Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://dx.doi.org/1...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://dx.doi.org/10.25577/ss...
Collection . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Episode: 1995 Stimulation and Hydraulic Tests Soultz-sous-Forêts

Authors: Groupement Europeen D'interet Economique: Exploitation Miniere De La Chaleur De Soultz-Sous-Forets (GEIE EMC); Ecole Et Observatoire Des Sciences De La Terre (EOST);

Episode: 1995 Stimulation and Hydraulic Tests Soultz-sous-Forêts

Abstract

After drilling GPK2 an extensive hydraulic program was performed in 1995 to test the well and the circulation with GPK1. The main tests were realized during June, July and August 1995. It consisted first of two injection tests at GPK2 in June. The injection tests revealed that the injectivity was too low to consider circulation between the two wells GPK1 and GPK2. A short term and a long term stimulation experiments were also performed in June at GPK2 to stimulate the fracture network. A total of 28000 m3 of fluid was injected during the long term experiment. Following the stimulations, a stepped post-fracturing injection test was realized to observe the results of the stimulations. Finally, three relatively short circulation experiments were performed in July and August by using GPK1 as production borehole and GPK2 as reinjection borehole. Dates of the different tests of the 1995 hydraulic programme: - First injection test at GPK2: from 11:26 11/06/95 to 01:50 12/06/95 - Second injection test at GPK2: from 11:56 12/06/95 to 23:11 12/06/95 - Short term stimulation experiment at GPK2: from 20:00 14/06/95 to 01:27 15/06/95 - Long term stimulation experiment at GPK2: from 10:24 17/06/95 to 16:03 28/06/95 - Stepped post-fracturing injection test at GPK2: from 08:08 01/07/95 to 20:02 02/07/95 - First circulation test between GPK1 and GPK2: from 08:35 09/07/95 to 21:32 24/07/95 - Second circulation test between GPK1 and GPK2: from 13:09 31/07/95 to 19:04 09/08/95 - Third circulation test between GPK1 and GPK2: from 04:50 16/08/95 to 19:19 20/08/95

Keywords

Flow, Geohazards, Microseismic downhole network, Hydraulic, Geothermal energy, Micro-seismicity, Hydraulic Stimulation, Catalogue, Earth System Science, Seismology, Seismic hazard

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Energy Research