• Energy Research

Background: With efforts underway globally to scale up access to surgical care for the billions who lack it, understanding the impact of climate change on surgical care delivery is critical for clinicians and policymakers. We aimed to assess the current state of knowledge regarding the impact of climate change on the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery Bellwether Procedures: laparotomy, caesarean delivery and treatment of an open fracture. Methods: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. We included studies that incorporated at least one of each of our two sets of search terms: (1) a specific Bellwether Procedure or its directly related pathophysiology, and (2) a climate change pressure (e.g. extreme heat, major storm, etc.). We excluded studies published before January 1, 2000; in languages outside coauthors’ fluency; and those without primary data (e.g. meta-analyses). Two co-authors screened each abstract and then the qualifying full articles for inclusion and data extraction. Our study is registered in PROSPERO (#CRD42021271933). Results: We initially identified 4,618 references, narrowed to 32 for final analysis. Most studies (n = 18, 56.3%) were conducted in high income countries. Only one study was conducted in Africa; none were conducted in South America or the Western Pacific. Caesarean section was the most studied procedure (n = 20, 54.1%) and major storms were the most studied climate change pressure (n = 14, 37.8%). Conclusion: Overall, the impact of climate change on surgery is understudied. Major specific content gaps include laparotomy procedures; long-term climate pressures (e.g. heat, air pollution); geographic regions in South America, the Western Pacific and Africa; and low income country contexts. Though the existing body of literature is small, current trends can inform future research and policy initiatives in global surgery.

A stable climate is the most fundamental determinant of human health. Therefore, the goal of the Paris Agreement—limiting global warming to no more than 2 degrees Celsius—is arguably humanity's most important public health goal. To accomplish this goal, nearly all nations must greatly increase the ambition of their Nationally Determined Contributions at the upcoming United Nations COP26 meeting in 2021. We argue that health professionals and health organizations can and must join the growing global community of science-based advocates working to achieve the goal of the Paris Agreement. Doing so can be our greatest contribution to the health and wellbeing of all people, especially the world's most vulnerable, marginalized and disempowered people who tend to be harmed first and worst.

The purpose of this Consensus Statement is to provide a global, collaborative, representative and inclusive vision for educating an interprofessional healthcare workforce that can deliver sustainable healthcare and promote planetary health. It is intended to inform national and global accreditation standards, planning and action at the institutional level as well as highlight the role of individuals in transforming health professions education. Many countries have agreed to ‘rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes’ to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 45% within 10 years and achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, including in healthcare. Currently, however, health professions graduates are not prepared for their roles in achieving these changes. Thus, to reduce emissions and meet the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), health professions education must equip undergraduates, and those already qualified, with the knowledge, skills, values, competence and confidence they need to sustainably promote the health, human rights and well-being of current and future generations, while protecting the health of the planet. The current imperative for action on environmental issues such as climate change requires health professionals to mobilize politically as they have before, becoming strong advocates for major environmental, social and economic change. A truly ethical relationship with people and the planet that we inhabit so precariously, and to guarantee a future for the generations which follow, demands nothing less of all health professionals. This Consensus Statement outlines the changes required in health professions education, approaches to achieve these changes and a timeline for action linked to the internationally agreed SDGs. It represents the collective vision of health professionals, educators and students from various health professions, geographic locations and cultures. ‘Consensus’ implies broad agreement amongst all individuals engaged in discussion on a specific issue, which in this instance, is agreement by all signatories of this Statement developed under the auspices of the Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE). To ensure a shared understanding and to accurately convey information, we outline key terms in a glossary which accompanies this Consensus Statement (Supplementary Appendix 1). We acknowledge, however, that terms evolve and that different terms resonate variably depending on factors such as setting and audience. We define education for sustainable healthcare as the process of equipping current and future health professionals with the knowledge, values, confidence and capacity to provide environmentally sustainable services through health professions education. We define a health professional as a person who has gained a professional qualification for work in the health system, whether in healthcare delivery, public health or a management or supporting role and education as ‘the system comprising structures, curricula, faculty and activities contributing to a learning process’. This Statement is relevant to the full continuum of training – from undergraduate to postgraduate and continuing professional development.

Five billion people lack access to surgical care worldwide; climate change is the biggest threat to human health in the 21st century. This review studies how climate change could be integrated into national surgical planning in the Western Pacific region. We searched databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Global Health) for articles on climate change and surgical care. Findings were categorised using the modified World Health Organisation Health System Building Blocks Framework. 220 out of 2577 records were included. Infrastructure: Operating theatres are highly resource-intensive. Their carbon footprint could be reduced by maximising equipment longevity, improving energy efficiency, and renewable energy use. Service delivery Tele-medicine, outreaches, and avoiding desflurane could reduce emissions. Robust surgical systems are required to adapt to the increasing burden of surgically treated diseases, such as injuries from natural disasters. Finance: Climate change adaptation funds could be mobilised for surgical system strengthening. Information systems: Sustainability should be a key performance indicator for surgical systems. Workforce: Surgical providers could change clinical, institutional, and societal practices. Governance: Planning in surgical care and climate change should be aligned. Climate change mitigation is essential in the regional surgical care scale-up; surgical system strengthening is also necessary for adaptation to climate change.

peer-reviewed Against the backdrop of civic engagement, such as the Fridays For Future movement, expectations were high for 2020 to be a year of accelerating commitment to climate, biodiversity, and women’s rights; marked by plans for the UN Climate Summit, the Convention on Biological Diversity Summit, and the 25th anniversary of the Beijing Declaration on women’s rights. Instead, the political agenda was defined by COVID-19, which has served as an unwelcome, although timely, reminder of the fundamental interconnectedness of environmental, social, and economic systems. True recovery and a transi tion to a more resilient global society can be achieved by adopting an approach based on planetary health with a core focus on reducing social inequalities. This focus is necessary because the most vulnerable people globally are also the least represented in powerful positions in government and industry.