• Energy Research

This dataset contains three R scripts used for spatial analysis and modeling in the study on greenhouse gas emissions from drained peatlands in the European Union. Mainscript_Peatcover_maps.R: Processes spatial data to generate high-resolution peatland cover maps across EU+ countries. It integrates multiple geospatial datasets and applies masking and classification procedures to identify peatland areas. Emission_script.R: Calculates greenhouse gas emissions from drained peatlands using peatland cover data and emission factor allocations. It employs parallel processing techniques to efficiently estimate emissions across large spatial domains. Hotspot_map.R: Generates hotspot maps of greenhouse gas emissions by aggregating spatial emission data, applying statistical downscaling, and visualizing emissions using "bi-variate" mapping techniques. The script integrates multiple geospatial sources to refine emission estimates. These scripts form the computational backbone for mapping and quantifying peatland-related emissions in the EU+ region.

Drained peatlands are significant sources of the greenhouse gas (GHG) carbon dioxide. Rewetting is a proven strategy used to protect carbon stocks; however, it can lead to increased emissions of the potent GHG methane. The response to rewetting of soil microbiomes as drivers of these processes is poorly understood, as are the biotic and abiotic factors that control community composition. We analyzed the pro- and eukaryotic microbiomes of three contrasting pairs of minerotrophic fens subject to decade-long drainage and subsequent long-term rewetting. Abiotic soil properties including moisture, dissolved organic matter, methane fluxes, and ecosystem respiration rates were also determined. The composition of the microbiomes was fen-type-specific, but all rewetted sites showed higher abundances of anaerobic taxa compared to drained sites. Based on multi-variate statistics and network analyses, we identified soil moisture as a major driver of community composition. Furthermore, salinity drove the separation between coastal and freshwater fen communities. Methanogens were more than 10-fold more abundant in rewetted than in drained sites, while their abundance was lowest in the coastal fen, likely due to competition with sulfate reducers. The microbiome compositions were reflected in methane fluxes from the sites. Our results shed light on the factors that structure fen microbiomes via environmental filtering.

Abstract not available.

AbstractThe EU Nature Restoration Law (NRL) is critical for the restoration of degraded ecosystems and active afforestation of degraded peatlands has been suggested as a restoration measure under the NRL. Here, we discuss the current state of scientific evidence on the climate mitigation effects of peatlands under forestry. Afforestation of drained peatlands without restoring their hydrology does not fully restore ecosystem functions. Evidence on long-term climate benefits is lacking and it is unclear whether CO2 sequestration of forest on drained peatland can offset the carbon loss from the peat over the long-term. While afforestation may offer short-term gains in certain cases, it compromises the sustainability of peatland carbon storage. Thus, active afforestation of drained peatlands is not a viable option for climate mitigation under the EU Nature Restoration Law and might even impede future rewetting/restoration efforts. Instead, restoring hydrological conditions through rewetting is crucial for effective peatland restoration.