• Energy Research
• US close
• IT close
• ZENODO close

# Dataset: Subglacial freshwater driven speedup of East Antarctic outlet glacier retreat [https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1vhhmgr0b](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1vhhmgr0b) Journal: Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface Principle Investigator: * Tyler Pelle, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, [tpelle@ucsd.edu](mailto:tpelle@ucsd.edu) Co-Authors: * Dr. Jamin Greenbaum, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego * Dr. Shivani Ehrenfeucht, Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo * Prof. Christine Dow, Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo * Dr. Felicity S. McCormack, Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, School of Earth, Atmosphere, & Environment, Monash University Created on October 4, 2023 ## Description of the data and file structure ### File description: 1. runme.m - MATLAB script used to run coupled ISSM-GlaDS SSP5-8.5_{F,M} simulation - includes melt rate parameterization. 2. ssp585.mat – Yearly ice sheet model output from 2017-2100 for SSP5-8.5 simulation. 3. ssp585_F.mat – Yearly ice sheet model output from 2017-2100 for SSP5-8.5_{F} simulation. 4. ssp585_M.mat – Yearly ice sheet model output from 2017-2100 for SSP5-8.5_{M} simulation. 5. ssp585_FM.mat – Yearly ice sheet model output from 2017-2100 for SSP5-8.5_{F,M} simulation. 6. ssp126.mat – Yearly ice sheet model output from 2017-2100 for SSP1-2.6 simulation. 7. ssp126_F.mat – Yearly ice sheet model output from 2017-2100 for SSP1-2.6_{F} simulation. 8. ssp126_M.mat – Yearly ice sheet model output from 2017-2100 for SSP1-2.6_{M} simulation. 9. ssp126_FM.mat – Yearly ice sheet model output from 2017-2100 for SSP1-2.6_{F,M} simulation. 10. ssp585_Totten_T.mat - Bi-weekly ocean temperature (Ta) for Totten Glacier from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2099 (high emission). 11. ssp585_Moscow_T.mat - Bi-weekly ocean temperature (Ta) for Moscow University Glacier from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2099 (high emission). 12. ssp585_Vander_T.mat - Bi-weekly ocean temperature (Ta) for Vander Glacier from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2099 (high emission). 13. ssp585_Totten_S.mat - Bi-weekly ocean salinity (Sa) for Totten Glacier from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2099 (high emission). 14. ssp585_Moscow_S.mat - Bi-weekly ocean salinity (Sa) for Moscow University Glacier from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2099 (high emission). 15. ssp585_Vander_S.mat - Bi-weekly ocean salinity (Sa) for Vander Glacier from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2099 (high emission). 16. ssp126_Totten_T.mat - Bi-weekly ocean temperature (Ta) for Totten Glacier from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2099 (low emission). 17. ssp126_Moscow_T.mat - Bi-weekly ocean temperature (Ta) for Moscow University Glacier from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2099 (low emission). 18. ssp126_Vander_T.mat - Bi-weekly ocean temperature (Ta) for Vander Glacier from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2099 (low emission). 19. ssp126_Totten_S.mat - Bi-weekly ocean salinity (Sa) for Totten Glacier from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2099 (low emission). 20. ssp126_Moscow_S.mat - Bi-weekly ocean salinity (Sa) for Moscow University Glacier from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2099 (low emission). 21. ssp126_Vander_S.mat - Bi-weekly ocean salinity (Sa) for Vander Glacier from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2099 (low emission). 22. TotBasin.exp - Polygon that contains Totten Glacier over which Totten's ocean temperature is applied. 23. MuisBasin.exp - Polygon that contains Moscow University Glacier over which Totten's ocean temperature is applied. 24. VandBasin.exp - Polygon that contains Vanderford Glacier over which Totten's ocean temperature is applied. ### File specific information: **ASB_IceHydroModel.mat**: All data associated with the ice sheet and subglacial hydrology model initial state is held in ASB_IceHydroModel.mat, which contains a MATLAB ‘model’ object (for more information, see [https://issm.jpl.nasa.gov/documentation/modelclass/](https://issm.jpl.nasa.gov/documentation/modelclass/). In MATLAB, the model can be loaded and displayed by running load(‘ASB_IceHydroModel.mat’), which will load in the model variable ‘md’. Of particular interest will be the following data contained in md: md.mesh (mesh information), md.geometry (initial ice sheet geometry, ice shelf geometry, and bed topography), md.hydrology (initial hydrology model fields), md.initialization (model initialization fields) and md.mask (ice mask and grounded ice mask). Note that all fields are defined on the mesh nodes, and one can plot a given field in MATLAB using the ISSM tool ‘plotmodel’ (e.g., plotmodel(md,'data',md.geometry.bed) will plot the model bed topography). For more information on plotting, please see [https://issm.jpl.nasa.gov/documentation/plotmatlab/](https://issm.jpl.nasa.gov/documentation/plotmatlab/). **Model output files (e.g. ssp585_FM.mat)**: Yearly ice sheet model results between 2017-2100 for all model simulations described in the paper. Fields appended with '*' are included in results with changing subglacial hydrology (ssp126_F, ssp126_M, ssp126_FM, ssp585_F, ssp585_M, ssp585_FM). Fields appended with '**' are included in results where ice shelf melt is enhanced by subglacial discharge (ssp126_M, ssp126_FM, ssp585_M, ssp585_FM). These files contain a MATLAB variable that is the same as the file name, which is a model object of size 1x83 that contains the following yearly variables: * \* Vel (velocity norm, m/yr) * \* Thickness (ice sheet thickness, m) * \* Surface (ice sheet surface elevation, m) * \* Base (ice sheet base elevation, m) * \* BasalforcingsFloatingiceMeltingRate (ice shelf basal melting rate field, m/yr) * \* MaskOceanLevelset (ground ice mask, grounded ice if > 0, grounding line position if = 0, floating ice if < 0) * \* IceVolume (total ice volume in the model domain, t) * \* IceVolumeAboveFloatation (total ice volume in the model domain that is above hydrostatic equilibrium, t) * \* TotalFloatingBmb (Total floating basal mass balance, Gt) * \* \\*ChannelDischarge\\_Node (GlaDS-computed channel discharge interpolated onto model node, m3/s) * \* \\*ChannelDiameter\\_Node (GlaDS-computed channel diameter interpolated onto model node, m) * \* \\*ChannelArea (GlaDS-computed channel area defined on model edges, m2) * \* \\*ChannelDischarge (GlaDS\\_computed channel discharge defined on model edges, m3/s) * \* \\*EffectivePressure (GlaDS-computed ice sheet effective pressure, Pa) * \* \\*HydraulicPotential (GlaDS computed hydraulic potential, - * \* \\*HydrologySheetThickness (GlaDS-computed after sheet thickness, m) * \* \\*GroundedIceMeltingRate (Grounded ice melting rate defined on all grounded nodes, m/yr) * \* \\*\\*melt\\_nodis (ice shelf basal melting rate computed when discharge is set to zero, m/yr) * \* \\*\\*zgl (grounding line height field, m) * \* \\*\\*glfw (grounding line fresh water flux field, m2/s) * \* \\*\\*chan\\_wid (Domain average subglacial discharge channel width, m) * \* \\*\\*maxdist (5L' length scale used in melt computation, m) * \* \\*\\*maxis (maximum discharge at each subglacial outflow location, m2/s) * \**\\*\\_T.mat**: Bi-weekly ocean temperature extracted from an East Antarctic configuration of the MITgcm (Pelle et al., 2021), where '\\*' ssp126 (low emission) or ssp585 (high emission). Ocean temperature was averaged adjacent to each target ice front in both depth and in the contours shown in figure 1b. * \**\\*\\_S.mat**: Same as above, but for salinity in units on the Practical Salinity Scale (PSU). * \***.exp**: Exp files that contain coordinates that outline a polygon for the drainage basins of each major glacier in this study (Vanderford Glacier contains the drainage basins for Adams, Bond, and Underwood Glaciers as well). Recent studies have revealed the presence of a complex freshwater system underlying the Aurora Subglacial Basin (ASB), a region of East Antarctica that contains ~7 m of global sea level potential in ice mainly grounded below sea level. Yet, the impact that subglacial freshwater has on driving the evolution of the dynamic outlet glaciers that drain this basin has yet to be tested in a coupled ice sheet-subglacial hydrology numerical modeling framework. Here, we project the evolution of the primary outlet glaciers draining the ASB (Moscow University Ice Shelf, Totten, Vanderford, and Adams Glaciers) in response to an evolving subglacial hydrology system and to ocean forcing through 2100, following low and high CMIP6 emission scenarios. By 2100, ice-hydrology feedbacks enhance the ASB’s 2100 sea level contribution by ~30% (7.50 mm to 9.80 mm) in high emission scenarios and accelerate retreat of Totten Glacier’s main ice stream by 25 years. Ice-hydrology feedbacks are particularly influential in the retreat of the Vanderford and Adams Glaciers, driving an additional 10 km of retreat in fully-coupled simulations relative to uncoupled simulations. Hydrology-driven ice shelf melt enhancements are the primary cause of domain-wide mass loss in low emission scenarios, but are secondary to ice sheet frictional feedbacks under high emission scenarios. The results presented here demonstrate that ice-subglacial hydrology interactions can significantly accelerate retreat of dynamic Antarctic glaciers and that future Antarctic sea level assessments that do not take these interactions into account might be severely underestimating Antarctic Ice Sheet mass loss. In this data publication, we present the model output and results associated with the following manuscript recently submitted to the Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface: “Subglacial discharge accelerates ocean driven retreat of Aurora Subglacial Basin outlet glaciers over the 21st century”. We include yearly ice sheet model output between 2017-2100 for eight numerical ice-subglacial hydrology model runs. We also include the ice sheet and subglacial hydrology model initial states. In addition, we include all ocean forcing time-series (temperature and salinity for the low emission and high emission climate forcing scenarios for three glacial regions), which are used as input into the melt parameterization. Lastly, we include a MATLAB script that contains the code used to couple the ice-subglacial hydrology models as well as a "readme" file with further information on all data in this publication. Ice sheet model results: Direct results taken from the Ice-sheet and Sea-level System Model (ISSM, Larour et al. 2012) with no processing applied, provided yearly as *.mat files. Ice sheet and subglacial hydrology model initial states: Initial state of the ice sheet model (ice geometry, mesh information, inversion results, etc.) and subglacial hydrology model (steady-state water column thickness, effective pressure, channelized discharge, etc.) containing Aurora Subglacial Basin outlet glaciers with no processing applied, provided as a *.mat file. The contents of the *.mat file is a MATLAB variable of class "model", which is compatible with ISSM. Model coupling script: Documented MATLAB script ready to run with the provided data sets. Ocean temperature and salinity timeseries: Bottom ocean temperature (°C) and salinity (PSU) timeseries (January 1st, 2017 through December 31, 2099) extracted from an East Antarctic configuration of the ocean component of the MITgcm (Pelle et al., 2021). Temperature and salinity are provided bi-weekly and averged both in depth and along the ice fronts of Moscow University, Totten, and Vanderford Glaciers (see white dashed contour in figure 1b of the main manuscript text). Data are provided as *.mat files. Polygons that provide locaion to apply ocean temperature and salinity: Polygons provided as a list of x/y coordinates (meters) are provided in three *.exp files that cover the drainage basins of Moscow University, Totten, and Vanderford Glaciers (the polygon for Vanderford also includes the drainage basins of Adams, Bond, and Underwood Glaciers). 

