
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Table_2_Genetic Diversity, Structure and Effective Population Size of Old-Growth vs. Second-Growth Populations of Keystone and Long-Lived Conifer, Eastern White Pine (Pinus strobus): Conservation Value and Climate Adaptation Potential.pdf
Whether old-growth (OG) forests have higher genetic diversity and effective population size, consequently higher conservation value and climate adaptive potential than second-growth (SG) forests, remain an unresolved issue. We have tested the hypothesis that old-growth forest tree populations have higher genetic diversity, effective population size (N E ), climate adaptive potential and conservation value and lower genetic differentiation than second-growth forest tree populations, employing a keystone and long-lived conifer, eastern white pine (EWP; Pinus strobus). Genetic diversity and population structure of old-growth and second-growth populations of eastern white pine (EWP) were examined using microsatellites of the nuclear and chloroplast genomes and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in candidate nuclear genes putatively involved in adaptive responses to climate and underlying multilocus genetic architecture of local adaptation to climate in EWP. Old-growth and second-growth EWP populations had statistically similar genetic diversity, inbreeding coefficient and inter-population genetic differentiation based on nuclear microsatellites (nSSRs) and SNPs. However, old-growth populations had significantly higher chloroplast microsatellites (cpSSRs) haploid diversity than second-growth populations. Old-growth EWP populations had significantly higher coalescence-based historical long-term N E than second-growth EWP populations, but the linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based contemporary N E estimates were statistically similar between the old-growth and second-growth EWP populations. Analyses of population genetic structure and inter-population genetic relationships revealed some genetic constitution differences between the old-growth and second-growth EWP populations. Overall, our results suggest that old-growth and second-growth EWP populations have similar genetic resource conservation value. Because old-growth and second-growth EWP populations have similar levels of genetic diversity in genes putatively ...
580, Epigenetics (incl. Genome Methylation and Epigenomics), Genetically Modified Animals, Developmental Genetics (incl. Sex Determination), Livestock Cloning, genetic diversity and population structure, Genome Structure and Regulation, conservation value, Genomics, microsatellites, 333, old-growth and second-growth forests, climate change, Gene Expression (incl. Microarray and other genome-wide approaches), Genetics, SNPs in climate-responsive candidate genes, climate adaptive potential, Genetic Engineering, Biomarkers, Gene and Molecular Therapy, effective population size
580, Epigenetics (incl. Genome Methylation and Epigenomics), Genetically Modified Animals, Developmental Genetics (incl. Sex Determination), Livestock Cloning, genetic diversity and population structure, Genome Structure and Regulation, conservation value, Genomics, microsatellites, 333, old-growth and second-growth forests, climate change, Gene Expression (incl. Microarray and other genome-wide approaches), Genetics, SNPs in climate-responsive candidate genes, climate adaptive potential, Genetic Engineering, Biomarkers, Gene and Molecular Therapy, effective population size
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
