- home
- Advanced Search
Filters
Year range
-chevron_right GOOrganization
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2013Embargo end date: 20 Sep 2018 United Kingdom, Ireland, IrelandPublisher:Wiley Publicly fundedFunded by:EC | THESEUSEC| THESEUSAntony M. Knights; Antony M. Knights; Simon P. G. Hoggart; Stephen J. Hawkins; Stephen J. Hawkins; Louise B. Firth; Louise B. Firth; Juliette Jackson; Meredith Schofield; Richard C. Thompson; Freya J. White; Martin W. Skov;doi: 10.1111/ddi.12079 , 10.13025/27494
handle: 10379/11476
AbstractAimArtificial coastal defence structures are proliferating in response to rising and stormier seas. These structures provide habitat for many species but generally support lower biodiversity than natural habitats. This is primarily due to the absence of environmental heterogeneity and water‐retaining features on artificial structures. We compared the epibiotic communities associated with artificial coastal defence structures and natural habitats to ask the following questions: (1) is species richness on emergent substrata greater in natural than artificial habitats and is the magnitude of this difference greater at mid than upper tidal levels; (2) is species richness greater in rock pools than emergent substrata and is the magnitude of this difference greater in artificial than natural habitats; and (3) in artificial habitats, is species richness in rock pools greater at mid than upper tidal levels?LocationBritish Isles.MethodsStandard non‐destructive random sampling compared the effect of habitat type and tidal height on epibiota on natural rocky shores and artificial coastal defence structures.ResultsNatural emergent substrata supported greater species richness than artificial substrata. Species richness was greater at mid than upper tidal levels, particularly in artificial habitats. Rock pools supported greater species richness than emergent substrata, and this difference was more pronounced in artificial than natural habitats. Rock pools in artificial habitats supported greater species richness at mid than upper tidal levels.Main conclusionsArtificial structures support lower biodiversity than natural habitats. This is primarily due to the lack of habitat heterogeneity in artificial habitats. Artificial structures can be modified to provide rock pools that promote biodiversity. The effect of rock pool creation will be more pronounced at mid than upper tidal levels. The challenge now is to establish at what tidal height the effect of pools becomes negligible and to determine the rock pool dimensions for optimum habitat enhancement.
National University ... arrow_drop_down National University of Ireland (NUI), Galway: ARANArticle . 2013License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10379/11476Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Diversity and DistributionsArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/ddi.12079&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 161 citations 161 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert National University ... arrow_drop_down National University of Ireland (NUI), Galway: ARANArticle . 2013License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10379/11476Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Diversity and DistributionsArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/ddi.12079&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2013Embargo end date: 20 Sep 2018 United Kingdom, Ireland, IrelandPublisher:Wiley Publicly fundedFunded by:EC | THESEUSEC| THESEUSAntony M. Knights; Antony M. Knights; Simon P. G. Hoggart; Stephen J. Hawkins; Stephen J. Hawkins; Louise B. Firth; Louise B. Firth; Juliette Jackson; Meredith Schofield; Richard C. Thompson; Freya J. White; Martin W. Skov;doi: 10.1111/ddi.12079 , 10.13025/27494
handle: 10379/11476
AbstractAimArtificial coastal defence structures are proliferating in response to rising and stormier seas. These structures provide habitat for many species but generally support lower biodiversity than natural habitats. This is primarily due to the absence of environmental heterogeneity and water‐retaining features on artificial structures. We compared the epibiotic communities associated with artificial coastal defence structures and natural habitats to ask the following questions: (1) is species richness on emergent substrata greater in natural than artificial habitats and is the magnitude of this difference greater at mid than upper tidal levels; (2) is species richness greater in rock pools than emergent substrata and is the magnitude of this difference greater in artificial than natural habitats; and (3) in artificial habitats, is species richness in rock pools greater at mid than upper tidal levels?LocationBritish Isles.MethodsStandard non‐destructive random sampling compared the effect of habitat type and tidal height on epibiota on natural rocky shores and artificial coastal defence structures.ResultsNatural emergent substrata supported greater species richness than artificial substrata. Species richness was greater at mid than upper tidal levels, particularly in artificial habitats. Rock pools supported greater species richness than emergent substrata, and this difference was more pronounced in artificial than natural habitats. Rock pools in artificial habitats supported greater species richness at mid than upper tidal levels.Main conclusionsArtificial structures support lower biodiversity than natural habitats. This is primarily due to the lack of habitat heterogeneity in artificial habitats. Artificial structures can be modified to provide rock pools that promote biodiversity. The effect of rock pool creation will be more pronounced at mid than upper tidal levels. The challenge now is to establish at what tidal height the effect of pools becomes negligible and to determine the rock pool dimensions for optimum habitat enhancement.
National University ... arrow_drop_down National University of Ireland (NUI), Galway: ARANArticle . 2013License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10379/11476Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Diversity and DistributionsArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/ddi.12079&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 161 citations 161 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert National University ... arrow_drop_down National University of Ireland (NUI), Galway: ARANArticle . 2013License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10379/11476Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Diversity and DistributionsArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/ddi.12079&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu