• Energy Research
• EU close
• GB close
• ZENODO close

# Data on: Projecting spatiotemporal dynamics of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in the mainland of China [https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vdncjsz1z](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vdncjsz1z) This dataset is the data used in the paper of Global change biology entitled "Projecting spatiotemporal dynamics of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in the mainland of China". We use an integrated multi-model, multi-scenario framework to assess the impact of global climate change on SFTS disease in the mainland of China. ## Description of the data and file structure The predicted annual incidence of national SFTS cases with or without human population reduction under four RCPs under different climate change scenarios (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5) in the 2030s, 2050s, and 2080s. The value represents the annual incidence, and the unit is 105/year. The Dataset-1 file includes the predicted annual incidence of national SFTS cases with a fixed future human population under different climate change scenarios (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5) in the 2030s, 2050s, and 2080s. The Dataset-2 file includes the predicted annual incidence of national SFTS cases in the 2030s, 2050s, and 2080s with human population reduction (SSP2) under four RCPs. ## Sharing/Access information Data was derived from the following sources: * https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16969 This dataset is the data used in the paper of Global change biology entitled "Projecting spatiotemporal dynamics of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in the mainland of China". We use an integrated multi-model, multi-scenario framework to assess the impact of global climate change on SFTS disease in the mainland of China. The SFTS incidence in three time periods (2030-2039, 2050-2059, 2080-2089) is predicted to be increased as compared to the 2010s in the context of various RCPs. The projected spatiotemporal dynamics of SFTS will be heterogeneous across provinces. Notably, we predict possible outbreaks in Xinjiang and Yunnan in the future, where only sporadic cases have been reported previously. These findings highlight the need for population awareness of SFTS in endemic regions, and enhanced monitoring in potential risk areas.  See the Materials and methods section in the original paper. The code used in the statistical analyses are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.

Variable list for files: SW wind - Section table on Skomer (Standardised).csv / NW wind - Section table on Skomer (Standardised).csv / SE wind - Section table on Skomer (Standardised).csv /NE wind - Section table on Skomer (Standardised).csv and SW wind - Sections on Skokholm (Standardised).csv FID: Row ID (for use in ArcGIs) Count: Number of guillemots per section Area: Total area of each section () Density: Density of guillemots per section (number of birds/ Area) X_Centre: X coordinate of the central point of each section Y_Centre: Y coordinate of the central point of each section Sector: Section ID MeanUMedian; MeanUIQR, MeanUSkewness, MeanUCV: Median, interquartile range,skewness and coefficient of variation of mean wind speed per section HorizontalMedian;HorizontalIQR,HorizontalSkewness,HorizontalCV: Median, interquartile range,skewness and coefficient of variation of horizontal wind speed per section PMedian;PIQR,PSkewness,PCV: Median, interquartile range,skewness and coefficient of variation of preessure per section TKEMedian;TKEIQR,TKESkewness,TKECV: Median, interquartile range,skewness and coefficient of variation of turbulent kinetic energy per section TIMedian;TIIQR,TISkewness,TICV: Median, interquartile range,skewness and coefficient of variation of turbulence intensity per section U_2Median;lU_2IQR;U_2Skewness;U_2CV: Median, interquartile range,skewness and coefficient of variation of vertical wind speed per section EpsilonMedian;EpsilonIQR,EpsilonSkewness,EpsilonCV: Median, interquartile range,skewness and coefficient of variation of turbulent dissipation rate per section NutMedian;NutIQR,NutSkewness,NutCV: Median, interquartile range,skewness and coefficient of variation of kinematic viscosity per section GustsMedian;GustsIQR,GustsSkewness,GustsCV: Median, interquartile range,skewness and coefficient of variation of instataneous gusts per section MeanSectorSlope: Mean slope per section ColPresence: Binomial variable, indicating whether a section has birds or not. This variable varies with classification, based on either the count of birds or the density per section Variable list for file: Section table on Skomer - with Mean cliff orientation and Slope (NOT-Standardised).csv FID: Row ID (for use in ArcGIs) Count: Number of guillemots per section Area: Total area of each section () Density: Density of guillemots per section (number of birds/ Area) X_Centre: X coordinate of the central point of each section Y_Centre: Y coordinate of the central point of each section Sector: Section ID MeanSectorSlope: Mean slope per section MeanSectorAspectCircular: Mean cliff orientation per section ApsectClass: Factor indicating whether the mean cliff orientation is lee- or windward to the SW wind ColPresence: Binomial variable, indicating whether a section has birds or not. This variable varies with classification, based on either the count of birds or the density per section Variable list for file: SW wind - Sections on Skokholm to predict colonies using cliff orientation and slope model from Skomer (NON - Standardised).csv FID: Row ID (for use in ArcGIs) Count: Number of guillemots per section Area: Total area of each section () Density: Density of guillemots per section (number of birds/ Area) Sector: Section ID MeanSectorSlope: Mean slope per section MeanSectorAspectCircular: Mean cliff orientation per section Wind is fundamentally related to shelter and flight performance: two factors that are critical for birds at their nest sites. Despite this, airflows have never been fully integrated into models of breeding habitat selection, even for well-studied seabirds. Here we use computational fluid dynamics to provide the first assessment of whether flow characteristics (including wind speed and turbulence) predict the distribution of seabird colonies, taking common guillemots (Uria aalge) breeding on Skomer island as our study system. This demonstrates that occupancy is driven by the need to shelter from both wind and rain/ wave action, rather than airflow characteristics alone. Models of airflows and cliff orientation both performed well in predicting high quality habitat in our study site, identifying 80% of colonies and 93% of avoided sites, as well as 73% of the largest colonies on a neighbouring island. This suggests generality in the mechanisms driving breeding distributions, and provides an approach for identifying habitat for seabird reintroductions considering current and projected wind speeds and directions. Methods detailed in manuscript: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05733.

Data type: Experimental measurements, correlations and Van't Hoff plot. Date format: .opj. Origin of the data: Experimental pressure composition isotherm measurements. Data generated by a home-made Sieverts’ type apparatus from CNRS, ICMPE, Thiais, France. Software needed to plot the data: Origin.

The zipped file of this repository contains code and data to reproduce the results of the publication: Kotz et al, Nature, The effect of rainfall changes on economic production. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04283-8 Economic data are derived from the DoSE database: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4681305 Climate data are derived from the ERA-5 reanalysis: https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/reanalysis-datasets/era5 Please see the README document for detailed: - Descriptions of the code and data provided - Lists of the required dependencies - Naming conventions for variables

Description: Leaf and invertebrate biomass in streams Project: This dataset was collected as part of the following SAFE research project: A preliminary study of the allochthonous inputs into tropical streams across a land use gradient in Sabah, Malaysia XML metadata: GEMINI compliant metadata for this dataset is available here Data worksheets: There are 2 data worksheets in this dataset: Insects (Worksheet Insects) Dimensions: 23 rows by 11 columns Description: Insect capture rates Fields: Location: SAFE project riparian site (Field type: Location) Stream: SAFE project stream (Field type: ID) Repeat: sample number for that stream (Field type: ID) Total Mass of Insects (g): the total dried mass of insects collected for each of the repeats (Field type: Numeric) Total Insects: the total number of insects collected in each repeat (Field type: Abundance) Hymenoptera: the total number of hymenoptera in each repeat (Field type: Abundance) Diptera: the total number of diptera in each repeat (Field type: Abundance) Coleoptera: the total number of coleoptera in each repeat (Field type: Abundance) Other.Insect: the grouped total of Hemiptera, Thysanoptera, Orthoptera, Blattodea, Trichoptera, Mantodea, Ephemeroptera, Dermaptera for each repeat (Field type: Abundance) Other: the grouped total of Arachnida, Entognatha, Diplopoda, Chilopoda for each repeat (Field type: Abundance) Hydrology (Worksheet Hydrology) Dimensions: 60 rows by 17 columns Description: River characteristics and litter quantities Fields: Location: SAFE project riparian site (Field type: Location) Stream Code: The stream from which the sample was taken (LFE, 15m, 30m, VJR or OP) (Field type: ID) Transect No.: The point of each sample within the 100m transect at each stream (Field type: ID) Channel Width: The bank full width of the channel at this point (Field type: Numeric) Wetted Width: The width of the runnin water at this point (Field type: Numeric) SAFE Habitat Quality Right: the SAFE Habitat quality on the right of the channel when looking upstream (Field type: Ordered Categorical) SAFE Habitat Quality Centre: the SAFE Habitat quality in the centre of the channel when looking upstream (Field type: Ordered Categorical) SAFE Habitat Quality Left: the SAFE Habitat quality on the left of the channel when looking upstream (Field type: Ordered Categorical) Flow Rate Right (s): the time taken for a tennis ball to travel 10m in the water on the right of the channel when looking upstream (Field type: Numeric) Flow Rate Centre (s): the time taken for a tennis ball to travel 10m in the water in the centre of the channel when looking upstream (Field type: Numeric) Flow Rate Left (s): the time taken for a tennis ball to travel 10m in the water on the left of the channel when looking upstream (Field type: Numeric) Average Flow Rate (s): an average of flow rate centre, flow rate left and flow rate right (Field type: Numeric) Leaf Litter Retention (g): the dried mass of leaf litter retained across the wetted width of the stream at each point (Field type: Numeric) Average Substrate Size: the average size of the substrate across the channel width of the stream at each point (Field type: Numeric) Leaf Litter Trap Position: the position where the leaf litter trap was placed relative to the stream when looking upstream (left, right or centre) (Field type: Categorical) Leaf Litter Mass: the dried mass of leaf litter collected in the leaf litter trap at each point (Field type: Numeric) Date range: 2017-02-06 to 2017-07-06 Latitudinal extent: 4.6314 to 4.7273 Longitudinal extent: 117.4556 to 117.6233 Taxonomic coverage: All taxon names are validated against the GBIF backbone taxonomy. If a dataset uses a synonym, the accepted usage is shown followed by the dataset usage in brackets. Taxa that cannot be validated, including new species and other unknown taxa, morphospecies, functional groups and taxonomic levels not used in the GBIF backbone are shown in square brackets. Animalia - Arthropoda - - Insecta - - - Coleoptera - - - Diptera - - - Hymenoptera - - [Other.Insect]

