly influences ecosystem annual net primary productivity (NPP), emphasizing the urgent need to monitor the impacts of climate change. A recent paper challenged this consensus, arguing, based on an analysis of NPP for 1247 woody plant communities across global climate gradients, that temperature and precipitation have negligible direct effects on NPP and only perhaps have indirect effects by constraining total stand biomass (Mtot) and stand age (a). The authors of that study concluded that the length of the growing season (lgs) might have a minor influence on NPP, an effect they considered not to be directly related to climate. In this article, we describe flaws that affected that study's conclusions and present novel analyses to disentangle the effects of stand variables and climate in determining NPP. We re‐analyzed the same database to partition the direct and indirect effects of climate on NPP, using three approaches: maximum‐likelihood model selection, independent‐effects analysis, and structural equation modeling. These new analyses showed that about half of the global variation in NPP could be explained by Mtot combined with climate variables and supported strong and direct influences of climate independently of Mtot, both for NPP and for net biomass change averaged across the known lifetime of the stands (ABC = average biomass change). We show that lgs is an important climate variable, intrinsically correlated with, and contributing to mean annual temperature and precipitation (Tann and Pann), all important climatic drivers of NPP. Our analyses provide guidance for statistical and mechanistic analyses of climate drivers of ecosystem processes for predictive modeling and provide novel evidence supporting the strong, direct role of climate in determining vegetation productivity at the global scale.
Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13079&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu107 citations 107 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13079&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2014 Australia, Argentina, United States, Argentina, United States, United States, Australia, United KingdomPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Publicly fundedFunded by:UKRI | RootDetect: Remote Detect..., FCT | LA 1, EC | GLOBEPURE +2 projectsUKRI| RootDetect: Remote Detection and Precision Management of Root Health ,FCT| LA 1 ,EC| GLOBEPURE ,NSF| RCN: Coordination of the Nutrient Network (NutNet), global manipulations of nutrients and consumers ,NSF| LTER: Biodiversity, Multiple Drivers of Environmental Change and Ecosystem Functioning at the Prairie Forest BorderHautier, Yann; Seabloom, Eric W.; Borer, Elizabeth T.; Adler, Peter B.; Harpole, W. Stanley; Hillebrand, Helmut; Lind, Eric M.; MacDougall, Andrew S.; Stevens, Carly J.; Bakker, Jonathan D.; Buckley, Yvonne M.; Chu, Chengjin; Collins, Scott L.; Daleo, Pedro; Damschen, Ellen I.; Davies, Kendi F.; Fay, Philip A.; Firn, Jennifer; Gruner, Daniel S.; Jin, Virginia L.; Klein, Julia A.; Knops, Johannes M. H.; La Pierre, Kimberly J.; Li, Wei; McCulley, Rebecca L.; Melbourne, Brett A.; Moore, Joslin L.; O'Halloran, Lydia R.; Prober, Suzanne M.; Risch, Anita C.; Sankaran, Mahesh; Schuetz, Martin; Hector, Andy;Studies of experimental grassland communities have demonstrated that plant diversity can stabilize productivity through species asynchrony, in which decreases in the biomass of some species are compensated for by increases in others. However, it remains unknown whether these findings are relevant to natural ecosystems, especially those for which species diversity is threatened by anthropogenic global change. Here we analyse diversity-stability relationships from 41 grasslands on five continents and examine how these relationships are affected by chronic fertilization, one of the strongest drivers of species loss globally. Unmanipulated communities with more species had greater species asynchrony, resulting in more stable biomass production, generalizing a result from biodiversity experiments to real-world grasslands. However, fertilization weakened the positive effect of diversity on stability. Contrary to expectations, this was not due to species loss after eutrophication but rather to an increase in the temporal variation of productivity in combination with a decrease in species asynchrony in diverse communities. Our results demonstrate separate and synergistic effects of diversity and eutrophication on stability, emphasizing the need to understand how drivers of global change interactively affect the reliable provisioning of ecosystem services in real-world systems.
Nature arrow_drop_down http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/Natu...Other literature typeData sources: European Union Open Data PortalThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nature13014&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 449 citations 449 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Nature arrow_drop_down http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/Natu...Other literature typeData sources: European Union Open Data PortalThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nature13014&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Diego Ismael Rodríguez-Hernández; David C. Deane; Weitao Wang; Yongfa Chen; Buhang Li; Wenqi Luo; Chengjin Chu;pmid: 33870455
Understanding the multiple biotic and abiotic controls of aboveground biomass (AGB) is important for projecting the consequences of global change and to effectively manage carbon storage. Although large-scale studies have identified the major environmental and biological controls of AGB, drivers of local-scale variation are less well known. Additionally, involvement of multiple causal paths and scale dependence in effect sizes potentially confounds comparisons among studies differing in methodology and sampling grain. We tested for scale dependence in evidence supporting selection, complementarity and environmental factors as the main determinants of AGB variation over a 50 ha study extent in subtropical China, modelling this at four sampling grains (0.01, 0.04, 0.25 and 1 ha). At each grain, we used piecewise structural equation models to quantify the direct and indirect effects of environmental (topographic and edaphic properties) and forest attributes (structure, diversity and functional traits) on AGB, while controlling for spatial autocorrelation. Direct scale-invariant effects on AGB were evident for structure and community-mean traits, supporting dominance of selection effects. However, diversity had strong indirect effects on AGB via forest structure, particularly at larger sampling grains (≥ 0.25 ha), while direct effects only emerged at the smallest grain size (0.01 ha). The direct and indirect effects of edaphic and topographic factors were also important for explaining both forest attributes and AGB across all scales. Although selection effects appeared to be more influential on ecosystem function, ignoring indirect causal pathways for diversity via structural attributes risks overlooking the importance of complementarity on ecosystem functioning, particularly as sampling grain increases.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s00442-021-04915-w&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu14 citations 14 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s00442-021-04915-w&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2025Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Donghao Wu; Enzai Du; Nico Eisenhauer; Jérome Mathieu; Chengjin Chu;pmid: 39939777
The biogenic structures produced by termites, ants and earthworms provide key functions across global ecosystems1,2. However, little is known about the drivers of the soil engineering effects caused by these small but important invertebrates3 at the global scale. Here we show, on the basis of a meta-analysis of 12,975 observations from 1,047 studies on six continents, that all three taxa increase soil macronutrient content, soil respiration and soil microbial and plant biomass compared with reference soils. The effect of termites on soil respiration and plant biomass, and the effect of earthworms on soil nitrogen and phosphorus content, increase with mean annual temperature and peak in the tropics. By contrast, the effects of ants on soil nitrogen, soil phosphorus, plant biomass and survival rate peak at mid-latitude ecosystems that have the lowest primary productivity. Notably, termites and ants increase plant growth by alleviating plant phosphorus limitation in the tropics and nitrogen limitation in temperate regions, respectively. Our study highlights the important roles of these invertebrate taxa in global biogeochemical cycles and ecosystem functions. Given the importance of these soil-engineering invertebrates, biogeochemical models should better integrate their effects, especially on carbon fluxes and nutrient cycles.