
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Productivity and Selectivity of Gas‐Phase CO2 Electroreduction to Methane at Copper Nanoparticle‐Based Electrodes

Productivity and Selectivity of Gas‐Phase CO2 Electroreduction to Methane at Copper Nanoparticle‐Based Electrodes
AbstractIn this study, copper nanoparticles are supported on porous carbon papers by airbrushing; they are then coupled with a Nafion 117 membrane to form working electrodes for the continuous production of methane through gas‐phase electroreduction of CO2 in a filter‐press electrochemical cell. The methane production and Faradaic efficiency (FE) are evaluated and compared at different applied voltages (from −1.8 to −2.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl) and catalyst loadings (0.25, 0.5, 1, and 1.5 mg cm−2). The maximum methane production rate is achieved at −2 V and 0.5 mg cm−2 (4.4 μmol m−2 s−1) whereas the highest Faradaic efficiencies can be obtained at 1 mg cm−2 (FE=10.1 %) and at −1.8 V (FE=12.1 %). The role of the porous carbon support and the possibility of humidifying the CO2 stream before it enters the cell are also tested. These results may provide a new understanding of the use of gas–liquid electrochemical membrane reactors for the direct conversion of CO2 in the gas phase.
- University of the Basque Country Spain
- University of Cantabria Spain
- University of Cantabria Spain
2 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2009IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).74 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