Comprehensive and reliable information on anthropogenic sources of greenhouse gas emissions is required to track progress towards keeping warming well below 2°C as agreed upon in the Paris Agreement. Here we provide a dataset on anthropogenic GHG emissions 1970-2019 with a broad country and sector coverage. We build the dataset from recent releases from the “Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research” (EDGAR) for CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and industry (FFI), CH4 emissions, N2O emissions, and fluorinated gases and use a well-established fast-track method to extend this dataset from 2018 to 2019. We complement this with information on net CO2 emissions from land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) from three available bookkeeping models.

Data set with reference scenarios. As it is not possible to include the entire dataset in this report, we only include two Tables on final energy demand. Table 1 shows the Final Energy Demand projections per industrial subsector and EU28 country in the Reference Scenario and Table 2 the Final Energy Demand projections per industrial subsector and EU28 country in the Frozen Efficiency Scenario. The full dataset, including physical production (in ktonnes) and fuel and electricity demand (in TJ) per industrial sub-sector, per fuel type and per EU 28 country is available upon request to the project coordinator.

Aim: Climate warming and biodiversity loss both alter plant productivity, yet we lack an understanding of how biodiversity regulates the responses of ecosystems to warming. In this study, we examine how plant diversity regulates the responses of grassland productivity to experimental warming using meta-analytic techniques. Location: Global Major taxa studied: Grassland ecosystems Methods: Our meta-analysis is based on warming responses of 40 different plant communities obtained from 20 independent studies on grasslands across five continents. Results: Our results show that plant diversity and its responses to warming were the most important factors regulating the warming effects on plant productivity, among all the factors considered (plant diversity, climate and experimental settings). Specifically, warming increased plant productivity when plant diversity (indicated by effective number of species) in grasslands was lesser than 10, whereas warming decreased plant productivity when plant diversity was greater than 10. Moreover, the structural equation modelling showed that the magnitude of warming enhanced plant productivity by increasing the performance of dominant plant species in grasslands of diversity lesser than 10. The negative effects of warming on productivity in grasslands with plant diversity greater than 10 were partly explained by diversity-induced decline in plant dominance. Main Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the positive or negative effect of warming on grassland productivity depends on how biodiverse a grassland is. This could mainly owe to differences in how warming may affect plant dominance and subsequent shifts in interspecific interactions in grasslands of different plant diversity levels.