Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Catalytic effects of simulated biomass ashes on coal gasification characteristics and the transformation evolution during gasification process

Authors: Xiao, Li;

Catalytic effects of simulated biomass ashes on coal gasification characteristics and the transformation evolution during gasification process

Abstract

This paper focuses on the influence of key components in biomass ash on the gasification reactivity of coal by using simulated biomass ash. The migration patterns of typical biomass ash components and the structural evolution characteristics of coal during gasification process were deeply investigated. The results indicate that gasification temperature and Si element content are the key factors affecting gasification reactivity of coal. When the Si/K mass ratio is 0.5 and 1.0, gasification reactivity of the composite coal sample is stronger than that of raw coal, while the Si/K mass ratio is 1.5, gasification reactivity is weaker than that of raw coal. Under the experimental conditions, the composite coal sample with a Si/K mass ratio of 0.5 and a Ca/K mass ratio of 0.4 shows the strongest reactivity. The gasification reactivity index is 1.35 times higher than that of raw coal. Compared to potassium-containing minerals, calcium-containing minerals have stronger reactivity and are more likely to react with silicates to form calcium-containing silicates, such as calcium zeolites (CaO·Al2O3·2SiO2·4H2O), thereby avoiding the reaction between potassium-containing minerals and silicates to form non-catalytic minerals, which allows potassium to fully exert its catalytic effects. Dynamic analysis implies that shrinking core model well describes the gasification process of deashing coal catalyzed by simulated biomass ash. When the Si/K mass ratio is 0.5 and the Ca/K mass ratio is 0.4, the activation energy of composite coal sample is reduced to 174.39 kJ/mol, which is 14.32% lower than that of raw coal.

This paper focuses on the influence of key components in biomass ash on the gasification reactivity of coal by using simulated biomass ash. The migration patterns of typical biomass ash components and the structural evolution characteristics of coal during gasification process were deeply investigated. The results indicate that gasification temperature and Si element content are the key factors affecting gasification reactivity of coal. When the Si/K mass ratio is 0.5 and 1.0, gasification reactivity of the composite coal sample is stronger than that of raw coal, while the Si/K mass ratio is 1.5, gasification reactivity is weaker than that of raw coal. Under the experimental conditions, the composite coal sample with a Si/K mass ratio of 0.5 and a Ca/K mass ratio of 0.4 shows the strongest reactivity. The gasification reactivity index is 1.35 times higher than that of raw coal. Compared to potassium-containing minerals, calcium-containing minerals have stronger reactivity and are more likely to react with silicates to form calcium-containing silicates, such as calcium zeolites (CaO·Al2O3·2SiO2·4H2O), thereby avoiding the reaction between potassium-containing minerals and silicates to form non-catalytic minerals, which allows potassium to fully exert its catalytic effects. Dynamic analysis implies that shrinking core model well describes the gasification process of deashing coal catalyzed by simulated biomass ash. When the Si/K mass ratio is 0.5 and the Ca/K mass ratio is 0.4, the activation energy of composite coal sample is reduced to 174.39 kJ/mol, which is 14.32% lower than that of raw coal.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Chemical engineering, Coal, Biomass, FOS: Chemical engineering, Gasification

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Energy Research