
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
A bottom‐up cost analysis of silicon–perovskite tandem photovoltaics

doi: 10.1002/pip.3354
AbstractStacking two photovoltaic (PV) cells to form a tandem structure can improve the efficiency of PV modules, and if achieved at sufficiently low cost, could dominate the PV market in the future. Rapid progress in silicon–perovskite tandem (SPT) cell efficiency has been made, so cost modelling is becoming important in analysing the commercial attractiveness of this approach. While previous cost modelling assumed idealised production processes, this work focuses first on six demonstrated SPT sequences using both homojunction and heterojunction bottom silicon cells, analysed in detail using a bottom‐up cost and uncertainty model and then compared with other reported SPT high‐efficiency cells. This identifies cost barriers in the perovskite cell, including high‐cost hole transport material (HTM) and electron transport layer (ETL) materials such as (2,2′,7,7′‐tetrakis[N,N‐di(4‐methoxyphenyl)amino]‐9,9′‐spirobifluorene [SPIRO] and [6,6]‐phenyl‐C61‐butyric acid methyl ester [PCBM]), and the use of spin coating which has a high wastage rate. Once these cost issues are solved, the silicon cell cost becomes important, and the use of lower cost homojunction cells with p‐type wafers can further reduce costs. A hypothetical medium term low‐cost sequence that combines the lowest cost parts of the analysed sequences and an improved perovskite deposition process has a projected likely cost of $1.50/cell, which if combined with 25% efficiency would give a favourable levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) compared with industry standard c‐Si cells. This analysis guides research directions to address cost issues in parallel with higher efficiencies in this technology area.
- UNSW Sydney Australia
- University of Sydney Australia
- Australian National University Australia
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).44 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
