• Energy Research
• 2021-2025close

The mobility sector was one of the sectors most affected by COVID-19 and its political restrictions, with, inter alia a huge drop in mobility behavior due to travel bans, lockdowns, and a reduced need to be mobile. The present study examined the potential of COVID-19 restrictions aiming at containing the spread of the virus to be a window of opportunity for the transition toward sustainable mobility by breaking up strongly habitualized daily and travel mobility behaviors through changes of behavioral contexts. We conducted an online survey in a sample representative for the German population (N = 3092) to study the consequences of the COVID-19 restrictions on Germans' daily and travel mode choices and on their wishes for future mobility. Furthermore, we examined the moderating effects of Germans' personal norms to protect the climate on changes in their mobility behavior toward sustainable mobility, both within and beyond the corona pandemic. In line with previous research, the present study shows an overall reduction of mobility across almost all modes of transport for daily and travel mobility during time periods of COVID-19 restrictions compared to pre-COVID-19-times, with different transport modes being affected differently. Our findings additionally point out the relevance of personal norms to protect the climate for the transition toward sustainable mobility behavior. Altogether, the present study provides first empirical evidence for the corona pandemic to represent a window of opportunity for the transition toward sustainable mobility. Furthermore, the study also points out relevant directions for further research.

Publiziert als Diskussionsbeiträge der Scientists for Future 5 (43 pp). Die Erstveröffentlichung (nur in Deutsch) erfolgte am 16. Dez. 2020, diese geringfügige Revision 1.1 (Deutsch und Englisch) am 16. Jan. 2021. GERMAN SUMMARY (English Summary further below): Die Zeit drängt. Ohne schnell wirksame Gegenmaßnahmen werden Erderhitzung und Biodiversitätsverlust Ausmaße annehmen, welche die Lebensweise von Menschen nicht abschätzbaren Risiken aussetzen. Obwohl die Herausforderungen weiten Teilen der Bevölkerung bewusst sind, werden dringend nötige Entscheidungen aufgeschoben oder nur teilweise umgesetzt. Eine Ursache hierfür sind fehlende Foren, in denen sich Bürger:innen mit Expert:innen austauschen und gemeinsam mögliche Szenarien und Lösungen erörtern können. Scientists for Future empfiehlt deshalb, mit geeigneten Formen von Bürger:innenversammlungen eine breite und demokratisch partizipative Beteiligung an Zukunftsgestaltung und -sicherung zu ermöglichen. Diese sollten auch unabhängig von einem Auftrag von Regierung oder Parlament initiiert werden. Wir rufen daher zu einem Gründungstreffen auf, um Planung und Durchführung einer Bürger:innenversammlung zum Thema Klima im Jahr 2021 zu ermöglichen. Eine sorgfältige Planung ist nötig, damit die Durchführung neutral und offen geschieht. Hierfür werden einige zentrale Kriterien beschrieben. ENGLISH SUMMARY: Time is pressing. Without quick and effective countermeasures, global warming and loss of biodiversity will assume proportions that expose people’s way of life to incalculable risks. Although large parts of the population are aware of the challenges, urgently needed decisions are postponed or only partially implemented. One reason for this is the lack of forums where citizens can discuss possible scenarios and solutions with experts. Therefore, Scientists for Future recommends enabling a broad and democratic participatory involvement in shaping and securing the future by appropriate forms of citizens’ assemblies. These should also be initiated independently of a mandate from government or parliament. We therefore call for a founding meeting to enable the planning and implementation of a citizens’ assembly on the topic of climate in 2021. A careful planning is necessary, so that the execution happens neutrally and openly. For this purpose, some central criteria are described. ___ Suggested citation: Hagedorn, G.; Baasch, S., Blöbaum, A., Brendel, H., Hardt, J.N., Heiland, S. Klins­mann, M., Matthies, E., Pfennig, A., West, C., Wipfler, B., et al., (2021). Scientists for Future empfiehlt eine reprä­sen­ta­tive Klima-Bürger:innen­ver­sammlung im Jahr 2021 / Scientists for Future recommends a representative Climate Citizens’ Assem­bly in 2021 (Version 1.1, in Deutsch/German & Englisch/English). Diskussionsbeiträge der Scientists for Future, 5, 23 pp. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4417265. Volume 5 of "Diskussionsbeiträge der Scientists for Future". This publication contains both the German original text and an English translation.

The Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) have a key role to play in understanding which factors and policies would motivate, encourage and enable different actors to adopt a wide range of sustainable energy behaviours and support the required system changes and policies. The SSH can provide critical insights into how consumers could be empowered to consistently engage in sustainable energy behaviour, support and adopt new technologies, and support policies and changes in energy systems. Furthermore, they can increase our understanding of how organisations such as private and public institutions, and groups and associations of people can play a key role in the sustainable energy transition. We identify key questions to be addressed that have been identified by the Platform for Energy Research in the Socio-economic Nexus (PERSON, see person.eu), including SSH scholars who have been studying energy issues for many years. We identify three main research themes. The first research theme involves understanding which factors encourage different actors to engage in sustainable energy behaviour. The second research theme focuses on understanding which interventions can be effective in encouraging sustainable energy behaviour of different actors, and which factors enhance their effects. The third research theme concerns understanding which factors affect public and policy support for energy policy and changes in energy systems, and how important public concerns can best be addressed as to reduce or prevent resistance.

Individuals can support climate-change mitigation in many ways, e.g., through private-sphere behaviors or the support of political measures. We assume that the common climate-change-mitigation heuristic of restriction does not sufficiently support impactful mitigation intentions and therefore introduce and investigate a new heuristic (optimization heuristic.) In a cross-sectional survey with N = 1427 participants (representative of the German population with regard to age, gender, education), we developed two scales to measure the heuristics of restriction and optimization. As individual climate-change-mitigation intentions, we recorded four types of private-sphere behavior, activism, and three forms of policy support. Further psychological variables (personal norm, biospheric value orientation) and sociodemographic variables were recorded. The factorial structure of all concepts was assessed by means of confirmatory factor analyses. Hierarchical regression analyses with the climate-change-mitigation intentions as the criterion were carried out. Results support the assumption of two related, yet distinct, climate-change-mitigation heuristics that were highly correlated with biospheric value orientation. We additionally computed measure of the dominance of the restriction heuristic. This variable had no correlation with biospheric values, and correlated with the intentions in the expected ways, indicating that individuals with a dominant restriction heuristic tend to show lower scores of impactful climate-change-mitigation intentions.

Abstract We introduce a novel, psychological perspective on the acceptability of carbon pricing in which we differentiate between a citizen’s perspective and a consumer’s coping style. We expected acceptance to be determined by three factors: a citizen’s perspective that is rooted in a pro-environmental orientation (mediated via the personal norm to support climate policies) and a consumer’s perspective, comprising two kinds of coping foci, i.e., an action-oriented coping focus (trying to reduce one’s carbon footprint to avoid the costs of carbon pricing) and an affective, state-oriented coping focus (reacting with fear, anger, and hostility toward carbon pricing). Furthermore, we expected the coping foci to be related to people’s evaluations of their own personal situation (whether they produce a lot of CO2 or not and whether they see options for reducing their carbon footprint). We tested the hypotheses via path models in a sample of n = 603 German participants. The results showed that a pro-environmental orientation (a citizen’s perspective) was the strongest factor for acceptability. It also had a stronger influence on state- and action-orientated coping than people’s evaluations of their own carbon emissions and the options for reducing them. Furthermore, the state-oriented consumer focus seemed to be a stronger predictor of the acceptance of carbon pricing than the action-oriented consumer focus. Implications of the results for promoting climate policies such as carbon pricing and for addressing the aspects that correspond to the consumer’s perspective are discussed.

The present study examined the overall potential that the COVID-19 pandemic and its restrictions have for the promotion of climate-friendly food consumption in Germany. We looked at COVID-19-related changes in people’s climate-friendly food-consumption behaviors by comparing retrospectively self-reported performances between the time period in which the COVID-19 restrictions were in place and the pre-COVID-19 period. Furthermore, we examined the durability of such COVID-19-related changes with regard to an imagined post-COVID-19 period and the role of people’s personal climate-protection norms in COVID-19-related behavioral changes. To do so, we conducted two online surveys in June/July 2020 with German consumers: (a) an online study in a sample that was representative of the German population (NCOR1 = 3092) and (b) another online study in a smaller sample of German consumers (NCOR2 = 300). Altogether, the data from both surveys indicated several COVID-19-related changes toward more climate-friendly food consumption, not only during the COVID-19 pandemic and its restrictions, but also with regard to long-term changes in a potential post-COVID-19 period. Furthermore, our results also provide initial empirical evidence that people’s personal climate-protection norms are relevant moderating factors of these short- and long-term COVID-19-related behavioral changes.

This study attempts to identify the main drivers for e-car investments in households and organizations. We questioned 227 decision makers in households currently considering car purchases, and 101 decision makers in small businesses. The businesses were private care services, because their driving profiles widely fit the capabilities of modern e-cars. The main investment drivers were compared in an integrated action model involving elements of the theory of planned behavior and the norm-activation model, i.e., investment intentions, attitudes, personal (ecological) and social norms, and perceived behavioral control. For each group, different models were calculated in order to investigate the relevance of different types of social norms within the decision process, i.e., injunctive or descriptive norms. As expected, the household and organizational decisions were found to be based on different key factors: the decision makers in households mostly considered personal and descriptive social norms; the organizational decisions were mostly grounded in attitudes and injunctive social norms concerning staff expectations. The results suggest the need for tailored policy measures for each target group.