

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Place-based interpretation of the sustainable development goals for the land-river interface

AbstractThe land–river interface (LRI) is important for sustainable development. The environmental processes that define the LRI support the natural capital and ecosystem services that are linked directly to multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, existing approaches to scale up or down SDG targets and link them to natural capital are insufficient for the two-way human–environment interactions that exist in the LRI. Therefore, this study proposes a place-based approach to interpret the SDG framework to support sustainable land/water management, by (i) identifying key priorities for sustainable development through a normative content analysis of the SDG targets, and (ii) illustrating these priorities and associated challenges within the LRI, based on a literature review and case-studies on human–environment interactions. The content analysis identifies three overarching sustainable development priorities: (i) ensuring improved access to resources and services provided by the LRI, (ii) strengthening the resilience of the LRI to deal with social and natural shocks, and (iii) increasing resource efficiency. The review of the current state of LRIs across the world confirms that these are indeed priority areas for sustainable development. Yet, the challenges of attaining the sustainable development priorities in the LRI are also illustrated with three examples of development-related processes. Urbanisation, dam construction, and aggregate mining occur within specific zones of the LRI (land, land–river, river, respectively), but their impacts can compromise sustainable development across the entire LRI and beyond. The existence of these unintended impacts highlights the need to consider the geomorphic, hydrological, and ecological processes within the LRI and how they interact with human activity. Identifying the place-based priorities and challenges for sustainable development will help achieve the SDGs without compromising the functions and services of the LRI.
- Cranfield University United Kingdom
- University of Liège Belgium
- University of Glasgow United Kingdom
- Shoolini University India
- National Institute of Technology Hamirpur India
Sociology and Political Science, Social Sciences, Natural resource management, Natural resource, 333, Environmental science, Global Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Engineering, Sustainable development, Human–environment interactions, Natural capital, Ecosystem services, Business, Civil engineering, Environmental resource management, Biology, Ecosystem, Environmental planning, Global and Planetary Change, Geography, Ecology, Social and Environmental Impacts of Dam-induced Displacement, Geomorphology, Surface Water Mapping, Sustainability, Land–river interface, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, Political Science and International Relations, Land use, Politics and Poetics of Water Infrastructure, Sustainable development priorities, Hydrology, FOS: Civil engineering
Sociology and Political Science, Social Sciences, Natural resource management, Natural resource, 333, Environmental science, Global Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Engineering, Sustainable development, Human–environment interactions, Natural capital, Ecosystem services, Business, Civil engineering, Environmental resource management, Biology, Ecosystem, Environmental planning, Global and Planetary Change, Geography, Ecology, Social and Environmental Impacts of Dam-induced Displacement, Geomorphology, Surface Water Mapping, Sustainability, Land–river interface, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, Political Science and International Relations, Land use, Politics and Poetics of Water Infrastructure, Sustainable development priorities, Hydrology, FOS: Civil engineering
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).8 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% visibility views 6 download downloads 4 - 6views4downloads
Data source Views Downloads Cranfield CERES 6 4


