- home
- Advanced Search
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2016 Netherlands, Belgium, United States, United States, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, United KingdomPublisher:The Royal Society Funded by:NSF | RCN: Coordination of the ..., NSF | LTER: Biodiversity, Multi..., DFG | German Centre for Integra...NSF| RCN: Coordination of the Nutrient Network (NutNet), global manipulations of nutrients and consumers ,NSF| LTER: Biodiversity, Multiple Drivers of Environmental Change and Ecosystem Functioning at the Prairie Forest Border ,DFG| German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research - iDivAuthors: Aleksandra M. Lewandowska; Antje Biermann; Elizabeth T. Borer; Miguel A. Cebrián-Piqueras; +30 AuthorsAleksandra M. Lewandowska; Antje Biermann; Elizabeth T. Borer; Miguel A. Cebrián-Piqueras; Steven A. J. Declerck; Luc De Meester; Ellen Van Donk; Lars Gamfeldt; Daniel S. Gruner; Nicole Hagenah; W. Stanley Harpole; Kevin P. Kirkman; Christopher A. Klausmeier; Michael Kleyer; Johannes M. H. Knops; Pieter Lemmens; Eric M. Lind; Elena Litchman; Jasmin Mantilla-Contreras; Koen Martens; Sandra Meier; Vanessa Minden; Joslin L. Moore; Harry Olde Venterink; Eric W. Seabloom; Ulrich Sommer; Maren Striebel; Anastasia Trenkamp; Juliane Trinogga; Jotaro Urabe; Wim Vyverman; Dedmer B. Van de Waal; Claire E. Widdicombe; Helmut Hillebrand;pmid: 27114584
pmc: PMC4843703
Numerous studies show that increasing species richness leads to higher ecosystem productivity. This effect is often attributed to more efficient portioning of multiple resources in communities with higher numbers of competing species, indicating the role of resource supply and stoichiometry for biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships. Here, we merged theory on ecological stoichiometry with a framework of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning to understand how resource use transfers into primary production. We applied a structural equation model to define patterns of diversity–productivity relationships with respect to available resources. Meta-analysis was used to summarize the findings across ecosystem types ranging from aquatic ecosystems to grasslands and forests. As hypothesized, resource supply increased realized productivity and richness, but we found significant differences between ecosystems and study types. Increased richness was associated with increased productivity, although this effect was not seen in experiments. More even communities had lower productivity, indicating that biomass production is often maintained by a few dominant species, and reduced dominance generally reduced ecosystem productivity. This synthesis, which integrates observational and experimental studies in a variety of ecosystems and geographical regions, exposes common patterns and differences in biodiversity–functioning relationships, and increases the mechanistic understanding of changes in ecosystems productivity.
Philosophical Transa... arrow_drop_down Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticleData sources: UnpayWallPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016Data sources: KNAW PurePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Royal Society Data Sharing and AccessibilityData sources: CrossrefVrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalArticle . 2016Data sources: Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2017Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1098/rstb.2015.0283&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 44 citations 44 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Philosophical Transa... arrow_drop_down Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticleData sources: UnpayWallPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016Data sources: KNAW PurePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Royal Society Data Sharing and AccessibilityData sources: CrossrefVrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalArticle . 2016Data sources: Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2017Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1098/rstb.2015.0283&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2016 Germany, BelgiumPublisher:The Royal Society Anastasia Trenkamp; Michael Kleyer; Christoph Scherber; Christoph Scherber; Miguel A. Cebrián Piqueras; Juliane Trinogga; Patrick Lienin; Jasmin Mantilla-Contreras; Vanessa Minden;pmid: 27114585
pmc: PMC4843704
Ecosystems managed for production of biomass are often characterized by low biodiversity because management aims to optimize single ecosystem functions (i.e. yield) involving deliberate selection of species or cultivars. In consequence, considerable differences in observed plant species richness and productivity remain across systems, and the drivers of these differences have remained poorly resolved so far. In addition, it has remained unclear if species richness feeds back on ecosystem functions such as yield in real-world systems. Here, we establish N = 360 experimental plots across a broad range of managed ecosystems in several European countries, and use structural equation models to unravel potential drivers of plant species richness. We hypothesize that the relationships between productivity, total biomass and observed species richness are affected by management intensity, and that these effects differ between habitat types (dry grasslands, grasslands, and wetlands). We found that local management was an important driver of species richness across systems. Management caused system disturbance, resulting in reduced productivity yet enhanced total biomass. Plant species richness was directly and positively driven by management, with consistently negative effects of total biomass. Productivity effects on richness were positive, negative or neutral. Our study shows that management and total biomass drive plant species richness across real-world managed systems.
Philosophical Transa... arrow_drop_down Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticleData sources: UnpayWallPublikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalArticle . 2016Data sources: Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Royal Society Data Sharing and AccessibilityData sources: CrossrefPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2017Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1098/rstb.2015.0284&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 16 citations 16 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Philosophical Transa... arrow_drop_down Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticleData sources: UnpayWallPublikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalArticle . 2016Data sources: Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Royal Society Data Sharing and AccessibilityData sources: CrossrefPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2017Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1098/rstb.2015.0284&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2019 GermanyPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:DFGDFGJörg Memmert; Sara D. Leonhardt; Gesine Pufal; Vanessa Minden; Vanessa Minden;pmid: 30466072
Veterinary antibiotics are widely used in livestock production and can be released to the environment via manure, affecting non-target organisms. Recent studies provide evidence that antibiotics can adversely affect both plants and insects but whether antibiotics in soil also affect trophic interactions is unknown. We tested whether antibiotics grown in sand as soil substitute with environmentally relevant concentrations of penicillin, sulfadiazine and tetracycline affect the survival of aphids feeding on plants (two crop and one non-crop plant species). Apera spica-venti, Brassica napus, and Triticum aestivum individuals were infested with aphids that were monitored over four weeks. We did not observe effects of penicillin or tetracycline on plants or aphids. However, sulfadiazine treatments reduced plant growth and increased mortality in the two tested grass species, but not in B. napus. Sulfadiazine subsequently decreased aphid density indirectly through reduced host plant biomass. We thus show that an antibiotic at realistic concentrations in a soil substitute can affect several trophic levels, i.e. plants and herbivores. This study contributes to the environmental risk assessment of veterinary antibiotics as it implies that their use potentially affects plant-insect interactions at environmentally relevant concentrations.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.008&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu7 citations 7 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.008&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2016 Netherlands, Belgium, United States, United States, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, United KingdomPublisher:The Royal Society Funded by:NSF | RCN: Coordination of the ..., NSF | LTER: Biodiversity, Multi..., DFG | German Centre for Integra...NSF| RCN: Coordination of the Nutrient Network (NutNet), global manipulations of nutrients and consumers ,NSF| LTER: Biodiversity, Multiple Drivers of Environmental Change and Ecosystem Functioning at the Prairie Forest Border ,DFG| German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research - iDivAuthors: Aleksandra M. Lewandowska; Antje Biermann; Elizabeth T. Borer; Miguel A. Cebrián-Piqueras; +30 AuthorsAleksandra M. Lewandowska; Antje Biermann; Elizabeth T. Borer; Miguel A. Cebrián-Piqueras; Steven A. J. Declerck; Luc De Meester; Ellen Van Donk; Lars Gamfeldt; Daniel S. Gruner; Nicole Hagenah; W. Stanley Harpole; Kevin P. Kirkman; Christopher A. Klausmeier; Michael Kleyer; Johannes M. H. Knops; Pieter Lemmens; Eric M. Lind; Elena Litchman; Jasmin Mantilla-Contreras; Koen Martens; Sandra Meier; Vanessa Minden; Joslin L. Moore; Harry Olde Venterink; Eric W. Seabloom; Ulrich Sommer; Maren Striebel; Anastasia Trenkamp; Juliane Trinogga; Jotaro Urabe; Wim Vyverman; Dedmer B. Van de Waal; Claire E. Widdicombe; Helmut Hillebrand;pmid: 27114584
pmc: PMC4843703
Numerous studies show that increasing species richness leads to higher ecosystem productivity. This effect is often attributed to more efficient portioning of multiple resources in communities with higher numbers of competing species, indicating the role of resource supply and stoichiometry for biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships. Here, we merged theory on ecological stoichiometry with a framework of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning to understand how resource use transfers into primary production. We applied a structural equation model to define patterns of diversity–productivity relationships with respect to available resources. Meta-analysis was used to summarize the findings across ecosystem types ranging from aquatic ecosystems to grasslands and forests. As hypothesized, resource supply increased realized productivity and richness, but we found significant differences between ecosystems and study types. Increased richness was associated with increased productivity, although this effect was not seen in experiments. More even communities had lower productivity, indicating that biomass production is often maintained by a few dominant species, and reduced dominance generally reduced ecosystem productivity. This synthesis, which integrates observational and experimental studies in a variety of ecosystems and geographical regions, exposes common patterns and differences in biodiversity–functioning relationships, and increases the mechanistic understanding of changes in ecosystems productivity.
Philosophical Transa... arrow_drop_down Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticleData sources: UnpayWallPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016Data sources: KNAW PurePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Royal Society Data Sharing and AccessibilityData sources: CrossrefVrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalArticle . 2016Data sources: Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2017Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1098/rstb.2015.0283&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 44 citations 44 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Philosophical Transa... arrow_drop_down Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticleData sources: UnpayWallPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016Data sources: KNAW PurePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Royal Society Data Sharing and AccessibilityData sources: CrossrefVrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalArticle . 2016Data sources: Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2017Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1098/rstb.2015.0283&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2016 Germany, BelgiumPublisher:The Royal Society Anastasia Trenkamp; Michael Kleyer; Christoph Scherber; Christoph Scherber; Miguel A. Cebrián Piqueras; Juliane Trinogga; Patrick Lienin; Jasmin Mantilla-Contreras; Vanessa Minden;pmid: 27114585
pmc: PMC4843704
Ecosystems managed for production of biomass are often characterized by low biodiversity because management aims to optimize single ecosystem functions (i.e. yield) involving deliberate selection of species or cultivars. In consequence, considerable differences in observed plant species richness and productivity remain across systems, and the drivers of these differences have remained poorly resolved so far. In addition, it has remained unclear if species richness feeds back on ecosystem functions such as yield in real-world systems. Here, we establish N = 360 experimental plots across a broad range of managed ecosystems in several European countries, and use structural equation models to unravel potential drivers of plant species richness. We hypothesize that the relationships between productivity, total biomass and observed species richness are affected by management intensity, and that these effects differ between habitat types (dry grasslands, grasslands, and wetlands). We found that local management was an important driver of species richness across systems. Management caused system disturbance, resulting in reduced productivity yet enhanced total biomass. Plant species richness was directly and positively driven by management, with consistently negative effects of total biomass. Productivity effects on richness were positive, negative or neutral. Our study shows that management and total biomass drive plant species richness across real-world managed systems.
Philosophical Transa... arrow_drop_down Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticleData sources: UnpayWallPublikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalArticle . 2016Data sources: Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Royal Society Data Sharing and AccessibilityData sources: CrossrefPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2017Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1098/rstb.2015.0284&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 16 citations 16 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Philosophical Transa... arrow_drop_down Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticleData sources: UnpayWallPublikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalArticle . 2016Data sources: Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research PortalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Royal Society Data Sharing and AccessibilityData sources: CrossrefPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesArticle . 2017Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1098/rstb.2015.0284&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2019 GermanyPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:DFGDFGJörg Memmert; Sara D. Leonhardt; Gesine Pufal; Vanessa Minden; Vanessa Minden;pmid: 30466072
Veterinary antibiotics are widely used in livestock production and can be released to the environment via manure, affecting non-target organisms. Recent studies provide evidence that antibiotics can adversely affect both plants and insects but whether antibiotics in soil also affect trophic interactions is unknown. We tested whether antibiotics grown in sand as soil substitute with environmentally relevant concentrations of penicillin, sulfadiazine and tetracycline affect the survival of aphids feeding on plants (two crop and one non-crop plant species). Apera spica-venti, Brassica napus, and Triticum aestivum individuals were infested with aphids that were monitored over four weeks. We did not observe effects of penicillin or tetracycline on plants or aphids. However, sulfadiazine treatments reduced plant growth and increased mortality in the two tested grass species, but not in B. napus. Sulfadiazine subsequently decreased aphid density indirectly through reduced host plant biomass. We thus show that an antibiotic at realistic concentrations in a soil substitute can affect several trophic levels, i.e. plants and herbivores. This study contributes to the environmental risk assessment of veterinary antibiotics as it implies that their use potentially affects plant-insect interactions at environmentally relevant concentrations.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.008&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu7 citations 7 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.008&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
