Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Hyper Article en Lig...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Can information be a challenge? The case of deep geothermal energy in Strasbourg Eurométropole

Authors: Chavot, Philippe; Masseran, Anne; Serrano, Yeny; Zoungrana, Jean;

Can information be a challenge? The case of deep geothermal energy in Strasbourg Eurométropole

Abstract

Abstract: While the economic and political climate seems to be favourable for setting up geothermal projects in Alsace, a controversy breaks out in 2014. The consequences are important: out of the six projects envisaged, only two will lead to drilling work. How has deep geothermal energy been transformed from an iconic technology into a public problem for which the Prefecture and the Strasbourg Eurométropole must provide solutions? This article looks back at the different moments in this controversy with a focus on the different arenas of debate (within politics, associations, media and legal public enquiries). In particular, we follow the trajectory of two groups of arguments: those concerning the environmental impacts of the projects, on the one hand, and those criticising the lack of involvement of the Strasbourg Eurométropole in the management of the projects, on the other hand. Finally, we examine the mechanisms of appropriation and transformation of the arguments of local residents that led to the new governance of projects, set up in 2016/2017.

Alors que le climat politique et économique semble favorable à la mise en place de projets de forages géothermiques en Alsace, une controverse éclate en 2014. Les conséquences sont importantes : sur les six projets envisagés, seuls deux débouchent sur des travaux de forage. Comment, de technologie adulée, la géothermie profonde s’est-elle transformée en problème public auquel la préfecture du Bas-Rhin et l’Eurométropole de Strasbourg doivent apporter des solutions ? Cet article revient sur les moments de la controverse en portant la focale sur les différentes arènes de débat (associatives, politiques, médias et enquêtes publiques). Il se propose notamment de suivre la trajectoire de deux groupes d’arguments : concernant les impacts environnementaux des projets, d’une part, et dénonçant le manque d’engagement de l’Eurométropole de Strasbourg dans la gestion du dossier, d’autre part. Il examine enfin les mécanismes d’appropriation et de transformation des arguments des riverains par une nouvelle gouvernance des projets qui se met en place en 2016-2017.

Keywords

public arena, changement climatique, climate change, governance, gouvernance, trajectoire argumentative, deep geothermal energy, géothermie profonde, arène publique, argumentative trajectory, [SHS.INFO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Energy Research