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41586-025-08594-y&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41586-025-08594-y&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euResearch data keyboard_double_arrow_right Dataset 2024Embargo end date: 25 Nov 2024Publisher:Dryad Wu, Donghao; Liu, Cong; Caron, Fernanda; Luo, Yuanyuan; Pie, Marcio; Yu, Mingjian; Eggleton, Paul; Chu, Chengjin;# Habitat fragmentation drives pest termite risk in humid but not arid biomes [https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.k98sf7mdt](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.k98sf7mdt) ## Description of the data and file structure We provided the checklist of coocurring termite species at local scale ('Checklist of Isoptera in local haitats.xlsx') and at oceanic-island scale ('Checklist of Isoptera on global islands.xlsx'), which included the original records of species distribution per site, the environmental attributes and spatial coordinates per site, and the full reference list from which the distribution records were extracted. We also provided the functional trait information for each studied species ('Species list and traits.xlsx'). For morpho-species, we calculated the mean trait values of intrageneric species as the estimate. Trait description and reference source were also reported. For body size, we plotted the correlation of body size between soldier and imago caste, which was significantly positive (R2 = 0.62). Therefore, we used the body size of soldier caste for analyses. We compiled the response and predictor variables per island (or local site) into a single file ('Data for analysis and visualization.xlsx'). This file assembled all environmental predictors, community-weighted means of pest species risk and other functional traits, and the standardized effect sizes (SES) of mean pairwise functional distance (MFD) and mean pairwise phylogenetic distance (MPD). Besides, we used the proportional data among cooccurring species per local community to calculate the proportion-weighted mean of pest species risk. Species pool was defined in two different ways. First, we treated all species occur on islands (or local sites) as the full species pool. Second, dispersion-field species pool was defined for each island (or local site), by including any species within the genera that had geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage. We calculated the functional and phylogenetic SES values based on the full or dispersion-field species pool. For the former case, we labelled the SES values as 'SES.MFD' and 'SES.MPD'. For the latter case, we labelled the SES values as 'SES.MFD.df' and 'SES.MPD.df'. We provided 1000 pseudo-posterior phylogeney tree ('termites_tacted.tre') of more than 3000 termite species that were constructed by Dr. Fernanda S. Caron and Prof. Marcio R. Pie (see their orginal research for more details; 10.1111/zsc.12502). This tree included all species covered in this study, and the morpho-species was inserted into the tree topology within their corresponding genera, subfamilies or families, by taking into account branch lengths determined by local diversification rates. The final phylogeny tree was generated through reserving species occurring in this study. ## Description of the variables **Checklist of Isoptera on global islands** Sheet 1: Occurrence data * *scientificName*: Currently valid scientific name * *Subspecies*: Subspecies name * *family*: Family name * *subfamily*: Subfamily name * *Genus_final*: Curated genus name * *genus*: Genus name reported by the source * *species*: Species name reported by the source * *Island name*: The name of the island where the species occurs * *Island.No*: The ID of island * *Latitude*: Latitude of the island centroid * *Longitude*: Longitude of the island centroid * *Country*: The country name where the species occurs * *Reference*: The data source that reports the specific island where the species occurs * *DOI*: DOI or the accessing link of the reference * *Comment*: Other information * *Single*: Is it the only termite species that occurs on the specific island? 1 - Yes; 0 - No Sheet 2: Island metric * *Island.No*: The ID of island * *Latitude*: Latitude of the island centroid * *Longitude*: Longitude of the island centroid * *Country*: The country name where the species occurs * *Archip*: The name of the archipelago where the island occurs * *Island*: The name of the island where the species occurs * *Area*: Island area (km2) * *Dist*: Distance to the nearest mainland (km) * *SLMP*: The log10‐transformed sum of the proportions of landmass within buffer distances of 100, 1,000 and 10,000 km around the island perimeter * *Temp*: The maximum values per island polygon of mean annual temperature (°C) * *Prec*: The maximum values per island polygon of mean annual precipitation (mm) * *CCVT*: Climate change velocity, calculated as the ratio between the temporal change in temperature per year (°C/year) and the contemporary spatial change in temperature (°C/m) and expressed in distance units per time (m/year) * *Ecoregion*: The smallest-scale units in the Marine Ecoregions of the World (MEOW) system * *Province*: The meidum-scale units in the Marine Ecoregions of the World (MEOW) system * *Realm*: The largest-scale units in the Marine Ecoregions of the World (MEOW) system * *Single*: Does the island have only one termite species? 1 - Yes; 0 - No Sheet 3: Reference list * *Title*: The data source that reports the distribution or checklist of termite species on the oceanic island(s) * *DOI*: DOI or the accessing link of the reference **Checklist of Isoptera in local haitats** Sheet 1: Occurrence data * *Habitat type*: Is the local site located on the mainland or oceanic island? * *StudyID*: The ID of the reference * *scientificName*: Currently valid scientific name * *Original record*: The full species name reported in the data source * *Family*: Family name * *subfamily*: Subfamily name * *Genus_final*: Curated genus name * *Genus*: Genus name reported by the source * *Species*: Species name reported by the source * *Abundance type*: The method of counting the numeric advantage of each species used in the specific study. "Occurrence frequency" is the number of transects or quadrats where the species is found. "Total individual number" is the total counts of termite workers and soldiers found in the site. "Total individual number (OTU reads)" is the total counts of the OTU reads sampled from the site. * *Abundance*: The abundance of the species * *Percent ratio*: The relative abundance of the species found in the site * *Pest.risk*: The level of pest risk of the species * *Diet information*: The dite of the species * *Sampling method*: The method of sampling termites in the specific study: transect or quadrat * *Number of sites*: The total number of local sites of the same area that are pooled to calculate the abundance * *Number of sampling units*: The total number of transects or quadrats of the same area that are pooled to calculate the abundance * *Width of sampling unit*: The width of the transect or quadrat * *Length of sampling unit*: The length of the transect or quadrat * *Total sampling area*: Total sampling area * *Site name*: The full name of local site * *SiteID*: The ID of local site * *Taxonomic-level*: The taxonomic level for how the species is identified * *Comment*: Other information * *Diet reference1*: The first reference that reports the diet information of the species * *Diet reference2*: The second reference that reports the diet information of the species * *Single*: Is it the only termite species that occurs in the local site? 1 - Yes; 0 - No Sheet 2: Habitat metric * *SiteID*: The ID of local site * *Latitude*: Latitude of the local site * *Longitude*: Longitude of the local site * *Treecover*: Percentage of tree cover in 2010 at 30-m resolution * *Treecover.z*: The Z score of percentage tree cover by comparing the observed tree cover to the mean values of all grids (30 × 30 m) within the 5 × 5 km. Specifically, the difference between observed and mean values was divided by the standard deviation of percent tree cover among all grids. This metric was independent of the cross-regional difference in natural tree cover and, thus, could be used to assessed the relative level of habitat area across regions * *Landuse*: The land use proportion (%) within a 5,000 × 5,000 m area that was covered by human infrastructure, cropland, and water, based on the 2019 global land cover map at 30-m resolution * *Temp*: Mean annual temperature (°C) * *Prec*: Mean annual precipitation (mm) * *CCVT*: Climate change velocity, calculated as the ratio between the temporal change in temperature per year (°C/year) and the contemporary spatial change in temperature (°C/m) and expressed in distance units per time (m/year) * *Land use*: The land use reported in the source * *Land use type*: One of the seven types of land use categories that the specific site belongs to, including the abandoned, agriculture, disturbed, forestry, grazing, protected, and restored * *Native vegetation*: One of the four types of native vegetation categories that the specific site belongs to, including the forest, woodland, grassland, and savanna * *Ecoregion*: The smallest-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Biome*: The meidum-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Realm*: The largest-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Continent*: The continent where the local site distributes * *Habitat.type*: Is the local site located on the mainland or oceanic island? * *Single*: Does the local site have only one termite species? 1 - Yes; 0 - No Sheet 3: Reference list * *Study*: The ID of the reference * *Title*: The data source that reports the community composition and/or abundance of termites in the local site(s) * *DOI*: DOI or the accessing link of the reference **Species list and traits** Sheet 1: Simplified * *Species*: The scientific name of the termite species * *Island*: Does the termite species occur on any of the documented islands? * *Local*: Does the termite species occur in any of the local sites? * *Pest.risk*: The classification of pest damage level (0 = non-pest; 1 = pest; 2 = major pest) * *Size.soldier*: The head width (mm) of largest soldier caste; for soldierless species, the head width of largest worker caste is used * *Morph.soldier*: The number of size morph for soldier caste (0 = soldierless; 1 = monomorphic; 2 = dimorphic or trimorphic * *Diet.dominant*: The most common feeding diet per genus (1 = wood-feeding lower termites; 2 = wood-feeding Termitidae; 3 = Humus-feeding Termitidae; 4 = Mineral-soil-feeding Termitidae) * *Nesting.complexity*: The complexity of nesting strategy (1 = one-piece nester; 2 = multiple-piece nester; 3 = central-piece nester) * *Soil.access*: Whether or not have access to soil (0/1) * *Diet.differentiation*: The number of distinct diet types per genus * *Forager*: Whether or not foraging outside the nest * *Diet.soil*: Whether or not ≥ 1 species per genus show soil-feeding habit (or feeding in wood/soil interface) * *Taxonomy*: The taxonomic level for how the species is identified Sheet 2: Full data * *scientificName*: The scientific name of the termite species * *Used_name*: The adapted format of species name that is used in the data analyses * *Island (0/1)*: Does the termite species occur on any of the documented islands? * *Local (0/1)*: Does the termite species occur in any of the local sites? * *Unique species in one-species site*: Does the termite species only occur in one local site or island? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Taxonomy*: The taxonomic level for how the species is identified * *Family*: Family name * *Subfamily*: Subfamily name * *Genus*: Genus name * *Pest.risk*: The classification of pest damage level (0 = non-pest; 1 = pest; 2 = major pest) * *Size*: Maximum head width of soldier caste (worker caste for soldierless species) * *Size.soldier*: The head width (mm) of largest soldier caste; for soldierless species, the head width of largest worker caste is used * *Morph.soldier*: The number of size morph for soldier caste (0 = soldierless; 1 = monomorphic; 2 = dimorphic or trimorphic * *Size_imago*: The head width (mm) of imago alate * *Forager*: Whether or not foraging outside the nest * *Diet.dominant*: The most common feeding diet per genus (1 = wood-feeding lower termites; 2 = wood-feeding Termitidae; 3 = Humus-feeding Termitidae; 4 = Mineral-soil-feeding Termitidae) * *Diet.differentiation*: The number of distinct diet types per genus * *Diet.soil*: Whether or not ≥ 1 species per genus show soil-feeding habit (or feeding in wood/soil interface) * *Nesting.complexity*: The complexity of nesting strategy (1 = one-piece nester; 2 = multiple-piece nester; 3 = central-piece nester) * *Soil.access*: Whether or not have access to soil (0/1) Sheet 3: Trait description (defining the variables presented in the previous two spreadsheets) Sheet 4: Size literature * *Species*: The scientific name of the termite species * *Family*: Family name * *Caste*: Soldier caste for species with soldier caste, or worker caste for soldierless species * *Head width*: Head width (mm) of largest soldier caste * *Head width_large*: Head width (mm) of largest soldier caste * *Head width_small*: Head width (mm) of smallest soldier caste * *Reference1*: The first reference reporting the head width * *DOI1*: The DOI or accessing link of the first reference * *Reference2*: The second reference reporting the head width * *DOI2*: The DOI or accessing link of the second reference * *Reference3*: The third reference reporting the head width * *DOI3*: The DOI or accessing link of the third reference * *Range1*: The range of head width reported from the first reference * *Range2*: The range of head width reported from the second reference * *Range3*: The range of head width reported from the third reference * *Comment*: Other information Sheet 5: Size correlation * *scientificName*: The scientific name of the termite species * *Family*: Family name * *Subfamily*: Subfamily name * *Genus*: Genus name * *Size_soldier*: The head width of soldier caste * *Size_imago*: The head width of imago caste Sheet 5: Diet literature * *Genus*: Genus name * *Family*: Family name * *Subfamily*: Subfamily name * *Diet.dominant*: The most common feeding diet per genus (1 = wood-feeding lower termites; 2 = wood-feeding Termitidae; 3 = Humus-feeding Termitidae; 4 = Mineral-soil-feeding Termitidae) * *Diet.differentiation*: The number of distinct diet types per genus * *Wood*: Does any species of the genus eat wood? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Litter*: Does any species of the genus eat litter? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Grass*: Does any species of the genus eat grass? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Epiphyte*: Does any species of the genus eat epiphyte? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Fungus*: Does any species of the genus eat fungus? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Dung*: Does any species of the genus eat dung? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Soil*: Does any species of the genus eat soil? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Reference for dominant diet*: The reference reporting the dominant diet information * *Reference for soil-feeding (or wood/soil interface) species within non-soil feeding genus (i.e. Dite_dominant = 2)*: The reference reporting the soil-feeding behaviors for species under the genus whose dominant diet is non-soil **Data for analysis and visualization** Sheet 1: Island * *Island.No*: The ID of island * *SES.MFD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring on all islands * *SES.MPD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring on all islands * *SES.MFD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage * *SES.MPD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage - *Pest.risk*: Community-weighted mean of pest risk level - *Size.soldier*: Community-weighted mean of the soldier head width - *Morph.soldier*: Community-weighted mean of the number of size morph for soldier caste - *Diet.dominant*: Community-weighted mean of the dominant diet - *Nesting.complexity*: Community-weighted mean of nesting strategy complexity - *Soil.access*: Community-weighted mean of soil access - *Diet.differentiation*: Community-weighted mean of diet differentiation - *Forager*: Community-weighted mean of forager trait - *Diet.soil*: Community-weighted mean of soil-feeding trait - *PC1*: The first principal component of termite functional traits - *PC2*: The second principal component of termite functional traits - *PC3*: The third principal component of termite functional traits - *PC4*: The fourth principal component of termite functional traits - *Latitude*: Latitude of the island centroid - *Longitude*: Longitude of the island centroid - *Country*: The country name where the island occurs - *Archip*: The name of the archipelago where the island occurs - *Island*: Island name - *Area*: Island area (km2) - *Dist*: Distance to the nearest mainland (km) - *SLMP*: The log10‐transformed sum of the proportions of landmass within buffer distances of 100, 1,000 and 10,000 km around the island perimeter - *Temp*: The maximum values per island polygon of mean annual temperature (°C) - *Prec*: The maximum values per island polygon of mean annual precipitation (mm) - *CCVT*: Climate change velocity, calculated as the ratio between the temporal change in temperature per year (°C/year) and the contemporary spatial change in temperature (°C/m) and expressed in distance units per time (m/year) - *Ecoregion*: The smallest-scale units in the Marine Ecoregions of the World (MEOW) system - *Province*: The meidum-scale units in the Marine Ecoregions of the World (MEOW) system - *Realm*: The largest-scale units in the Marine Ecoregions of the World (MEOW) system - *Single*: Does the island have only one termite species? 1 - Yes; 0 - No - *SR*: The total number of termite species on the island - *PrecS*: The scaled and centered values of mean annual precipitation - *AreaS*: The scaled and centered values of island area - *DistS*: The scaled and centered values of distance to the nearest mainland - *SLMPS*: The scaled and centered values of SLMP Sheet 2: Local * *SiteID*: The ID of local site * *SES.MFD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring in all local sites * *SES.MPD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring in all local sites * *SES.MFD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage * *SES.MPD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage - *Pest.risk*: Community-weighted mean of pest risk level - *Size.soldier*: Community-weighted mean of the soldier head width - *Morph.soldier*: Community-weighted mean of the number of size morph for soldier caste - *Diet.dominant*: Community-weighted mean of the dominant diet - *Nesting.complexity*: Community-weighted mean of nesting strategy complexity - *Soil.access*: Community-weighted mean of soil access - *Diet.differentiation*: Community-weighted mean of diet differentiation - *Forager*: Community-weighted mean of forager trait - *Diet.soil*: Community-weighted mean of soil-feeding trait - *PC1*: The first principal component of termite functional traits - *PC2*: The second principal component of termite functional traits - *PC3*: The third principal component of termite functional traits - *PC4*: The fourth principal component of termite functional traits * *Latitude*: Latitude of the local site * *Longitude*: Longitude of the local site * *Treecover*: Percentage of tree cover in 2010 at 30-m resolution * *Treecover.z*: The Z score of percentage tree cover by comparing the observed tree cover to the mean values of all grids (30 × 30 m) within the 5 × 5 km. Specifically, the difference between observed and mean values was divided by the standard deviation of percent tree cover among all grids. This metric was independent of the cross-regional difference in natural tree cover and, thus, could be used to assessed the relative level of habitat area across regions * *Landuse*: The land use proportion (%) within a 5,000 × 5,000 m area that was covered by human infrastructure, cropland, and water, based on the 2019 global land cover map at 30-m resolution * *Temp*: Mean annual temperature (°C) * *Prec*: Mean annual precipitation (mm) * *CCVT*: Climate change velocity, calculated as the ratio between the temporal change in temperature per year (°C/year) and the contemporary spatial change in temperature (°C/m) and expressed in distance units per time (m/year) * *Land use*: The land use reported in the source * *Land use type*: One of the seven types of land use categories that the specific site belongs to, including the abandoned, agriculture, disturbed, forestry, grazing, protected, and restored * *Native vegetation*: One of the four types of native vegetation categories that the specific site belongs to, including the forest, woodland, grassland, and savanna * *Ecoregion*: The smallest-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Biome*: The meidum-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Realm*: The largest-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Continent*: The continent where the local site distributes * *Habitat.type*: Is the local site located on the mainland or oceanic island? * *Single*: Does the local site have only one termite species? 