- home
- Advanced Search
- Energy Research
- 15. Life on land
- Energy Research
- 15. Life on land
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2014 Malaysia, Malaysia, AustraliaPublisher:Wiley Funded by:ARC | Fire Scar Impacts on Surf..., ARC | eScience and Climate: Usi..., ARC | Impacts of deforestation ... +4 projectsARC| Fire Scar Impacts on Surface Heat and Moisture Fluxes in Australia's Tropical Savanna and Feedbacks to Local and Regional Climate ,ARC| eScience and Climate: Using Grid technology to build capacity in studies of Australian climate variability ,ARC| Impacts of deforestation and afforestation on greenhouse gas emissions, and carbon and water resources in the Daly River catchment, north Australia ,ARC| Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP130101566 ,ARC| Integrative assessment of disturbance and land-use change on total greenhouse gas balance and nutrient cycling in savanna ecosystems ,ARC| Patterns and processes of carbon and water budgets across northern Australian landscapes: From point to region ,ARC| Complexity in climate impact assessment: a methodology to address extremesDavid Abramson; Lucas A. Cernusak; Caitlin E. Moore; Stefan K. Arndt; Samantha Grover; Samantha Grover; Derek Eamus; Michael R. Raupach; Lindsay B. Hutley; Stephen J. Livesley; Nigel J. Tapper; Jorg M. Hacker; Andrew Edwards; Simon Scheiter; Peter R. Briggs; Stefan W. Maier; Klaus Goergen; Vanessa Haverd; Petteri Uotila; Mila Bristow; Josep G. Canadell; Jason Beringer; Jason Beringer; Bradleys J. Evans; Jeremy Russell-Smith; Benedikt J. Fest; Amanda H. Lynch; Amanda H. Lynch; Kasturi Devi Kanniah; Kasturi Devi Kanniah;AbstractSavanna ecosystems comprise 22% of the global terrestrial surface and 25% of Australia (almost 1.9 million km2) and provide significant ecosystem services through carbon and water cycles and the maintenance of biodiversity. The current structure, composition and distribution of Australian savannas have coevolved with fire, yet remain driven by the dynamic constraints of their bioclimatic niche. Fire in Australian savannas influences both the biophysical and biogeochemical processes at multiple scales from leaf to landscape. Here, we present the latest emission estimates from Australian savanna biomass burning and their contribution to global greenhouse gas budgets. We then review our understanding of the impacts of fire on ecosystem function and local surface water and heat balances, which in turn influence regional climate. We show how savanna fires are coupled to the global climate through the carbon cycle and fire regimes. We present new research that climate change is likely to alter the structure and function of savannas through shifts in moisture availability and increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide, in turn altering fire regimes with further feedbacks to climate. We explore opportunities to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions from savanna ecosystems through changes in savanna fire management.
James Cook Universit... arrow_drop_down James Cook University, Australia: ResearchOnline@JCUArticle . 2015Full-Text: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12686Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)The University of Melbourne: Digital RepositoryArticle . 2015License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)The University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.12686&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 89 citations 89 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert James Cook Universit... arrow_drop_down James Cook University, Australia: ResearchOnline@JCUArticle . 2015Full-Text: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12686Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)The University of Melbourne: Digital RepositoryArticle . 2015License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)The University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.12686&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2013 France, United KingdomPublisher:Wiley Funded by:EC | CARBONESEC| CARBONESStephen Sitch; Yiqi Luo; Pierre Friedlingstein; Nan Cong; Anders Ahlström; Mark R. Lomas; Philippe Ciais; Tao Wang; Peter Levy; Chris Huntingford; Xuhui Wang; Ben Poulter; Samuel Levis; Philippe Peylin; Yuecun Ma; Shilong Piao; Shilong Piao; Soenke Zaehle; Zhenzhong Sun; Josep G. Canadell; Ning Zeng; Alessandro Anav; Junsheng Li; Martin Jung; Meng Lu; Nicolas Viovy; Ranga B. Myneni; Xin Lin;doi: 10.1111/gcb.12187
pmid: 23504870
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate 10 process‐based terrestrial biosphere models that were used for the IPCC fifth Assessment Report. The simulated gross primary productivity (GPP) is compared with flux‐tower‐based estimates by Jung et al. [Journal of Geophysical Research 116 (2011) G00J07] (JU11). The net primary productivity (NPP) apparent sensitivity to climate variability and atmospheric CO2 trends is diagnosed from each model output, using statistical functions. The temperature sensitivity is compared against ecosystem field warming experiments results. The CO2 sensitivity of NPP is compared to the results from four Free‐Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiments. The simulated global net biome productivity (NBP) is compared with the residual land sink (RLS) of the global carbon budget from Friedlingstein et al. [Nature Geoscience 3 (2010) 811] (FR10). We found that models produce a higher GPP (133 ± 15 Pg C yr−1) than JU11 (118 ± 6 Pg C yr−1). In response to rising atmospheric CO2 concentration, modeled NPP increases on average by 16% (5–20%) per 100 ppm, a slightly larger apparent sensitivity of NPP to CO2 than that measured at the FACE experiment locations (13% per 100 ppm). Global NBP differs markedly among individual models, although the mean value of 2.0 ± 0.8 Pg C yr−1 is remarkably close to the mean value of RLS (2.1 ± 1.2 Pg C yr−1). The interannual variability in modeled NBP is significantly correlated with that of RLS for the period 1980–2009. Both model‐to‐model and interannual variation in model GPP is larger than that in model NBP due to the strong coupling causing a positive correlation between ecosystem respiration and GPP in the model. The average linear regression slope of global NBP vs. temperature across the 10 models is −3.0 ± 1.5 Pg C yr−1 °C−1, within the uncertainty of what derived from RLS (−3.9 ± 1.1 Pg C yr−1 °C−1). However, 9 of 10 models overestimate the regression slope of NBP vs. precipitation, compared with the slope of the observed RLS vs. precipitation. With most models lacking processes that control GPP and NBP in addition to CO2 and climate, the agreement between modeled and observation‐based GPP and NBP can be fortuitous. Carbon–nitrogen interactions (only separable in one model) significantly influence the simulated response of carbon cycle to temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration, suggesting that nutrients limitations should be included in the next generation of terrestrial biosphere models.
Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2013Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03209699Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2013Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03209699Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefNatural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.12187&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 641 citations 641 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
visibility 5visibility views 5 download downloads 156 Powered bymore_vert Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2013Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03209699Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2013Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03209699Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefNatural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.12187&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2018 Germany, France, United StatesPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Frédéric Chevallier; Takashi Nakamura; J. G. Canadell; Albert van Dijk; Christian Rödenbeck; Andy Wiltshire; Nobuko Saigusa; Fang Li; Yosuke Niwa; Leonardo Calle; Thomas A. M. Pugh; Thomas A. M. Pugh; Takashi Maki; Atul K. Jain; A. Arneth; Tazu Saeki; Sönke Zaehle; Charles D. Koven; Prabir K. Patra; Etsushi Kato; Yi Y. Liu; Yi Y. Liu; Benjamin Poulter; Benjamin Poulter; Anna B. Harper; Stephen Sitch; Kazuhito Ichii; Kazuhito Ichii; Kazuhito Ichii; Masayuki Kondo; Masayuki Kondo; Pierre Friedlingstein;doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03374-x , 10.5445/ir/1000082232 , 10.60692/a5dkk-jnv47 , 10.60692/4shrz-zqs39
pmid: 29559637
pmc: PMC5861034
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03374-x , 10.5445/ir/1000082232 , 10.60692/a5dkk-jnv47 , 10.60692/4shrz-zqs39
pmid: 29559637
pmc: PMC5861034
AbstractAn integrated understanding of the biogeochemical consequences of climate extremes and land use changes is needed to constrain land-surface feedbacks to atmospheric CO2 from associated climate change. Past assessments of the global carbon balance have shown particularly high uncertainty in Southeast Asia. Here, we use a combination of model ensembles to show that intensified land use change made Southeast Asia a strong source of CO2 from the 1980s to 1990s, whereas the region was close to carbon neutral in the 2000s due to an enhanced CO2 fertilization effect and absence of moderate-to-strong El Niño events. Our findings suggest that despite ongoing deforestation, CO2 emissions were substantially decreased during the 2000s, largely owing to milder climate that restores photosynthetic capacity and suppresses peat and deforestation fire emissions. The occurrence of strong El Niño events after 2009 suggests that the region has returned to conditions of increased vulnerability of carbon stocks.
Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806789Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806789Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41467-018-03374-x&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 31 citations 31 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806789Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806789Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41467-018-03374-x&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2023Embargo end date: 05 Jun 2024 SwitzerlandPublisher:Copernicus GmbH Funded by:EC | 4C, EC | PROVIDE, EC | ESM2025EC| 4C ,EC| PROVIDE ,EC| ESM2025Malte Meinshausen; Carl-Friedrich Schleußner; Kathleen Beyer; G. E. Bodeker; Oliviér Boucher; Josep G. Canadell; J. S. Daniel; Aïda Diongue‐Niang; Fatima Driouech; Erich M. Fischer; Piers M. Forster; Michael R. Grose; Gerrit Hansen; Zeke Hausfather; Tatiana Ilyina; Jarmo Kikstra; Joyce Kimutai; Andrew D. King; June‐Yi Lee; Chris Lennard; Tabea Lissner; Alexander Nauels; Glen P. Peters; Anna Pirani; Gian‐Kasper Plattner; Hans O. Pörtner; Joeri Rogelj; Maisa Rojas; Joyashree Roy; B. H. Samset; Benjamin M. Sanderson; Roland Séférian; Sonia I. Seneviratne; Christopher J. Smith; Sophie Szopa; Adelle Thomas; Diana Ürge-Vorsatz; G. J. M. Velders; Tokuta Yokohata; Tilo Ziehn; Zebedee Nicholls;Abstract. In every Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment cycle, a multitude of scenarios are assessed, with different scope and emphasis throughout the various Working Group reports and special reports, as well as their respective chapters. Within the reports, the ambition is to integrate knowledge on possible climate futures across the Working Groups and scientific research domains based on a small set of “framing pathways” such as the so-called representative concentration pathways (RCPs) in the Fifth IPCC Assessment Report (AR5) and the shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) scenarios in the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). This perspective, initiated by discussions at the IPCC Bangkok workshop in April 2023 on the “Use of Scenarios in AR6 and Subsequent Assessments”, is intended to serve as one of the community contributions to highlight the needs for the next generation of framing pathways that is being advanced under the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) umbrella, which will influence or even predicate the IPCC AR7 consideration of framing pathways. Here we suggest several policy research objectives that such a set of framing pathways should ideally fulfil, including mitigation needs for meeting the Paris Agreement objectives, the risks associated with carbon removal strategies, the consequences of delay in enacting that mitigation, guidance for adaptation needs, loss and damage, and for achieving mitigation in the wider context of societal development goals. Based on this context, we suggest that the next generation of climate scenarios for Earth system models should evolve towards representative emission pathways (REPs) and suggest key categories for such pathways. These framing pathways should address the most critical mitigation policy and adaptation plans that need to be implemented over the next 10 years. In our view, the most important categories are those relevant in the context of the Paris Agreement long-term goal, specifically an immediate action (low overshoot) 1.5 °C pathway and a delayed action (high overshoot) 1.5 °C pathway. Two other key categories are a pathway category approximately in line with current (as expressed by 2023) near- and long-term policy objectives, as well as a higher-emission category that is approximately in line with “current policies” (as expressed by 2023). We also argue for the scientific and policy relevance in exploring two “worlds that could have been”. One of these categories has high-emission trajectories well above what is implied by current policies and the other has very-low-emission trajectories which assume that global mitigation action in line with limiting warming to 1.5 °C without overshoot had begun in 2015. Finally, we note that the timely provision of new scientific information on pathways is critical to inform the development and implementation of climate policy. Under the Paris Agreement, for the second global stocktake, which will occur in 2028, and to inform subsequent development of nationally determined contributions (NDCs) up to 2040, scientific inputs are required by 2027. These needs should be carefully considered in the development timeline of community modelling activities, including those under CMIP7.
IIASA DARE arrow_drop_down Geoscientific Model Development (GMD)Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-20...Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/gmd-17-4533-2024&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 7 citations 7 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert IIASA DARE arrow_drop_down Geoscientific Model Development (GMD)Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-20...Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/gmd-17-4533-2024&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2014Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Authors: Ernst Detlef Schulze; Josep G. Canadell;doi: 10.1038/ncomms6282
pmid: 25407959
Elevated concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHGs), particularly carbon dioxide (CO2), have affected the global climate. Land-based biological carbon mitigation strategies are considered an important and viable pathway towards climate stabilization. However, to satisfy the growing demands for food, wood products, energy, climate mitigation and biodiversity conservation-all of which compete for increasingly limited quantities of biomass and land-the deployment of mitigation strategies must be driven by sustainable and integrated land management. If executed accordingly, through avoided emissions and carbon sequestration, biological carbon and bioenergy mitigation could save up to 38 billion tonnes of carbon and 3-8% of estimated energy consumption, respectively, by 2050.
Nature Communication... arrow_drop_down Nature CommunicationsArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer Nature TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/ncomms6282&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesgold 170 citations 170 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Nature Communication... arrow_drop_down Nature CommunicationsArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer Nature TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/ncomms6282&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2023Publisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Publicly fundedJürgen Knauer; Matthias Cuntz; Benjamin Smith; Josep G. Canadell; Belinda E. Medlyn; Alison C. Bennett; Silvia Caldararu; Vanessa Haverd;Gross primary productivity (GPP) is the key determinant of land carbon uptake, but its representation in terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) does not reflect our latest physiological understanding. We implemented three empirically well supported but often omitted mechanisms into the TBM CABLE-POP: photosynthetic temperature acclimation, explicit mesophyll conductance, and photosynthetic optimization through redistribution of leaf nitrogen. We used the RCP8.5 climate scenario to conduct factorial model simulations characterizing the individual and combined effects of the three mechanisms on projections of GPP. Simulated global GPP increased more strongly (up to 20% by 2070–2099) in more comprehensive representations of photosynthesis compared to the model lacking the three mechanisms. The experiments revealed non-additive interactions among the mechanisms as combined effects were stronger than the sum of the individual effects. The modeled responses are explained by changes in the photosynthetic sensitivity to temperature and CO 2 caused by the added mechanisms. Our results suggest that current TBMs underestimate GPP responses to future CO 2 and climate conditions.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1126/sciadv.adh9444&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesgold 9 citations 9 popularity Average influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1126/sciadv.adh9444&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Conference object , Other literature type , Journal 2017Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2017 France, Germany, United States, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, United States, Norway, United StatesPublisher:Copernicus GmbH Funded by:NSERC, EC | CDREG, EC | METLAKE +3 projectsNSERC ,EC| CDREG ,EC| METLAKE ,EC| MACC II ,EC| MACC-III ,RCN| CICEP-Strategic Challenges in International Climate and Energy PolicyM. Saunois; P. Bousquet; B. Poulter; A. Peregon; P. Ciais; J. G. Canadell; E. J. Dlugokencky; G. Etiope; G. Etiope; D. Bastviken; S. Houweling; S. Houweling; G. Janssens-Maenhout; F. N. Tubiello; S. Castaldi; S. Castaldi; S. Castaldi; R. B. Jackson; M. Alexe; V. K. Arora; D. J. Beerling; P. Bergamaschi; D. R. Blake; G. Brailsford; L. Bruhwiler; C. Crevoisier; P. Crill; K. Covey; C. Frankenberg; C. Frankenberg; N. Gedney; L. Höglund-Isaksson; M. Ishizawa; A. Ito; F. Joos; H.-S. Kim; T. Kleinen; P. Krummel; J.-F. Lamarque; R. Langenfelds; R. Locatelli; T. Machida; S. Maksyutov; J. R. Melton; I. Morino; V. Naik; S. O'Doherty; F.-J. W. Parmentier; P. K. Patra; C. Peng; C. Peng; S. Peng; S. Peng; G. P. Peters; I. Pison; R. Prinn; M. Ramonet; W. J. Riley; M. Saito; M. Santini; M. Santini; R. Schroeder; I. J. Simpson; R. Spahni; A. Takizawa; B. F. Thornton; H. Tian; Y. Tohjima; N. Viovy; A. Voulgarakis; R. Weiss; D. J. Wilton; A. Wiltshire; D. Worthy; D. Wunch; X. Xu; X. Xu; Y. Yoshida; B. Zhang; Z. Zhang; Z. Zhang; Q. Zhu;Abstract. Following the recent Global Carbon Project (GCP) synthesis of the decadal methane (CH4) budget over 2000–2012 (Saunois et al., 2016), we analyse here the same dataset with a focus on quasi-decadal and inter-annual variability in CH4 emissions. The GCP dataset integrates results from top-down studies (exploiting atmospheric observations within an atmospheric inverse-modelling framework) and bottom-up models (including process-based models for estimating land surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry), inventories of anthropogenic emissions, and data-driven approaches. The annual global methane emissions from top-down studies, which by construction match the observed methane growth rate within their uncertainties, all show an increase in total methane emissions over the period 2000–2012, but this increase is not linear over the 13 years. Despite differences between individual studies, the mean emission anomaly of the top-down ensemble shows no significant trend in total methane emissions over the period 2000–2006, during the plateau of atmospheric methane mole fractions, and also over the period 2008–2012, during the renewed atmospheric methane increase. However, the top-down ensemble mean produces an emission shift between 2006 and 2008, leading to 22 [16–32] Tg CH4 yr−1 higher methane emissions over the period 2008–2012 compared to 2002–2006. This emission increase mostly originated from the tropics, with a smaller contribution from mid-latitudes and no significant change from boreal regions. The regional contributions remain uncertain in top-down studies. Tropical South America and South and East Asia seem to contribute the most to the emission increase in the tropics. However, these two regions have only limited atmospheric measurements and remain therefore poorly constrained. The sectorial partitioning of this emission increase between the periods 2002–2006 and 2008–2012 differs from one atmospheric inversion study to another. However, all top-down studies suggest smaller changes in fossil fuel emissions (from oil, gas, and coal industries) compared to the mean of the bottom-up inventories included in this study. This difference is partly driven by a smaller emission change in China from the top-down studies compared to the estimate in the Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGARv4.2) inventory, which should be revised to smaller values in a near future. We apply isotopic signatures to the emission changes estimated for individual studies based on five emission sectors and find that for six individual top-down studies (out of eight) the average isotopic signature of the emission changes is not consistent with the observed change in atmospheric 13CH4. However, the partitioning in emission change derived from the ensemble mean is consistent with this isotopic constraint. At the global scale, the top-down ensemble mean suggests that the dominant contribution to the resumed atmospheric CH4 growth after 2006 comes from microbial sources (more from agriculture and waste sectors than from natural wetlands), with an uncertain but smaller contribution from fossil CH4 emissions. In addition, a decrease in biomass burning emissions (in agreement with the biomass burning emission databases) makes the balance of sources consistent with atmospheric 13CH4 observations. In most of the top-down studies included here, OH concentrations are considered constant over the years (seasonal variations but without any inter-annual variability). As a result, the methane loss (in particular through OH oxidation) varies mainly through the change in methane concentrations and not its oxidants. For these reasons, changes in the methane loss could not be properly investigated in this study, although it may play a significant role in the recent atmospheric methane changes as briefly discussed at the end of the paper.
CORE arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/55004Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)École Polytechnique, Université Paris-Saclay: HALArticle . 2017Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-02414578Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Article . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/ACP-17-11135-2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2017Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-02414578Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2017Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-02414578Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Caltech Authors (California Institute of Technology)Article . 2017Full-Text: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Atmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20...Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefAtmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsOther literature type . 2017Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)eScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2017Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaMunin - Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Munin - Open Research ArchiveAtmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 88 citations 88 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
visibility 6visibility views 6 download downloads 36 Powered bymore_vert CORE arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/55004Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)École Polytechnique, Université Paris-Saclay: HALArticle . 2017Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-02414578Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Article . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/ACP-17-11135-2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2017Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-02414578Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2017Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-02414578Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Caltech Authors (California Institute of Technology)Article . 2017Full-Text: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Atmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20...Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefAtmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsOther literature type . 2017Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)eScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2017Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaMunin - Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Munin - Open Research ArchiveAtmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2013Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2014 United States, United Kingdom, France, Australia, Belgium, Germany, United States, United Kingdom, United States, Norway, GermanyPublisher:Copernicus GmbH Funded by:EC | GEOCARBON, EC | EMBRACE, EC | COMBINE +4 projectsEC| GEOCARBON ,EC| EMBRACE ,EC| COMBINE ,NSF| Collaborative Research: Improved Regional and Decadal Predictions of the Carbon Cycle ,EC| CARBOCHANGE ,EC| LUC4C ,RCN| Support for the Scientific Steering Committee of the Global Carbon ProjectPieter P. Tans; C. Le Quéré; Sönke Zaehle; Atul K. Jain; Fabienne Maignan; Jörg Schwinger; Jörg Schwinger; Dorothee C. E. Bakker; Steve D Jones; Geun-Ha Park; Christian Rödenbeck; Laurent Bopp; Arne Körtzinger; Abdirahman M Omar; Bronte Tilbrook; Gregg Marland; T. Ono; Joachim Segschneider; Thomas A. Boden; Richard A. Houghton; Andy Wiltshire; Pierre Regnier; Louise Chini; Philippe Ciais; Joanna Isobel House; Taro Takahashi; Almut Arneth; Glen P. Peters; Josep G. Canadell; Etsushi Kato; Robert J. Andres; Kees Klein Goldewijk; Benjamin Poulter; Anna B. Harper; Rik Wanninkhof; Pierre Friedlingstein; Michael R. Raupach; Benjamin D. Stocker; Stephen Sitch; Ralph F. Keeling; Benjamin Pfeil; Benjamin Pfeil; Robbie M. Andrew; S. van Heuven; Charles D. Koven; R. Moriarty; S. Saito; Nathalie Lefèvre; Scott C. Doney; Ian Harris; A. Arvanitis; Nicolas Viovy;Abstract. Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe datasets and a methodology to quantify all major components of the global carbon budget, including their uncertainties, based on the combination of a range of data, algorithms, statistics and model estimates and their interpretation by a broad scientific community. We discuss changes compared to previous estimates consistency within and among components, alongside methodology and data limitations. CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel combustion and cement production (EFF) are based on energy statistics, while emissions from Land-Use Change (ELUC), including deforestation, are based on combined evidence from land-cover change data, fire activity in regions undergoing deforestation, and models. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly and its rate of growth (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The mean ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) is based on observations from the 1990s, while the annual anomalies and trends are estimated with ocean models. The variability in SOCEAN is evaluated for the first time in this budget with data products based on surveys of ocean CO2 measurements. The global residual terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) is estimated by the difference of the other terms of the global carbon budget and compared to results of Dynamic Global Vegetation Models. All uncertainties are reported as ± 1 sigma, reflecting the current capacity to characterise the annual estimates of each component of the global carbon budget. For the last decade available (2003–2012), EFF was 8.6 ± 0.4 GtC yr−1, ELUC 0.8 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, GATM 4.3 ± 0.1 GtC yr−1, SOCEAN 2.6 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, and SLAND 2.6 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1. For year 2012 alone, EFF grew to 9.7 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, 2.2% above 2011, reflecting a continued trend in these emissions; GATM was 5.2 ± 0.2 GtC yr−1, SOCEAN was 2.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, and assuming and ELUC of 0.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 (based on 2001–2010 average), SLAND was 2.5 ± 0.9 GtC yr−1. GATM was high in 2012 compared to the 2003–2012 average, almost entirely reflecting the high EFF. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration reached 392.52 ± 0.10 ppm on average over 2012. We estimate that EFF will increase by 2.1% (1.1–3.1%) to 9.9 ± 0.5 GtC in 2013, 61% above emissions in 1990, based on projections of World Gross Domestic Product and recent changes in the carbon intensity of the economy. With this projection, cumulative emissions of CO2 will reach about 550 ± 60 GtC for 1870–2013, 70% from EFF (390 ± 20 GtC) and 30% from ELUC (160 ± 55 GtC). This paper is intended to provide a baseline to keep track of annual carbon budgets in the future. All data presented here can be downloaded from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (10.3334/CDIAC/GCP_2013_v1.1).
OceanRep arrow_drop_down Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01828526Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2014License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB)Article . 2015License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/1956/10495Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2015License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01828526Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Woods Hole Open Access ServerArticle . 2014License: CC BYFull-Text: https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/GCP_2013_V2.3Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)École Polytechnique, Université Paris-Saclay: HALArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01828526Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Australian National University: ANU Digital CollectionsArticleFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/74928Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Columbia University Academic CommonsArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8319V8NData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)https://doi.org/10.5194/essdd-...Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefEarth System Science Data (ESSD)Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefBergen Open Research Archive - UiBArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Bergen Open Research Archive - UiBUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/essdd-6-689-2013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 381 citations 381 popularity Top 1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01828526Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2014License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB)Article . 2015License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/1956/10495Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2015License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01828526Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Woods Hole Open Access ServerArticle . 2014License: CC BYFull-Text: https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/GCP_2013_V2.3Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)École Polytechnique, Université Paris-Saclay: HALArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01828526Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Australian National University: ANU Digital CollectionsArticleFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/74928Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Columbia University Academic CommonsArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8319V8NData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)https://doi.org/10.5194/essdd-...Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefEarth System Science Data (ESSD)Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefBergen Open Research Archive - UiBArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Bergen Open Research Archive - UiBUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/essdd-6-689-2013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2019 SwitzerlandPublisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Funded by:EC | 4CEC| 4CPierre Friedlingstein; Myles Allen; Josep G. Canadell; Glen P. Peters; Sonia I. Seneviratne;pmid: 31624183
Bastin et al . (Reports, 5 July 2019, p. 76) claim that global tree restoration is the most effective climate change solution to date, with a reported carbon storage potential of 205 gigatonnes of carbon. However, this estimate and its implications for climate mitigation are inconsistent with the dynamics of the global carbon cycle and its response to anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1126/science.aay8060&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 75 citations 75 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1126/science.aay8060&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2014Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Lu He; Moucheng Liu; Zheng Yuan; Wenhua Li; Dan Zhang; Zhong-qi Xu; Fei Lun; Josep G. Canadell;Rural energy consumption in China has increased dramatically in the last decades, and has become a significant contributor of carbon emissions. Yet there is limited data on energy consumption patterns and their evolution in forest rural areas of China. In order to bridge this gap, we report the findings of field surveys in forest villages in Weichang County as a case study of rural energy consumption in northern China. We found that the residential energy consumption per household is 3313 kgce yr(-1) (kilogram standard coal equivalent per year), with energy content of 9.7 x 107 kJ yr(-1), including 1783 kgce yr(-1) from coal, 1386 kgce yr(-1) from fuel wood, 96 kgce yr(-1) from electricity, and 49 kgce yr(-1) from LPG. Per capita consumption is 909 kgce yr(-1) and its energy content is 2.7 x 107 kJ yr(-1). Due to a total energy utilization efficiency of 24.6%, all the consumed energy can only supply about 2.4 x 107 kJ yr(-1) of efficient energy content. Secondly, household energy consumption is partitioned into 2614 kgce yr(-1) for heating, 616 kgce yr(-1) for cooking, and 117 kgce yr(-1) for home appliances. Thirdly, the associated carbon emissions per household are 2556 kgC yr(-1), including 1022 kgC yr(-1) from unutilized fuel wood (90% of the total fuel wood). The rest of emissions come from the use of electricity (212 kgC yr(-1)), coal (1301 kgC yr(-1)) and LPG (21 kgC yr(-1)). Fourthly, local climate, family size and household income have strong influences on rural residential energy consumption. Changes in storage and utilization practices of fuel can lead to the 10%-30% increase in the efficiency of fuel wood use, leading to reduced energy consumption by 924 kgce yr(-1) per household (27.9% reduction) and 901 kgC yr(-1) of carbon emissions (35.3% reduction).
Journal of Mountain ... arrow_drop_down Journal of Mountain ScienceArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s11629-013-2884-1&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 11 citations 11 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert Journal of Mountain ... arrow_drop_down Journal of Mountain ScienceArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s11629-013-2884-1&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2014 Malaysia, Malaysia, AustraliaPublisher:Wiley Funded by:ARC | Fire Scar Impacts on Surf..., ARC | eScience and Climate: Usi..., ARC | Impacts of deforestation ... +4 projectsARC| Fire Scar Impacts on Surface Heat and Moisture Fluxes in Australia's Tropical Savanna and Feedbacks to Local and Regional Climate ,ARC| eScience and Climate: Using Grid technology to build capacity in studies of Australian climate variability ,ARC| Impacts of deforestation and afforestation on greenhouse gas emissions, and carbon and water resources in the Daly River catchment, north Australia ,ARC| Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP130101566 ,ARC| Integrative assessment of disturbance and land-use change on total greenhouse gas balance and nutrient cycling in savanna ecosystems ,ARC| Patterns and processes of carbon and water budgets across northern Australian landscapes: From point to region ,ARC| Complexity in climate impact assessment: a methodology to address extremesDavid Abramson; Lucas A. Cernusak; Caitlin E. Moore; Stefan K. Arndt; Samantha Grover; Samantha Grover; Derek Eamus; Michael R. Raupach; Lindsay B. Hutley; Stephen J. Livesley; Nigel J. Tapper; Jorg M. Hacker; Andrew Edwards; Simon Scheiter; Peter R. Briggs; Stefan W. Maier; Klaus Goergen; Vanessa Haverd; Petteri Uotila; Mila Bristow; Josep G. Canadell; Jason Beringer; Jason Beringer; Bradleys J. Evans; Jeremy Russell-Smith; Benedikt J. Fest; Amanda H. Lynch; Amanda H. Lynch; Kasturi Devi Kanniah; Kasturi Devi Kanniah;AbstractSavanna ecosystems comprise 22% of the global terrestrial surface and 25% of Australia (almost 1.9 million km2) and provide significant ecosystem services through carbon and water cycles and the maintenance of biodiversity. The current structure, composition and distribution of Australian savannas have coevolved with fire, yet remain driven by the dynamic constraints of their bioclimatic niche. Fire in Australian savannas influences both the biophysical and biogeochemical processes at multiple scales from leaf to landscape. Here, we present the latest emission estimates from Australian savanna biomass burning and their contribution to global greenhouse gas budgets. We then review our understanding of the impacts of fire on ecosystem function and local surface water and heat balances, which in turn influence regional climate. We show how savanna fires are coupled to the global climate through the carbon cycle and fire regimes. We present new research that climate change is likely to alter the structure and function of savannas through shifts in moisture availability and increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide, in turn altering fire regimes with further feedbacks to climate. We explore opportunities to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions from savanna ecosystems through changes in savanna fire management.
James Cook Universit... arrow_drop_down James Cook University, Australia: ResearchOnline@JCUArticle . 2015Full-Text: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12686Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)The University of Melbourne: Digital RepositoryArticle . 2015License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)The University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.12686&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 89 citations 89 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert James Cook Universit... arrow_drop_down James Cook University, Australia: ResearchOnline@JCUArticle . 2015Full-Text: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12686Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)The University of Melbourne: Digital RepositoryArticle . 2015License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)The University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.12686&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2013 France, United KingdomPublisher:Wiley Funded by:EC | CARBONESEC| CARBONESStephen Sitch; Yiqi Luo; Pierre Friedlingstein; Nan Cong; Anders Ahlström; Mark R. Lomas; Philippe Ciais; Tao Wang; Peter Levy; Chris Huntingford; Xuhui Wang; Ben Poulter; Samuel Levis; Philippe Peylin; Yuecun Ma; Shilong Piao; Shilong Piao; Soenke Zaehle; Zhenzhong Sun; Josep G. Canadell; Ning Zeng; Alessandro Anav; Junsheng Li; Martin Jung; Meng Lu; Nicolas Viovy; Ranga B. Myneni; Xin Lin;doi: 10.1111/gcb.12187
pmid: 23504870
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate 10 process‐based terrestrial biosphere models that were used for the IPCC fifth Assessment Report. The simulated gross primary productivity (GPP) is compared with flux‐tower‐based estimates by Jung et al. [Journal of Geophysical Research 116 (2011) G00J07] (JU11). The net primary productivity (NPP) apparent sensitivity to climate variability and atmospheric CO2 trends is diagnosed from each model output, using statistical functions. The temperature sensitivity is compared against ecosystem field warming experiments results. The CO2 sensitivity of NPP is compared to the results from four Free‐Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiments. The simulated global net biome productivity (NBP) is compared with the residual land sink (RLS) of the global carbon budget from Friedlingstein et al. [Nature Geoscience 3 (2010) 811] (FR10). We found that models produce a higher GPP (133 ± 15 Pg C yr−1) than JU11 (118 ± 6 Pg C yr−1). In response to rising atmospheric CO2 concentration, modeled NPP increases on average by 16% (5–20%) per 100 ppm, a slightly larger apparent sensitivity of NPP to CO2 than that measured at the FACE experiment locations (13% per 100 ppm). Global NBP differs markedly among individual models, although the mean value of 2.0 ± 0.8 Pg C yr−1 is remarkably close to the mean value of RLS (2.1 ± 1.2 Pg C yr−1). The interannual variability in modeled NBP is significantly correlated with that of RLS for the period 1980–2009. Both model‐to‐model and interannual variation in model GPP is larger than that in model NBP due to the strong coupling causing a positive correlation between ecosystem respiration and GPP in the model. The average linear regression slope of global NBP vs. temperature across the 10 models is −3.0 ± 1.5 Pg C yr−1 °C−1, within the uncertainty of what derived from RLS (−3.9 ± 1.1 Pg C yr−1 °C−1). However, 9 of 10 models overestimate the regression slope of NBP vs. precipitation, compared with the slope of the observed RLS vs. precipitation. With most models lacking processes that control GPP and NBP in addition to CO2 and climate, the agreement between modeled and observation‐based GPP and NBP can be fortuitous. Carbon–nitrogen interactions (only separable in one model) significantly influence the simulated response of carbon cycle to temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration, suggesting that nutrients limitations should be included in the next generation of terrestrial biosphere models.
Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2013Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03209699Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2013Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03209699Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefNatural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.12187&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 641 citations 641 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
visibility 5visibility views 5 download downloads 156 Powered bymore_vert Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2013Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03209699Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2013Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03209699Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefNatural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.12187&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2018 Germany, France, United StatesPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Frédéric Chevallier; Takashi Nakamura; J. G. Canadell; Albert van Dijk; Christian Rödenbeck; Andy Wiltshire; Nobuko Saigusa; Fang Li; Yosuke Niwa; Leonardo Calle; Thomas A. M. Pugh; Thomas A. M. Pugh; Takashi Maki; Atul K. Jain; A. Arneth; Tazu Saeki; Sönke Zaehle; Charles D. Koven; Prabir K. Patra; Etsushi Kato; Yi Y. Liu; Yi Y. Liu; Benjamin Poulter; Benjamin Poulter; Anna B. Harper; Stephen Sitch; Kazuhito Ichii; Kazuhito Ichii; Kazuhito Ichii; Masayuki Kondo; Masayuki Kondo; Pierre Friedlingstein;doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03374-x , 10.5445/ir/1000082232 , 10.60692/a5dkk-jnv47 , 10.60692/4shrz-zqs39
pmid: 29559637
pmc: PMC5861034
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03374-x , 10.5445/ir/1000082232 , 10.60692/a5dkk-jnv47 , 10.60692/4shrz-zqs39
pmid: 29559637
pmc: PMC5861034
AbstractAn integrated understanding of the biogeochemical consequences of climate extremes and land use changes is needed to constrain land-surface feedbacks to atmospheric CO2 from associated climate change. Past assessments of the global carbon balance have shown particularly high uncertainty in Southeast Asia. Here, we use a combination of model ensembles to show that intensified land use change made Southeast Asia a strong source of CO2 from the 1980s to 1990s, whereas the region was close to carbon neutral in the 2000s due to an enhanced CO2 fertilization effect and absence of moderate-to-strong El Niño events. Our findings suggest that despite ongoing deforestation, CO2 emissions were substantially decreased during the 2000s, largely owing to milder climate that restores photosynthetic capacity and suppresses peat and deforestation fire emissions. The occurrence of strong El Niño events after 2009 suggests that the region has returned to conditions of increased vulnerability of carbon stocks.
Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806789Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806789Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41467-018-03374-x&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 31 citations 31 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Hyper Article en Lig... arrow_drop_down KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806789Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806789Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/s41467-018-03374-x&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2023Embargo end date: 05 Jun 2024 SwitzerlandPublisher:Copernicus GmbH Funded by:EC | 4C, EC | PROVIDE, EC | ESM2025EC| 4C ,EC| PROVIDE ,EC| ESM2025Malte Meinshausen; Carl-Friedrich Schleußner; Kathleen Beyer; G. E. Bodeker; Oliviér Boucher; Josep G. Canadell; J. S. Daniel; Aïda Diongue‐Niang; Fatima Driouech; Erich M. Fischer; Piers M. Forster; Michael R. Grose; Gerrit Hansen; Zeke Hausfather; Tatiana Ilyina; Jarmo Kikstra; Joyce Kimutai; Andrew D. King; June‐Yi Lee; Chris Lennard; Tabea Lissner; Alexander Nauels; Glen P. Peters; Anna Pirani; Gian‐Kasper Plattner; Hans O. Pörtner; Joeri Rogelj; Maisa Rojas; Joyashree Roy; B. H. Samset; Benjamin M. Sanderson; Roland Séférian; Sonia I. Seneviratne; Christopher J. Smith; Sophie Szopa; Adelle Thomas; Diana Ürge-Vorsatz; G. J. M. Velders; Tokuta Yokohata; Tilo Ziehn; Zebedee Nicholls;Abstract. In every Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment cycle, a multitude of scenarios are assessed, with different scope and emphasis throughout the various Working Group reports and special reports, as well as their respective chapters. Within the reports, the ambition is to integrate knowledge on possible climate futures across the Working Groups and scientific research domains based on a small set of “framing pathways” such as the so-called representative concentration pathways (RCPs) in the Fifth IPCC Assessment Report (AR5) and the shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) scenarios in the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). This perspective, initiated by discussions at the IPCC Bangkok workshop in April 2023 on the “Use of Scenarios in AR6 and Subsequent Assessments”, is intended to serve as one of the community contributions to highlight the needs for the next generation of framing pathways that is being advanced under the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) umbrella, which will influence or even predicate the IPCC AR7 consideration of framing pathways. Here we suggest several policy research objectives that such a set of framing pathways should ideally fulfil, including mitigation needs for meeting the Paris Agreement objectives, the risks associated with carbon removal strategies, the consequences of delay in enacting that mitigation, guidance for adaptation needs, loss and damage, and for achieving mitigation in the wider context of societal development goals. Based on this context, we suggest that the next generation of climate scenarios for Earth system models should evolve towards representative emission pathways (REPs) and suggest key categories for such pathways. These framing pathways should address the most critical mitigation policy and adaptation plans that need to be implemented over the next 10 years. In our view, the most important categories are those relevant in the context of the Paris Agreement long-term goal, specifically an immediate action (low overshoot) 1.5 °C pathway and a delayed action (high overshoot) 1.5 °C pathway. Two other key categories are a pathway category approximately in line with current (as expressed by 2023) near- and long-term policy objectives, as well as a higher-emission category that is approximately in line with “current policies” (as expressed by 2023). We also argue for the scientific and policy relevance in exploring two “worlds that could have been”. One of these categories has high-emission trajectories well above what is implied by current policies and the other has very-low-emission trajectories which assume that global mitigation action in line with limiting warming to 1.5 °C without overshoot had begun in 2015. Finally, we note that the timely provision of new scientific information on pathways is critical to inform the development and implementation of climate policy. Under the Paris Agreement, for the second global stocktake, which will occur in 2028, and to inform subsequent development of nationally determined contributions (NDCs) up to 2040, scientific inputs are required by 2027. These needs should be carefully considered in the development timeline of community modelling activities, including those under CMIP7.
IIASA DARE arrow_drop_down Geoscientific Model Development (GMD)Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-20...Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/gmd-17-4533-2024&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 7 citations 7 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert IIASA DARE arrow_drop_down Geoscientific Model Development (GMD)Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-20...Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/gmd-17-4533-2024&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2014Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Authors: Ernst Detlef Schulze; Josep G. Canadell;doi: 10.1038/ncomms6282
pmid: 25407959
Elevated concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHGs), particularly carbon dioxide (CO2), have affected the global climate. Land-based biological carbon mitigation strategies are considered an important and viable pathway towards climate stabilization. However, to satisfy the growing demands for food, wood products, energy, climate mitigation and biodiversity conservation-all of which compete for increasingly limited quantities of biomass and land-the deployment of mitigation strategies must be driven by sustainable and integrated land management. If executed accordingly, through avoided emissions and carbon sequestration, biological carbon and bioenergy mitigation could save up to 38 billion tonnes of carbon and 3-8% of estimated energy consumption, respectively, by 2050.