Salmonids are of immense socio-economic importance in much of the world but are threatened by climate change. This has generated a substantial literature documenting effects of climate variation on salmonid productivity in freshwater ecosystems, but there has been no global quantitative synthesis across studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to gain quantitative insight into key factors shaping the effects of climate on salmonid productivity, ultimately collecting 1,321 correlations from 156 studies, representing 23 species across 24 countries. Fisher’s Z was used as the standardized effect size, and a series of weighted mixed-effects models were compared to identify covariates that best explained variation in effects. Patterns in climate effects were complex, and were driven by spatial (latitude, elevation), temporal (time-period, age-class), and biological (range, habitat type, anadromy) variation within and among study populations. These trends were often consistent with predictions based on salmonid thermal tolerances. Namely, warming and decreased precipitation tended to reduce productivity when high temperatures challenged upper thermal limits, while opposite patterns were common when cold temperatures limited productivity. Overall, variable climate impacts on salmonids suggest that future declines in some locations may be counterbalanced by gains in others. In particular, we suggest that future warming should (1) increase salmonid productivity at high latitudes and elevations (especially >60° and >1,500m), (2) reduce productivity in populations experiencing hotter and dryer growing season conditions, (3) favor non-native over native salmonids, and (4) impact lentic populations less negatively than lotic ones. These patterns should help conservation and management organizations identify populations most vulnerable to climate change, which can then be prioritized for protective measures. Our framework enables broad inferences about future productivity that can inform decision-making under climate change for salmonids and other taxa, but more widespread, standardized, and hypothesis-driven research is needed to expand current knowledge. See README document and R code. See README document.

Two maps are provided from a study of the Republic of Panama. The maps are based on airborne light detection and ranging (lidar) data, combined with satellite-based maps of forest cover and properties, acquired in 2012. The resulting maps are: (1) top of canopy height or TCH; and (2) aboveground carbon density or ACD. Units for TCH are meters above ground. Units for ACD are Mg C per hectare. Maps are provided at 1.0 ha spatial resolution. File format is GeoTIFF. Use of these data require citation of this dataset and the original journal paper that delivered the mapping method. These citations are as follows: Asner, G.P., J. Mascaro, C. Anderson, D.E. Knapp, R.E. Martin, T. Kennedy-Bowdoin, M. van Breugel, S. Davies, J.S. Hall, H.C. Muller-Landau, C. Potvin, W. Sousa, J. Wright and E. Bermingham. 2013. High-fidelity national carbon mapping for resource management and REDD+. Carbon Balance and Management 8:7 (doi:10.1186/1750-0680-8-7) Asner, G.P., J. Mascaro, C. Anderson, D.E. Knapp, and R.E. Martin. 2021. Global Airborne Observatory: Forest canopy height and carbon stocks of Panama (Version 1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4624240

Editorial Complex Optimization and Simulation in Power Systems

Model results and data used to make future projections of the effects of climate change on the physiology of tuna in the global ocean ------------------------------------------------- Description: Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) model results were downloaded from here: https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/cmip5/ World Ocean Atlas (WOA) 2009 data were downloaded from here: https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/WOA09/netcdf_data.html The model results and data should only be used to reproduce the analysis described in this publication: Mislan, K. A. S., C. A. Deutsch, R. W. Brill, J. P. Dunne, and J. L. Sarmiento. (2017) Projections of climate driven changes in tuna vertical habitat based on species-specific differences in blood oxygen affinity. Global Change Biology. The Zenodo archive of the code is here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.808742 ------------------------------------------------- Instructions: Download the tar.gz file, unzip, and put the folders in the data folder of the CMIP5_p50_tuna code.

In the transition from linear production systems, unsustainable from the point of view of resources, to a model that finds strength in environmental, social and economic sustainability, the circular economy paradigm is the foundation that facilitates the planetary agro-ecological transition. The European Union has taken a number of steps (including the Circular Economy Package of Directives) shaping circularity as a wide-ranging driver measure involving many sectors. The paper intends to provide a regulatory framework on the current general situation regarding circularity in European Union, in order to extrapolate and give evidence to the aspects that intersect the agri-food sector. This is not only because they are poorly addressed in the literature, but also because there is a lack of regulatory instruments on the circular economy specifically addressing this area of interest. For this purpose, the analysis focuses on waste and residue/scrap management issues, recognized by law as by-products and end-of-waste status, as they are covered by circular economy legislation and as they can be applied to the agri-food sector. The latter allow the implementation of circularity strategies in the agri-food sector and, given the numerousness of production chains and the peculiarities of each of them, various regeneration and/or reuse processes of specific resources may be depicted. The intent is to provide useful knowledge on how to implement sustainable waste management, also proposing a concrete case on a by-product of olive oil processing, through which it is possible to highlight how the correct application of regulations favors the adoption of circular economic and management models in the firms involved, as well as informing the relevant economic operators on the possible profiles of legal liability that may arise from insufficient knowledge. Furthermore, this paper delves into the European Green Deal’s Strategy as it enriches the circular economy paradigm with new facets. NextGenerationEU and the National Recovery and Resilience Plan financially support this strategy in the aftermath of the socioeconomic crisis from COVID-19 in the EU Member States. This is in order to achieve the objective of achieving the agro-ecological transition.

This work was supported by the Bioenergy Technologies Office of the U.S. Department of Energy through Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231 between Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the US Department of Energy. This research also used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, which is a Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility supported under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. Property prediction database for melting point, boiling point, flash point, yield sooting index, and heat of combustion as they appear in the Feedstock to Function website.

The data archived here represent two types of information used in the publication “Climate change is shifting and narrowing prescribed fire windows in the Western United States” by Swain et al. 2023: 1) The meteorological and vegetation dryness/fuel moisture data (as described within the file) extracted from prescribed fire burn plans around the Western United States (drawn from entities such as the U.S. Forest Service, U.S. National Park Service, and The Nature Conservancy) between 2002 and 2022. This data is provided in tabular form, both as an .xlsx file and a .csv file for the convenience of the user. In addition to the specific values from each burn plan, summaries of median values for forested and non-forested landscapes are provided as well. 2) The number of days on which environmental conditions (i.e., weather and vegetation fuel moistures) are acceptable for prescribed fire according to the composite metric described in Swain et al. 2023 (known as “RxDays”). Underlying RxDay definitions are different for forest and non-forested landscapes. This data is provided in geospatially explicit (gridded) form as NetCDF files, which are a self-describing file format. Each file is provided as a single 3-dimensional hypercube (i.e., dimensions of time, latitude, and longitude, respectively; units and details described within the file) corresponding to the number of RxDays per calendar month. One file is provided for each climate model iteration (as identified in each filename); these represent projected RxDays at monthly scale between 1981 and 2060 using an RCP 4.5 climate forcing trajectory. An additional file (rx_gridMET.nc) is provided that represents the same values from an atmospheric reanalysis dataset, which represents a best estimate of observed RxDay values (1981-2020).