
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Effectiveness of Grass Filters in Reducing Phosphorus and Sediment Runoff

Surface water contamination can often be reduced by passing runoff water through perennial grass filters. Research was conducted in 2006 to 2008 to evaluate the size of cool season grass filters consisting primarily of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb) with some orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.) relative to drainage area size in reducing runoff sediment and phosphorus (P). The soil was Pohocco silt loam Typic Eutro- chrepts with a median slope of 5.5 %. The grass filters occupying 1.1 and 4.3 % of the plot area were compared with no filter with four replica- tions. The filters were planted in the V-shaped plot outlets which were 3.7×11.0 m in size. The filter effect on sediment and P concentration was deter- mined from four natural runoff events when nearly all plots had runoff. Filter effect on runoff volume and contaminant load was determined using total runoff and composites of samples collected from 12 runoff events. Sediment concentration was re- duced by 25 %w ith filters compared with no filter (from 1.10 to 1.47 gL −1 ), but P concentration was not affected. The 1.1 and 4.3 % filters, respective- ly, compared with having no grass filter, reduced: runoff volume by 54 and 79 %; sediment load by 67 and 84 % (357 to 58 kgha −1 ); total P load by 68 and 76 %( 0.58 to 0.14 kgha −1 ); particulate P (PP) load by 66 and 82 %( 0.39 to 0.07 kgha −1 ); and dissolved reactive P (DRP) load by 73 and 66 % (0.2 to 0.07 kgha −1 ), respectfully. A snowmelt runoff event had 56 % greater DRP concentration compared with rainfall-induced runoff events. Grass filters re- duced sediment and P load largely by reducing runoff volume rather than reducing concentration. Well- designed and well-placed grass filters that occupy 1.0 to 1.5 % of the drainage area and intercept a uniform
- University of Nebraska System United States
- CGIAR France
- University of Nebraska System United States
- International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas Syrian Arab Republic
- CGIAR France
Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment, grass filter, Agriculture, tall fescue, Horticulture, water quality, Water Resource Management, Sustainability, Agronomy and Crop Sciences, Natural Resources and Conservation, Sediment, Environmental Sciences
Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment, grass filter, Agriculture, tall fescue, Horticulture, water quality, Water Resource Management, Sustainability, Agronomy and Crop Sciences, Natural Resources and Conservation, Sediment, Environmental Sciences
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).20 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
