• Energy Research
• other engineering and technologies close
• 13. Climate action close
• 1. No poverty close
• 14. Life underwater close
• AU close

Microalgae have tremendous potential for producing liquid renewable fuel. Many methods for converting microalgae to biofuel have been proposed; however, an economical and energetically feasible route for algal fuel production is yet to be found. This paper presents a review on the comparison of the most promising conversion pathways of microalgae to liquid fuel: hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), wet extraction and non-destructive extraction. The comparison is based on important assessment parameters of product quality and yield, nutrient recovery, GHG emissions, energy and the cost associated with the production of fuel from microalgae, in order to better understand the pros and cons of each method. It was found that the HTL pathway produces more oil than the wet extraction pathway; however, higher concentrations of unwanted components are present in the HTL oil produced. Less nutrients (N and P) can be recovered in HTL compared to wet extraction. HTL consumes more fossil energy and generates higher GHG emissions than wet extraction, while the production cost of fuel from HTL pathway is lower than wet extraction pathway. There is considerable uncertainty in the comparison of the energy consumption and economics of the HTL pathway and the wet extraction pathway due to different scenarios analysed in the assessment studies. To be able to appropriately compare methodologies, the conversion methods should be analysed from growth to upgradation of oil utilising sufficiently similar assumptions and scenarios. Based on the data in available literature, wet oil extraction is the more appropriate system for biofuel production than HTL. However, the potential of alternative extraction/conversion technologies, such as, non-destructive extraction, need to be further assessed.

Microalgae have tremendous potential for producing liquid renewable fuel. Many methods for converting microalgae to biofuel have been proposed; however, an economical and energetically feasible route for algal fuel production is yet to be found. This paper presents a review on the comparison of the most promising conversion pathways of microalgae to liquid fuel: hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), wet extraction and non-destructive extraction. The comparison is based on important assessment parameters of product quality and yield, nutrient recovery, GHG emissions, energy and the cost associated with the production of fuel from microalgae, in order to better understand the pros and cons of each method. It was found that the HTL pathway produces more oil than the wet extraction pathway; however, higher concentrations of unwanted components are present in the HTL oil produced. Less nutrients (N and P) can be recovered in HTL compared to wet extraction. HTL consumes more fossil energy and generates higher GHG emissions than wet extraction, while the production cost of fuel from HTL pathway is lower than wet extraction pathway. There is considerable uncertainty in the comparison of the energy consumption and economics of the HTL pathway and the wet extraction pathway due to different scenarios analysed in the assessment studies. To be able to appropriately compare methodologies, the conversion methods should be analysed from growth to upgradation of oil utilising sufficiently similar assumptions and scenarios. Based on the data in available literature, wet oil extraction is the more appropriate system for biofuel production than HTL. However, the potential of alternative extraction/conversion technologies, such as, non-destructive extraction, need to be further assessed.

In recent years, sustainability concerns have gained increasing attention among countries and stakeholders worldwide. Towards the transition to sustainable rural development, the rural web framework (RWF) has become a consistent tool. Indicators from the RWF have been used to explore sustainable rural development for decision-making tasks, which improves the social, economic, and environmental performance of rural regions. However, the application of the RWF in studies is on the decline. Furthermore, there is a lack of literature reviews on the importance of the RWF and its relationship with different facets of sustainable development. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) (a) to explore how studies have used the RWF in the context of sustainable development and (b) to identify areas for further research. This study found that the RWF has mostly been used in developed countries, with fewer applications in developing countries. We suggest that there should be increased application of the RWF, particularly in developing countries, to broaden the rural web–sustainable development discourse and its relevance. This paper presents several areas where the indicators of the RWF can be applied to illustrate their relevance for policy decisions towards the achievement of the sustainable development goals (SDGs).

In recent years, sustainability concerns have gained increasing attention among countries and stakeholders worldwide. Towards the transition to sustainable rural development, the rural web framework (RWF) has become a consistent tool. Indicators from the RWF have been used to explore sustainable rural development for decision-making tasks, which improves the social, economic, and environmental performance of rural regions. However, the application of the RWF in studies is on the decline. Furthermore, there is a lack of literature reviews on the importance of the RWF and its relationship with different facets of sustainable development. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) (a) to explore how studies have used the RWF in the context of sustainable development and (b) to identify areas for further research. This study found that the RWF has mostly been used in developed countries, with fewer applications in developing countries. We suggest that there should be increased application of the RWF, particularly in developing countries, to broaden the rural web–sustainable development discourse and its relevance. This paper presents several areas where the indicators of the RWF can be applied to illustrate their relevance for policy decisions towards the achievement of the sustainable development goals (SDGs).

Abstract This study evaluates the performance of 75 clear-sky global irradiance models against 75 ground stations worldwide covering five major Koppen-Geiger climate classifications and overall global performance. After quality control, clear-sky detection and data-availability criteria, there are 4.36 million 1-min valid global horizontal irradiance (GHI) data points for evaluation. This study represents the most encompassing evaluation of its kind in terms of number of models assessed, number of ground stations used, most consistent selection of input variables in terms of temporal and spatial resolution, also using the most rigorous and fair performance assessment criteria and suitable ranking system. A statistically rigorous Principal Component Analysis (PCA) ranking procedure is proposed to replace the conventional ordering method based on single and simple statistics. In particular, it is demonstrated that all 13 error metrics contribute to the variance of GHI estimation and thus must all be accounted for in the ranking procedure. The best performing models in each climate zone of equatorial, arid, temperate, cold and polar are REST2v9.1, REST2v9.1, MAC2, REST2v5 and CLS, respectively. Globally, the top three performing models are MAC2, REST2v5, and REST2v9.1. Many models appear to suffer from over-fitting empirical relationships to training data, resulting in inconsistent worldwide performance. Furthermore, six different formulations of the Linke Turbidity factor (TL) are evaluated through its application to five clear-sky models that require it as an input. The best globally performing TL formulations are either by Ineichen or Gueymard when combined with four of the five Linke-dependent clear-sky models, whilst the Grenier formulation performs best with the Ineichen & Perez model. Significant performance variation is observed depending on the TL formulation selected, hence, careful selection is required for an optimal application. The model codes are available in R [1].

Abstract This study evaluates the performance of 75 clear-sky global irradiance models against 75 ground stations worldwide covering five major Koppen-Geiger climate classifications and overall global performance. After quality control, clear-sky detection and data-availability criteria, there are 4.36 million 1-min valid global horizontal irradiance (GHI) data points for evaluation. This study represents the most encompassing evaluation of its kind in terms of number of models assessed, number of ground stations used, most consistent selection of input variables in terms of temporal and spatial resolution, also using the most rigorous and fair performance assessment criteria and suitable ranking system. A statistically rigorous Principal Component Analysis (PCA) ranking procedure is proposed to replace the conventional ordering method based on single and simple statistics. In particular, it is demonstrated that all 13 error metrics contribute to the variance of GHI estimation and thus must all be accounted for in the ranking procedure. The best performing models in each climate zone of equatorial, arid, temperate, cold and polar are REST2v9.1, REST2v9.1, MAC2, REST2v5 and CLS, respectively. Globally, the top three performing models are MAC2, REST2v5, and REST2v9.1. Many models appear to suffer from over-fitting empirical relationships to training data, resulting in inconsistent worldwide performance. Furthermore, six different formulations of the Linke Turbidity factor (TL) are evaluated through its application to five clear-sky models that require it as an input. The best globally performing TL formulations are either by Ineichen or Gueymard when combined with four of the five Linke-dependent clear-sky models, whilst the Grenier formulation performs best with the Ineichen & Perez model. Significant performance variation is observed depending on the TL formulation selected, hence, careful selection is required for an optimal application. The model codes are available in R [1].

Abstract In Australia, the government spending on public buildings’ energy and water consumption is considerable; however the building energy and water retrofit market potential has been diminished by a number of barriers, especially financial. In contrast, in other advanced economies there are several reported financing strategies that have been shown to accelerate retrofit projects implementation. In this study, a coupled Bayesian Network – System Dynamics model was developed with the core aim to assess the likely influence of those novel financing options and procurement procedures on public building retrofit outcomes scenarios in the Australian context. A particular case-study focusing on Australian public hospitals was showcased as an example in this paper. Stakeholder engagement was utilised to estimate likely preferences and to conceptualise causal relationships of model parameters. The scenario modelling showed that a revolving loan fund supporting an energy performance contracting procurement procedure was preferred. Subsequently, the specific features of this preferred framework were optimised to yield the greatest number of viable retrofit projects over the long term. The results indicated that such a financing scheme would lead to substantial abatement of energy and water consumption, as well as carbon emissions. The strategic scenario analysis approach developed herein provides evidence-based support to policy-makers advocating novel financing and procurement models for addressing a government’s sustainability agenda in a financially responsible and net-positive manner.