1 - Yes; 0 - No - *SR*: The total number of termite species on the island - *PrecS*: The scaled and centered values of mean annual precipitation - *TreecoverS*: The scaled and centered values of percentage tree cover - *Treecover.zS*: The scaled and centered values of the Z score of percentage tree cover - *LanduseS*: The scaled and centered values of land use proportion Sheet 3: SES.island * *Island.No*: The ID of island * *SES.MFD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring on all islands * *SES.MPD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring on all islands * *SES.MFD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage * *SES.MPD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage Sheet 4: SES.local * *SiteID*: The ID of local site * *SES.MFD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring in all local sites * *SES.MPD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring in all local sites * *SES.MFD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage * *SES.MPD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage Sheet 5: Pest.risk.global * *SiteID*: The ID of local site * *Scale*: The spatial scale of the species assemblages: island or local site * *Latitude*: Latitude of the local site * *Longitude*: Longitude of the local site * *Pest.risk*: Community-weighted mean of pest risk level Sheet 6: Pest.risk.weighted * *SiteID*: The ID of local site * *SES.MFD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring in all local sites * *SES.MPD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring in all local sites * *SES.MFD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage * *SES.MPD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage - *Pest.risk*: Community-weighted mean of pest risk level - *Size.soldier*: Community-weighted mean of the soldier head width - *Morph.soldier*: Community-weighted mean of the number of size morph for soldier caste - *Diet.dominant*: Community-weighted mean of the dominant diet - *Nesting.complexity*: Community-weighted mean of nesting strategy complexity - *Soil.access*: Community-weighted mean of soil access - *Diet.differentiation*: Community-weighted mean of diet differentiation - *Forager*: Community-weighted mean of forager trait - *Diet.soil*: Community-weighted mean of soil-feeding trait - *PC1*: The first principal component of termite functional traits - *PC2*: The second principal component of termite functional traits - *PC3*: The third principal component of termite functional traits - *PC4*: The fourth principal component of termite functional traits * *Latitude*: Latitude of the local site * *Longitude*: Longitude of the local site * *Treecover*: Percentage of tree cover in 2010 at 30-m resolution * *Treecover.z*: The Z score of percentage tree cover by comparing the observed tree cover to the mean values of all grids (30 × 30 m) within the 5 × 5 km. Specifically, the difference between observed and mean values was divided by the standard deviation of percent tree cover among all grids. This metric was independent of the cross-regional difference in natural tree cover and, thus, could be used to assessed the relative level of habitat area across regions * *Landuse*: The land use proportion (%) within a 5,000 × 5,000 m area that was covered by human infrastructure, cropland, and water, based on the 2019 global land cover map at 30-m resolution * *Temp*: Mean annual temperature (°C) * *Prec*: Mean annual precipitation (mm) * *CCVT*: Climate change velocity, calculated as the ratio between the temporal change in temperature per year (°C/year) and the contemporary spatial change in temperature (°C/m) and expressed in distance units per time (m/year) * *Land use*: The land use reported in the source * *Land use type*: One of the seven types of land use categories that the specific site belongs to, including the abandoned, agriculture, disturbed, forestry, grazing, protected, and restored * *Native vegetation*: One of the four types of native vegetation categories that the specific site belongs to, including the forest, woodland, grassland, and savanna * *Ecoregion*: The smallest-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Biome*: The meidum-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Realm*: The largest-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Continent*: The continent where the local site distributes * *Habitat.type*: Is the local site located on the mainland or oceanic island? * *Single*: Does the local site have only one termite species? 1 - Yes; 0 - No - *SR*: The total number of termite species on the island - *PrecS*: The scaled and centered values of mean annual precipitation - *TreecoverS*: The scaled and centered values of percentage tree cover - *Treecover.zS*: The scaled and centered values of the Z score of percentage tree cover - *LanduseS*: The scaled and centered values of land use proportion * *Pest.risk.weighted*: Abundance-weighted mean of pest risk level ## Code/Software All statistical analyses were conducted in R 4.2.3. We provided four R scripts to generate all results reported in the main text and supplementary materials. 'SES-full species pool.R' was used to calculate the SES.MPD among cooccurring species for 1000 pseudo-posterior trees. It may take 1~2 weeks to finish the whole process. Meanwhile, SES.MFD could be fastly computed and therefore we inserted the respective code in the next script. 'SES-dispersion field.R' was used to calculate the SES.MFD.df and SES.MPD.df among cooccurring species. Given that dispersion-field species pool was defined differently for each island or local site, the running time was considerably higher (i.e. times the number of islands or local sites) than that of 'SES-full species pool.R'. 'Analysis code.R' was used to generate the dataset for analysis and visualization ('Data for analysis and visualization.xlsx'). Furthermore, multiple linear regression after stepwise selection was used to determine the important predictors and interaction effects. Finally, global Moran's I analysis was conducted to evaluate the spatial autocorrelation in the residuals of each response variable after accounting for the environmental effects. 'Figure code.R' was used to visualize the distribution of data records (Fig. 1a) and interaction effects between climate and habitat fragmentation (Figs. 3-5 and Figs. S4-S7). In addition, we also provided the code for plotting the Pearson's correlation matrix among functional traits (Fig. S2) and environmental predictors (Fig. S3). Predicting global change effects poses significant challenges due to the intricate interplay between climate change and anthropogenic stressors in shaping ecological communities and their function, such as pest outbreak risk. Termites are ecosystem engineers, yet some pest species are causing worldwide economic losses. While habitat fragmentation seems to drive pest-dominated termite communities, its interaction with climate change effect remains unknown. We test if climate and habitat fragmentation interactively alter interspecific competition that may limit pest termite risk. Leveraging global termite cooccurrence including 280 pest species, we found that competitively superior termite species (e.g. large-bodied) increased in large and continuous habitats solely at high precipitation. While competitive species suppressed pest species globally, habitat fragmentation drove pest termite risk only in humid biomes. Unfortunately, humid tropics have experienced vast forest fragmentation and rainfall reduction over the past decades. These stressors, if not stopped, may drive pest termite risk potentially via competitive release.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.k98sf7mdt&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu0 citations 0 popularity Average influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.k98sf7mdt&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2022Publisher:Oxford University Press (OUP) Authors: Yongfa Chen; Chengjin Chu; Fangliang He; Suqin Fang;AbstractBackground and AimsNitrogen is often regarded as a limiting factor to plant growth in various ecosystems. Understanding how nitrogen drives plant growth has numerous theoretical and practical applications in agriculture and ecology. In 2004, Göran I. Ågren proposed a mechanistic model of plant growth from a biochemical perspective. However, neglecting respiration and assuming stable and balanced growth made the model unrealistic for plants growing in natural conditions. The aim of the present paper is to extend Ågren’s model to overcome these limitations.MethodsWe improved Ågren’s model by incorporating the respiratory process and replacing the stable and balanced growth assumption with a three-parameter power function to describe the relationship between nitrogen concentration (Nc) and biomass. The new model was evaluated based on published data from three studies on corn (Zea mays) growth.Key ResultsRemarkably, the mechanistic growth model derived in this study is mathematically equivalent to the classical Richards model, which is the most widely used empirical growth model. The model agrees well with empirical plant growth data.ConclusionsOur model provides a mechanistic interpretation of how nitrogen drives plant growth. It is very robust in predicting growth curves and the relationship between Nc and relative growth rate.
Annals of Botany arrow_drop_down Annals of BotanyArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedLicense: OUP Standard Publication ReuseData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/aob/mcac018&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routeshybrid 5 citations 5 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Annals of Botany arrow_drop_down Annals of BotanyArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedLicense: OUP Standard Publication ReuseData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/aob/mcac018&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2011Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2011 United States, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, United States, Switzerland, Australia, United States, United States, AustraliaPublisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Funded by:NSF | RCN: Coordination of the ...NSF| RCN: Coordination of the Nutrient Network (NutNet), global manipulations of nutrients and consumersYann Hautier; Anita C. Risch; Andy Hector; Jennifer Firn; Kevin P. Kirkman; Eve I. Gasarch; Andrew S. MacDougall; Eric W. Seabloom; Charles E. Mitchell; Laura B. Calabrese; Suzanne M. Prober; Nicole M. DeCrappeo; Melinda D. Smith; T. Michael Anderson; Nicole Hagenah; Nicole Hagenah; Kathryn L. Cottingham; Peter D. Wragg; Peter B. Adler; John G. Lambrinos; Jonathan D. Bakker; Daneil S. Gruner; James B. Grace; Gang Wang; Elizabeth T. Borer; Scott L. Collins; Brent Mortensen; Kendi F. Davies; Chengjin Chu; Michael J. Crawley; Carly J. Stevens; Carly J. Stevens; Martin Schuetz; Kimberly J. La Pierre; Louie H. Yang; Virginia L. Jin; Joslin L. Moore; John L. Orrock; Helmut Hillebrand; Lauren L. Sullivan; Yvonne M. Buckley; Brett A. Melbourne; Philip A. Fay; W. Stanley Harpole; Johannes M. H. Knops; Adam D. Kay; John W. Morgan; Lori A. Biederman; Paul N. Frater; Ellen I. Damschen; Lydia R. O'Halloran; Justin P. Wright; Julia A. Klein; Wei Li; Hope C. Humphries; Rebecca L. McCulley; Elsa E. Cleland; Janneke Hille Ris Lambers; Cynthia S. Brown; David A. Pyke;Standardized sampling from many sites worldwide was used to address an important ecological problem.
CORE arrow_drop_down Zurich Open Repository and ArchiveArticle . 2011 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Zurich Open Repository and ArchiveThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Digital Repository @ Iowa State UniversityArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of St. Thomas: UST Research OnlineArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1126/science.1204498&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 489 citations 489 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CORE arrow_drop_down Zurich Open Repository and ArchiveArticle . 2011 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Zurich Open Repository and ArchiveThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Digital Repository @ Iowa State UniversityArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of St. Thomas: UST Research OnlineArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2011Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1126/science.1204498&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2016Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Funded by:NSF | CAREER: Forecasting Clima..., NSF | LTER: Long-Term Research ...NSF| CAREER: Forecasting Climate Change Impacts on Plant Communities? When Do Species Interactions Matter? ,NSF| LTER: Long-Term Research at the Jornada Basin (LTER-VI)Peter B. Adler; Kris M. Havstad; Mitchel P. McClaran; Andrew R. Kleinhesselink; Debra P. C. Peters; Chengjin Chu; Lance T. Vermeire; Haiyan Wei;AbstractTheory predicts that strong indirect effects of environmental change will impact communities when niche differences between competitors are small and variation in the direct effects experienced by competitors is large, but empirical tests are lacking. Here we estimate negative frequency dependence, a proxy for niche differences, and quantify the direct and indirect effects of climate change on each species. Consistent with theory, in four of five communities indirect effects are strongest for species showing weak negative frequency dependence. Indirect effects are also stronger in communities where there is greater variation in direct effects. Overall responses to climate perturbations are driven primarily by direct effects, suggesting that single species models may be adequate for forecasting the impacts of climate change in these communities.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/ncomms11766&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 37 citations 37 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/ncomms11766&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2010 FrancePublisher:Wiley J. Xu; Sa Xiao; J.‐L. Zhang; C.‐J. Chu; Richard Michalet; Richard Michalet; Gen-Xuan Wang;pmid: 20701701
Biotic interaction studies have revealed a large discrepancy among experiments in target responses to the effects of neighbours, which may in part be due to both high species-specificity of plant responses and low number of target species used in experiments. Our aim was to assess facilitative responses at the community level and the role of both functional groups and ecological attributes of target species. In a sub-alpine grassland on the eastern Tibet plateau, we assessed growth responses of all species in the community to removal of a dominant shrub. We also measured changes in the main environmental variables. Species responses were analysed by functional group and in relation to their mean regional altitudinal distribution. All significant interactions were positive and affected one-third of the total species richness of the community. All functional groups were facilitated but forbs were less strongly facilitated than in the two other groups. High-alpine species were less strongly facilitated than low-sub-alpine species, but the strength of this relationship was weaker than that reported in previous work. There was evidence of a decrease in extreme temperatures below the canopy of the shrub but no variations in soil moisture. We conclude that the highly stressful conditions induced by the dry continental climate of the eastern Tibet plateau are a main driver of the exclusive dominance of positive interactions. Assessing interactive responses at the community level is likely to provide a useful tool to better understand the role of biotic interactions in community responses to environmental changes.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00271.x&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu30 citations 30 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00271.x&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2019 Australia, NetherlandsPublisher:Wiley Chengjin Chu; Guozhen Du; Merel B. Soons; Mariet M. Hefting; Cynthia S. Brown; Pengfei Zhang; Pengfei Zhang; Yann Hautier; Jennifer Firn; George A. Kowalchuk; Zhi Guo; Xian-Hui Zhou; Xiaolong Zhou; Zhi-Gang Zhao;Abstract Predicting changes in plant diversity in response to human activities represents one of the major challenges facing ecologists and land managers striving for sustainable ecosystem management. Classical field studies have emphasized the importance of community primary productivity in regulating changes in plant species richness. However, experimental studies have yielded inconsistent empirical evidence, suggesting that primary productivity is not the sole determinant of plant diversity. Recent work has shown that more accurate predictions of changes in species diversity can be achieved by combining measures of species’ cover and height into an index of space resource utilization (SRU). While the SRU approach provides reliable predictions, it is time‐consuming and requires extensive taxonomic expertise. Ecosystem processes and plant community structure are likely driven primarily by dominant species (mass ratio effect). Within communities, it is likely that dominant and rare species have opposite contributions to overall biodiversity trends. We, therefore, suggest that better species richness predictions can be achieved by utilizing SRU assessments of only the dominant species (SRUD), as compared to SRU or biomass of the entire community. Here, we assess the ability of these measures to predict changes in plant diversity as driven by nutrient addition and herbivore exclusion. First, we tested our hypotheses by carrying out a detailed analysis in an alpine grassland that measured all species within the community. Next, we assessed the broader applicability of our approach by measuring the first three dominant species for five additional experimental grassland sites across a wide geographic and habitat range. We show that SRUD outperforms community biomass, as well as community SRU, in predicting biodiversity dynamics in response to nutrients and herbivores in an alpine grassland. Across our additional sites, SRUD yielded far better predictions of changes in species richness than community biomass, demonstrating the robustness and generalizable nature of this approach. Synthesis. The SRUD approach provides a simple, non‐destructive and more accurate means to monitor and predict the impact of global change drivers and management interventions on plant communities, thereby facilitating efforts to maintain and recover plant diversity.
Queensland Universit... arrow_drop_down Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2019License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/1365-2745.13205&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 10 citations 10 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert Queensland Universit... arrow_drop_down Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2019License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/1365-2745.13205&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2015 DenmarkPublisher:Wiley Fangliang He; Fangliang He; Jérôme Chave; Jacob Weiner; Chengjin Chu; Megan K. Bartlett; Youshi Wang; Lawren Sack;doi: 10.1111/gcb.13079
pmid: 26442433
AbstractThe need for rigorous analyses of climate impacts has never been more crucial. Current textbooks state that climate directly influences ecosystem annual net primary productivity (NPP), emphasizing the urgent need to monitor the impacts of climate change. A recent paper challenged this consensus, arguing, based on an analysis of NPP for 1247 woody plant communities across global climate gradients, that temperature and precipitation have negligible direct effects on NPP and only perhaps have indirect effects by constraining total stand biomass (Mtot) and stand age (a). The authors of that study concluded that the length of the growing season (lgs) might have a minor influence on NPP, an effect they considered not to be directly related to climate. In this article, we describe flaws that affected that study's conclusions and present novel analyses to disentangle the effects of stand variables and climate in determining NPP. We re‐analyzed the same database to partition the direct and indirect effects of climate on NPP, using three approaches: maximum‐likelihood model selection, independent‐effects analysis, and structural equation modeling. These new analyses showed that about half of the global variation in NPP could be explained by Mtot combined with climate variables and supported strong and direct influences of climate independently of Mtot, both for NPP and for net biomass change averaged across the known lifetime of the stands (ABC = average biomass change). We show that lgs is an important climate variable, intrinsically correlated with, and contributing to mean annual temperature and precipitation (Tann and Pann), all important climatic drivers of NPP. Our analyses provide guidance for statistical and mechanistic analyses of climate drivers of ecosystem processes for predictive modeling and provide novel evidence supporting the strong, direct role of climate in determining vegetation productivity at the global scale.
Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13079&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu107 citations 107 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13079&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2014 Australia, Argentina, United States, Argentina, United States, United States, Australia, United KingdomPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Publicly fundedFunded by:UKRI | RootDetect: Remote Detect..., FCT | LA 1, EC | GLOBEPURE +2 projectsUKRI| RootDetect: Remote Detection and Precision Management of Root Health ,FCT| LA 1 ,EC| GLOBEPURE ,NSF| RCN: Coordination of the Nutrient Network (NutNet), global manipulations of nutrients and consumers ,NSF| LTER: Biodiversity, Multiple Drivers of Environmental Change and Ecosystem Functioning at the Prairie Forest BorderHautier, Yann; Seabloom, Eric W.; Borer, Elizabeth T.; Adler, Peter B.; Harpole, W. Stanley; Hillebrand, Helmut; Lind, Eric M.; MacDougall, Andrew S.; Stevens, Carly J.; Bakker, Jonathan D.; Buckley, Yvonne M.; Chu, Chengjin; Collins, Scott L.; Daleo, Pedro; Damschen, Ellen I.; Davies, Kendi F.; Fay, Philip A.; Firn, Jennifer; Gruner, Daniel S.; Jin, Virginia L.; Klein, Julia A.; Knops, Johannes M. H.; La Pierre, Kimberly J.; Li, Wei; McCulley, Rebecca L.; Melbourne, Brett A.; Moore, Joslin L.; O'Halloran, Lydia R.; Prober, Suzanne M.; Risch, Anita C.; Sankaran, Mahesh; Schuetz, Martin; Hector, Andy;Studies of experimental grassland communities have demonstrated that plant diversity can stabilize productivity through species asynchrony, in which decreases in the biomass of some species are compensated for by increases in others. However, it remains unknown whether these findings are relevant to natural ecosystems, especially those for which species diversity is threatened by anthropogenic global change. Here we analyse diversity-stability relationships from 41 grasslands on five continents and examine how these relationships are affected by chronic fertilization, one of the strongest drivers of species loss globally. Unmanipulated communities with more species had greater species asynchrony, resulting in more stable biomass production, generalizing a result from biodiversity experiments to real-world grasslands. However, fertilization weakened the positive effect of diversity on stability. Contrary to expectations, this was not due to species loss after eutrophication but rather to an increase in the temporal variation of productivity in combination with a decrease in species asynchrony in diverse communities. Our results demonstrate separate and synergistic effects of diversity and eutrophication on stability, emphasizing the need to understand how drivers of global change interactively affect the reliable provisioning of ecosystem services in real-world systems.
Nature arrow_drop_down http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/Natu...Other literature typeData sources: European Union Open Data PortalThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nature13014&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 449 citations 449 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Nature arrow_drop_down http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/Natu...Other literature typeData sources: European Union Open Data PortalThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Lancaster University: Lancaster EprintsArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nature13014&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Diego Ismael Rodríguez-Hernández; David C. Deane; Weitao Wang; Yongfa Chen; Buhang Li; Wenqi Luo; Chengjin Chu;pmid: 33870455
Understanding the multiple biotic and abiotic controls of aboveground biomass (AGB) is important for projecting the consequences of global change and to effectively manage carbon storage. Although large-scale studies have identified the major environmental and biological controls of AGB, drivers of local-scale variation are less well known. Additionally, involvement of multiple causal paths and scale dependence in effect sizes potentially confounds comparisons among studies differing in methodology and sampling grain. We tested for scale dependence in evidence supporting selection, complementarity and environmental factors as the main determinants of AGB variation over a 50 ha study extent in subtropical China, modelling this at four sampling grains (0.01, 0.04, 0.25 and 1 ha). At each grain, we used piecewise structural equation models to quantify the direct and indirect effects of environmental (topographic and edaphic properties) and forest attributes (structure, diversity and functional traits) on AGB, while controlling for spatial autocorrelation. Direct scale-invariant effects on AGB were evident for structure and community-mean traits, supporting dominance of selection effects. However, diversity had strong indirect effects on AGB via forest structure, particularly at larger sampling grains (≥ 0.25 ha), while direct effects only emerged at the smallest grain size (0.01 ha). The direct and indirect effects of edaphic and topographic factors were also important for explaining both forest attributes and AGB across all scales. Although selection effects appeared to be more influential on ecosystem function, ignoring indirect causal pathways for diversity via structural attributes risks overlooking the importance of complementarity on ecosystem functioning, particularly as sampling grain increases.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s00442-021-04915-w&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu14 citations 14 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s00442-021-04915-w&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2025Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Donghao Wu; Enzai Du; Nico Eisenhauer; Jérome Mathieu; Chengjin Chu;pmid: 39939777
The biogenic structures produced by termites, ants and earthworms provide key functions across global ecosystems1,2. However, little is known about the drivers of the soil engineering effects caused by these small but important invertebrates3 at the global scale. Here we show, on the basis of a meta-analysis of 12,975 observations from 1,047 studies on six continents, that all three taxa increase soil macronutrient content, soil respiration and soil microbial and plant biomass compared with reference soils. The effect of termites on soil respiration and plant biomass, and the effect of earthworms on soil nitrogen and phosphorus content, increase with mean annual temperature and peak in the tropics. By contrast, the effects of ants on soil nitrogen, soil phosphorus, plant biomass and survival rate peak at mid-latitude ecosystems that have the lowest primary productivity. Notably, termites and ants increase plant growth by alleviating plant phosphorus limitation in the tropics and nitrogen limitation in temperate regions, respectively. Our study highlights the important roles of these invertebrate taxa in global biogeochemical cycles and ecosystem functions. Given the importance of these soil-engineering invertebrates, biogeochemical models should better integrate their effects, especially on carbon fluxes and nutrient cycles.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41586-025-08594-y&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41586-025-08594-y&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euResearch data keyboard_double_arrow_right Dataset 2024Embargo end date: 25 Nov 2024Publisher:Dryad Wu, Donghao; Liu, Cong; Caron, Fernanda; Luo, Yuanyuan; Pie, Marcio; Yu, Mingjian; Eggleton, Paul; Chu, Chengjin;# Habitat fragmentation drives pest termite risk in humid but not arid biomes [https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.k98sf7mdt](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.k98sf7mdt) ## Description of the data and file structure We provided the checklist of coocurring termite species at local scale ('Checklist of Isoptera in local haitats.xlsx') and at oceanic-island scale ('Checklist of Isoptera on global islands.xlsx'), which included the original records of species distribution per site, the environmental attributes and spatial coordinates per site, and the full reference list from which the distribution records were extracted. We also provided the functional trait information for each studied species ('Species list and traits.xlsx'). For morpho-species, we calculated the mean trait values of intrageneric species as the estimate. Trait description and reference source were also reported. For body size, we plotted the correlation of body size between soldier and imago caste, which was significantly positive (R2 = 0.62). Therefore, we used the body size of soldier caste for analyses. We compiled the response and predictor variables per island (or local site) into a single file ('Data for analysis and visualization.xlsx'). This file assembled all environmental predictors, community-weighted means of pest species risk and other functional traits, and the standardized effect sizes (SES) of mean pairwise functional distance (MFD) and mean pairwise phylogenetic distance (MPD). Besides, we used the proportional data among cooccurring species per local community to calculate the proportion-weighted mean of pest species risk. Species pool was defined in two different ways. First, we treated all species occur on islands (or local sites) as the full species pool. Second, dispersion-field species pool was defined for each island (or local site), by including any species within the genera that had geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage. We calculated the functional and phylogenetic SES values based on the full or dispersion-field species pool. For the former case, we labelled the SES values as 'SES.MFD' and 'SES.MPD'. For the latter case, we labelled the SES values as 'SES.MFD.df' and 'SES.MPD.df'. We provided 1000 pseudo-posterior phylogeney tree ('termites_tacted.tre') of more than 3000 termite species that were constructed by Dr. Fernanda S. Caron and Prof. Marcio R. Pie (see their orginal research for more details; 10.1111/zsc.12502). This tree included all species covered in this study, and the morpho-species was inserted into the tree topology within their corresponding genera, subfamilies or families, by taking into account branch lengths determined by local diversification rates. The final phylogeny tree was generated through reserving species occurring in this study. ## Description of the variables **Checklist of Isoptera on global islands** Sheet 1: Occurrence data * *scientificName*: Currently valid scientific name * *Subspecies*: Subspecies name * *family*: Family name * *subfamily*: Subfamily name * *Genus_final*: Curated genus name * *genus*: Genus name reported by the source * *species*: Species name reported by the source * *Island name*: The name of the island where the species occurs * *Island.No*: The ID of island * *Latitude*: Latitude of the island centroid * *Longitude*: Longitude of the island centroid * *Country*: The country name where the species occurs * *Reference*: The data source that reports the specific island where the species occurs * *DOI*: DOI or the accessing link of the reference * *Comment*: Other information * *Single*: Is it the only termite species that occurs on the specific island? 1 - Yes; 0 - No Sheet 2: Island metric * *Island.No*: The ID of island * *Latitude*: Latitude of the island centroid * *Longitude*: Longitude of the island centroid * *Country*: The country name where the species occurs * *Archip*: The name of the archipelago where the island occurs * *Island*: The name of the island where the species occurs * *Area*: Island area (km2) * *Dist*: Distance to the nearest mainland (km) * *SLMP*: The log10‐transformed sum of the proportions of landmass within buffer distances of 100, 1,000 and 10,000 km around the island perimeter * *Temp*: The maximum values per island polygon of mean annual temperature (°C) * *Prec*: The maximum values per island polygon of mean annual precipitation (mm) * *CCVT*: Climate change velocity, calculated as the ratio between the temporal change in temperature per year (°C/year) and the contemporary spatial change in temperature (°C/m) and expressed in distance units per time (m/year) * *Ecoregion*: The smallest-scale units in the Marine Ecoregions of the World (MEOW) system * *Province*: The meidum-scale units in the Marine Ecoregions of the World (MEOW) system * *Realm*: The largest-scale units in the Marine Ecoregions of the World (MEOW) system * *Single*: Does the island have only one termite species? 1 - Yes; 0 - No Sheet 3: Reference list * *Title*: The data source that reports the distribution or checklist of termite species on the oceanic island(s) * *DOI*: DOI or the accessing link of the reference **Checklist of Isoptera in local haitats** Sheet 1: Occurrence data * *Habitat type*: Is the local site located on the mainland or oceanic island? * *StudyID*: The ID of the reference * *scientificName*: Currently valid scientific name * *Original record*: The full species name reported in the data source * *Family*: Family name * *subfamily*: Subfamily name * *Genus_final*: Curated genus name * *Genus*: Genus name reported by the source * *Species*: Species name reported by the source * *Abundance type*: The method of counting the numeric advantage of each species used in the specific study. "Occurrence frequency" is the number of transects or quadrats where the species is found. "Total individual number" is the total counts of termite workers and soldiers found in the site. "Total individual number (OTU reads)" is the total counts of the OTU reads sampled from the site. * *Abundance*: The abundance of the species * *Percent ratio*: The relative abundance of the species found in the site * *Pest.risk*: The level of pest risk of the species * *Diet information*: The dite of the species * *Sampling method*: The method of sampling termites in the specific study: transect or quadrat * *Number of sites*: The total number of local sites of the same area that are pooled to calculate the abundance * *Number of sampling units*: The total number of transects or quadrats of the same area that are pooled to calculate the abundance * *Width of sampling unit*: The width of the transect or quadrat * *Length of sampling unit*: The length of the transect or quadrat * *Total sampling area*: Total sampling area * *Site name*: The full name of local site * *SiteID*: The ID of local site * *Taxonomic-level*: The taxonomic level for how the species is identified * *Comment*: Other information * *Diet reference1*: The first reference that reports the diet information of the species * *Diet reference2*: The second reference that reports the diet information of the species * *Single*: Is it the only termite species that occurs in the local site? 1 - Yes; 0 - No Sheet 2: Habitat metric * *SiteID*: The ID of local site * *Latitude*: Latitude of the local site * *Longitude*: Longitude of the local site * *Treecover*: Percentage of tree cover in 2010 at 30-m resolution * *Treecover.z*: The Z score of percentage tree cover by comparing the observed tree cover to the mean values of all grids (30 × 30 m) within the 5 × 5 km. Specifically, the difference between observed and mean values was divided by the standard deviation of percent tree cover among all grids. This metric was independent of the cross-regional difference in natural tree cover and, thus, could be used to assessed the relative level of habitat area across regions * *Landuse*: The land use proportion (%) within a 5,000 × 5,000 m area that was covered by human infrastructure, cropland, and water, based on the 2019 global land cover map at 30-m resolution * *Temp*: Mean annual temperature (°C) * *Prec*: Mean annual precipitation (mm) * *CCVT*: Climate change velocity, calculated as the ratio between the temporal change in temperature per year (°C/year) and the contemporary spatial change in temperature (°C/m) and expressed in distance units per time (m/year) * *Land use*: The land use reported in the source * *Land use type*: One of the seven types of land use categories that the specific site belongs to, including the abandoned, agriculture, disturbed, forestry, grazing, protected, and restored * *Native vegetation*: One of the four types of native vegetation categories that the specific site belongs to, including the forest, woodland, grassland, and savanna * *Ecoregion*: The smallest-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Biome*: The meidum-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Realm*: The largest-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Continent*: The continent where the local site distributes * *Habitat.type*: Is the local site located on the mainland or oceanic island? * *Single*: Does the local site have only one termite species? 1 - Yes; 0 - No Sheet 3: Reference list * *Study*: The ID of the reference * *Title*: The data source that reports the community composition and/or abundance of termites in the local site(s) * *DOI*: DOI or the accessing link of the reference **Species list and traits** Sheet 1: Simplified * *Species*: The scientific name of the termite species * *Island*: Does the termite species occur on any of the documented islands? * *Local*: Does the termite species occur in any of the local sites? * *Pest.risk*: The classification of pest damage level (0 = non-pest; 1 = pest; 2 = major pest) * *Size.soldier*: The head width (mm) of largest soldier caste; for soldierless species, the head width of largest worker caste is used * *Morph.soldier*: The number of size morph for soldier caste (0 = soldierless; 1 = monomorphic; 2 = dimorphic or trimorphic * *Diet.dominant*: The most common feeding diet per genus (1 = wood-feeding lower termites; 2 = wood-feeding Termitidae; 3 = Humus-feeding Termitidae; 4 = Mineral-soil-feeding Termitidae) * *Nesting.complexity*: The complexity of nesting strategy (1 = one-piece nester; 2 = multiple-piece nester; 3 = central-piece nester) * *Soil.access*: Whether or not have access to soil (0/1) * *Diet.differentiation*: The number of distinct diet types per genus * *Forager*: Whether or not foraging outside the nest * *Diet.soil*: Whether or not ≥ 1 species per genus show soil-feeding habit (or feeding in wood/soil interface) * *Taxonomy*: The taxonomic level for how the species is identified Sheet 2: Full data * *scientificName*: The scientific name of the termite species * *Used_name*: The adapted format of species name that is used in the data analyses * *Island (0/1)*: Does the termite species occur on any of the documented islands? * *Local (0/1)*: Does the termite species occur in any of the local sites? * *Unique species in one-species site*: Does the termite species only occur in one local site or island? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Taxonomy*: The taxonomic level for how the species is identified * *Family*: Family name * *Subfamily*: Subfamily name * *Genus*: Genus name * *Pest.risk*: The classification of pest damage level (0 = non-pest; 1 = pest; 2 = major pest) * *Size*: Maximum head width of soldier caste (worker caste for soldierless species) * *Size.soldier*: The head width (mm) of largest soldier caste; for soldierless species, the head width of largest worker caste is used * *Morph.soldier*: The number of size morph for soldier caste (0 = soldierless; 1 = monomorphic; 2 = dimorphic or trimorphic * *Size_imago*: The head width (mm) of imago alate * *Forager*: Whether or not foraging outside the nest * *Diet.dominant*: The most common feeding diet per genus (1 = wood-feeding lower termites; 2 = wood-feeding Termitidae; 3 = Humus-feeding Termitidae; 4 = Mineral-soil-feeding Termitidae) * *Diet.differentiation*: The number of distinct diet types per genus * *Diet.soil*: Whether or not ≥ 1 species per genus show soil-feeding habit (or feeding in wood/soil interface) * *Nesting.complexity*: The complexity of nesting strategy (1 = one-piece nester; 2 = multiple-piece nester; 3 = central-piece nester) * *Soil.access*: Whether or not have access to soil (0/1) Sheet 3: Trait description (defining the variables presented in the previous two spreadsheets) Sheet 4: Size literature * *Species*: The scientific name of the termite species * *Family*: Family name * *Caste*: Soldier caste for species with soldier caste, or worker caste for soldierless species * *Head width*: Head width (mm) of largest soldier caste * *Head width_large*: Head width (mm) of largest soldier caste * *Head width_small*: Head width (mm) of smallest soldier caste * *Reference1*: The first reference reporting the head width * *DOI1*: The DOI or accessing link of the first reference * *Reference2*: The second reference reporting the head width * *DOI2*: The DOI or accessing link of the second reference * *Reference3*: The third reference reporting the head width * *DOI3*: The DOI or accessing link of the third reference * *Range1*: The range of head width reported from the first reference * *Range2*: The range of head width reported from the second reference * *Range3*: The range of head width reported from the third reference * *Comment*: Other information Sheet 5: Size correlation * *scientificName*: The scientific name of the termite species * *Family*: Family name * *Subfamily*: Subfamily name * *Genus*: Genus name * *Size_soldier*: The head width of soldier caste * *Size_imago*: The head width of imago caste Sheet 5: Diet literature * *Genus*: Genus name * *Family*: Family name * *Subfamily*: Subfamily name * *Diet.dominant*: The most common feeding diet per genus (1 = wood-feeding lower termites; 2 = wood-feeding Termitidae; 3 = Humus-feeding Termitidae; 4 = Mineral-soil-feeding Termitidae) * *Diet.differentiation*: The number of distinct diet types per genus * *Wood*: Does any species of the genus eat wood? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Litter*: Does any species of the genus eat litter? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Grass*: Does any species of the genus eat grass? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Epiphyte*: Does any species of the genus eat epiphyte? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Fungus*: Does any species of the genus eat fungus? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Dung*: Does any species of the genus eat dung? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Soil*: Does any species of the genus eat soil? 1 - Yes; 0 - No * *Reference for dominant diet*: The reference reporting the dominant diet information * *Reference for soil-feeding (or wood/soil interface) species within non-soil feeding genus (i.e. Dite_dominant = 2)*: The reference reporting the soil-feeding behaviors for species under the genus whose dominant diet is non-soil **Data for analysis and visualization** Sheet 1: Island * *Island.No*: The ID of island * *SES.MFD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring on all islands * *SES.MPD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring on all islands * *SES.MFD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage * *SES.MPD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage - *Pest.risk*: Community-weighted mean of pest risk level - *Size.soldier*: Community-weighted mean of the soldier head width - *Morph.soldier*: Community-weighted mean of the number of size morph for soldier caste - *Diet.dominant*: Community-weighted mean of the dominant diet - *Nesting.complexity*: Community-weighted mean of nesting strategy complexity - *Soil.access*: Community-weighted mean of soil access - *Diet.differentiation*: Community-weighted mean of diet differentiation - *Forager*: Community-weighted mean of forager trait - *Diet.soil*: Community-weighted mean of soil-feeding trait - *PC1*: The first principal component of termite functional traits - *PC2*: The second principal component of termite functional traits - *PC3*: The third principal component of termite functional traits - *PC4*: The fourth principal component of termite functional traits - *Latitude*: Latitude of the island centroid - *Longitude*: Longitude of the island centroid - *Country*: The country name where the island occurs - *Archip*: The name of the archipelago where the island occurs - *Island*: Island name - *Area*: Island area (km2) - *Dist*: Distance to the nearest mainland (km) - *SLMP*: The log10‐transformed sum of the proportions of landmass within buffer distances of 100, 1,000 and 10,000 km around the island perimeter - *Temp*: The maximum values per island polygon of mean annual temperature (°C) - *Prec*: The maximum values per island polygon of mean annual precipitation (mm) - *CCVT*: Climate change velocity, calculated as the ratio between the temporal change in temperature per year (°C/year) and the contemporary spatial change in temperature (°C/m) and expressed in distance units per time (m/year) - *Ecoregion*: The smallest-scale units in the Marine Ecoregions of the World (MEOW) system - *Province*: The meidum-scale units in the Marine Ecoregions of the World (MEOW) system - *Realm*: The largest-scale units in the Marine Ecoregions of the World (MEOW) system - *Single*: Does the island have only one termite species? 