• Energy Research
• clinical medicine close
• Psychopharmacology close

The distinctive effects of ethanol on behavior suggest that certain parts of the CNS may be especially sensitive to it. One of the primary candidates is the hippocampal formation. Damage to this structure mimics acute ethanol treatment across a wide variety of behavioral tasks and processes. The possibility of a hippocampal basis for ethanol psychopharmacology was examined in the present experiments. Chosen for behavioral analysis were relatively complex eight-arm radial maze tasks which have independently been shown to be sensitive to ethanol administration and hippocampal lesions. Measures included arm selection predictability, vigilance, and retardation of extinction. Bilateral hippocampal lesions or ethanol injection (1.5 g/kg, IP) produced similar effects. However, hippocampectomy did not disrupt ethanol's influence on any task. Comparatively, neocortical ablation, especially prefrontal, was quite effective in this respect. It blocked or reduced two of the drug's three behavioral effects examined here, without any strong influence of its own, and without altering blood alcohol concentration.

Low doses of ethanol (EtOH) stimulate activity in an open field in many strains of laboratory mice. We are selectively breeding two lines of mice to exhibit a large (FAST) response on this test, and two other lines to exhibit a small (SLOW) response (Crabbe et al. 1987). The lines initially diverged in response to EtOH, but despite continued selection pressure, the difference between each pair of FAST and SLOW lines has not increased over generations as much as expected. Our practice has been to test animals on the 1st day after saline injection, and repeat the test after EtOH injection 24 h later. Lister (1987) recently demonstrated that the order in which an animal was exposed to EtOH and saline influenced the magnitude of the response to EtOH, with animals tested initially after EtOH having greater stimulation. Middaugh et al. (1987) recently demonstrated that the magnitude of EtOH stimulation was greater under conditions of relatively bright light than under dim light. Using non-selected Swiss mice, the current experiments essentially confirmed Lister's findings. Using FAST and SLOW mice, the predictions of both groups were tested. Both hypotheses were confirmed. Additionally, these experiments demonstrated that the magnitude of the difference between FAST and SLOW mice was greater under bright light than under dim light. The line difference was also greater when tested in the EtOH-Saline order. In experiments with Swiss mice, the possible role of peritoneal irritation in the EtOH effect was eliminated, and the optimal dose and time for demonstrating the effect was determined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Negative contrast that occurs when rats are shifted from 32% to 4% sucrose was reduced by IP injections of ethanol (1.0 g/kg) on postshift day 2, but not on postshift day 1. Smaller doses (0.25 and 0.5 g/kg) were ineffective, while larger doses (1.5 and 2 g/kg) produced sedation. A dose of 0.75 g/kg had effects similar to the 1.0 g/kg dose when administered on post-shift day 2. These results parallel those obtained with chlordiazepoxide and differ somewhat from amobarbital treatment.

Rats trained to discriminate ethanol (EtOH, 1 g/kg IP) from saline in a two-lever procedure completely generalized to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fluoxetine and paroxetine. Substitution of fluoxetine was completely blocked by the selective 5-HT2A receptor antagonist MDL 100,907 and not affected by the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635. It is suggested that the previously reported effectiveness of SSRIs in reducing EtOH consumption could be based on similarities in discriminative stimulus effects of SSRIs and EtOH. Stimulation of 5-HT2A receptors may underlie these stimulus similarities and contribute to the EtOH intake-reducing effects of SSRIs.

This study examined the phenomenon of acute tolerance to ethanol (ETOH) using drug discrimination learning (DDL), and open-field (OF) procedures. In DDL, rats were trained to discriminate between ETOH (1.2 g/kg) and saline. Doses of ETOH lower (0.6 and 0.9 g/kg), or higher (1.8 and 2.4 g/kg) than the training dose were tested to examine possible influence of ETOH pretreatment doses on the expression of acute tolerance. To assess concentrations of ETOH in the organism, a rebreathed air procedure was used. Equal concentrations after different ETOH doses were achieved by postponing the tests until sufficient time had elapsed. Only doses of ETOH higher than the training dose produced acute tolerance in the DDL procedure. For the response-time data no acute tolerance was observed. In the OF experiment, the occurrence of acute tolerance was examined for different spontaneous behaviours in drug-naive animals. At equal ETOH concentrations, the group examined during the descending phase of intoxication (1.8 g/kg, 60 min post-injection), reared significantly more than the group tested during the ascending phase (1.5 g/kg, 10 min post-injection). Other OF behaviours did not differ significantly between the two time intervals. Thus, it is suggested that acute tolerance is seen both in ETOH naive and in ETOH pre-exposed rats. However, in DDL acute tolerance was observed only when doses higher than training dose of ETOH were evaluated.

The past decade has brought many advances in our understanding of GABAA receptor-mediated ethanol action in the central nervous system. We now know that specific GABAA receptor subtypes are sensitive to ethanol at doses attained during social drinking while other subtypes respond to ethanol at doses attained by severe intoxication. Furthermore, ethanol increases GABAergic neurotransmission through indirect effects, including the elevation of endogenous GABAergic neuroactive steroids, presynaptic release of GABA, and dephosphorylation of GABAA receptors promoting increases in GABA sensitivity. Ethanol’s effects on intracellular signaling also influence GABAergic transmission in multiple ways that vary across brain regions and cell types. The effects of chronic ethanol administration are influenced by adaptations in GABAA receptor function, expression, trafficking, and subcellular localization that contribute to ethanol tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal hyperexcitability. Adolescents exhibit altered sensitivity to ethanol actions, the tendency for higher drinking and longer lasting GABAergic adaptations to chronic ethanol administration. The elucidation of the mechanisms that underlie adaptations to ethanol exposure are leading to a better understanding of the regulation of inhibitory transmission and new targets for therapies to support recovery from ethanol withdrawal and alcoholism.

Memory illusions are currently a focus of memory research. Studies using the Deese/Roediger and McDermott paradigm have shown a differential pattern of illusory memories is associated with amnesia and ageing. The effects of pharmacological agents in this paradigm are not yet known.Using this paradigm, the present study investigated the effects of a low dose of alcohol upon recollective experience of illusory memories.A double-blind cross-over design was used to compare the effects of alcohol (0.26-0.28 g.kg-1) with a matched placebo drink.High levels of false recognition were obtained across both treatments, replicating previous results. Although the small dose of alcohol employed did not produce gross changes in measures of false memory, it did modify the pattern of recollective experience in terms of remember and know responses. Specifically, it increased the level of remember responses for falsely recognised items (critical lures).These results are discussed in terms of ethanol's effects on false recognition of information which was not presented during the study episode. The effects of low dose alcohol on illusory memory are similar to the pattern found in ageing rather than that found in organic amnesia.

Social status and reproductive cycle determine the effects of acute, low doses of alcohol on the social behavior of squirrel monkeys. Alcohol produces biphasic effects on the behavior of dominant but not subordinate monkeys, and only during the mating season. The change in alcohol sensitivity measured in dominant monkeys coincides with changes in plasma testosterone levels. In order to directly study the interaction between alcohol, testosterone and aggressive behavior, testosterone propionate (TP, 25 mg/kg/day, SC) was administered to either dominant or subordinate male monkeys belonging to four separate groups, resulting in significantly elevated plasma levels of testosterone (i.e., 905 +/- 43 ng/ml in subordinates; 171 +/- 19 ng/ml in dominants). Two to three weeks after the beginning of testosterone treatment, the monkeys were administered doses of alcohol (0.1-1.0 g/kg). The behavior of subordinate monkeys was unaffected by TP treatment (even after the dominant monkey from each colony was removed and housed separately for 6 weeks). Testosterone treatment altered the sensitivity of subordinate monkeys to alcohol. Low doses of alcohol increased the frequency of threats, grasps, and displacements exhibited by subordinate monkeys with exogenously elevated testosterone. Daily administration of TP to dominant monkeys during the non-mating season did not affect the behavior of the treated animals in the group, although the body weight of TP-treated monkeys was similar to that measured during the mating season. Low doses of alcohol increased the frequency of threats, grasps, and displacements in dominant monkeys maintained on TP. We also tested the role of social context in maintaining high levels of plasma testosterone, and alcohol sensitivity in dominant monkeys.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Changes in the expression of type A receptors for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) represent one of the mechanisms implicated in the development of tolerance to and dependence on ethanol. The impact of such changes on the function and pharmacological sensitivity of GABAA receptors (GABAARs) has remained unclear, however. Certain behavioral and electrophysiological actions of ethanol are mediated by an increase in the concentration of neuroactive steroids in the brain that results from stimulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Such steroids include potent modulators of GABAAR function.We have investigated the effect of ethanol exposure and withdrawal on subunit expression and receptor function evaluated by subunit selective compounds, as well as the effects of short-term exposure to ethanol on both neurosteroid synthesis and GABAAR function, in isolated neurons and brain tissue.Chronic treatment with and subsequent withdrawal from ethanol alter the expression of genes for specific GABAAR subunits in cultured rat neurons, and these changes are associated with alterations in receptor function and pharmacological sensitivity to neurosteroids, zaleplon, and flumazenil. Acute ethanol exposure increases the amount of 3alpha-hydroxy-5alpha-pregnan-20-one (allopregnanolone) in hippocampal slices by a local action independent of the activity of the HPA axis. This effect of ethanol was associated with an increased amplitude of GABAAR-mediated miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons in such slices.Chronic ethanol exposure elicits changes in the subunit composition of GABAARs, which, in turn, likely contribute to changes in receptor function associated with the altered pharmacological and behavioral sensitivity characteristic of ethanol tolerance and dependence. Ethanol may also modulate GABAAR function by increasing the de novo synthesis of neurosteroids in the brain in a manner independent of the HPA axis. This latter mechanism may play an important role in the central effects of ethanol.