• Energy Research
• DE close
• IT close
• ES close
• English close

Vegetation surveys were carried out in four different study areas in the Sakha Republic, Russia: in the mountainous region of the Verkhoyansk Range within the Oymyakonsky and Tomponsky District (Event EN21-201 - EN21-219), and in three lowland regions of Central Yakutia within the Churapchinsky, Tattinsky and the Megino-Kangalassky District (Event EN21220 - EN21264). The study area is located within the boreal forest biome that is underlain by permafrost soils. The aim was to record the projective ground vegetation in different boreal forest types studied during the RU-Land_2021_Yakutia summer field campaign in August and September 2021.Ground vegetation was surveyed for different vegetation types within a circular forest plot of 15m radius. Depending on the heterogeneity of the forest plot, multiple vegetation types (VA, VB, or VC) were chosen for the survey. The assignment of a vegetation type is always unique to a site. Their cover on the circular forest plot was recorded in percent.In total, 84 vegetation types at 58 forest plots were assessed. All data were collected by scientists form the Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (AWI) Germany, the University of Potsdam Germany, and the North-Easter Federal University of Yakutsk (NEFU) Russia.

Soubor primárnich dat klimatických charakteristik a izotopových poměrů uhlíku v letokruzích dubů podél výškového gradientu v letech 1961-2020. Jedná se o primární výchozí data k publikaci Pernicová et al. (2024) Impacts of elevated CO2 levels and temperature on photosynthesis and stomatal closure along an altitudinal gradient are counteracted by the rising atmospheric vapor pressure deficit, který byl publikován v časopise Science of the Total Environment (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171173). A primary dataset of climate characteristics and carbon isotopic ratios in oak tree rings along an altitudinal gradient in 1961-2020. This dataset contains primary values used in the publication Pernicová et al. (2024) Impacts of elevated CO2 levels and temperature on photosynthesis and stomatal closure along an altitudinal gradient are counteracted by the rising atmospheric vapor pressure deficit, published in the journal Science of the Total Environment (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171173).

Humanity’s role in changing the face of the earth is a long-standing concern, as is the human domination of ecosystems. Geologists are debating the introduction of a new geological epoch, the ‘anthropocene’, as humans are ‘overwhelming the great forces of nature’. In this context, the accumulation of artefacts, i.e., human-made physical objects, is a pervasive phenomenon. Variously dubbed ‘manufactured capital’, ‘technomass’, ‘human-made mass’, ‘in-use stocks’ or ‘socioeconomic material stocks’, they have become a major focus of sustainability sciences in the last decade. Globally, the mass of socioeconomic material stocks now exceeds 10e14 kg, which is roughly equal to the dry-matter equivalent of all biomass on earth. It is doubling roughly every 20 years, almost perfectly in line with ‘real’ (i.e. inflation-adjusted) GDP. In terms of mass, buildings and infrastructures (here collectively called ‘built structures’) represent the overwhelming majority of all socioeconomic material stocks. This dataset features a detailed map of material stocks in the CONUS on a 10m grid based on high resolution Earth Observation data (Sentinel-1 + Sentinel-2), crowd-sourced geodata (OSM) and material intensity factors. Spatial extent This subdataset covers the West Coast CONUS, i.e. CA OR WA For the remaining CONUS, see the related identifiers. Temporal extent The map is representative for ca. 2018. Data format The data are organized by states. Within each state, data are split into 100km x 100km tiles (EQUI7 grid), and mosaics are provided. Within each tile, images for area, volume, and mass at 10m spatial resolution are provided. Units are m², m³, and t, respectively. Each metric is split into buildings, other, rail and street (note: In the paper, other, rail, and street stocks are subsumed to mobility infrastructure). Each category is further split into subcategories (e.g. building types). Additionally, a grand total of all stocks is provided at multiple spatial resolutions and units, i.e. t at 10m x 10m kt at 100m x 100m Mt at 1km x 1km Gt at 10km x 10km For each state, mosaics of all above-described data are provided in GDAL VRT format, which can readily be opened in most Geographic Information Systems. File paths are relative, i.e. DO NOT change the file structure or file naming. Additionally, the grand total mass per state is tabulated for each county in mass_grand_total_t_10m2.tif.csv. County FIPS code and the ID in this table can be related via FIPS-dictionary_ENLOCALE.csv. Material layers Note that material-specific layers are not included in this repository because of upload limits. Only the totals are provided (i.e. the sum over all materials). However, these can easily be derived by re-applying the material intensity factors from (see related identifiers): A. Baumgart, D. Virág, D. Frantz, F. Schug, D. Wiedenhofer, Material intensity factors for buildings, roads and rail-based infrastructure in the United States. Zenodo (2022), doi:10.5281/zenodo.5045337. Further information For further information, please see the publication. A web-visualization of this dataset is available here. Visit our website to learn more about our project MAT_STOCKS - Understanding the Role of Material Stock Patterns for the Transformation to a Sustainable Society. Publication D. Frantz, F. Schug, D. Wiedenhofer, A. Baumgart, D. Virág, S. Cooper, C. Gomez-Medina, F. Lehmann, T. Udelhoven, S. van der Linden, P. Hostert, H. Haberl. Weighing the US Economy: Map of Built Structures Unveils Patterns in Human-Dominated Landscapes. In prep Funding This research was primarly funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (MAT_STOCKS, grant agreement No 741950). Workflow development was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—Project-ID 414984028-SFB 1404. Acknowledgments We thank the European Space Agency and the European Commission for freely and openly sharing Sentinel imagery; USGS for the National Land Cover Database; Microsoft for Building Footprints; Geofabrik and all contributors for OpenStreetMap.This dataset was partly produced on EODC - we thank Clement Atzberger for supporting the generation of this dataset by sharing disc space on EODC.

Data files included: 1\) all.pres_global.csv: is a classic plot (on rows) x species (in column) dataset of presences for all alien species recorded at the global scale. These contain the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and European Vegetation Archive (EVA) presences of alien species recorded globally in the global buffer. Columns correspond to: * source: can be either GBIF or EVA, depending on the original dataset from which data are sourced * Longitude\Latitude: two columns to georeference plots, coordinates in geographic WGS 84 * cells: a unique identifier shared among all the datasets to identify the raster cell to which all other columns refer * 93 columns of species names: these columns display 1 if the corresponding alien species have been found in the corresponding cell, and 0 if at least one other alien species has been found in the same cell. In this case, 0 does not correspond to absences but should be interpreted as a table filler * 7 columns for the environmental variables: these represent the environmental variables extracted for the relevant cells in which at least one alien species was observed. Variable names match the original ones, refer to ly.names.def.csv for a more intuitive description 2\) all.pres_regional.csv: is a classic plot (on rows) x species (in column) dataset of presences for all alien species recorded at the local/regional scale, i.e., in Mediterranean Europe. These contain the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and European Vegetation Archive (EVA) presence of alien species in the regional buffer. Columns correspond to: * source: can be either GBIF or EVA, depending on the original dataset from which data are sourced * Longitude\Latitude: two columns to georeference plots, coordinates in geographic WGS 84 * cells: a unique identifier shared among all the datasets to identify the raster cell to which all other columns refer * 93 columns of species names: these columns display 1 if the corresponding alien species have been found in the corresponding cell, and 0 if at least one other alien species has been found in the same cell. In this case, 0 does not correspond to absences but should be interpreted as a table filler * 7 columns for the environmental variables: these represent the environmental variables extracted for the relevant cells in which at least one alien species was observed. Variable names match the original ones, refer to ly.names.def.csv for a more intuitive description 3\) ly.names.def.csv: is a character vector file (just one row) to define intuitive names of the environmental variables. 4\) Global_BKG.csv: represents all background points used to fit the global model. These were used to extract three sets of background points, after weithging by the regional sampling intensity. Columns correspond to: * Longitude\Latitude: two columns to georeference plots, coordinates in geographic WGS 84 * EVA_Nr._plots: the number of sampled EVA plots in the corresponding cell * cells: a unique identifier shared among all the datasets to identify the raster cell to which all other columns refer * GBIF_Nr._plots: the number of sampled GBIF plots in the corresponding cell. The two cell's number (i.e., EVA_Nr._plots and GBIF_Nr._plots) were summed and used to weigh absences (only once for all species) that were then used to randomly extract the three background point samples in the global background * 7 columns for the environmental variables: these represent the environmental variables extracted for the relevant cells in which at least one alien species was observed. Variable names match the original ones, refer to ly.names.def.csv for a more intuitive description 5\) Local_BKG.csv: represents all background points used to fit the local/regional model. These were used to extract three sets of background points, after weithging by the regional sampling intensity. Columns correspond to: * Longitude\Latitude: two columns to georeference plots, coordinates in geographic WGS 84 * EVA_Nr._plots: the number of sampled EVA plots in the corresponding cell * cells: a unique identifier shared among all the datasets to identify the raster cell to which all other columns refer * GBIF_Nr._plots: the number of sampled GBIF plots in the corresponding cell . The two cells (i.e., EVA_Nr._plots and GBIF_Nr._plots) were summed and used to weight absences (only once for all species) that were then used to randomly extract the three background point samples in the local/regional background * 7 columns for the environmental variables: these represent the environmental variables extracted for the relevant cells in which at least one alien species was observed. Variable names match the original ones, refer to ly.names.def.csv for a more intuitive description 6\) myexpl.var30... : by their extended name, represent the environmental variables used to project the model in the current and future environmental conditions of Mediterranean Europe. This is a raster stack and each layer name is defined by the file ly.names.def.csv, which order is matched. 7\) Distance_to_cities: is a raster file that can be uploaded in R using the raster (function), and represents a cellwise distance to the major cities. 8\) Distance_to_coast: is a raster file that can be uploaded in R using the raster (function), and represents a cellwise distance to the European coastline. 9\) Distance_to_ports: is a raster file that can be uploaded in R using the raster (function), and represents a cellwise distance to the major European ports. These are the raw data that can be used to reproduce results of the paper: "Plant invasion in Mediterranean Europe: current invasion hotspots and future scenarios". The Mediterranean Basin has historically been subject to alien plant invasions that threaten its unique biodiversity. This seasonally dry and densely populated region is undergoing severe climatic and socioeconomic changes, and it is unclear whether these changes will worsen or mitigate plant invasions. Predictions are often biased, as species may not be in equilibrium in the invaded environment, depending on their invasion stage and ecological characteristics. To address future predictions uncertainty, we identified invasion hotspots across multiple biased modelling scenarios and ecological characteristics of successful invaders. We selected 92 alien plant species widespread in Mediterranean Europe and compiled data on their distribution in the Mediterranean and worldwide. We combined these data with environmental and propagule pressure variables to model global and regional species niches and map their current and future habitat suitability. We identified invasion hotspots, examined their potential future shifts, and compared the results of different modelling strategies. Finally, we generalised our findings by using linear models to determine the traits and biogeographic features of invaders most likely to benefit from global change. Currently, invasion hotspots are found near ports and coastlines throughout Mediterranean Europe. However, many species occupy only a small portion of the environmental conditions to which they are preadapted, suggesting that their invasion is still an ongoing process. Future conditions will lead to declines in many currently widespread aliens, which will tend to move to higher elevations and latitudes. Our trait models indicate that future climates will generally favour species with conservative ecological strategies that can cope with reduced water availability, such as those with short stature and low specific leaf area. Taken together, our results suggest that in future environments, these conservative aliens will move farther from the introduction areas and upslope, threatening mountain ecosystems that have been spared from invasions so far. With these data (environmental variables, species presences and background points, and distance to ports cities and to the coast) and using the R software following the ODMAP protocol attached to the original paper all results meet the criteria of reproducible science. Datasets from the EVA and GBIF were processed following the Material and Methods section of the paper, to derive the attached files of regional and global presences and background points. The environmental variables used were processed as explained in the paper. Files of distances to the cities, ports and coast were elaborated from the raw data downloadable as reported in the data availability statement. The data is in .csv format and can be read by any text editor file. We recommend their usage in R. To reproduce analyses please use Biomod 2 R package. 

This file contains the raw dataset used in the manuscript "Tailored Nanoscale Plasmon-Enhanced Vibrational Electron Spectroscopy" published in L. H. G. Tizei et al Nano Letters, 2020 (doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04659) Data has been acquired using Nion Swift (https://nionswift.readthedocs.io/en/stable/). Experimental details can be found in L. H. G. Tizei et al Nano Letters, 2020 (doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04659). The dataset has been analyzed using the following Python libraries: Numpy, Scipy, Hyperspy, Matplotlib EELS hyperspectral images have been aligned using the Hyperspy "align1D" method. Aligned EELS hyperspectral images are saved in files finished with "_Aligned.hspy": For the strong coupling experiments: Tip 1 is on hBN Tip 2 is on vacuum For each of the nanowires tips, a file with the fitted coefficients are available, as well as a plot of the data and the fitted curve. Datasets have been fitted with gaussian and/or lorentizan functions, as described in the published text. Any question can be forwarded to the corresponding authors of the published text. Other funding: 1) National Agency for Researchunder the program of future investment TEMPOS-CHROMATEM (reference no. ANR-10-EQPX-50); 2) Spanish MINECO (MAT2017-88492-R and SEV2015-0522); 3) the Catalan CERCA Program; 4) Fundació Privada Celle;

# Bird\_breeding\_productivity\_data [https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.fxpnvx0zt](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.fxpnvx0zt) This folder contains data sets (**Bird_prod_data.csv, Clim_mean_prod_lin.csv, Clim_mean_prod_poly.csv, Clim_trend_PCA_prod_lin.csv, Clim_trend_PCA_prod_poly.csv**), models (.rds files; see below for their naming scheme) and code (**R-script_bird_prod.R**) related to the article: *Climatic predictors of long-distance migratory birds’ breeding productivity across Europe* ## Description of the data and file structure The data is stored in subfolder "Data" **Bird_prod_data.csv** * *Reg*: breeding region; CZP = the Czech Republic, DEG-DKC = Germany and Denmark, ESP = Spain, FRP_N = northern part of France, FRP_S = central & southern part of France, GBT_N = northern parts of Great Britain – Wales and England, Scotland, Northern Ireland – and Ireland, GBT_S = southern parts of Great Britain – England and Wales, HGB = Hungary, NLA = the Netherlands, SFH = Finland, SVS = Sweden - *EURING*: species code * *Year*: year corresponding to breeding season - *Species*: species name (see also Table 3 in the article) * *Site*: site code - *Ad*: number of adults * *Juv*: number of juveniles - *TotalEPR*: water availability in wintering grounds (called ETr in the article) * *Ad_scaled*: Number of adults standardized to mean = 0 and SD = 1 for each species and site - *T3, T4, T5, T6*: temperature in March, April, May, June * *GDD10_3, GDD10_4, GDD10_5, GDD10_6*: growing degree-days in March, April, May, June - *GOD*: green-up onset date * *Rain_anom_3, Rain_anom_4, Rain_anom_5, Rain_anom_6*: precipitation anomaly in March, April, May, June, abbreviated as ΔR in the article - *R10_5, R10_6*: number of heavy rain days in May, June * *R20_5, R20_6*: number of very heavy rain days in May, June - *R1c_5, R1c_6*: number of consecutive rain days 1mm in May, June * *R2c_5, R2c_6*: number of consecutive rain days 2mm in May, June **Clim_mean_prod_lin.csv** * *reg*: breeding region - *clim_var*: abbreviation of climate variable * *mean_val*: mean value of the climate variable - *Est_prod_lin*: estimate of the linear term in the relationship between breeding productivity and climate variable * *SE_prod_lin*: standard error of the estimate of the linear term in the relationship between breeding productivity and climate variable **Clim_mean_prod_poly.csv** * *reg*: breeding region - *clim_var*: abbreviation of climate variable * *mean_val*: mean value of the climate variable - *Est_prod_poly*: estimate of the quadratic term in the relationship between breeding productivity and climate variable * *SE_prod_poly*: standard error of the estimate of the quadratic term in the relationship between breeding productivity and climate variable **Clim_trend_PCA_prod_lin.csv** * *reg*: breeding region - *clim_change*: climate warming variable derived from the first axis of PCA (Principal Component Analysis), for months of March, April, May, June * *Est_trend*: slope of the linear temporal trend of climate warming variable over the study period **Clim_trend_PCA_prod_poly.csv** * reg: breeding region - clim_change: climate warming variable derived from the first axis of PCA (Principal Component Analysis), for months of March, April, May, June * Est_trend: slope of the quadratic temporal trend of climate warming variable over the study period Fitted models (88 files) are stored in subfolder "Models" Naming scheme of the models is: **Hyp2 or Hyp3**: models for testing Hypothesis 2 or Hypothesis 3, respectively **resp1 or resp2**: response variable of the model was derived from the relationship between breeding productivity and the linear term of the climate variable (i.e. *Est_prod_lin*, see above in Clim_mean_prod_lin.csv) or the quadratic term of the climate variable (i.e. *Est_prod_poly*, see above in Clim_mean_prod_poly.csv), respectively **lin or poly**: models employ linear or polynomial (quadratic) terms of climate variables, respectively **T, GDD10, ΔR, GOD**: climate variables used in testing Hypothesis 2 or Hypothesis 3, i.e. temperature, growing degree-days, precipitation anomaly, and green-up onset date, respectively **3, 4, 5, 6**: months of March, April, May, or June **warm_PCA1** (for Hypothesis 3 only): climate warming variable was derived from the first axis of PCA (Principal Component Analysis), suffixes 3, 4, 5 or 6 means months of March, April, May, and June ## Code/Software The code file "R-script_bird_prod.R" is an R script created by version 4.3.1, allowing to run all our analyses. It consists of the following parts: * loading the libraries * loading the data set Bird_prod_data.csv and preparing the variables for testing Hypothesis 1 * fitting the models for testing Hypothesis 1 * performing the model averaging * extraction of the marginal effects of climate variables * calculation of the temporal variance explained by climate variables * loading the data sets Clim_mean_prod_lin.csv and Clim_mean_prod_poly.csv and preparing the variables for testing Hypothesis 2 * fitting the models for testing Hypothesis 2 * extraction of parameters from the fitted models * loading the data sets Clim_trend_PCA_prod_lin.csv and Clim_trend_PCA_prod_poly.csv and preparing the variables for testing Hypothesis 3 * fitting the models for testing Hypothesis 3 * extraction of parameters from the fitted models Ongoing climate changes represent a major determinant of demographic processes in many organisms worldwide. Birds, and especially long-distance migrants, are particularly sensitive to such changes. To better understand these impacts on long-distance migrants’ breeding productivity, we tested three hypotheses focused on (i) the shape of the relationships with different climate variables, including previously rarely tested quadratic responses, and on regional differences in these relationships predicted by (ii) mean climatic conditions and (iii) by the rate of climate change in respective regions ranging from Spain to Finland. We calculated breeding productivity from constant effort ringing sites from 11 European countries covering 34 degrees of latitude, and extracted temperature- and precipitation-related climate variables from E-OBS and NASA MODIS datasets. To test our hypotheses, we fitted GLMM and Bayesian meta-analytic models. We revealed hump-shaped responses of productivity to temperature, growing degree-days, green-up onset date, and precipitation anomaly, and negative responses to intense and prolonged rains across the regions. The effects of March temperature and April growing degree-days were more negative in cold than in warm regions, except that one with the highest accumulated heat, whereas increasing June precipitation anomalies were associated with higher productivity in both dry and wet regions. The rate of climate warming was unrelated to productivity responses to climate. The influence of climate on bird productivity proved to be frequently non-linear, as expected by ecological theory. To explain the differences between regions, the rate of climate change is less important than regional interannual variability in climate (which is predicted to increase), but this may change with the progression of climate change in the future. Productivity declines in long-distance migratory songbirds are particularly expected if out-of-norm water excess increases in frequency or strength.

Global warming and direct anthropogenic impacts, such as water extraction, are largely affecting water budgets in Mediterranean wetlands, thereby increasing wetland salinities and isolation, and decreasing water depths and hydroperiods (duration of the inundation period). These wetland features are key elements structuring waterbird communities. However, the ultimate and net consequences of these dynamic conditions on waterbird assemblages are largely unknown. We combined a regular sampling on waterbird presence through the 2008 annual cycle with in-situ data on these relevant environmental predictors of waterbird distribution to model habitat selection for 69 individual species in a typical Mediterranean wetland network in south-western Spain. Species association with environmental features were subsequently used to predict changes in habitat suitability for each species under three climate change scenarios (encompassing changes in environment that ranged from 10% to 50% change as predicted by climatic models). Waterbirds distributed themselves unevenly throughout environmental gradients and water salinity was the most important gradient structuring the distribution of the community. Environmental suitability for the guilds of diving birds and vegetation gleaners will be reduced according to future climate scenarios, while most small wading birds will benefit from changing conditions. Resident species and those that breed in this wetland network will be also more impacted than those using this area for wintering or stopover. We provide here a tool that can be used in a horizon-scanning framework to identify emerging issues on waterbird conservation and to anticipate suitable management actions : Datasets as supporting information to article “How will climate change affect endangered Mediterranean waterbirds?” to be published in PLOS ONE. Address questions to Francisco Ramírez: ramirez@ub.edu

In the agricultural sector, climate change (CC) affects multiple weather variables at different stages of crop cycles. CC may influence the mean level or affect the distribution of events (e.g., rainfall, temperature). This work evaluates the economic impact of CC-related changes in multiple climatic components, and the resulting uncertainty. For this purpose, a three-stage discrete stochastic programming model is used to represents farm sector of an irrigated area of Italy and to examine the influence of CC on rainfall and on maximum temperature. These variables affect the availability of water for agriculture and the water requirements of irrigated crops. The states of nature, and their change, are defined more broadly than in previous analyses; this allows examining the changes of more climatic variables and crops cultivation. The effect of CC is obtained by comparing the results of scenarios that represent the climatic conditions in the current situation and in the future. The results show that the agricultural sector would seek to lower costs by modifying patterns of land use, farming practices and increasing the use groundwater. The overall economic impact of these changes is small and due primarily to the reduced availability of water in the future. The temperature increase is, in fact, largely offset by the effects of the increase in CO2 levels, which boosts the yield of main crops of the irrigated zone. Therefore, availability and water management becomes a crucial factor to offset the increase of evapotranspiration and of water stress resulting from the increase of temperature. However, the costs of CC are very high for some types of farming, which suffer a large reduction in income.