1 - Yes; 0 - No - *SR*: The total number of termite species on the island - *PrecS*: The scaled and centered values of mean annual precipitation - *AreaS*: The scaled and centered values of island area - *DistS*: The scaled and centered values of distance to the nearest mainland - *SLMPS*: The scaled and centered values of SLMP Sheet 2: Local * *SiteID*: The ID of local site * *SES.MFD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring in all local sites * *SES.MPD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring in all local sites * *SES.MFD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage * *SES.MPD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage - *Pest.risk*: Community-weighted mean of pest risk level - *Size.soldier*: Community-weighted mean of the soldier head width - *Morph.soldier*: Community-weighted mean of the number of size morph for soldier caste - *Diet.dominant*: Community-weighted mean of the dominant diet - *Nesting.complexity*: Community-weighted mean of nesting strategy complexity - *Soil.access*: Community-weighted mean of soil access - *Diet.differentiation*: Community-weighted mean of diet differentiation - *Forager*: Community-weighted mean of forager trait - *Diet.soil*: Community-weighted mean of soil-feeding trait - *PC1*: The first principal component of termite functional traits - *PC2*: The second principal component of termite functional traits - *PC3*: The third principal component of termite functional traits - *PC4*: The fourth principal component of termite functional traits * *Latitude*: Latitude of the local site * *Longitude*: Longitude of the local site * *Treecover*: Percentage of tree cover in 2010 at 30-m resolution * *Treecover.z*: The Z score of percentage tree cover by comparing the observed tree cover to the mean values of all grids (30 × 30 m) within the 5 × 5 km. Specifically, the difference between observed and mean values was divided by the standard deviation of percent tree cover among all grids. This metric was independent of the cross-regional difference in natural tree cover and, thus, could be used to assessed the relative level of habitat area across regions * *Landuse*: The land use proportion (%) within a 5,000 × 5,000 m area that was covered by human infrastructure, cropland, and water, based on the 2019 global land cover map at 30-m resolution * *Temp*: Mean annual temperature (°C) * *Prec*: Mean annual precipitation (mm) * *CCVT*: Climate change velocity, calculated as the ratio between the temporal change in temperature per year (°C/year) and the contemporary spatial change in temperature (°C/m) and expressed in distance units per time (m/year) * *Land use*: The land use reported in the source * *Land use type*: One of the seven types of land use categories that the specific site belongs to, including the abandoned, agriculture, disturbed, forestry, grazing, protected, and restored * *Native vegetation*: One of the four types of native vegetation categories that the specific site belongs to, including the forest, woodland, grassland, and savanna * *Ecoregion*: The smallest-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Biome*: The meidum-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Realm*: The largest-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Continent*: The continent where the local site distributes * *Habitat.type*: Is the local site located on the mainland or oceanic island? * *Single*: Does the local site have only one termite species? 1 - Yes; 0 - No - *SR*: The total number of termite species on the island - *PrecS*: The scaled and centered values of mean annual precipitation - *TreecoverS*: The scaled and centered values of percentage tree cover - *Treecover.zS*: The scaled and centered values of the Z score of percentage tree cover - *LanduseS*: The scaled and centered values of land use proportion Sheet 3: SES.island * *Island.No*: The ID of island * *SES.MFD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring on all islands * *SES.MPD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring on all islands * *SES.MFD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage * *SES.MPD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage Sheet 4: SES.local * *SiteID*: The ID of local site * *SES.MFD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring in all local sites * *SES.MPD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring in all local sites * *SES.MFD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage * *SES.MPD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage Sheet 5: Pest.risk.global * *SiteID*: The ID of local site * *Scale*: The spatial scale of the species assemblages: island or local site * *Latitude*: Latitude of the local site * *Longitude*: Longitude of the local site * *Pest.risk*: Community-weighted mean of pest risk level Sheet 6: Pest.risk.weighted * *SiteID*: The ID of local site * *SES.MFD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring in all local sites * *SES.MPD*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species occurring in all local sites * *SES.MFD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for functional dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage * *SES.MPD.df*: The standardized effect size (SES) for phylogenetic dissimilarity, with the regional species pool being species with geographic extents overlapping the focal assemblage - *Pest.risk*: Community-weighted mean of pest risk level - *Size.soldier*: Community-weighted mean of the soldier head width - *Morph.soldier*: Community-weighted mean of the number of size morph for soldier caste - *Diet.dominant*: Community-weighted mean of the dominant diet - *Nesting.complexity*: Community-weighted mean of nesting strategy complexity - *Soil.access*: Community-weighted mean of soil access - *Diet.differentiation*: Community-weighted mean of diet differentiation - *Forager*: Community-weighted mean of forager trait - *Diet.soil*: Community-weighted mean of soil-feeding trait - *PC1*: The first principal component of termite functional traits - *PC2*: The second principal component of termite functional traits - *PC3*: The third principal component of termite functional traits - *PC4*: The fourth principal component of termite functional traits * *Latitude*: Latitude of the local site * *Longitude*: Longitude of the local site * *Treecover*: Percentage of tree cover in 2010 at 30-m resolution * *Treecover.z*: The Z score of percentage tree cover by comparing the observed tree cover to the mean values of all grids (30 × 30 m) within the 5 × 5 km. Specifically, the difference between observed and mean values was divided by the standard deviation of percent tree cover among all grids. This metric was independent of the cross-regional difference in natural tree cover and, thus, could be used to assessed the relative level of habitat area across regions * *Landuse*: The land use proportion (%) within a 5,000 × 5,000 m area that was covered by human infrastructure, cropland, and water, based on the 2019 global land cover map at 30-m resolution * *Temp*: Mean annual temperature (°C) * *Prec*: Mean annual precipitation (mm) * *CCVT*: Climate change velocity, calculated as the ratio between the temporal change in temperature per year (°C/year) and the contemporary spatial change in temperature (°C/m) and expressed in distance units per time (m/year) * *Land use*: The land use reported in the source * *Land use type*: One of the seven types of land use categories that the specific site belongs to, including the abandoned, agriculture, disturbed, forestry, grazing, protected, and restored * *Native vegetation*: One of the four types of native vegetation categories that the specific site belongs to, including the forest, woodland, grassland, and savanna * *Ecoregion*: The smallest-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Biome*: The meidum-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Realm*: The largest-scale units in the Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW) system * *Continent*: The continent where the local site distributes * *Habitat.type*: Is the local site located on the mainland or oceanic island? * *Single*: Does the local site have only one termite species? 1 - Yes; 0 - No - *SR*: The total number of termite species on the island - *PrecS*: The scaled and centered values of mean annual precipitation - *TreecoverS*: The scaled and centered values of percentage tree cover - *Treecover.zS*: The scaled and centered values of the Z score of percentage tree cover - *LanduseS*: The scaled and centered values of land use proportion * *Pest.risk.weighted*: Abundance-weighted mean of pest risk level ## Code/Software All statistical analyses were conducted in R 4.2.3. We provided four R scripts to generate all results reported in the main text and supplementary materials. 'SES-full species pool.R' was used to calculate the SES.MPD among cooccurring species for 1000 pseudo-posterior trees. It may take 1~2 weeks to finish the whole process. Meanwhile, SES.MFD could be fastly computed and therefore we inserted the respective code in the next script. 'SES-dispersion field.R' was used to calculate the SES.MFD.df and SES.MPD.df among cooccurring species. Given that dispersion-field species pool was defined differently for each island or local site, the running time was considerably higher (i.e. times the number of islands or local sites) than that of 'SES-full species pool.R'. 'Analysis code.R' was used to generate the dataset for analysis and visualization ('Data for analysis and visualization.xlsx'). Furthermore, multiple linear regression after stepwise selection was used to determine the important predictors and interaction effects. Finally, global Moran's I analysis was conducted to evaluate the spatial autocorrelation in the residuals of each response variable after accounting for the environmental effects. 'Figure code.R' was used to visualize the distribution of data records (Fig. 1a) and interaction effects between climate and habitat fragmentation (Figs. 3-5 and Figs. S4-S7). In addition, we also provided the code for plotting the Pearson's correlation matrix among functional traits (Fig. S2) and environmental predictors (Fig. S3). Predicting global change effects poses significant challenges due to the intricate interplay between climate change and anthropogenic stressors in shaping ecological communities and their function, such as pest outbreak risk. Termites are ecosystem engineers, yet some pest species are causing worldwide economic losses. While habitat fragmentation seems to drive pest-dominated termite communities, its interaction with climate change effect remains unknown. We test if climate and habitat fragmentation interactively alter interspecific competition that may limit pest termite risk. Leveraging global termite cooccurrence including 280 pest species, we found that competitively superior termite species (e.g. large-bodied) increased in large and continuous habitats solely at high precipitation. While competitive species suppressed pest species globally, habitat fragmentation drove pest termite risk only in humid biomes. Unfortunately, humid tropics have experienced vast forest fragmentation and rainfall reduction over the past decades. These stressors, if not stopped, may drive pest termite risk potentially via competitive release.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.k98sf7mdt&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu0 citations 0 popularity Average influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.k98sf7mdt&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2022Publisher:Oxford University Press (OUP) Authors: Yongfa Chen; Chengjin Chu; Fangliang He; Suqin Fang;AbstractBackground and AimsNitrogen is often regarded as a limiting factor to plant growth in various ecosystems. Understanding how nitrogen drives plant growth has numerous theoretical and practical applications in agriculture and ecology. In 2004, Göran I. Ågren proposed a mechanistic model of plant growth from a biochemical perspective. However, neglecting respiration and assuming stable and balanced growth made the model unrealistic for plants growing in natural conditions. The aim of the present paper is to extend Ågren’s model to overcome these limitations.MethodsWe improved Ågren’s model by incorporating the respiratory process and replacing the stable and balanced growth assumption with a three-parameter power function to describe the relationship between nitrogen concentration (Nc) and biomass. The new model was evaluated based on published data from three studies on corn (Zea mays) growth.Key ResultsRemarkably, the mechanistic growth model derived in this study is mathematically equivalent to the classical Richards model, which is the most widely used empirical growth model. The model agrees well with empirical plant growth data.ConclusionsOur model provides a mechanistic interpretation of how nitrogen drives plant growth. It is very robust in predicting growth curves and the relationship between Nc and relative growth rate.
Annals of Botany arrow_drop_down Annals of BotanyArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedLicense: OUP Standard Publication ReuseData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/aob/mcac018&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routeshybrid 5 citations 5 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Annals of Botany arrow_drop_down Annals of BotanyArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedLicense: OUP Standard Publication ReuseData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/aob/mcac018&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu