Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
USC Research Bank research data
Part of book or chapter of book . 2016
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Constraints and Success Factors for Woody Biomass Energy Systems in Two Countries with Minimal Bioenergy Sectors

Authors: Coote, David C; Thiffault, E; Brown, M W;

Constraints and Success Factors for Woody Biomass Energy Systems in Two Countries with Minimal Bioenergy Sectors

Abstract

In many EU countries, ambitious targets have been set for reducing greenhouse gas emissions by increasing the contribution of woody biomass to renewable energy production. Although nations with active forest sectors could be subject to unique factors that discourage the increased use of wood for energy, lessons learned from nations with well-developed woody biomass energy sectors could be used to assist in the development of nascent woody biomass energy sectors elsewhere. Here, energy sector data and relevant policies from Austria, Finland, Germany and Sweden (OECD countries with well-developed, modern wood energy sectors) are compared with those from Australia and Canada (OECD countries with less mature wood energy sectors). The energy sectors of the EU nations considered in this analysis exhibit striking differences with Australia and Canada. Of particular interest are critical differences in the supply of domestic primary energy, energy used per unit GDP, sovereign energy security, the mix of energy sources utilised, the economic viability of non-hydro renewables and the extent to which economies depend on fossil fuels. The policies affecting renewable energy sector development, including woody biomass availability and GHG reduction targets, also differ significantly. Adoption of new technologies with niche applications, leveraged with knowledge from the best practices and experience of countries with well-established bioenergy supply chains, represent an opportunity to set strong foundations for bioenergy production in countries with immature bioenergy sectors. Based on this analysis, it appears prima facie that the goal of reducing GHG emissions is only one of many factors that determine how much emphasis individual nations place on developing non-hydro renewable energy sectors (including woody biomass). The development of a woody biomass energy sector may be driven most strongly by regional issues, such as the need for less expensive waste disposal, cost-effective substitutions for fossil fuels, local economic development and energy resilience. © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Country
Australia
Keywords

technology transfer, 381, lessons learnt, renewable energy drivers, GDP, FoR 0705 (Forestry Sciences), energy sector, fossil fuels, levellised cost of energy, technological learning

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average