• Energy Research
• Embargo close
• 7. Clean energy close
• FI close
• US close

Estimates of wind power potential are relevant for decision-making in energy policy and business. Such estimates are affected by several uncertain assumptions, most significantly related to wind turbine technology and land use. Here, we calculate the technical and economic onshore wind power potentials with the aim to evaluate the impact of such assumptions using the case-study area of Finland as an example. We show that the assumptions regarding turbine technology and land use policy are highly significant for the potential estimate. Modern turbines with lower specific ratings and greater hub heights improve the wind power potential considerably, even though it was assumed that the larger rotors decrease the installation density and increase the turbine investment costs. New technology also decreases the impact of strict land use policies. Uncertainty in estimating the cost of wind power technology limits the accuracy of assessing economic wind power potential.

This research provides new techno-economic insights into integrating flexible combined-cycle gas turbines with post-combustion carbon capture and storage (CCGT-CCS) for low-carbon power systems. This study developed a versatile unit-commitment optimisation model of CCGT-CCS. This research highlights the model’s adaptability, accommodating diverse techno-economic configurations, feed gases (e.g., biomethane or fossil natural gas), carbon capture rates, and policy instruments. This generalisation empowers seamless application in various policy and market contexts, making the model a potent tool for researchers and policymakers. While the case study focuses on the UK, the findings are relevant for most low-carbon power systems with variable renewable supplies. Analysing the UK’s net-zero scenarios from 2030 to 2050, the economic viability of flexible CCGT-CCS was highlighted. Intertemporal flexibility proves highly valuable with greater electricity price volatility, with a total ROI range of 81–246 %, surpassing the CCGT-CCS plant’s ROI (7–64 %). A flexible solvent storage solution should be seen in the context of the overall system ‘flexibility’ requirements of a low-carbon power system. On a cost basis, solvent storage represents just a fraction of the capital costs of more “mainstream” energy storage technologies, such as lithium-ion batteries or hydro-pumped storage, while CCGT-CCS offers firm power. Overall, while seen as a rather technical solution, if abated fossil fuel generation is to be part of a future low-carbon power system, having this flexibility adds economic benefits not just to operators but also improves overall system security and complements high shares of variable renewables on the grid.