
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Scientists' warning on extreme wildfire risks to water supply

Abstract2020 is the year of wildfire records. California experienced its three largest fires early in its fire season. The Pantanal, the largest wetland on the planet, burned over 20% of its surface. More than 18 million hectares of forest and bushland burned during the 2019–2020 fire season in Australia, killing 33 people, destroying nearly 2500 homes, and endangering many endemic species. The direct cost of damages is being counted in dozens of billion dollars, but the indirect costs on water‐related ecosystem services and benefits could be equally expensive, with impacts lasting for decades. In Australia, the extreme precipitation (“200 mm day −1 in several location”) that interrupted the catastrophic wildfire season triggered a series of watershed effects from headwaters to areas downstream. The increased runoff and erosion from burned areas disrupted water supplies in several locations. These post‐fire watershed hazards via source water contamination, flash floods, and mudslides can represent substantial, systemic long‐term risks to drinking water production, aquatic life, and socio‐economic activity. Scenarios similar to the recent event in Australia are now predicted to unfold in the Western USA. This is a new reality that societies will have to live with as uncharted fire activity, water crises, and widespread human footprint collide all‐around of the world. Therefore, we advocate for a more proactive approach to wildfire‐watershed risk governance in an effort to advance and protect water security. We also argue that there is no easy solution to reducing this risk and that investments in both green (i.e., natural) and grey (i.e., built) infrastructure will be necessary. Further, we propose strategies to combine modern data analytics with existing tools for use by water and land managers worldwide to leverage several decades worth of data and knowledge on post‐fire hydrology.
- United States Department of the Interior United States
- North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University United States
- Washington State University United States
- University of Melbourne Australia
- University of Geneva Switzerland
Risk, extreme events, 550, risk governance, Oceanografi, hydrologi och vattenresurser, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/354.3, Wildfire, 333, Oceanography, Hydrology and Water Resources, Water supply, socio-hydrology, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/333.7-333.9, forest ecosystem services, fire regime restoration, water security, climate change, watershed protection, Wildfire and Hydrological Processes, Water governance, ddc: ddc:354.3, ddc: ddc:333.7-333.9
Risk, extreme events, 550, risk governance, Oceanografi, hydrologi och vattenresurser, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/354.3, Wildfire, 333, Oceanography, Hydrology and Water Resources, Water supply, socio-hydrology, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/333.7-333.9, forest ecosystem services, fire regime restoration, water security, climate change, watershed protection, Wildfire and Hydrological Processes, Water governance, ddc: ddc:354.3, ddc: ddc:333.7-333.9
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).77 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
