
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Metal‐organic framework derived porous structures towards lithium rechargeable batteries

doi: 10.1002/eom2.12283
handle: 20.500.11750/17020
AbstractBatteries are a promising technology in the field of electrical energy storage and have made tremendous strides in recent few decades. In particular, lithium‐ion batteries are leading the smart device era as an essential component of portable electronic devices. From the materials aspect, new and creative solutions are required to resolve the current technical issues on advanced lithium (Li) batteries and improve their safety. Metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) are considered as tempting candidates to satisfy the requirements of advanced energy storage technologies. In this review, we discuss the characteristics of MOFs for application in different types of Li batteries. A review of these emerging studies in which MOFs have been applied in lithium storage devices can provide an informative blueprint for future MOF research on next‐generation advanced energy storage devices.image
- Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology Korea (Republic of)
- Korea University of Science and Technology Korea (Republic of)
- University of Wollongong Australia
- Kyung Hee University Korea (Republic of)
- DGIST (대구경북과학기술원) Korea (Republic of)
TJ807-830, lithium-ion battery, lithium‐air battery, lithium-metal battery, Renewable energy sources, metal‐organic frameworks, PSEUDO-CAPACITIVE MATERIAL, HIGH-PERFORMANCE ANODE, lithium-sulfur battery, GE1-350, ASSISTED MECHANOCHEMICAL SYNTHESIS, metal-organic frameworks, lithium‐ion battery, lithium‐metal battery, porous structure, PRUSSIAN BLUE ANALOGS, ZINC-AIR BATTERIES, ELECTROCHEMICAL ENERGY-STORAGE, ROOM-TEMPERATURE SYNTHESIS, lithium-air battery, 600, lithium‐sulfur battery, ZEOLITIC IMIDAZOLATE FRAMEWORKS, Environmental sciences, HOLLOW CARBON NANOSPHERES, HIGH-THROUGHPUT SYNTHESIS
TJ807-830, lithium-ion battery, lithium‐air battery, lithium-metal battery, Renewable energy sources, metal‐organic frameworks, PSEUDO-CAPACITIVE MATERIAL, HIGH-PERFORMANCE ANODE, lithium-sulfur battery, GE1-350, ASSISTED MECHANOCHEMICAL SYNTHESIS, metal-organic frameworks, lithium‐ion battery, lithium‐metal battery, porous structure, PRUSSIAN BLUE ANALOGS, ZINC-AIR BATTERIES, ELECTROCHEMICAL ENERGY-STORAGE, ROOM-TEMPERATURE SYNTHESIS, lithium-air battery, 600, lithium‐sulfur battery, ZEOLITIC IMIDAZOLATE FRAMEWORKS, Environmental sciences, HOLLOW CARBON NANOSPHERES, HIGH-THROUGHPUT SYNTHESIS
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).52 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
