- home
- Advanced Search
- Energy Research
- 2016-2025
- Energy Research
- 2016-2025
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2020 AustraliaPublisher:Mary Ann Liebert Inc Michael B. Onn; Cassie C. Jansen; Amanda Murphy; Amanda Murphy;
Martin A. Shivas; Martin A. Shivas
Martin A. Shivas in OpenAIRE
Alison J. Peel; Alison J. Peel
Alison J. Peel in OpenAIRE
Simon Reid; Eloise B. Skinner;Simon Reid
Simon Reid in OpenAIRE
Hamish McCallum; Hamish McCallum
Hamish McCallum in OpenAIRETransmission of vector-borne pathogens can vary in complexity from single-vector, single-host systems through to multivector, multihost vertebrate systems. Understanding the dynamics of transmission is important for disease prevention efforts, but is dependent on disentangling complex interactions within coupled natural systems. Ross River virus (RRV) is a multivector multihost pathogen responsible for the greatest number of notified vector-borne pathogen infections in humans in Australia. Current evidence suggests that nonhuman vertebrates are critical for the maintenance and spillover of RRV into mosquito populations. Yet, there is a limited knowledge of which mosquito vector species and amplifying vertebrate host species are most important for transmission of RRV to humans. We conducted field surveys of nonhuman vertebrates and mosquitoes in the RRV endemic city of Brisbane, Australia, to assess the effect of vector and host community structure on human RRV notifications. Six suburbs were selected across a gradient of human disease notification rates. Differences in vertebrate and mosquito compositions were observed across all suburbs. Suburbs with higher RRV notification rates contained greater vertebrate biomass (dominated by the presence of horses) and higher mosquito abundances. This study suggests that horse-mosquito interactions should be considered in more detail and that vertebrate biomass and mosquito abundance be incorporated into future RRV modeling studies and considered in public health strategies for RRV management.
Griffith University:... arrow_drop_down Griffith University: Griffith Research OnlineArticle . 2020Full-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/397466Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Vector-Borne and Zoonotic DiseasesArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Mary Ann Liebert TDMData sources: CrossrefThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Griffith University: Griffith Research OnlineArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1089/vbz.2019.2585&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen 10 citations 10 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Griffith University:... arrow_drop_down Griffith University: Griffith Research OnlineArticle . 2020Full-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/397466Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Vector-Borne and Zoonotic DiseasesArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Mary Ann Liebert TDMData sources: CrossrefThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Griffith University: Griffith Research OnlineArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1089/vbz.2019.2585&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2020 Australia, South AfricaPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Authors:
Julia Van Velden; Boyson Moyo; Kerrie A. Wilson; Peter A. Lindsey; +3 AuthorsJulia Van Velden
Julia Van Velden in OpenAIRE
Julia Van Velden; Boyson Moyo; Kerrie A. Wilson; Peter A. Lindsey; Peter A. Lindsey;Julia Van Velden
Julia Van Velden in OpenAIRE
Hamish McCallum; Duan Biggs;Hamish McCallum
Hamish McCallum in OpenAIREhandle: 2263/73811 , 10072/395489
The hunting and consumption of wild meat (bushmeat) is recognized as a key threat to the world’s biodiversity and there are indications this threat may extend to much of the African continent. However, this problem is understudied in African savannah systems—particularly in southern Africa. Due to its illicit nature, little research on the drivers behind hunting and consumption exists, especially using methods appropriate to the topic’s sensitivity. We explored the prevalence of hunting and consumption of wild meat in the low-income country of Malawi, by conducting 1562 interviews in communities neighbouring four different protected areas. We identified characteristics of households illegally hunting and consuming wild meat, using the unmatched count technique and socio-demographic variables in linear models. Consumption had a higher prevalence than hunting, reaching up to 39% of the population, while 4–19% of the population engaged in hunting. Consumption was more prevalent in poorer households, while hunting was more prevalent in wealthier households. Increased involvement in community projects initiated by protected areas did not always lead to reduced consumption or hunting, including at protected areas with substantial outside investment, indicating these projects need a clearer link to conservation outcomes. A preference for the taste of wild meat and for added diversity in diet were key drivers of consumption, whereas hunting was primarily motivated by the need for income. Our results highlight the disparity between drivers of hunting and consumption of wild meat and the pervasive nature of this threat, despite considerable investment into community projects and enforcement.
Queensland Universit... arrow_drop_down Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2020License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Griffith University: Griffith Research OnlineArticle . 2020Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10072/395489Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Biodiversity and ConservationArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: CrossrefThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s10531-020-01944-4&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 30 citations 30 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Queensland Universit... arrow_drop_down Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2020License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Griffith University: Griffith Research OnlineArticle . 2020Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10072/395489Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Biodiversity and ConservationArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: CrossrefThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s10531-020-01944-4&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