Nature Communication... arrow_drop_down Nature CommunicationsArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer Nature TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/ncomms6282&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesgold 170 citations 170 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Nature Communication... arrow_drop_down Nature CommunicationsArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer Nature TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/ncomms6282&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2023Publisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Publicly fundedJürgen Knauer; Matthias Cuntz; Benjamin Smith; Josep G. Canadell; Belinda E. Medlyn; Alison C. Bennett; Silvia Caldararu; Vanessa Haverd;Gross primary productivity (GPP) is the key determinant of land carbon uptake, but its representation in terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) does not reflect our latest physiological understanding. We implemented three empirically well supported but often omitted mechanisms into the TBM CABLE-POP: photosynthetic temperature acclimation, explicit mesophyll conductance, and photosynthetic optimization through redistribution of leaf nitrogen. We used the RCP8.5 climate scenario to conduct factorial model simulations characterizing the individual and combined effects of the three mechanisms on projections of GPP. Simulated global GPP increased more strongly (up to 20% by 2070–2099) in more comprehensive representations of photosynthesis compared to the model lacking the three mechanisms. The experiments revealed non-additive interactions among the mechanisms as combined effects were stronger than the sum of the individual effects. The modeled responses are explained by changes in the photosynthetic sensitivity to temperature and CO 2 caused by the added mechanisms. Our results suggest that current TBMs underestimate GPP responses to future CO 2 and climate conditions.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1126/sciadv.adh9444&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesgold 9 citations 9 popularity Average influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1126/sciadv.adh9444&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Conference object , Other literature type , Journal 2017Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2017 France, Germany, United States, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, United States, Norway, United StatesPublisher:Copernicus GmbH Funded by:NSERC, EC | CDREG, EC | METLAKE +3 projectsNSERC ,EC| CDREG ,EC| METLAKE ,EC| MACC II ,EC| MACC-III ,RCN| CICEP-Strategic Challenges in International Climate and Energy PolicyM. Saunois; P. Bousquet; B. Poulter; A. Peregon; P. Ciais; J. G. Canadell; E. J. Dlugokencky; G. Etiope; G. Etiope; D. Bastviken; S. Houweling; S. Houweling; G. Janssens-Maenhout; F. N. Tubiello; S. Castaldi; S. Castaldi; S. Castaldi; R. B. Jackson; M. Alexe; V. K. Arora; D. J. Beerling; P. Bergamaschi; D. R. Blake; G. Brailsford; L. Bruhwiler; C. Crevoisier; P. Crill; K. Covey; C. Frankenberg; C. Frankenberg; N. Gedney; L. Höglund-Isaksson; M. Ishizawa; A. Ito; F. Joos; H.-S. Kim; T. Kleinen; P. Krummel; J.-F. Lamarque; R. Langenfelds; R. Locatelli; T. Machida; S. Maksyutov; J. R. Melton; I. Morino; V. Naik; S. O'Doherty; F.-J. W. Parmentier; P. K. Patra; C. Peng; C. Peng; S. Peng; S. Peng; G. P. Peters; I. Pison; R. Prinn; M. Ramonet; W. J. Riley; M. Saito; M. Santini; M. Santini; R. Schroeder; I. J. Simpson; R. Spahni; A. Takizawa; B. F. Thornton; H. Tian; Y. Tohjima; N. Viovy; A. Voulgarakis; R. Weiss; D. J. Wilton; A. Wiltshire; D. Worthy; D. Wunch; X. Xu; X. Xu; Y. Yoshida; B. Zhang; Z. Zhang; Z. Zhang; Q. Zhu;Abstract. Following the recent Global Carbon Project (GCP) synthesis of the decadal methane (CH4) budget over 2000–2012 (Saunois et al., 2016), we analyse here the same dataset with a focus on quasi-decadal and inter-annual variability in CH4 emissions. The GCP dataset integrates results from top-down studies (exploiting atmospheric observations within an atmospheric inverse-modelling framework) and bottom-up models (including process-based models for estimating land surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry), inventories of anthropogenic emissions, and data-driven approaches. The annual global methane emissions from top-down studies, which by construction match the observed methane growth rate within their uncertainties, all show an increase in total methane emissions over the period 2000–2012, but this increase is not linear over the 13 years. Despite differences between individual studies, the mean emission anomaly of the top-down ensemble shows no significant trend in total methane emissions over the period 2000–2006, during the plateau of atmospheric methane mole fractions, and also over the period 2008–2012, during the renewed atmospheric methane increase. However, the top-down ensemble mean produces an emission shift between 2006 and 2008, leading to 22 [16–32] Tg CH4 yr−1 higher methane emissions over the period 2008–2012 compared to 2002–2006. This emission increase mostly originated from the tropics, with a smaller contribution from mid-latitudes and no significant change from boreal regions. The regional contributions remain uncertain in top-down studies. Tropical South America and South and East Asia seem to contribute the most to the emission increase in the tropics. However, these two regions have only limited atmospheric measurements and remain therefore poorly constrained. The sectorial partitioning of this emission increase between the periods 2002–2006 and 2008–2012 differs from one atmospheric inversion study to another. However, all top-down studies suggest smaller changes in fossil fuel emissions (from oil, gas, and coal industries) compared to the mean of the bottom-up inventories included in this study. This difference is partly driven by a smaller emission change in China from the top-down studies compared to the estimate in the Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGARv4.2) inventory, which should be revised to smaller values in a near future. We apply isotopic signatures to the emission changes estimated for individual studies based on five emission sectors and find that for six individual top-down studies (out of eight) the average isotopic signature of the emission changes is not consistent with the observed change in atmospheric 13CH4. However, the partitioning in emission change derived from the ensemble mean is consistent with this isotopic constraint. At the global scale, the top-down ensemble mean suggests that the dominant contribution to the resumed atmospheric CH4 growth after 2006 comes from microbial sources (more from agriculture and waste sectors than from natural wetlands), with an uncertain but smaller contribution from fossil CH4 emissions. In addition, a decrease in biomass burning emissions (in agreement with the biomass burning emission databases) makes the balance of sources consistent with atmospheric 13CH4 observations. In most of the top-down studies included here, OH concentrations are considered constant over the years (seasonal variations but without any inter-annual variability). As a result, the methane loss (in particular through OH oxidation) varies mainly through the change in methane concentrations and not its oxidants. For these reasons, changes in the methane loss could not be properly investigated in this study, although it may play a significant role in the recent atmospheric methane changes as briefly discussed at the end of the paper.
