- home
- Advanced Search
Filters
Access
Type
Year range
-chevron_right GO- This year
- Last 5 years
- Last 10 years
Field of Science
Funder
SDG [Beta]
Country
Source
Research community
Organization
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2021 Spain, Spain, United KingdomPublisher:MDPI AG Publicly fundedFunded by:EC | MARINET2EC| MARINET2Thomas Davey; Javier Sarmiento; Jérémy Ohana; Florent Thiebaut; Sylvain Haquin; Matthieu Weber; Sebastien Gueydon; Frances Judge; Eoin Lyden; Michael O’Shea; Roman Gabl; Laura-Beth Jordan; Martyn Hann; Daming Wang; Keri Collins; Daniel Conley; Deborah Greaves; David M. Ingram; Jimmy Murphy;The EU H2020 MaRINET2 project has a goal to improve the quality, robustness and accuracy of physical modelling and associated testing practices for the offshore renewable energy sector. To support this aim, a round robin scale physical modelling test programme was conducted to deploy a common wave energy converter at four wave basins operated by MaRINET2 partners. Test campaigns were conducted at each facility to a common specification and test matrix, providing the unique opportunity for intercomparison between facilities and working practices. A nonproprietary hinged raft, with a nominal scale of 1:25, was tested under a set of 12 irregular sea states. This allowed for an assessment of power output, hinge angles, mooring loads, and six-degree-of-freedom motions. The key outcome to be concluded from the results is that the facilities performed consistently, with the majority of variation linked to differences in sea state calibration. A variation of 5–10% in mean power was typical and was consistent with the variability observed in the measured significant wave heights. The tank depth (which varied from 2–5 m) showed remarkably little influence on the results, although it is noted that these tests used an aerial mooring system with the geometry unaffected by the tank depth. Similar good agreement was seen in the heave, surge, pitch and hinge angle responses. In order to maintain and improve the consistency across laboratories, we make recommendations on characterising and calibrating the tank environment and stress the importance of the device–facility physical interface (the aerial mooring in this case).
Journal of Marine Sc... arrow_drop_down Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringOther literature type . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/9/946/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteJournal of Marine Science and EngineeringArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefRecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/jmse9090946&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 16 citations 16 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 105visibility views 105 download downloads 21 Powered bymore_vert Journal of Marine Sc... arrow_drop_down Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringOther literature type . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/9/946/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteJournal of Marine Science and EngineeringArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefRecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/jmse9090946&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2021 Spain, Spain, United KingdomPublisher:MDPI AG Publicly fundedFunded by:EC | MARINET2EC| MARINET2Thomas Davey; Javier Sarmiento; Jérémy Ohana; Florent Thiebaut; Sylvain Haquin; Matthieu Weber; Sebastien Gueydon; Frances Judge; Eoin Lyden; Michael O’Shea; Roman Gabl; Laura-Beth Jordan; Martyn Hann; Daming Wang; Keri Collins; Daniel Conley; Deborah Greaves; David M. Ingram; Jimmy Murphy;The EU H2020 MaRINET2 project has a goal to improve the quality, robustness and accuracy of physical modelling and associated testing practices for the offshore renewable energy sector. To support this aim, a round robin scale physical modelling test programme was conducted to deploy a common wave energy converter at four wave basins operated by MaRINET2 partners. Test campaigns were conducted at each facility to a common specification and test matrix, providing the unique opportunity for intercomparison between facilities and working practices. A nonproprietary hinged raft, with a nominal scale of 1:25, was tested under a set of 12 irregular sea states. This allowed for an assessment of power output, hinge angles, mooring loads, and six-degree-of-freedom motions. The key outcome to be concluded from the results is that the facilities performed consistently, with the majority of variation linked to differences in sea state calibration. A variation of 5–10% in mean power was typical and was consistent with the variability observed in the measured significant wave heights. The tank depth (which varied from 2–5 m) showed remarkably little influence on the results, although it is noted that these tests used an aerial mooring system with the geometry unaffected by the tank depth. Similar good agreement was seen in the heave, surge, pitch and hinge angle responses. In order to maintain and improve the consistency across laboratories, we make recommendations on characterising and calibrating the tank environment and stress the importance of the device–facility physical interface (the aerial mooring in this case).
Journal of Marine Sc... arrow_drop_down Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringOther literature type . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/9/946/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteJournal of Marine Science and EngineeringArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefRecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/jmse9090946&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 16 citations 16 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 105visibility views 105 download downloads 21 Powered bymore_vert Journal of Marine Sc... arrow_drop_down Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringOther literature type . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/9/946/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteJournal of Marine Science and EngineeringArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefRecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/jmse9090946&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu