

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of solid organic substrates: evaluation of anaerobic biodegradability using data from an international interlaboratory study

doi: 10.1002/jctb.2622
handle: 10261/53360 , 10278/26461 , 10072/173665
AbstractBACKGROUND: This paper describes results obtained for different participating research groups in an interlaboratory study related to biochemical methane potential (BMP). In this research work, all experimental conditions influencing the test such as inoculum, substrate characteristics and experimental conditions were investigated. The study was performed using four substrates: three positive control substrates (starch, cellulose and gelatine), and one raw biomass material (mung bean) at two different inoculum to substrate ratios (ISR).RESULTS: The average methane yields for starch, cellulose, gelatine and mung bean at ISR of 2 and 1 were 350 ± 33, 350 ± 29, 380 ± 42, 370 ± 36 and 370 ± 35 mL CH4 g−1 VSadded, respectively. The percentages of biotransformation of these substrates into methane were 85 ± 8, 85 ± 7, 88 ± 9, 85 ± 8 and 85 ± 8%, respectively. On the other hand, the first‐order rate constants obtained from the experimental data were 0.24 ± 0.14, 0.23 ± 0.15, 0.27 ± 0.13, 0.31 ± 0.17 and 0.23 ± 0.13 d−1, respectively.CONCLUSION: The influence of inocula and experimental factors was nearly insignificant with respect to the extents of the anaerobic biodegradation, while the rates differed significantly according to the experimental approaches. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry
anaerobic digestion, [SDE] Environmental Sciences, reactor optimization, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], ANAEROBIC DIGESTION, BIODEGRADABLE, fruits, digestion, BIOMASS, Environmental engineering not elsewhere classified, Bioreactors, Environmental biotechnology, environmental biotechnology, Sectie Milieutechnologie, Biomass, energiakasvit, fermentation, BIORECTEUR, ruoansulatus, 600, ENVIRONMENTAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], [SDE]Environmental Sciences, parametrit, BIOREACTORS, 570, ta1172, components, komponentit, Anaerobic digestion, chemical oxygen-demand, biomassa (teollisuus), waste feedstocks, energy crops, REACTOR OPTIMIZATION, parameters, biomass, Anaerobic Digestion, bioreactors, Reactor optimization, bioreaktorit, Biodegradable, biodegradable, Anaerobic digestion; Biodegradable; Biomass; Bioreactors; Environmental biotechnology; Reactor optimization, hedelmät
anaerobic digestion, [SDE] Environmental Sciences, reactor optimization, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], ANAEROBIC DIGESTION, BIODEGRADABLE, fruits, digestion, BIOMASS, Environmental engineering not elsewhere classified, Bioreactors, Environmental biotechnology, environmental biotechnology, Sectie Milieutechnologie, Biomass, energiakasvit, fermentation, BIORECTEUR, ruoansulatus, 600, ENVIRONMENTAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], [SDE]Environmental Sciences, parametrit, BIOREACTORS, 570, ta1172, components, komponentit, Anaerobic digestion, chemical oxygen-demand, biomassa (teollisuus), waste feedstocks, energy crops, REACTOR OPTIMIZATION, parameters, biomass, Anaerobic Digestion, bioreactors, Reactor optimization, bioreaktorit, Biodegradable, biodegradable, Anaerobic digestion; Biodegradable; Biomass; Bioreactors; Environmental biotechnology; Reactor optimization, hedelmät
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).442 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% visibility views 100 - 100views
Data source Views Downloads DIGITAL.CSIC 100 0