CORE arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/55004Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)École Polytechnique, Université Paris-Saclay: HALArticle . 2017Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-02414578Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Article . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/ACP-17-11135-2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2017Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-02414578Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2017Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-02414578Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Caltech Authors (California Institute of Technology)Article . 2017Full-Text: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Atmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20...Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefAtmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsOther literature type . 2017Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)eScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2017Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaMunin - Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Munin - Open Research ArchiveAtmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 88 citations 88 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
visibility 6visibility views 6 download downloads 36 Powered bymore_vert CORE arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/55004Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)École Polytechnique, Université Paris-Saclay: HALArticle . 2017Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-02414578Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Article . 2018License: CC BYFull-Text: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/ACP-17-11135-2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2017Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-02414578Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2017Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-02414578Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Caltech Authors (California Institute of Technology)Article . 2017Full-Text: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Atmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20...Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefAtmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsOther literature type . 2017Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)eScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2017Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaMunin - Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Munin - Open Research ArchiveAtmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2013Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2014 United States, United Kingdom, France, Australia, Belgium, Germany, United States, United Kingdom, United States, Norway, GermanyPublisher:Copernicus GmbH Funded by:EC | GEOCARBON, EC | EMBRACE, EC | COMBINE +4 projectsEC| GEOCARBON ,EC| EMBRACE ,EC| COMBINE ,NSF| Collaborative Research: Improved Regional and Decadal Predictions of the Carbon Cycle ,EC| CARBOCHANGE ,EC| LUC4C ,RCN| Support for the Scientific Steering Committee of the Global Carbon ProjectPieter P. Tans; C. Le Quéré; Sönke Zaehle; Atul K. Jain; Fabienne Maignan; Jörg Schwinger; Jörg Schwinger; Dorothee C. E. Bakker; Steve D Jones; Geun-Ha Park; Christian Rödenbeck; Laurent Bopp; Arne Körtzinger; Abdirahman M Omar; Bronte Tilbrook; Gregg Marland; T. Ono; Joachim Segschneider; Thomas A. Boden; Richard A. Houghton; Andy Wiltshire; Pierre Regnier; Louise Chini; Philippe Ciais; Joanna Isobel House; Taro Takahashi; Almut Arneth; Glen P. Peters; Josep G. Canadell; Etsushi Kato; Robert J. Andres; Kees Klein Goldewijk; Benjamin Poulter; Anna B. Harper; Rik Wanninkhof; Pierre Friedlingstein; Michael R. Raupach; Benjamin D. Stocker; Stephen Sitch; Ralph F. Keeling; Benjamin Pfeil; Benjamin Pfeil; Robbie M. Andrew; S. van Heuven; Charles D. Koven; R. Moriarty; S. Saito; Nathalie Lefèvre; Scott C. Doney; Ian Harris; A. Arvanitis; Nicolas Viovy;Abstract. Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe datasets and a methodology to quantify all major components of the global carbon budget, including their uncertainties, based on the combination of a range of data, algorithms, statistics and model estimates and their interpretation by a broad scientific community. We discuss changes compared to previous estimates consistency within and among components, alongside methodology and data limitations. CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel combustion and cement production (EFF) are based on energy statistics, while emissions from Land-Use Change (ELUC), including deforestation, are based on combined evidence from land-cover change data, fire activity in regions undergoing deforestation, and models. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly and its rate of growth (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The mean ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) is based on observations from the 1990s, while the annual anomalies and trends are estimated with ocean models. The variability in SOCEAN is evaluated for the first time in this budget with data products based on surveys of ocean CO2 measurements. The global residual terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) is estimated by the difference of the other terms of the global carbon budget and compared to results of Dynamic Global Vegetation Models. All uncertainties are reported as ± 1 sigma, reflecting the current capacity to characterise the annual estimates of each component of the global carbon budget. For the last decade available (2003–2012), EFF was 8.6 ± 0.4 GtC yr−1, ELUC 0.8 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, GATM 4.3 ± 0.1 GtC yr−1, SOCEAN 2.6 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, and SLAND 2.6 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1. For year 2012 alone, EFF grew to 9.7 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, 2.2% above 2011, reflecting a continued trend in these emissions; GATM was 5.2 ± 0.2 GtC yr−1, SOCEAN was 2.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, and assuming and ELUC of 0.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 (based on 2001–2010 average), SLAND was 2.5 ± 0.9 GtC yr−1. GATM was high in 2012 compared to the 2003–2012 average, almost entirely reflecting the high EFF. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration reached 392.52 ± 0.10 ppm on average over 2012. We estimate that EFF will increase by 2.1% (1.1–3.1%) to 9.9 ± 0.5 GtC in 2013, 61% above emissions in 1990, based on projections of World Gross Domestic Product and recent changes in the carbon intensity of the economy. With this projection, cumulative emissions of CO2 will reach about 550 ± 60 GtC for 1870–2013, 70% from EFF (390 ± 20 GtC) and 30% from ELUC (160 ± 55 GtC). This paper is intended to provide a baseline to keep track of annual carbon budgets in the future. All data presented here can be downloaded from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (10.3334/CDIAC/GCP_2013_v1.1).
OceanRep arrow_drop_down Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01828526Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2014License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB)Article . 2015License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/1956/10495Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2015License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01828526Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Woods Hole Open Access ServerArticle . 2014License: CC BYFull-Text: https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/GCP_2013_V2.3Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)École Polytechnique, Université Paris-Saclay: HALArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01828526Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Australian National University: ANU Digital CollectionsArticleFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/74928Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Columbia University Academic CommonsArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8319V8NData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)https://doi.org/10.5194/essdd-...Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefEarth System Science Data (ESSD)Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefBergen Open Research Archive - UiBArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Bergen Open Research Archive - UiBUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/essdd-6-689-2013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 381 citations 381 popularity Top 1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01828526Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2014License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB)Article . 2015License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/1956/10495Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2015License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01828526Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Woods Hole Open Access ServerArticle . 2014License: CC BYFull-Text: https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/GCP_2013_V2.3Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)École Polytechnique, Université Paris-Saclay: HALArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01828526Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Australian National University: ANU Digital CollectionsArticleFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/74928Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Columbia University Academic CommonsArticle . 2014Full-Text: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8319V8NData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)https://doi.org/10.5194/essdd-...Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefEarth System Science Data (ESSD)Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefBergen Open Research Archive - UiBArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Bergen Open Research Archive - UiBUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/essdd-6-689-2013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2019 SwitzerlandPublisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Funded by:EC | 4CEC| 4CPierre Friedlingstein; Myles Allen; Josep G. Canadell; Glen P. Peters; Sonia I. Seneviratne;pmid: 31624183
Bastin et al . (Reports, 5 July 2019, p. 76) claim that global tree restoration is the most effective climate change solution to date, with a reported carbon storage potential of 205 gigatonnes of carbon. However, this estimate and its implications for climate mitigation are inconsistent with the dynamics of the global carbon cycle and its response to anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1126/science.aay8060&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 75 citations 75 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1126/science.aay8060&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2014Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Lu He; Moucheng Liu; Zheng Yuan; Wenhua Li; Dan Zhang; Zhong-qi Xu; Fei Lun; Josep G. Canadell;Rural energy consumption in China has increased dramatically in the last decades, and has become a significant contributor of carbon emissions. Yet there is limited data on energy consumption patterns and their evolution in forest rural areas of China. In order to bridge this gap, we report the findings of field surveys in forest villages in Weichang County as a case study of rural energy consumption in northern China. We found that the residential energy consumption per household is 3313 kgce yr(-1) (kilogram standard coal equivalent per year), with energy content of 9.7 x 107 kJ yr(-1), including 1783 kgce yr(-1) from coal, 1386 kgce yr(-1) from fuel wood, 96 kgce yr(-1) from electricity, and 49 kgce yr(-1) from LPG. Per capita consumption is 909 kgce yr(-1) and its energy content is 2.7 x 107 kJ yr(-1). Due to a total energy utilization efficiency of 24.6%, all the consumed energy can only supply about 2.4 x 107 kJ yr(-1) of efficient energy content. Secondly, household energy consumption is partitioned into 2614 kgce yr(-1) for heating, 616 kgce yr(-1) for cooking, and 117 kgce yr(-1) for home appliances. Thirdly, the associated carbon emissions per household are 2556 kgC yr(-1), including 1022 kgC yr(-1) from unutilized fuel wood (90% of the total fuel wood). The rest of emissions come from the use of electricity (212 kgC yr(-1)), coal (1301 kgC yr(-1)) and LPG (21 kgC yr(-1)). Fourthly, local climate, family size and household income have strong influences on rural residential energy consumption. Changes in storage and utilization practices of fuel can lead to the 10%-30% increase in the efficiency of fuel wood use, leading to reduced energy consumption by 924 kgce yr(-1) per household (27.9% reduction) and 901 kgC yr(-1) of carbon emissions (35.3% reduction).
Journal of Mountain ... arrow_drop_down Journal of Mountain ScienceArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s11629-013-2884-1&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 11 citations 11 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert Journal of Mountain ... arrow_drop_down Journal of Mountain ScienceArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s11629-013-2884-1&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu