• Energy Research

Grazing represents the most extensive use of land worldwide. Yet its impacts on ecosystem services remain uncertain because pervasive interactions between grazing pressure, climate, soil properties, and biodiversity may occur but have never been addressed simultaneously. Using a standardized survey at 98 sites across six continents, we show that interactions between grazing pressure, climate, soil, and biodiversity are critical to explain the delivery of fundamental ecosystem services across drylands worldwide. Increasing grazing pressure reduced ecosystem service delivery in warmer and species-poor drylands, whereas positive effects of grazing were observed in colder and species-rich areas. Considering interactions between grazing and local abiotic and biotic factors is key for understanding the fate of dryland ecosystems under climate change and increasing human pressure.

AbstractThe performance of coordinated distributed experiments designed to compare ecosystem sensitivity to global-change drivers depends on whether they cover a significant proportion of the global range of environmental variables. In the present article, we described the global distribution of climatic and soil variables and quantified main differences among continents. Then, as a test case, we assessed the representativeness of the International Drought Experiment (IDE) in parameter space. Considering the global environmental variability at this scale, the different continents harbor unique combinations of parameters. As such, coordinated experiments set up across a single continent may fail to capture the full extent of global variation in climate and soil parameter space. IDE with representation on all continents has the potential to address global scale hypotheses about ecosystem sensitivity to environmental change. Our results provide a unique vision of climate and soil variability at the global scale and highlight the need to design globally distributed networks.

AbstractClimate‐change assessments project increasing precipitation variability through increased frequency of extreme events. However, the effects of interannual precipitation variance per se on ecosystem functioning have been largely understudied. Here, we report on the effects of interannual precipitation variability on the primary production of global drylands, which include deserts, steppes, shrublands, grasslands, and prairies and cover about 40% of the terrestrial earth surface. We used a global database that has 43 datasets, which are uniformly distributed in parameter space and each has at least 10 years of data. We found (a) that at the global scale, precipitation variability has a negative effect on aboveground net primary production. (b) Expected increases in interannual precipitation variability for the year 2,100 may result in a decrease of up to 12% of the global terrestrial carbon sink. (c) The effect of precipitation interannual variability on dryland productivity changes from positive to negative along a precipitation gradient. Arid sites with mean precipitation under 300 mm/year responded positively to increases in precipitation variability, whereas sites with mean precipitation over 300 mm/year responded negatively. We propose three complementary mechanisms to explain this result: (a) concave‐up and concave‐down precipitation–production relationships in arid vs. humid systems, (b) shift in the distribution of water in the soil profile, and (c) altered frequency of positive and negative legacies. Our results demonstrated that enhanced precipitation variability will have direct impacts on global drylands that can potentially affect the future terrestrial carbon sink.

AbstractClimate change will result in reduced soil water availability in much of the world either due to changes in precipitation or increased temperature and evapotranspiration. How communities of mites and nematodes may respond to changes in moisture availability is not well known, yet these organisms play important roles in decomposition and nutrient cycling processes. We determined how communities of these organisms respond to changes in moisture availability and whether common patterns occur along fine‐scale gradients of soil moisture within four individual ecosystem types (mesic, xeric and arid grasslands and a polar desert) located in the western United States and Antarctica, as well as across a cross‐ecosystem moisture gradient (CEMG) of all four ecosystems considered together. An elevation transect of three sampling plots was monitored within each ecosystem and soil samples were collected from these plots and from existing experimental precipitation manipulations within each ecosystem once in fall of 2009 and three times each in 2010 and 2011. Mites and nematodes were sorted to trophic groups and analyzed to determine community responses to changes in soil moisture availability. We found that while both mites and nematodes increased with available soil moisture across theCEMG, within individual ecosystems, increases in soil moisture resulted in decreases to nematode communities at all but the arid grassland ecosystem; mites showed no responses at any ecosystem. In addition, we found changes in proportional abundances of mite and nematode trophic groups as soil moisture increased within individual ecosystems, which may result in shifts within soil food webs with important consequences for ecosystem functioning. We suggest that communities of soil animals at local scales may respond predictably to changes in moisture availability regardless of ecosystem type but that additional factors, such as climate variability, vegetation composition, and soil properties may influence this relationship over larger scales.

Le pâturage représente l'utilisation la plus étendue des terres dans le monde. Pourtant, ses impacts sur les services écosystémiques restent incertains car des interactions omniprésentes entre la pression de pâturage, le climat, les propriétés des sols et la biodiversité peuvent se produire mais n'ont jamais été traitées simultanément. En utilisant une enquête standardisée sur 98 sites sur six continents, nous montrons que les interactions entre la pression du pâturage, le climat, le sol et la biodiversité sont essentielles pour expliquer la fourniture de services écosystémiques fondamentaux dans les zones arides du monde entier. L'augmentation de la pression de pâturage a réduit la prestation de services écosystémiques dans les zones arides plus chaudes et pauvres en espèces, tandis que les effets positifs du pâturage ont été observés dans les zones plus froides et riches en espèces. La prise en compte des interactions entre le pâturage et les facteurs abiotiques et biotiques locaux est essentielle pour comprendre le sort des écosystèmes des terres arides sous le changement climatique et l'augmentation de la pression humaine. El pastoreo representa el uso más extenso de la tierra en todo el mundo. Sin embargo, sus impactos en los servicios ecosistémicos siguen siendo inciertos porque las interacciones generalizadas entre la presión del pastoreo, el clima, las propiedades del suelo y la biodiversidad pueden ocurrir, pero nunca se han abordado simultáneamente. Utilizando una encuesta estandarizada en 98 sitios en seis continentes, mostramos que las interacciones entre la presión del pastoreo, el clima, el suelo y la biodiversidad son fundamentales para explicar la prestación de servicios ecosistémicos fundamentales en las tierras secas de todo el mundo. El aumento de la presión del pastoreo redujo la prestación de servicios ecosistémicos en las tierras secas más cálidas y pobres en especies, mientras que los efectos positivos del pastoreo se observaron en las zonas más frías y ricas en especies. Considerar las interacciones entre el pastoreo y los factores abióticos y bióticos locales es clave para comprender el destino de los ecosistemas de tierras secas bajo el cambio climático y el aumento de la presión humana. Grazing represents the most extensive use of land worldwide. Yet its impacts on ecosystem services remain uncertain because pervasive interactions between grazing pressure, climate, soil properties, and biodiversity may occur but have never been addressed simultaneously. Using a standardized survey at 98 sites across six continents, we show that interactions between grazing pressure, climate, soil, and biodiversity are critical to explain the delivery of fundamental ecosystem services across drylands worldwide. Increasing grazing pressure reduced ecosystem service delivery in warmer and species-poor drylands, whereas positive effects of grazing were observed in colder and species-rich areas. Considering interactions between grazing and local abiotic and biotic factors is key for understanding the fate of dryland ecosystems under climate change and increasing human pressure. يمثل الرعي الاستخدام الأوسع للأراضي في جميع أنحاء العالم. ومع ذلك، لا تزال آثاره على خدمات النظام الإيكولوجي غير مؤكدة لأن التفاعلات المنتشرة بين ضغط الرعي والمناخ وخصائص التربة والتنوع البيولوجي قد تحدث ولكن لم تتم معالجتها أبدًا في وقت واحد. باستخدام مسح موحد في 98 موقعًا في ست قارات، نوضح أن التفاعلات بين ضغط الرعي والمناخ والتربة والتنوع البيولوجي ضرورية لشرح تقديم خدمات النظام الإيكولوجي الأساسية عبر الأراضي الجافة في جميع أنحاء العالم. أدى الضغط المتزايد للرعي إلى تقليل تقديم خدمات النظام الإيكولوجي في الأراضي الجافة الأكثر دفئًا والفقيرة بالأنواع، في حين لوحظت آثار إيجابية للرعي في المناطق الأكثر برودة والغنية بالأنواع. يعتبر النظر في التفاعلات بين الرعي والعوامل المحلية اللاأحيائية والأحيائية أمرًا أساسيًا لفهم مصير النظم الإيكولوجية للأراضي الجافة في ظل تغير المناخ وزيادة الضغط البشري.

Water availability limits plant growth and production in almost all terrestrial ecosystems. However, biomes differ substantially in sensitivity of aboveground net primary production (ANPP) to between-year variation in precipitation. Average rain-use efficiency (RUE; ANPP/precipitation) also varies between biomes, supposedly because of differences in vegetation structure and/or biogeochemical constraints. Here we show that RUE decreases across biomes as mean annual precipitation increases. However, during the driest years at each site, there is convergence to a common maximum RUE (RUE(max)) that is typical of arid ecosystems. RUE(max) was also identified by experimentally altering the degree of limitation by water and other resources. Thus, in years when water is most limiting, deserts, grasslands and forests all exhibit the same rate of biomass production per unit rainfall, despite differences in physiognomy and site-level RUE. Global climate models predict increased between-year variability in precipitation, more frequent extreme drought events, and changes in temperature. Forecasts of future ecosystem behaviour should take into account this convergent feature of terrestrial biomes.

Resource partitioning, facilitation, and sampling effect are the three mechanisms behind the biodiversity effect, which is depicted usually as the effect of plant-species richness on aboveground net primary production. These mechanisms operate simultaneously but their relative importance and interactions are difficult to unravel experimentally. Thus, niche differentiation and facilitation have been lumped together and separated from the sampling effect. Here, we propose three hypotheses about interactions among the three mechanisms and test them using a simulation model. The model simulated water movement through soil and vegetation, and net primary production mimicking the Patagonian steppe. Using the model, we created grass and shrub monocultures and mixtures, controlled root overlap and grass water-use efficiency (WUE) to simulate gradients of biodiversity, resource partitioning and facilitation. The presence of shrubs facilitated grass growth by increasing its WUE and in turn increased the sampling effect, whereas root overlap (resource partitioning) had, on average, no effect on sampling effect. Interestingly, resource partitioning and facilitation interacted so the effect of facilitation on sampling effect decreased as resource partitioning increased. Sampling effect was enhanced by the difference between the two functional groups in their efficiency in using resources. Morphological and physiological differences make one group outperform the other; once these differences were established further differences did not enhance the sampling effect. In addition, grass WUE and root overlap positively influence the biodiversity effect but showed no interactions.